Identifying the components of the Information Resource Selection Behavior of the Members of Public Libraries Using Metasynthesis

Yari, Shiva and Noruzi, Alireza and Fahimnia, Fatemeh and Nowkarizi, Mohsen Identifying the components of the Information Resource Selection Behavior of the Members of Public Libraries Using Metasynthesis. Research on Information Science and Public Libraries, 2021, vol. 27, n. 1, pp. 71-101. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[img]
Preview
Text
Information Resource Selection.pdf

Download (1MB) | Preview

English abstract

Purpose: It is impossible to increase the use of information resources in libraries and provide user-centered information services without understanding how users select and search for information resources. Selecting information sources involves identifying a subset of available information sources that best meet the information needs of users. Selecting the right source of information has a significant effect on whether the source is read or not. Moreover, acquisition, organizing resources, and arranging them in libraries, as well as designing an efficient and user-friendly user interface that supports book selection, requires sufficient knowledge of resource selection behaviors by users; This is what not sufficiently known in Iran. Thus, this study aimed to identify the components and dimensions of the selection behavior of information resources of public library users and to design the relevant conceptual model. Method: The present research is a meta-synthesis study that was conducted with a qualitative approach, following the seven steps of the Sandelowski and Barroso method. The research population consists of articles and dissertations published in seven Persian databases and eight international databases between 2000 and 2020 (1379 to 1399 SH). Out of 7560 identified sources, 35 sources were approved under the Vital Skills Assessment Program. The codes were extracted from the articles, and the reliability of the coding was assessed using the kappa coefficient. Findings: A total of 176 codes including 26 concepts were extracted and categorized under five categories as follows: user-related factors (including source selection objectives, tasks, and needs, personality traits and user life, demographic characteristics, interest and emotion, previous user experiences, reasons for interaction or relationship with books, selection strategies, and costs); book-related factors (including appearance features, bibliographic elements, content elements, content quality, storybook content, book style, language and relevance, popularity, and distinction); library-related factors (facilities, shelves, and arrangement of books and ancillary programs); barriers and restrictions (including individual, library and community barriers and restrictions); and recommendations and theatrical productions of works (including direct and indirect recommendations and theatrical productions of works). According to the findings, a user, depending on his situation, spends time and money under the influence of the library environment and its facilities, and examines and selects a source in terms of various appearance and content features, and communicates with that source (book) and reads it for reasons such as the overall perceived attractiveness of a book, being engaged with the story in the book, the atmosphere of the book, the personal experience narrated by the characters, and so on; influenced by the recommendations and theatrical productions of works, the user may face obstacles in choosing the source that has been created by himself/herself, the library or the community. Originality/value: The model of information resource selection behavior of public library members is indicative of the complexity and effectiveness of this behavior from a wide range of factors, including individual differences, physical and content characteristics of the book, and environmental factors. The designed model can be used as a basis for a broad survey of users’ information resource selection behavior in physical and virtual environments, as well as as a guide to collection building, space designing, and service designing in libraries, the compilation of resources, and designing the appearance and structure of books by authors and publishers.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Information resource selection behavior, Information Evaluation, Users, Public libraries, Meta-synthesis
Subjects: H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HE. Print materials.
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HO. e-books.
Depositing user: Dr. Alireza Noruzi
Date deposited: 19 Jun 2021 17:24
Last modified: 19 Jun 2021 17:24
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/42165

References

Abel, E., Keane, J., Paton, N. W., Fernandes, A. A., Koehler, M., Konstantinou, N., ... & Embury, S. M. (2018). User driven multi-criteria source selection. Information Sciences, 430, 179-199.

Albanese, A. (2020, April 3). Are public libraries in decline? Publishers Weekly. https://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industrynews/libraries/article/82925-are-public-libraries-in-decline.html

Bulghari, S. (2015). Evaluating the content of the electronic circuit book of the technical and professional branch of electronics based on the characteristics of content determination and organization from the point of view of art students in Tehran [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Valiasr University Complex. (in Persian)

Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (2014). CIPFA Library Survey Shows Continuing Decline in Buildings, Books and Borrowers as Cuts Continue to Bite. http://www.cipfa.org/ About-CIPFA/Press-Office/latestpress-releases/CIPFAlibrary-survey

Chinchpure, S., Tr, A., Raju, A., Kr, A., Ar, A., & Barate, A. T. (2018). Utilization of the Library and Internet as a Source of Scientific Information by the Nursing Students. Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, 2(4), 2774-2784.

Coates, T. (2019). On the closure of English public libraries. Public Library Quarterly, 38(1), 3–18.

Dawkins, B. K. (2017). Need help choosing good books for students? A book selection study, book selection checklist, and a discussion of how educators can select books that engage young readers of color and possibly improve reading achievement. Journal of Education & Social Policy, 4(2), 1-10.

Erwin, E. J., Brotherson, M. J., & Summers, J. A. (2011). Understanding qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and opportunities in early childhood intervention research. Journal of Early Intervention, 33(3), 186-200.

Hashemi, R. (2010). Selection and evaluation of English books in non-English speaking environments [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Tabriz University. (in Persian)

Hayati, Z., & Hamidi, A. (2007). Selection and evaluation criteria of e-journals in governmental academic and research institutions’ libraries of Iran. National Studies on Librarianship and Information Organization, 17(4), 159-172. (in Persian)

Hernon, P., Altman, E., & Dugan, R. E. (2015). Assessing service quality: Satisfying the expectations of library customers. ALA Editions.

Jacoby, J. W., & Edlefsen, K. (2020). “I Love Paw Patrol!”: Book Selection and the Allure of Popular Media Characters Among Preschoolers. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 34(2), 208-222.

Khaje, T., & Balaghi, R. (2018, July 16). Investigating the health information behavior of public library users in Bandar Abbas [Paper presentation]. The first conference of information technology and health promotion, Tehran, Information Technology and Health Promotion Association, Tehran, Iran. (in Persian)

List, A., Grossnickle, E. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2016). Undergraduate students’ justifications for source selection in a digital academic context. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(1), 22-61.

Maynard, S., Mackay, S., & Smyth, F. (2008). A survey of young people's reading in England: Borrowing and choosing books. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 40(4), 239-253.

Mohr, K. A. (2006). Children's choices for recreational reading: A three-part investigation of selection preferences, rationales, and processes. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(1), 81-104.

Motameni, A., Hemmati A. and Moradi H. (2013). Identifying and prioritizing the barriers of youth tending to use public library services. Research on Information Science & Public Libraries, 18(4), 363-383. (in Persian)

Nemattollahi. L. (2012). Investigating the attitudes of librarians of public libraries in Fars province towards the centralized collection method in these libraries [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Shiraz University. (in Persian)

Ooi, K., & Liew, C. L. (2011). Selecting fiction as part of everyday life information seeking. Journal of Documentation, 67(5), 748-772.

Rahmani, S., Abassi, Z., & Sanatjoo, A. (2016). Identifying the key factors in collection and collection management policy of Information Center & Central Library of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. Library and Information Science Research, 6(1), 321-340. (in Persian)

Randall, R. (2013). How Young Adult Readers select fiction in public libraries: A study of the factors which influence information-seeking in context [Master’s thesis, Victoria University of Wellington]. Research Archive. http://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10063/2659/thesis.pdf

Reuter, K. (2007). Assessing aesthetic relevance: Children's book selection in a digital library. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(12), 1745-1763.

Reutzel, D. R., & Gali, K. (1998). The art of children's book selection: A labyrinth unexplored. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 19(1), 3-50.

Ross, C. S. (2000). Making Choices: What Readers Say About Choosing Books to Read for Pleasure. The Acquisitions Librarian, 13(25), 5-21.

Ross, C. S., McKechnie, L., & Rothbauer, P. M. (2006). Reading matters: What the research reveals about reading, libraries, and community. Libraries Unlimited.

Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. New York: NY: Springer.

Sepehr, F. (1999). The status of selection and ordering of Latin periodicals in the central libraries of Iran’s universities. Journal of Academic Librarianship and Information Research, 0(30-31), 59-85. (in Persian)

Shamselahi, M., & Noruzi, A. (2018). Information Needs of Young Adults. Tehran: Asatir Parsi Publication. (Persian language).

Shokohian, M., Asemi, A. and Shabani, A. (2018). The information needs of young adults at public Libraries in Isfahan. Journal of Studies in Library and Information Science, 10(3), 65-86. (in Persian)

Stenseth, T., & Strømsø, H. I. (2019). To read or not to read: A qualitative study of students’ justifications for document selection in task-oriented reading. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 63(5), 771-788.

Tao, D. (2008). Using theory of reasoned action (TRA) in understanding selection and use of information resources: an information resource selection and use model [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Missouri]. MOspace. https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10355/6736/research.pdf

Taylor, J. B., Hora, A., & Krueger, K. S. (2019). Self-selecting books in a children’s fiction collection arranged by genre. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 51(3), 852-865.

Verma, J., & Sonkar, S. K. (2013). Impact of E-Resources and Web Technology on Reading Habits. In Challenges of Academic Library Management in Developing Countries (pp. 68-74). IGI Global.

Wu, C. Y., & Lin, C. S. (2016). The pleasures of reading mystery fiction and mystery readers’ book selection behavior. Journal of Educational Media and Library Sciences, (53), 361-388.

Xie, I., & Joo, S. (2009). Selection of information sources: Accessibility of and familiarity with sources, and types of tasks. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 46(1), 1-18.

Yari, S. (2015, November 11). Use of Internet and social media among the members of public libraries in Kermanshah and its effect on their reading habits [Paper presentation]. The 8th National Conference of Edka entitled “Social Media in Information Center”, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. (in Persian)

Yari, S. (2017). Visibility of Kermanshah public libraries. Research on Information Science & Public Libraries, 23(2), 173-198. (in Persian)

Yari, S., & Ojaghi, R. (2016, February 24-25). An exploration into the factors attracting and developing the audience in public libraries from the perspective of Kermanshahi users [Paper presentation]. National Conference of “Public libraries: Factors and barriers to attracting and developing audience”, Ahvaz, Iran. (in Persian)

Zare, A., Godeyni, Y., & Riahi, A. (2015). A study of factors effecting the use of public libraries (Case study of user of Kermanshah public libraries). Journal of Information System & Services, 4(3-4), 51-62. (in Persian)


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item