Methodological principles to create a metadata extension to the Darwin Core standard for agrobiodiversity data

Soares, Filipi Miranda and Maculan, Benildes Coura Moreira dos Santos and Drucker, Debora Pignatari and Saraiva, Antonio Mauro Methodological principles to create a metadata extension to the Darwin Core standard for agrobiodiversity data. Brazilian Journal of Information Science: Research Trends, 2020, vol. 14, n. 4, pp. 1-27. [Journal article (Paginated)]


Download (372kB) | Preview

English abstract

This research aims to propose principles to creating a metadata extension to the Darwin Core standard that addresses the agrobiodiversity data, with a thematic scope on ecological interactions. These principles have been compiled from the scientific literature, giving special attention to recommendations of the DCMI Abstract Model, which outlines the principles for creating metadata. The DCMI Abstract Model governs the creation of the Dublin Core metadata standard upon which Darwin Core is based. The requirements of ISO/IEC 11179-4/2004 standard for the definition of metadata were also taken into consideration. The research is in progress, so what is exposed in this article are preliminary results. A prototype of a metadata record for the field of ecological interactions, which is the scope of research within agrobiodiversity, was created to demonstrate the format that metadata will have when the extension is finalized. This research represents an initial effort to propose more effective tools for agrobiodiversity data management, but it is necessary to mature and deepen the discussions around the conceptual aspects of the ecological interactions in agrobiodiversity and the relationship of the new metadata extension with the term set of the Darwin Core, as well a robust methodology to create DwC extensions is still pending of being developed.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Metadata, Metadata extension, Darwin Core, Agrobiodiversity, Information representation
Subjects: I. Information treatment for information services > ID. Knowledge representation.
I. Information treatment for information services > IE. Data and metadata structures.
I. Information treatment for information services > IF. Information transfer: protocols, formats, techniques.
I. Information treatment for information services > IG. Information presentation: hypertext, hypermedia.
Depositing user: Filipi Miranda Soares
Date deposited: 01 May 2022 12:56
Last modified: 01 May 2022 12:56


Alves, R. C. Web Semântica: uma análise focada no uso de metadados, 2005. Universidade Estadual Paulista, PhD dissertation.

Alves, R. C. “Metadados para representação e recuperação da informação em ambiente Web”. Proceedings of the 4th Seminar on Museum Information Services: Digital Information as Cultural Heritage, São Paulo, 2016.

Arnaud, E., et al. Final report of the task group on GBIF data fitness for use in agrobiodiversity. GBIF, 2016.

Body, G., et al. “Applying the Darwin core standard to the monitoring of wildlife species, their management and estimated records”. EFSA Supporting Publications vol. 17, no. 4, 2020, p. 01-77, doi: 10.2903/sp.efsa.2020.en-1841. Accessed 3 march 2020.

Bray, T., et al. Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0. W3C, 26 November 2008. Accessed 25 November 2020.

Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA). Embrapa em números. Brasília, 2019.

Brickley, D., et al. RDF Schema 1.1: W3C Recommendation 25 February 2014. W3C, 25 Feb. 2014. Accessed 25 November 2020.

Cain, M. L., et al. Ecology. 4th ed. Sinauer Associates, 2017.

Cassini, S. T. Ecologia: conceitos fundamentais. PPGEA-UFES, 2005.

Chu, H. Information representation and retrieval: an overview. Information Today, 2005.

Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). COP 5 Decisions: Agricultural biological diversity: Review of phase I of the programme of work and adoption of a multi-year work programme: Annex: Programme of work on agricultural biodiversity. CBD, 2000. Accessed 3 march 2020.

Coyle, K. DCAM Explained, 2008. Accessed 3 march 2020.

Darwin Core and RDF/OWL Task Groups. Darwin Core RDF guide. TDWG, 2015. Accessed 3 march 2020.

Darwin Core Task Group. Darwin Core text guide. TDWG, 2009a. Accessed 3 march 2020.

Darwin Core Task Group. Simple Darwin Core. TDWG, 2009b. Accessed 3 march 2020.

Darwin Core Task Group. Darwin Core XML guide. TDWG, 2009c. Accessed 3 march 2020.

Darwin Core Task Group. Darwin Core basic vocabulary. TDWG, 2009d. Accessed 3 march 2020.

DCMI Usage Board. DCMI Metadata Terms: date, 2020. Accessed 3 march 2020.

FAO. Why bees matter: the importance of bees and other pollinators for food and agriculture. FAO, 2018.

ISO, and IEC. ISO/IEC 11179-4: information technology: metadata registries (MDR): part 4: formulation of data definitions. 2nd ed. ISO, 2004.

ISO, and IEC. ISO/IEC 11179-6: information technology: metadata registries (MDR): part 6: registration. ISO, 2015.

Kenis, M., et al. Guide to the classical biological control of insect pests in planted and natural forests. FAO, 2019.

Lourenço, C. A. “Representação de informação, metadados, interoperabilidade e recuperação da informação na atualidade”. Proceedings of the 2nd Seminário do Grupo de Pesquisa , Belo Horizonte, 2016.

National Information Standards Organization. Understanding Metadata. NISO Press, 2004.

National Information Standards Organization. A framework of guidance for building good digital collections. 3rd ed. NISO Press, 2007.

Odum, E. P., and Barret, G. W. Fundamentals of ecology. 5th ed. Thomson Brooks/Cole, 2005.

Oxford University Press. Oxford Learner's Dictionaries, 2020. Accessed 3 march 2020.

Pacheco, D. J., and Corrêa-Ferreira, B. S. “Parasitismo de Telenomus podisi Ashmead (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) em populações de percevejos pragas da soja”. Anais da Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil vol. 29, no. 2, 2000, p. 295-302.

Pinto-Coelho, R. M. Fundamentos em ecologia. Artmed, 2007.

Pomerantz, J. Metadata. The MIT Press, 2015.

Powell, A., et al. “DCMI Abstract Model”. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, 2007. Accessed 3 march 2020.

RDF Working Group. “Resource Description Framework (RDF)”. W3C Semantic Web, 25 Feb. 2014. Accessed 3 March 2020.

Riley, J. Understanding Metadata: what is Metadata, and what is it for?: a primer. NISO, 2017.

Soares, F. M. Princípios para a criação de uma extensão de metadados sobre interações ecológicas na agrobiodiversidade para o padrão Darwin Core, 2019. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Master’s thesis. Accessed 3 march 2020.

Soares, F. M., et al. “Linking Agrobiodiversity Data through Metadata Standards”. Biodiversity Information Science and

Standards, vol. 4, 2020, p. e58928. doi:10.3897/biss.4.58928. Accessed 3 march 2020.

Soares, F. M., et al. “Darwin Core for Agricultural Biodiversity: A metadata extension proposal”. Biodiversity Information

Science and Standards vol. 3, 2019, p. e37053. doi: 10.3897/biss.3.37053. Accessed 3 march 2020.

Sorci, G., and Garnier, S. “Parasitism”. Encyclopedia of Ecology, edited by S. E. Jørgensen and B. F. Fath. Elsevier, 2008, pp 2645-2650. doi: 10.1016/B978-008045405-4.00814-4. Accessed 3 march 2020.

Stein, R. T. Ecologia geral. SAGAH, 2018.

Wieczorek, J., et al. “Darwin Core: an evolving community-developed biodiversity data standard”. PloS one, vol. 7, no. 1, 2012, p. e29715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029715. Accessed 3 march 2020.

Wilkinson, M. D., M. Dumontier, I. J. Aalbersberg, G. Appleton, M. Axton, A. Baak, N. Blomberg, et al. “The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship”. Scientific data, vol. 3, 2016, pp. 160018. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18. Accessed 3 march 2020.

Zeng, M. L. “Metadata basics”. Version 2.0, 2015. Accessed 3 march 2020.

Zeng, M. L., and Qin, J. Metadata. Neal-Scguman Publishers, 2008.


Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item