Analyzing the Collaboration Network of Global Scientific Outputs in the Field of Bibliotherapy in the Web of Science Database

Khoeini, Soheila and Noruzi, Alireza and Jozi, Zeinab and Mostafavi, Esmaeil Analyzing the Collaboration Network of Global Scientific Outputs in the Field of Bibliotherapy in the Web of Science Database. Payavard Salamat, 2022, vol. 15, n. 6, pp. 562-577. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[img]
Preview
 Text
bibliotherapy.pdf
Download (10MB) | Preview

English abstract

Background and Aim: Bibliotherapy is a useful treatment for the prevention and treatment of mental disorders and has led to the formation of many scientific publications in this field. The purpose of this study was to investigate the publication trends in the field of bibliotherapy and visualize the structure of its scientific collaborations based on the Web of Science database during the period 1975 to 2020. Materials and Methods: The present scientometric study was conducted by citation analysis and social network analysis. The statistical population includes 1032 documents published. HistCite, VOSveiwer, Pajek, and UciNet software were used to analyze the data. The co-authorship networks were analyzed and drawn by the VOSviewer software. Results: The U.S., the UK, and Australia were ranked first to third with 369, 148, and 91 documents respectively. The documents published by researchers from these three countries have received 10547, 3459, and 3041 citations, respectively. The Universities of Alabama, Nevada, and the Karolinska Institutet in Sweden published the most in this field, with 29, 26, and 21 documents. Scogin F, Cuijpers P, and Rohde P were the most prolific authors with 29, 21, and 17 documents, respectively. Miller WR, Cuijpers P, and Andersson G received the most citations with 2441, 2298, and 1750, citations respectively. The UK with 63 degree centrality, the U.S. the most influential country with a betweenness centrality of 191.450 and the closeness centrality of the 80 were the most influential countries, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam with a betweenness centrality of 1416.755 and a closeness centrality of 658 and the Karolinska Institute with a degree centrality of 43 was the most influential organizations. Rohde P with 39-degree centrality and Cuijpers P with 314.500 betweenness centrality and 821 closeness centrality were the most active author in the co-authorship networks in bibliotherapy. Journal of Clinical Counseling and Psychology was the most cited and the Journal of Poetry Therapy published the most documents. Conclusion: Paying more attention than before to the cooperation of countries, universities and active authors in the field of bibliotherapy can lead to more knowledge and experience exchange in developed and developing countries.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Scientific Collaboration Analysis, Network Analysis, Co-Authorship Networks, Network Centrality, Co-Citation Analysis, Bibliotherapy
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BB. Bibliometric methods
C. Users, literacy and reading. > CF. Reading and story telling.
Depositing user: Dr. Alireza Noruzi
Date deposited: 24 May 2022 09:34
Last modified: 24 May 2022 09:34
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/43227

References

1. Floyd M, Scogin F, McKendree-Smith NL, Floyd DL & Rokke PD. Coganaitive therapy depression: A comparison of individual psychotherapy and bibliotherapy for depressed older adult. Behvior Modification 2004; 28(2): 297-318.

2. Ahmadvand A, Sepehrmanesh Z, Ghoreyshi F, Assarian F, Moosavi GA, Saee R, et al. Prevalence of mental disorders in general population of Kashan city. Iranian Journal of Epidemiology 2010; 6(2): 16-24[Article in Persian].

3. Nour Bala AA, Namani F, Yahyavi Dizej J, Anvari S & Mahmoudpour Azari M. Burden of mental disorders: A study of the middle east countries for the period 2000-2017. Journal of Medical Council of Iran 2020; 38(1): 19-26[Article in Persian].

4. Alonso J, Chatterji S & He Y. The burdens of mental disorders: Gloobal perspectives from WHO world mental health surveys. Available at: https://accessbiomedicalscience.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?bookid=710&sectionid=46796918

5. Alonso J, Angermeyer MC, Bernert S, Bruffaerts R, Brugha TS, Bryson H, et al. Prevalence of mental disorders in Europe: Results from the European study of the epidemiology of mental disorders (ESEMeD) project. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 2004; 109(S 420): 21-7.

6. Haddad M, Vistorte AOR, Haddad GG, Ribeiro W, Ziebold C, Asevedo E, et al. Management of common mental disorders should take place in primary health or specialized care? Clinical decisions of psychiatrists from Latin American countries. PLOS One 2022; 17(4): e0265308.

7. Gravenhorst F, Muaremi A, Bardram J, Grunerbl A, Mayora O, Wurzer G, et al. Mobile phones as medical devices in mental disorder treatment: An overview. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 2015; 19(2): 335-53.

8. Fanner D & Urquhart C. Bibliotherapy for mental health service users Part 1: A systematic review. Health Information and Libraries Journal 2008; 25(4): 237-52.

9. World Health Organization (WHO). Global Health Observartory data repository. Available at: https://apps.who.int/gho/data/node.sdg.3-4-data?lang=en

10. Montazeri A, Mousavi SJ, Omidvari S, Tavousi M, Hashemi A & Rostami T. Depression in Iran: A systematic review of the literature (2000-2010). Payesh 2013; 12(6): 567-94[Article in Persian].

11. Salehi A, Mazaheri Z, Aghajani Z & Jahanbazi B. The role of cognitive emotion regulation strategies in the prediction of depression. Knowledge and Research in Applied Psychology 2017; 16(1): 108-17[Article in Persian].

12. Baghani E, Fata L, Salehi M & Hassani F. Prediction of suicide ideation based on the attentional bias in clinical and non-clinical populations. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology 2020; 26(1): 76-101[Article in Persian].

13. Iranian Legal Medicine Organization. Forensice medicine in the media (Suicide statistics in Iran). Available at: https://www.lmo.ir/web_directory/54732

14. Tavakol M & Farahani H. Sociological study of mental disorders: A case study in Arak. Journal of Bioethics 2017; 7(26): 7-21[Article in Persian].

15. Patten SB. The global burden of disease 2010 update: Keeping mental health in the spotlight. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 2014; 23(3): 255-7.

16. Zare H, Nazer M & Sayyadi AR. Frequency of mental disorders and factors related to suicide in patients referring to emergency ward of Ali Ebne Abitaleb hospital of Rafsanjan in 2007. Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services 2010; 9(3): 221-32[Article in Persian].

17. World Health Organization (WHO). Preventing suicide: A resource for counsellors. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43487/9241594314_eng.pdf

18. Hogdahl L, Birgegard A & Bjorck C. How effective is bibliotherapy-based self-help cognitive behavioral therapy with Internet support in clinical settings? Results from a pilot study. Eating and Weight Disorders (EWD) 2013; 18(1): 37-44.

19. Moldovan R, Cobeanu O & David D. Cognitive bibliotherapy for mild depressive symptomatology: Randomized clinical trial of efficacy and mechanisms of change. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy 2013; 20(6): 482-93.

20. Rohde P, Stice E, Shaw H & Briere FN. Indicated cognitive behavioral group depression prevention compared to bibliotherapy and brochure control: Acute effects of an effectiveness trial with adolescents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2014; 82(1): 65-74.

21. Stip E, Ostlundh L & Abdel Aziz K. Bibliotherapy: Reading OVID during COVID. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.567539/full

22. World Health Organization. World Suicide Prevention Day 2008. Available at: https://www.who.int/mental_health/prevention/suicide/wspd_2008_statement.pdf

23. Hamilton DR. Suicide as an escape from pain: An analysis of suicide notes and case files [Thesis]. USA: Wright State University; 2013.

24. Surulinathi M, Muthuraj A & Rajkumar T. Measuring the research productivity on bibliotherapy: A global perspective. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323935059_Measuring_the_Research_Productivity_on_Bibliotherapy_A_Global_Perspective

25. Bigdeli Z & Taherzadeh Mousavian SS. Can librarians play a role in bibliotherapy? Health Information Management 2014; 11(2): 270-84 [Article in Persian].

26. Mostafavi I, Esmaeil Pounaki E & Khoieni S. Co-authoring patterns and subject trends of scientific documents produced by psychology researchers at Universities of Tehran city in web of science database. Scientometrics Research Journal 2021; 7(13): 183-202 [Article in Persian].

27. Mahmoudkhani M. Investigating the status of scientific products and the co-occurrence of keywords in the field of tax based on web of science-indexed papers. Scientometrics Research Journal 2021; 7(14): 115-36 [Article in Persian].

28. Hamdipour A, Atapour H & Ghasemzadeh F. Analysis of the publication process in the field of road accidents and injuries and visualization of its scientific structure. Journal of Payavard Salamat 2021; 15(1): 26-38 [Article in Persian].

29. Newman ME. A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks. Social Networks 2005; 27(1): 39-54.

30. Chung KKS, Hossain L & Davis J. Exploring sociocentric and egocentric approaches for social network analysis. Available at: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.494.5446&rep=rep1&type=pdf

31. Cheng B. Using social network analysis to investigate potential bias in editorial peer review in core journals of comparative/ international education [Thesis]. USA: Brigham Young University; 2006.

32. Soheili F & Osareh F. Concepts of centrality and density in scientific and social networks. Journal of National Studies on Librarianship and Information Organization 2013; 24(3): 92-108[Article in Persian].

33. Khoeini S & Norouzi A. State of the art of bibliotherapy in Iran. Scientific Communication 2015; 38(2): 1-16 [Article in Persian].

34. Levin L & Gildea R. Bibliotherapy: Tracing the roots of a moral therapy movement in the United States from the early Nineteenth century to the present. Journal of the Medical Library Association (JMLA) 2013; 101(2): 89-91.

35. Sharif Moghadam H, Amiri MR & Safipour Afshar A. Bibliotherapy and its position in medical library and information science. Journal of Modern Medical Information Sciences 2016; 2(1): 54[Article in Persian].

36. Mirjalili SH & Akrami Abarghoi S. Most cited authors in the field of clinical medicine: A concentration on its transdisciplinary relations in ISI. Health Information Management 2010; 7(3): 283-92 [Article in Persian].

37. Zhou X, Zhang Y, Furukawa TA, Cuijpers P, Pu J, Weisz JR, et al. Different types and acceptability of psychotherapies for acute anxiety disorders in children and adolescents: A network meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry 2019; 76(1): 41-50.

38. Rastehmoghaddam A, Abbaspour A & Jalali Dizaji A. Reflection on global scientific legacy of educational management. Journal of Management and Planning in Educational Systems 2016; 9(16): 51-84 [Article in Persian].


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS