A concepção de epistemologia da organização do conhecimento

Tennis, Joseph T and Guimarães, José Augusto Chaves and Araújo, Paula Carina de A concepção de epistemologia da organização do conhecimento. Palabra Clave (La Plata), 2021, vol. 10, n. 2, e120. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[img] Text
13771 - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.
Download (5kB)
Alternative locations: https://doi.org/10.24215/18539912e120

English abstract

Objective: Study about the epistemic stances that influence the knowledge organization domain by analyzing its scholarly literature. It aims to describe the conception of epistemology in the journal Knowledge Organization through metatheory. Methods: It is an exploratory and descriptive research that develops a metatheoretical study based on Ritzer’s metatheory. In theanalysis stage, two grounded theory tools were used, coding and memoing. Results: Three attribute families arose from the coding and memoing processes: the concept of epistemology in knowledgeorganization, the purpose of epistemology of knowledge organization and, epistemic stances influencing the knowledgeorganization domain. The third attribute family is analyzed in this paper. Empiricism, rationalism, historicism and pragmatismare described as the mains epistemic stances influencing the domain. The pragmatist stance is prominent in the analysis, followedby critical theories and historicism. Conclusions: The study concludes that the conception of epistemology on the knowledge organization domain is the criticalstudy of principles, hypothesis and knowledge production in the domain. Epistemology is concerned with the scientific knowledgeproduced by the knowledge organization domain, as well as with the application of that knowledge to design the KnowledgeOrganization Systems and to support the knowledge organization process as a whole.

Portuguese abstract

Objetivo: Estudo sobre posições epistêmicas que influenciam o domínio da organização do conhecimento a partir da análiseda literatura científica. Objetiva descrever a concepção de epistemologia no periódico Knowledge Organization por meio dametateoria. Método: Pesquisa exploratória e descritiva que desenvolve um estudo metateórico baseado na metateoria de Ritzer. Duasferramentas da teoria fundamentada em dados foram utilizadas, codificação e memorando. Resultado: Três famílias de atributos foram identificadas a partir do processo de codificação e do memorando: o conceitode epistemologia na organização do conhecimento, seu propósito e as posições epistêmicas que influenciam o domínio. Aterceira família de atributos é analisada neste artigo. Empirismo, racionalismo, historicismo e pragmatismo são descritos como asprincipais posições epistêmicas que influenciam o domínio. O pragmatismo predomina na análise, seguido das teorias críticas edo historicismo. Conclusões: O estudo conclui que a concepção da epistemologia no domínio da organização do conhecimento é o estudo críticodos princípios, hipóteses e produção de conhecimento no domínio. A epistemologia se preocupa com o conhecimento científicoproduzido pelo domínio da organização do conhecimento, bem como com a aplicação do conhecimento para a criação dos sistemasde organização do conhecimento para apoiar o processo de organização do conhecimento como um todo.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Knowledge organization, Epistemology, Epistemic Stance, Metatheory, Grounded Theory, Organização do conhecimento, Epistemologia, Posição epistêmica, Metateoria, Teoria Fundamentada em Dados
Subjects: A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information.
Depositing user: Palabra Clave
Date deposited: 17 Jun 2021 23:16
Last modified: 17 Jun 2021 23:16
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/42152

References

Alvesson, M. & Sköldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive methodology: new vistas for qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Arboit, A. E. (2014). O processo de institucionalização sociocognitiva do domínio de Organização do Conhecimento apartir dos trabalhos científicos dos congressos da ISKO [Tese (doutorado), Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho], Marilia. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unesp.br/handle/11449/123389

Bies, W. (1996). Thinking with the help of images: On the metaphors of knowledge organization. Knowledgeorganization, 23(1), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-1996-1-3.

Bufrem, L. S. (2012). A prática da pesquisa e os quadros teóricos concorrentes no campo de produção científica em ciênciada informação [Proposta de pesquisa apresentada como requisito parcial à renovação e/ou progressão da Bolsade Produtividade em Pesquisa do Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq).].

Bullock, A (Ed.) (1989). Fontana dictionary of modern thought. London: Fontana Press.

Campbell, G. (2000). Queer theory and the creation of contextual subject access tools for gay and lesbian communities. Knowledge organization, 27(3), 122–131. https://doi.org/0.5771/0943-7444-2000-3-122

Castanha, R. C. G. & Gracio, M. C. C. (2014). Bibliometrics contribution to the metatheoretical and domain analysis studies. Knowledge organization, 41(2), 171–174. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2014-2-171

Dahlberg, I. (1995). Current trends in knowledge organization. In F. J. García Marco (Org.).Organización del conocimiento em sistemas de información y documentación (pp. 7-25). Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza.

Dousa, T. M. (2010). Classical pragmatism and its varieties: on a pluriform metatheoretical perspective for knowledgeorganization. Knowledge organization, 37(1), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2010-1-65

Flick, U. (2004). Uma introdução à pesquisa qualitativa (S. Netz, Trad.; 2.ed.). New York: Bookman.

Furner, J. (2009). Interrogating “Identity”: A philosophical approach to an enduring issue in knowledge organization. Knowledge organization, 36(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2009-1-3

Garcia Marco, F. J. & Estebán Navarro, M. A. (1993). On some contributions of the cognitive sciences andepistemology to a theory of classification. Knowledge organization, 20(3), 126–132. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-1993-3-126

Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research (4. paper back printing). New York: Aldine.

Gnoli, C. (2008). Ten long-term research questions in knowledge organization. Knowledge organization, 35(2–3),137–149. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2008-2-3-137

Gnoli, C. (2012). Metadata about what? Distinguishing between ontic, epistemic, and documental dimensions inknowledge organization. Knowledge organization, 39(4), 268–275. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2012-4-268

Guimarães, J. A. C. (2014). Análise de domínio como perspectiva metodológica em organização da informação. Ciência da informação, 43(1), 13–21. Recuperado de http://revista.ibict.br/ciinf/article/view/1415/1593

Hansson, J. (2013). The materiality of knowledge organization: Epistemology, metaphors and society. Knowledgeorganization, 40(6), 384–391. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2013-6-384

Hjørland, B. (2002a). Domain analysis in information science: eleven approaches: traditional as well as innovative. Journal of documentation, 58(4), 422–462. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410210431136

Hjørland, B. (2002b). Epistemology and the socio-cognitive perspective in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(4), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10042

Hjørland, B. (2003). Fundamentals of knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization, 30(2), 87–111. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2003-2-87

Hjørland, B. (2005). Empiricism, rationalism and positivism in library and information science. Journal ofdocumentation, 61(1), 130–155. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410510578050

Hjørland, B. (2008). What is knowledge organization (KO)? Knowledge organization, 35(2-3), 86–101. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2008-2-3-86

Hjørland, B. (2013a). Theories of knowledge organization: theories of knowledge. Knowledge organization, 40(3),169–181. Library & information science abstracts (LISA). Recuperado de http://search.proquest.com/docview/1692278816?accountid=14784

Hjørland, B. (2013b). Theories of knowledge organization: Theories of knowledge. Knowledge organization, 40(3),169–181. Library & information science abstracts (LISA). http://search.proquest.com/docview/1692278816?accountid=14784

Hjørland, B. (2014). Is facet analysis based on rationalism? A discussion of Satija (1992), Tennis (2008), Herre (2013),Mazzocchi (2013b), and Dousa & Ibekwe-SanJuan (2014). Knowledge organization, 41(5), 369–376. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2014-5-369.

Hjørland, B. (2017). Domain analysis. Knowledge organization, 44(6), 436–464. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2017-6-436

Hjørland, B. (2020). Political versus apolitical epistemologies in knowledge organization. Knowledge organization,47(6), 461–485. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2020-6-461

Hjørland, B. & Hartel, J. (2003). Atherword: ontological, epistemological and sociological dimensions of domains. Knowledge organization, 30(3–4), 239–245. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2003-3-4-239

Ibekwe-SanJuan, F. & Bowker, G. C. (2017). Implications of big data for knowledge organization. Knowledgeorganization, 44(3), 187–198.

ISKO. International Society for Knowledge Organization. (1989). Charter and preamble. Recuperado de http://www.isko.org/charter.pdfISKO. (2007). VII Congreso ISKO, León, España. Recuperado de http://www.iskoiberico.org/congresos/leon-2007/

Kiel, E. (1994). Knowledge organization needs epistemological openness: A reply. Knowledge Organization, 21(3),148–152. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-1994-3-148

Kleineberg, M. (2013). The blind men and the elephant: towards an organization of epistemic contexts. Knowledge organization, 40(5), 340–362. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2013-5-340

López-Huertas, M. J. (2015). Domain analysis for interdisciplinary knowledge domains. Knowledge organization,42(8), 570–580. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2015-8-570

Mantzavinos, C. (2016). Hermeneutics. In E. N. Zalta (Org.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Recuperado de https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/hermeneutics/

Marteleto, R. M. & Carvalho, L. dos S. (2015). Health as a knowledge domain and social field: dialogues with Birger

Hjorland and Pierre Bourdieu. Knowledge organization, 42(8), 581–590. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2015-8-581

Martínez-Ávila, D. & Beak, J. (2016). Methods, theoretical frameworks and hope for knowledge organization. Knowledge organization, 43(5), 358–366. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2016-5-358

Martinez-Avila, D., Semidao, R. & Ferreira, M. (2016). Methodological aspects of critical theories in knowledge organization. Knowledge organization, 43(2), 118–125. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2016-2-118

Moura, M. A. (2014). Emerging discursive formations, folksonomy and social semantic information spaces (SSIS): The contributions of the theory of integrative levels in the studies carried out by the Classification Research Group(CRG). Knowledge organization, 41(4), 304–310. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2014-4-304

Ridi, R. (2016). Phenomena or noumena?: objective and subjective aspects in knowledge organization. Knowledge organization, 43(4), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2016-4-239

Ritzer, G. (1991a). Reflections on the rise of metatheorizing in sociology. Sociological perspectives, 34(3), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.2307/1389509

Ritzer, G. (1991b). Metatheorizing in sociology. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.

Ritzer, G. (2001). Metatheorizing in Sociology. In G. Ritzer. Explorations in social theory: Thom metatheorizing torationalization (pp. 13-33). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

Saldanha, G. S. (2014). The philosophy of language and knowledge organization in the 1930s: Pragmatics of Wittgenstein and Ranganathan. Knowledge organization, 41(4), 296–303. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2014-4-296

Sales, R. de & Murguia, E. I. (2017). Instaurações discursivas da organização do conhecimento: H. E. Bliss e a International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO). Ciência da informação, 44(3). https://doi.org/10.18225/ci.inf..v44i3.1949

Samuelsson, J. (2010). Knowledge organization for feminism and feminist research: a discourse oriented study of systematic outlines, logical structure, semantics and the process of indexing. Knowledge organization, 37(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2010-1-3

Santis, R. de & Souza, R. F. de. (2014). Classifying popular songs: possibilities and challenges. Knowledge organization, 41(2), 181–187. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2014-2-181

Silveira, N. C. & Saldanha, G. S. (2016). “Own name” in knowledge organization epistemology: A philosophical-theoretical debate. Knowledge organization, 43(4), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2016-4-265

Smiraglia, R. P. (2013). The epistemological dimension of knowledge organization. IRIS - Revista de informação, memória e tecnologia, 2(1), 2–11. Recuperado de https://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/IRIS/article/view/498

Smiraglia, R. P. (2015). Domain analysis of domain analysis for knowledge organization: Observations on an emergent methodological cluster. Knowledge organization, 42(8), 602–611. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2015-8-602.

Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. London: Cambridge University Press.

Tennis, J. T. (2005a). Experientialist epistemology and classification theory: Embodied and dimensional classification. Knowledge organization, 32(2), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2005-2-79

Tennis, J. T. (2005b). Conceptions of subject analysis: a metatheoretical investigation. Recuperado de http://search.proquest.com/docview/305423788/

Tennis, J. T. (2008). Epistemology, theory, and methodology in knowledge organization: Toward a classification, metatheory, and research framework. Knowledge organization, 35(2–3), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2008-2-3-102

Tennis, J. T. (2015). Foundational, first-order, and second-order classification theory. Knowledge organization, 42(4),244–249. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2015-4-244

Vakkari, P. & Kuokkanem, M. (1997). Theory growth in information science: applications of the theory of scienceto a theory of information seeking. Journal of documentation, 53(5), 497–519. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007210

Vickery, B. (1998). Metatheory and information science. Journal of documentation, 53(5), 457–76. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007206

Zins, C. (2004). Knowledge organization: An epistemological perspective. Knowledge organization, 31(1), 49-54. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2004-1-9


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Altmetric
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS