Ten Years of Altmetrics: A Review of Latin America Contributions

Moreira De Oliveira, Thaiane and Barata, Germana and Uribe-Tirado, Alejandro Ten Years of Altmetrics: A Review of Latin America Contributions. Journal of Scientometric Research, 2021, vol. 10, n. 1, pp. 102-114. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[img]
Preview
 Text
FINAL. JScientometRes-10-1s-s102.pdf
Download (1MB) | Preview
Alternative locations: https://jscires.org/article/422

English abstract

Altmetrics studies emerged ten years ago in the Global North context and after a few years spread around the world. The paper investigates who are the Latin American researchers, which topics are covered and the relationship between South and North in Altmetric Studies. This study combines global mapping, social networks analysis and Content Analysis, using Dimensions, VOSviewer and Iramuteq to measure co-authorship, bibliographic coupling and co-citation analysis and content analysis to identify topics and types of production in Latina America outputs on alternative metrics. Results (n=172) show the prominence of Brazil, Colombia and Mexico in altmetric research in Latin America. There is an internal national co-authorship, with a huge influence from the North as reference to Latin American altmetric studies, but with gradual recognition of Mexico and Brazil as leading exponents in the region. We identify main topics related to local issues and regional impacts and discussions about the social role of the university. We conclude that the landscape of science output on altmetrics is becoming multipolar. Latin America emerged as an alternative hub of altmetric studies, but it still depends on references and collaboration with central countries. We also observed an emerging discussion on critics about low covering of regional data and an innovative development of methodologies and technologies as alternatives to commercial platforms that provide data to evaluate the social impact of universities. Latin America altmetric community should invest in resources to strengthen regional collaboration.

Spanish abstract

Los estudios de altmetría surgieron hace diez años en el contexto del Norte Global y después de unos años se extendieron por todo el mundo. El artículo investiga quiénes son los investigadores latinoamericanos, qué temas se tratan y la relación entre el sur y el norte en los estudios altmétricos. Este estudio combina mapeo global, análisis de redes sociales y análisis de contenido, utilizando Dimensions, VOSviewer e Iramuteq para medir la coautoría, el acoplamiento bibliográfico y el análisis de co-citas, y el análisis de contenido para identificar temas y tipos de producción en la producción de América Latina sobre métricas alternativas. Los resultados (n = 172) muestran la prominencia de Brasil, Colombia y México en la investigación altmétrica en América Latina. Existe una coautoría nacional interna, con una enorme influencia del Norte como referencia a los estudios altmétricos latinoamericanos, pero con un reconocimiento paulatino de México y Brasil como principales exponentes de la región. Identificamos los principales temas relacionados con temas locales e impactos regionales y discusiones sobre el rol social de la universidad. Concluimos que el panorama de la producción científica en altmetrics se está volviendo multipolar. América Latina surgió como un centro alternativo de estudios altmétricos, pero aún depende de referencias y colaboración con países centrales. También observamos una discusión emergente sobre críticas sobre la baja cobertura de datos regionales y un desarrollo innovador de metodologías y tecnologías como alternativas a las plataformas comerciales que brindan datos para evaluar el impacto social de las universidades. La comunidad altmétrica de América Latina debería invertir en recursos para fortalecer la colaboración regional.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Altmetrics, Bibliometrics, Dimensions, Global South, Latin America; Altmetría, Bibliometría, Sur Global, América Latina
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information
Depositing user: Alejandro Uribe-Tirado
Date deposited: 13 Jul 2021 15:31
Last modified: 13 Jul 2021 15:31
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/42253

References

[1]Priem J, Taraborelli D, Groth P, Neylon C. Altmetrics: A manifesto, 26 October 2010. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto

[2]Haustein S, Peters I, Bar-Ilan J, Priem J, Shema H, Terliesner J. Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community. Scientometrics. 2014;101(2):1145-1163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1221-3

[3]Bornmann L. Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics. Journal of Informetrics. 2014;8(4):895-903. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50627-2_8

[4]Sugimoto CR, Work S, Larivière V, Haustein S. Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: a review of the literature. JASIST. 2017;68(9):2037-2062. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23833

[5]Thelwall M. Using altmetrics to support research evaluation. In: International Workshop on Altmetrics for Research Outputs Measurements and Scholarly Information Management. Springer, Singapore. 2018:11-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1053-9_2

[6]Robinson-Garcia N, van Leeuwen TN, Rafols I. Using altmetrics for contextualised mapping of societal impact: From hits to networks. Science and Public Policy. 2018:45(6):815-826. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy024

[7]Van Noorden R. The impact gap: South America by the numbers. Nature. 2014;510, 202–203 (12 June 2014) https://doi.org/10.1038/510202a

[8]Alperin JP. Ask not what altmetrics can do for you, but what altmetrics can do for developing countries. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2013; 30(4):18-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/bult.2013.1720390407

[9]Alperin JP. Geographic variation in social media metrics: an analysis of Latin American journal articles. Aslib J. Inf. Manag. 2015;67(3):289-304. https://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-12-2014-0176

[10]Zahedi Z. Could we start to talk about an ‘altmetric divide’? On the imbalance in the access and use of social media platforms across countries. Blog post for Altmetric 3:AM conference. Bucarest, Romania.2016. https://scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl/handle/1887/47014

[11]Gui Q, Liu C, Du D. Globalization of science and international scientific collaboration: A network perspective. Geoforum. 2019;105:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.06.017

[12]Urbizagastegui R, Arango CR. Crecimiento de la literatura sobre bibliometría, informetría y cienciometría en el Brasil. RICI–Revista Ibero-Americana e Ciência da Informação. 2017;10(1), 6-3. https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.1981-0695.2017v12n1.34225

[13]Grácio MCC, Tannuri de Oliveira EF. Wolfram D. Produção científica Latino-Americana Em Estudos métricos Da informação: Análise bibliométrica Do período De 2011 a 2016. Brazilian Journal of Information Science. 2019:13(4)52-74. http://doi.org/10.36311/1981-1640.2019.v13n4.04.p52

[14]González‐Valiente CL, Pacheco‐Mendoza J, Arencibia‐Jorge R. A review of altmetrics as an emerging discipline for research evaluation. Learned Publishing. 2016;29(4):229-238. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1043

[15]Gouveia, F.C. Altmetria: métricas de produção científica para além das citações│ Altmetrics: scientific production metrics beyond citations. Liinc em revista. 2013; 9(1). http://revista.ibict.br/liinc/article/view/3434/3004

[16]López-López, W. Altmetrics and other Alternative Indicators to Measure Knowledge Diffusion. Universitas Psychologica. 2014; 13(5), 1645-1646. https://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/12549

[17]López-López, W. The measurement of scientific production: Myths and Complexities. Universitas Psychologica. 2014; 13(1), 11-15. https://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/8416

[18]Souza, I.V.P. Altmetria: métricas alternativas do impacto da comunicação científica. Master thesis, Universidade Federal Fluminense. 2014. http://eprints.rclis.org/23436/

[19]Erdt M, Nagarajan A, Sin SCJ, Theng YL. Altmetrics: an analysis of the state-of-the-art in measuring research impact on social media. Scientometrics. 2016;109(2):1117-1166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2077-0

[20]Thelwall M, Maflahi N. Are scholarly articles disproportionately read in their own country? An analysis of Mendeley readers. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2015;66(6):1124–1135. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23252

[21]Haustein S, Peters I. Commemorating Judit Bar-Ilan from bibliometric and altmetric perspectives. Scientometrics. 2020;123:1211–1224 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03448-y

[22]Herzog C, Hook D, Konkiel S. Dimensions: Bringing down barriers between scientometricians and data. Quantitative Science Studies. 2020;1(1):387-395. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00020

[23]Martín-Martín A, Thelwall M, Orduna-Malea E, López-Cózar ED. Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations' COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations. 2020:arXiv:2004.14329. https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.14329

[24]Thelwall M. Dimensions: A competitor to Scopus and the Web of Science? Journal of informetrics. 2018;12(2):430-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.03.006

[25]Gusenbauer M. Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases. Scientometrics. 2019;118(1):177-214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2958-5

[26]Harzing AW. Two new kids on the block: How do Crossref and Dimensions compare with Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus and the Web of Science?. Scientometrics. 2019;120(1):341-349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03114-y

[27]Visser M, van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic. arXiv preprint. 2020:arXiv:2005.10732. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.10732

[28]Hook DW, Porter SJ, Herzog C. Dimensions: building context for search and evaluation. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics. 2018;3(23):1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2018.00023

[29]Orduña-Malea E, Delgado-López-Cózar E. Dimensions: Re-discovering the ecosystem of scientific information. El profesional de la información (EPI). 2018;27(2):420-431. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.mar.21

[30]Orduña-Malea E, López-Cózar ED. Demography of Altmetrics under the light of Dimensions: Locations, institutions, journals, disciplines and funding bodies in the global research framework. Journal of Altmetrics. 2019;2(1). http://doi.org/10.29024/joa.13

[31]Olmeda-Gómez C, Perianes-Rodríguez A. Altmetrics as a research specialty (Dimensions, 2005-2018). El Profesional de la Información. 2019;28(6). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.nov.08

[32]Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010;84(2):523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

[33]Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. VOSviewer manual. Leiden: Univeristeit Leiden. 2013;1(1):1-53. Available at: https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.13.pdf (access in Nov.13 2020)

[34] Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics. 2017;111(2):1053-1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7

[35] White MD, Marsh EE. Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library trends. 2006;55(1): 22-45. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2006.0053

[36] RICYT - Red Iberoamericana e Interamericana de indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología.El Estado de la Ciencia. 2019. Argentina. 148p. http://www.ricyt.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/edlc2019.pdf

[37] RICYT - Red Iberoamericana e Interamericana de indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología. El Estado de la Ciencia. 2020. Argentina. 240p. http://ww.ricyt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/ElEstadoDeLaCiencia_2020.pdf

[38] McManus, C., Baeta Neves, A.A., Maranhão, A.Q. et al. International collaboration in Brazilian science: financing and impact. Scientometrics. 2020; 125, 2745–2772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03728-7

[39] Perrotta D, Alonso M. Cross-National Research Partnerships in International Relations: A Study of Research Groups’ Practices of MERCOSUR—Re-Envisioning Scholarly Activities Beyond the Global North–Global South Divide. Journal of Studies in International Education. 2020; 24(1):79-96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315319887390

[40]Zhao D, Strotmann A. Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in information science 1996–2005: Introducing author bibliographic‐coupling analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2008;59(13):2070-2086. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20910

[41]Boyack KW, Klavans R. Co‐citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2010;61(12):2389-2404. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21419

[42]Zhao D, Strotmann A. The knowledge base and research front of information science 2006–2010: An author cocitation and bibliographic coupling analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2014;65(5):995-1006. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23027

[43]Alperín, J. P., Fischman, G., & Willinsky, J. Open access and scholarly publishing in Latin America: ten flavours and a few reflections| Acesso livre e publicação acadêmica na América Latina: dez sabores e algumas reflexões. Liinc em Revista. 2008; 4(2). https://doi.org/10.18617/liinc.v4i2.269

[44]Babini, D. Acceso abierto a la producción científica de américa latina y el caribe: Identificación de principales instituciones para estrategias de integración regional. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad CTS. 2011; 6(17). http://eprints.rclis.org/15574/

[45]Alperin, J. P., Packer, A., Aguado-López, E., Becerril-García, A., Babini, D., Archuby, G., ... & Spano, D. Open access indicators and scholarly communications in Latin America. CLACSO. 2014 https://www.clacso.org.ar/libreria-latinoamericana/libro_detalle.php?id_libro=906

[46]Barata, G., Shores, K., & Alperin, J. P. Local chatter or international buzz? Language differences on posts about Zika research on Twitter and Facebook. PloS one. 2018; 13(1), e0190482. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190482

[47]Vanti, N., Sanz-Casado, E. Altmetria: a métrica social a serviço de uma ciência mais democrática. Transinformação. 2016; 28(3), 349-358. https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-08892016000300009

[48]Araujo RF. & Furnival ACM. Comunicação científica e atenção online: em busca de colégios virtuais que sustentam métricas alternativas. Informação & Informação. 2016;21(2):68-89. http://doi.org/10.5433/1981-8920.2016v21n2p68

[49]Araujo, R. F. Communities of attention networks: introducing qualitative and conversational perspectives for altmetrics. Scientometrics. 2020; 124(3), 1793-1809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03566-7

[50]Costa, B. I. R., Oliveira, M., & Araújo, R. Impactos das teses e dissertações do programa de pós-graduação em ciência da informação da UFMG: dos dados de leitura no Mendeley às citações no Google Schola. Informação em Pauta. 2019; v. 4, n. 2, p. 11-31. https://doi.org/10.32810/2525-3468.ip.v4i2.2019.42444.11-31

[51]Uribe-Tirado, A. Visibilidad e impacto de los investigadores colombianos en las principales redes y portales científicos del mundo. In I Congreso Internacional de Bibliotecas Académicas y Especializadas "Conocimiento y Sostenibilidad Mundial" (Agenda 2030), Politécnico Jaime Isaza Cadavid, Medellín, agosto 2 al 4. 2017. http://eprints.rclis.org/31592/

[52]Maia, L. F. M. P., & Oliveira, J. Investigation of research impacts on the zika virus: An approach focusing on social network analysis and altmetrics. In Proceedings of the 23rd Brazillian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web (pp. 413-416). October, 2017. https://sol.sbc.org.br/index.php/webmedia/article/view/5316

[53]de Carvalho, A. M. F., & Gouveia, F. C. Repositórios institucionais de acesso aberto: adequação às novas métricas da web. Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação e Inovação em Saúde. 2017; 11. https://doi.org/10.29397/reciis.v11i0.1420

[54]Genovés, P. Perfiles de autor en repositorios institucionales. Palabra clave. 2017; 7. https://doi.org/10.24215/18539912e033

[55]Reis JE, Spinola ATP, do Amaral RM. Incipiência da visualização de indicadores bibliométricos e altmétricos nos Repositórios Institucionais brasileiros. Em Questão. 2017;23:213-234. https://doi.org/10.19132/1808-5245230.213-234

[56]Valles, M., Injante, R., Hernández, E., Riascos, J., Galvez, M., & Velasco, J. An Altmetric Alternative for Measuring the Impact of University Institutional Repositories’ Grey Literature. In International Conference on Data and Information in Online (pp. 222-234). Springer, Cham. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50072-6_17

[57]Danny, M., Madelaine, F., Huriviades, C., & Dalys, S. Digital Institutional Repositories, Component of Open Science to Disseminate Scientific Publications: Case Repository UTP-Ridda2. In 2019 7th International Engineering, Sciences and Technology Conference (IESTEC) (pp. 653-658). IEEE. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/iestec46403.2019.00122

[58]Frixione, E., Ruiz-Zamarripa, L., & Hernández, G. Assessing individual intellectual output in scientific research: Mexico’s national system for evaluating scholars performance in the humanities and the behavioral sciences. PloS one. 2016; 11(5), e0155732. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155732

[59]Elena, L. M. M., Evelia, L. M., & Ángel, P. A. M. Influence of the international collaboration in the field of metric studies of science and technology: the case of Mexico (1971–2018). Scientometrics. 2020; 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03522-5

[60]Uribe-Tirado A, Alhuay Quispe, J. Estudio métrico de ALFIN en Iberoamérica: de la bibliometría a las altmetrics. Revista Española de Documentación Científica. 2017;40(3):1-18. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2017.3.1414

[61]Agüero Aguilar, C.E. Redes colaborativas y temáticas en la revista interamericana de bibliotecología. periodo 2005 - 2016. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología. 2018; 41(1), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rib.v41n1a08

[62]Vasen, F., & Vilchis, I. L. Sistemas nacionales de clasificación de revistas científicas en América Latina: tendencias recientes e implicaciones para la evaluación académica en ciencias sociales. Revista mexicana de ciencias políticas y sociales. 2017; 62(231), 199-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0185-1918(17)30043-0

[63]Delgado, R. M., Tarango, J., & Machin-Mastromatteo, J. D. Scientific evaluation models in Latin America and the criteria for assessing researchers. Information Development. 2020; 36(3), 457-467. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666920943966

[64]Aguado-López, E., Becerril-García, A., & Chávez-Ávila, S. Reflexión sobre la publicación académica y el acceso abierto a partir de la experiencia de Redalyc. Palabra clave. 2019; 8(2). https://doi.org/10.24215/18539912e067

[65]Barata, G. Por métricas alternativas mais relevantes para a América Latina. Transinformação. 2019;31:e190031 https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0889201931e190031

[66]Ovseiko, P. V., Greenhalgh, T., Adam, P., Grant, J., Hinrichs-Krapels, S., Graham, K. E., ... & Buchan, A. M. A global call for action to include gender in research impact assessment. Health research policy and systems. 2016; 14(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0126-z

[67]Parreiras, R. O., Kokshenev, I., Carvalho, M. O. M., Willer, A. C. M., Dellezzopolles Jr, C. F., Nacif Jr, D. B., & Santana, J. A. A flexible multicriteria decision-making methodology to support the strategic management of Science, Technology and Innovation research funding programs. European Journal of Operational Research. 2019; 272(2), 725-739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.06.050

[68]Keathley-Herring, H., Van Aken, E., Gonzalez-Aleu, F., Deschamps, F., Letens, G., & Orlandini, P. C. Assessing the maturity of a research area: bibliometric review and proposed framework. Scientometrics. 2016; 109(2), 927-951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2096-x

[69]Lezama-Nicolás, R., Rodríguez-Salvador, M., Río-Belver, R., & Bildosola, I. A bibliometric method for assessing technological maturity: the case of additive manufacturing. Scientometrics. 2018; 117(3), 1425-1452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2941-1

[70]Araújo, R. F., Caran, G. M., & de Souza, I. V. P. Orientação temática e coeficiente de correlação para análise comparativa entre dados altmétricos e citações: uma análise da revista DataGramaZero. Em Questão. 2016; 22(3), 184-200. https://doi.org/10.19132/1808-5245223.184-200

[71]Pereira, G. M. V., Rocha, S. C., da Costa Machado, H., & Brito, L. G. O. How do urogynecology and pelvic floor dysfunction terms used in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery research relate to social media indicators?. International Urogynecology Journal. 2020; 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04438-7

[72]Ordoñez-Gutiérrez, J. A., Oviedo-Moreno, J. M., Patino-Hernandez, D., & Fernández-Ávila, D. G. Immunology and social networks: an approach towards impact assessment. Rheumatology international. 2020; 40(2), 251-256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-019-04459-6

[73]Ribas, S., Ribeiro-Neto, B., de Souza e Silva, E., Ueda, A. H., & Ziviani, N. Using reference groups to assess academic productivity in computer science. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 603-608). 2015. https://doi.org/10.1145/2740908.2741735

[74]Muñoz-Velandia, O. M., Fernández-Ávila, D. G., Patino-Hernandez, D., & Gómez, A. M. Metrics of activity in social networks are correlated with traditional metrics of scientific impact in endocrinology journals. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews. 2019; 13(4), 2437-2440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2019.06.018

[75]Silva Filho, R.D.C., Vanz, S.A.D.S. Impacto de altmetrics sobre a visibilidade de artigos em acesso aberto da enfermagem brasileira: um estudo de caso. Transinformação. 2019; 31. https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0889201931e190025

[76]Björneborn L, Ingwersen P. Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American society for information science and technology. 2004;55(14):1216-1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20077

[77]INAECU-Instituto Interuniversitario de Investigación Avanzada sobre Evaluación de la Ciencia y la Universidad. Altmetría, influmetría… ¡Informetría! Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid y Universidad Carlos III de Madrid.2014. http://www.inaecu.com/altmetria-influmetria-informetria/

[78]Dos Santos FB, Alvarez GR, Junior RFG, de Moura AMM. Altmetria no Brasil: estudo de citação e cocitação na base de dados BRAPCI. Prisma.com. 2018;36:116-131. https://doi.org/10.21747/16463153/36a7

[79]Araújo RF, Murakami TR, De Lara JL, Fausto S. Does the global south have altmetrics? Analyzing a Brazilian LIS journal. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference. Istanbul, Turkey. 2015:111–112. https://www.issi-society.org/proceedings/issi_2015/0111.pdf

[80]Barros M. Altmetrics: métricas alternativas de impacto científico com base em redes sociais. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação. 2015;20(2):19-37. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5344/1782

[81]Araújo RF. Marketing científico digital e métricas alternativas para periódicos: da visibilidade ao engajamento. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação. 2015;20(3):67-84. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5344/2402

[82]Dos Santos PVQ, Albuquerque JPS. Altmetria: Uma nova lente para os estudos métricos da informação. Biblionline. 2017; 13(3): 3-12. https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.1809-4775.2017v13n3.35874

[83]Santana S. Las métricas alternativas y sus potencialidades para el profesional de la salud. Revista Médica Clínica Las Condes. 2018;29(4):484-490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmclc.2017.08.012

[84]Costas R, Zahedi Z, Wouters P. Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2015;66(10), 2003-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23309

[85]Ortega JL. Relationship between altmetric and bibliometric indicators across academic social sites: The case of CSIC's members. Journal of informetrics. 2015;9(1):39-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.11.004

[86]Poplašen LM. Grgić IH. Altmetric and bibliometric scores: does Open Access matter? Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries. 2017;5(2):451-460. http://www.qqml-journal.net/index.php/qqml/article/view/331

[87]De Filippo D, Sanz-Casado E. Bibliometric and altmetric analysis of three social science disciplines. Frontiers in research metrics and analytics. 2018;3(34):1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2018.00034

[88]Banshal SK, Singh VK, Kaderye G, Muhuri PK, Sánchez BP. An altmetric analysis of scholarly articles from India. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. 2018;34(5):3111-3118. http://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-169495

[89]Verma S, Madhusudhan M. An altmetric comparison of highly cited digital library publications of India and China. Annals of Library and Information Studies (ALIS). 2019;66(2):71-75. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/229208328.pdf

[90]Oliveira TMD. Alternative Metrics and Open Science in Latin America: Challenges for democratization of knowledge. TransInformação. 2019;31:e190089. https://doi.org/10.1590/231808892019e190089e

[91]Gouveia FC. Estudos altmétricos no Brasil: uma análise a partir dos currículos da Plataforma Lattes-CNPq. TransInformação. 2016;31:e190027. https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0889201931e190027

[92]Uribe-Tirado A, Ochoa-Gutiérrez J, Ruiz-Nuñez K, Fajardo-Bermúdez M. Visibilidad e impacto altmétrico de los investigadores de la Universidad de Antioquia:metodología aplicable a universidades. TransInformação. 2019;31:e190016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2318-0889201931e190016

[93]Vílchez-Román C, Huamán-Delgado F, Alhuay-Quispe J. Social dimension activates the usage and academic impact of Open Access publications in Andean countries: a structural modeling-based approach. Information Development. Feb 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0266666920901849

[94]Maia LFMP, Lenzi M, Rabello E, Oliveira J. A Web Tool to Map Research Impacts Via Altmetrics. In: Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2020. 2020;235-239. https://doi.org/10.1145/3366424.3383549


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS