Analysing Open Access Uptake by Academic and Research Institutions in India

Nazim, Mohammad Analysing Open Access Uptake by Academic and Research Institutions in India. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 2021, vol. 41, n. 2, pp. 108-115. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of 32 Analysing  Open Access  Uptake  by Academic  and  Research  Institutions  in  India (2).pdf]
Preview
Text
32 Analysing Open Access Uptake by Academic and Research Institutions in India (2).pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (2MB) | Preview

English abstract

The study analyses Open Access (OA) uptake by the Indian academic and research institutions concerning their research productivity. Publication data of 36 universities have been retrieved from the 2020 record of CWTS Leiden Ranking database. Findings of the study show that around 23 per cent of all publications of these universities are openly accessible, and their median OA publications proportion is much lower than the median measure of universities worldwide (43 %). ‘Green OA’ reserved the first place with 17 per cent of occurrence, and Biomedical and Health Sciences have achieved the highest median (34.37 %). The study concludes with a vision towards increasing the global collaboration of the academic institutions regarding OA following the account of the Indian achievements.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Open Access (OA), Gold OA, Green OA, Bronze OA, Hybrid OA, CWTS Leiden Ranking, Indian University
Subjects: E. Publishing and legal issues.
E. Publishing and legal issues. > ED. Intellectual property: author's rights, ownership, copyright, copyleft, open access.
Depositing user: Dr. Mohammad Nazim
Date deposited: 07 May 2024 12:28
Last modified: 07 May 2024 12:28
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/43160

References

1. Ginsparg, P. ArXiv at 20. Nature, 2011, 476, 145–147. doi:10.1038/476145a.

2. Burns, C., Lana, A. & Budd, J. Institutional repositories: Exploration of costs and value. D-Lib Magazine: The Magazine of the Digital Library Forum, 2013, 19(1/2), 1-16.

3. Fausto, S. The evolution of open access: A brief history. URI: https://blog.scielo.org/en/2013/10/21/the-evolution-of-open-access-a-brief-history/#.X2PD2HVS-Hs (accessed on 29 August 2020).

4. Harnad, S. Open access to peer-reviewed research through author/institution self-archiving: Maximising research impact by maximising online access. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, 2003, 49(4).

5. Kriegeskorte, N., Walther, A. & Deca, D. An emerging consensus for open evaluation: 18 visions for the future of scientific publishing. Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2012, 6, 94. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2012.00094.

6. Nazim, M. Bibliometric analysis of gold open access in India. International Information & Library Review, 2018, 49(2), 1-11. doi: 10.1080/10572317.2017.1326246.

7. Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Larivière, V., Alperin, J. P., Matthias, L., Norlander, B., Farley, A., West, J. & Haustein, S. The state of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ – Life & Environment, 2018, 6(e4375), doi: 10.7717/peerj.4375.

8. Mishra, D. Authors are vying with Pokémon and Taylor Swift: Meghna Pant. The Hindu, March 23, 2019. URI: https://www.frontlist.in/authors/authors-are-vying-with-pokemon-and-taylor-swift-meghna-pant/ (accessed on 29 August 2020).

9. Press Trust of India. Indian book market to touch 739 billion by 2020: Survey. India Today, December 1, 2015. URI: https://www.indiatoday.in/pti-feed/story/indian-book-market-to-touch-739-billion-by-2020-survey-522296-2015-12-01 (accessed on 30 August 2020).

10. Devasar, Nitasha. Publishers on publishing: Inside India's book business, All About Book Publishing, New Delhi, 2018.

11. FICCI & Nielsen (India) Private Limited. K-12 Book Publishing: Market Report 2016. URI: http://ficci.in/spdocument/20791/FICCI%20-Nielsen-Report-2016.pdf (accessed on 30 August 2020).

12. Shearer, Kathleen; Yamaji, Kazu; & Repanas, Kostas. Asian open access meeting report: April 2016. National Institute of Informatics and Confederation of Open Access Repositories, Tokyo, Japan, 2016. URI: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjr7OfLkfHrAhWZWisKHaAsC_sQFjAAegQIBBAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.coar-repositories.org%2Ffiles%2FOpen-Access-Asia-Report.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1dxg_61Pztzd4EOUo59s8D (accessed on 30 August 2020).

13. OpenDoar. OpenDOAR statistics. URI: https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/view/repository_visualisations/1.html (accessed on 30 August 2020).

14. Naika, M. & Pathak, S.K. India's open access future. Nature India. doi:10.1038/nindia.2020.

15. Springer Nature Limited. Nature Index: Country/territory output. URI: https://www.natureindex.com/country-outputs/generate/All/global/All/score (accessed on 29 August 2020).

16. Husain, S. & Nazim, M. Analysis of open access scholarly journals in media and communication. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 2013, 33(5), 405-411.

17. Jhamb, G. & Samim, A. Contribution to open access repository by the central universities of India: A case study of shodhganga. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 2017, 1559.

18. Loan, F.A. & Sheikh, S. Analytical study of open access health and medical repositories. The Electronic Library, 2016, 34(3), 419-434.

19. Mukherjee, B. & Nazim, M. Open access institutional archives: A quantitative study (2006-2010). DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 2011, 31(4), 317-324.

20. Nazim, Mohammad and Ahmadi, Ashiya. Open access to scholarly communication in India: current status. In 5th International Symposium on Emerging Trends and Technologies in Libraries and Information Services, 21-23 February 2018, Noida, India. 2018. pp. 202-209. doi: 10.1109/ETTLIS.2018.8485196 (accessed on 29 August 2020).

21. Sabha Ali, S.J. & Iram, A. Status of open access repositories: A global perspective. International Journal of Knowledge Management and Practices, 2013, 1(1), 35-42.

22. Singh, P. Scholarly publishing in India: The mapping of open access journals indexed in DOAJ. Chinese Librarianship: An International Electronic Journal, 2018, 45, 29-42.

23. Kumar, V. & Mahesh, G. Open access repositories in India: a lost opportunity. Current Science, 2017, 112(2), 210-212.

24. Dhawan, S.M., Gupta, B.M. & Gupta, R. Scientometric assessment of Indian publications on rare earths during 2005-14. SRELS Journal of Information Management, 2016, 53(4), 271-279.

25. Mondal, D., Chakrabarti, B. & Maity, A. Publications output of the Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science during 2008-2017: A scientometric assessment. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 2019, 39(5), 244-250. doi:10.14429/djlit.39.5.14572.

26. Nazim, M. & Ashar, M. Do open access journals have greater citation impact? A study of journals in health and medical sciences in India. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 2018, 15(3/4), 149-164. doi: 10.1080/15424065.2018.1554464.

27. Nazim, M. & Zia, S. Acceptance and adoption of open access publishing by researchers in India. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 2019, 68(1/2), 148-158. doi:10.1108/GKMC-09-2018-0077.

28. Nazim, M. & Zia, S. Use of open access publishing by researchers: An analysis of open access availability of research literature in the field of digital library. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 2020, 40(1), 366-373. doi: 10.14429/djlit.40.1.15045.

29. Piryani, R., Dua, J. & Singh, V.K. Open access levels and patterns in scholarly articles from India. Current Science, 2019, 117(9), 1435-1440.

30. Robinson-Garcia N, Costas R & van Leeuwen TN. Open access uptake by universities worldwide. PeerJ – Life & Environment, 2020, 8(e9410), doi: 10.7717/peerj.9410.

31. Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, Netherlands. CWTS Leiden ranking 2020. URI: https://www.leidenranking.com/information/universities (accessed on 23 August 2020).


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item