A CORRELATION COMPARISON ANALYSIS OF TOP ARTICLES IN LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE USING CITATION AND ALTMETRIC ATTENTION SCORES

Rangaswamy, Buddayya and Rajendra Babu, H A CORRELATION COMPARISON ANALYSIS OF TOP ARTICLES IN LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE USING CITATION AND ALTMETRIC ATTENTION SCORES. Review of Research, 2021, vol. 10, n. 7, pp. 1-8. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[img]
Preview
 Text
A CORRELATION COMPARISON ANALYSIS OF TOP ARTICLES IN LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE USING CITATION AND ALTMETRIC ATTENTION SCORES.pdf
Download (796kB) | Preview

English abstract

The paper is a comparative analysis of the papers published in library and information science journals. Correlation comparison between the traditional citations v/s modern score is derived through altmetrics score. Aspects compared are social media attention; and correlation comparison of citation and altmetric attention scores. Top 10 LIS journals with the highest Google scholar metrics in terms of h5-index were selected for the study on the basis of highly cited articles, altmetrics attention score, country-wise twitting etc. Top ranking one got the highest citations and AAS with 1528 and 1972 respectively and also got highest online attentions from Mendeley with 1930 readers and featured in 31 tweets. USA topped the list in the tweeting high ranking articles with 73, and UK second with 51. The results found that a significant difference with a negative correlation at r (9) =-.106, p=.770. The study opines that Indian scholars need to use social media sites to enable the scholarly literature to reach the wider audience.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Top LIS articles, Altmetrics, Tweets, Online attention score
Subjects: J. Technical services in libraries, archives, museum.
Depositing user: Mr. Rangaswamy Buddayya
Date deposited: 12 Apr 2021 01:49
Last modified: 12 Apr 2021 01:49
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/41914

References

Altmetrics.com. (2019). When did Altmetric start tracking attention to each attention source? DS Metrics. https://help.altmetric.com/support/solutions/articles/6000136884-when-did-altmetric-start-tracking-attention-to-each-attention-source-

Anne Kennan, M. (2011). Learning to share: Mandates and open access. Library Management, 32(4/5), 302–318. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435121111132301

Barakat, A. F., Nimri, N., Shokr, M., Mahtta, D., Mansoor, H., Mojadidi, M. K., Mahmoud, A. N., Senussi, M., Masri, A., & Elgendy, I. Y. (2018). Correlation of Altmetric Attention Score with Article Citations in Cardiovascular Research. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 72(8), 952–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.05.062

Bornmann, L. (2014). Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics. Journal of Informetrics, 8(4), 895–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005

Costas, R., Zahedi, Z., & Wouters, P. (2015). Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective: Do “Altmetrics “Correlate with Citations? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(10), 2003–2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23309

Delgado-López-Cózar, E., & Cabezas-Clavijo, Á. (2012). Google Scholar Metrics: An unreliable tool for assessing scientific journals. El Profesional de La Informacion, 21(4), 419–427. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2012.jul.15

Donato, H. (2014). Traditional and alternative metrics: The full story of impact. Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia, 20(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rppneu.2013.11.001

Enago, A. (2017, October 17). Understanding Research Metrics: Journal-Level, Article-Level, and Author-Level. Enago Academy. https://www.enago.com/academy/what-are-different-research-metrics/

Erfanmanesh, M. (2017). Highly-alted articles in Library and Information Science. Webology, 14(2), 12. http://www.webology.org/2017/v14n2/a158.pdf

Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M., & Ukkonen, A. (2016). The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(9), 2047–2059. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23552

Hammarfelt, B. (2014). Using altmetrics for assessing research impact in the humanities. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1419–1430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1261-3

Haustein, S., Peters, I., Sugimoto, C. R., Thelwall, M., & Larivière, V. (2014). Tweeting biomedicine: An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature: Tweeting Biomedicine: An Analysis of Tweets and Citations in the Biomedical Literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(4), 656–669. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23101

Heydari, S., Shekofteh, M., & Kazerani, M. (2019). Relationship between Altmetrics and Citations A Study on the Highly Cited Research Papers. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 39(4), 169–174. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.39.4.14204

HTOO, T. H. H., & NA, J.-C. (2015). Comparison of Altmetrics across Multiple Disciplines: Psychology, History, and Linguistics. International Conference of Asian Special Libraries 4th ICoASL 2015, April 22-24, 1–12. https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/library_research/50

Huang, W., Wang, P., & Wu, Q. (2018). A correlation comparison between Altmetric Attention Scores and citations for six PLOS journals. PLOS ONE, 13(4), e0194962. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194962

J, C. (2019). Twitter: Annual growth rate worldwide 2020. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/303723/twitters-annual-growth-rate-worldwide/

Jaring, P., & Bäck, A. (2017). How Researchers Use Social Media to Promote their Research and Network with Industry. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(8), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1098

Jason, P., Dario, T., Paul, G., & Cameron, N. (2010). Altmetrics: A manifesto – altmetrics.org. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/

Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.005

Lua, A. (2019, January 24). 21 Top Social Media Sites to Consider for Your Brand. Buffer Marketing Library. https://buffer.com/library/social-media-sites

Maggio, L. A., Leroux, T. C., Meyer, H. S., & Artino, A. R. (2018). Exploring the relationship between altmetrics and traditional measures of dissemination in health professions education. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/260059

Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5

Nemati-Anaraki, L., Aghajani Koupaei, H., & Alibeyk, M. (2017). The relationship between altmetric score with received citations in Iranian pediatrics articles. F1000Research, 6, 1221. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12020.1

Phillips, A. (2010). Blog to the Future? Journal of Scholarly Publishing. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.42.1.16

Powell, D. A., Jacob, C. J., & Chapman, B. J. (2012). Using Blogs and New Media in Academic Practice: Potential Roles in Research, Teaching, Learning, and Extension. Innovative Higher Education, 37(4), 271–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-011-9207-7

Rangaswamy, & H, Dr. R. B. (2020). An Altmetric Analysis of Top Journals in Library and Information Science. figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11567901

Rosenkrantz, A. B., Ayoola, A., Singh, K., & Duszak, R. (2017). Alternative Metrics (“Altmetrics”) for Assessing Article Impact in Popular General Radiology Journals. Academic Radiology, 24(7), 891–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2016.11.019

Schramm, L. (2017). Technological Innovation: An Introduction.

Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. Sebastian, N. (2020). Social Media Usage & Trends 2019 | GoodFirms Research. https://www.goodfirms.co/resources/social-media-usage-trends-research

Statista. (2019). Countries with most Twitter users 2019. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/242606/number-of-active-twitter-users-in-selected-countries/

Statista. (2020). Number of social media users worldwide 2010-2021. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/278414/number-of-worldwide-social-network-users/

Sun, X., Li, B., Ding, K., & Lin, Y. (2018). Who says what about the most-discussed articles of Altmetric? Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators in Transition, 7. https://hdl.handle.net/1887/64521

Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2015). ResearchGate: Disseminating, communicating, and measuring Scholarship? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(5), 876–889. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23236

Trueger, N. S., Thoma, B., Hsu, C. H., Sullivan, D., Peters, L., & Lin, M. (2015). The Altmetric Score: A New Measure for Article-Level Dissemination and Impact. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 66(5), 549–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.04.022

UNESCO. (2015). Research evaluation metrics—UNESCO Digital Library. United Nations Educationa l, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000232210

Vysakh, C., & Babu, R. H. (2019). Citations v/s Altmetric Attention Score: A Comparison of Top 10 Highly Cited Papers in Nature. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1. https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1P4-2300552517/citations-v-s-altmetric-attention-score-a-comparison

Waltman, L. (2016). A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 365–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007

Wooldridge, J., & King, M. B. (2019). Altmetric scores: An early indicator of research impact. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(3), 271–282. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24122


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS