Open Access Monitor Germany: Best Practice in Providing Metrics for Analysis and Decision-Making

Barbers, Irene and Stanzel, Franziska and Mittermaier, Bernhard Open Access Monitor Germany: Best Practice in Providing Metrics for Analysis and Decision-Making. Serials Review, 2022, pp. 1-14. [Journal article (Unpaginated)]

[img]
Preview
 Text
Serials-Review_OAM_Postprint.pdf
Download (1MB) | Preview

English abstract

In light of the ongoing transformation of scholarly publishing toward open access, libraries need data-based tools that enable them to make decisions that respond to the challenges posed by this shift. Tasks such as collection development, applications for funding, or consulting researchers on publication venues require a solid base of data, which is not always easily available to librarians. Funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), the Open Access Monitor Germany (OAM) aims to provide libraries, funders, and researchers with a freely available tool that presents data on publications and citations for analysis. The OAM records the publication output of German academic institutions in scientific journals. Through analyses of subscription fees and (open access) publication fees, it helps to monitor and support the transition of the publishing system toward an open access system. To this end, data from existing sources are collated within an expanded database, made available to users in an open interface, and disseminated by means of scientific publications. The OAM draws on sources such as Unpaywall, Dimensions, Web of Science, Scopus, and OpenAPC. Unpaywall is used as a central data source for publication metadata including open access availability; this data is then matched with Crossref data for journal-level metadata and finally with Dimensions, Web of Science and Scopus data for affiliations and citation data. The connection to OpenAPC provides data on publication costs for each participating institution. The interface https://open-access-monitor.de/publications presents users with a wide range of filters that can be used to customize the underlying data in line with specific needs. Users can switch between Dimensions, Web of Science and Scopus affiliations and make use of different analysis types including publication analyses, cost analyses, and citation analyses. Results are presented as tables as well as charts and can be downloaded for further use. In the future, additional data sources including subscriptions to scientific journals and subscription payments will be integrated to allow the shift in payment flows in the changing publication market to be observed. The integration of data from the electronic resource management system LAS:eR has already been initiated and will soon be completed. Moreover, interfaces will be created to connect the Alma and FOLIO systems. Together with data on publication costs, this will provide participating institutions with easily accessible overview of their total costs, thus enabling them to calculate an integrated budget for subscriptions and publications. Institutions using the OAM are advised with regard to analyzing data and technically integrating the OAM into their own applications. Small and medium-sized publishers from German-speaking countries are supported in the negotiation of transformation contracts by means of data from the OAM. The OAM project team also conducts studies that address a number of scientific issues, for example the impact of open access on scientific networks and the role of open access in the field of monographs. The relationship between open access and the citation rates of published works is another possible research area that can be addressed with the help of the OAM.

Item type: Journal article (Unpaginated)
Keywords: Open Access; Monitoring; Scholarly publication system
Subjects: E. Publishing and legal issues. > ED. Intellectual property: author's rights, ownership, copyright, copyleft, open access.
F. Management. > FC. Finance.
L. Information technology and library technology
Depositing user: Irene Barbers
Date deposited: 10 Jun 2022 06:17
Last modified: 10 Jun 2022 06:17
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/43265

References

Anonymous. (2003). Berlin declaration on open access to knowledge in the sciences and humanities. https://openaccess.mpg.de/67605/berlin_declaration_engl.pdf

Barbers, I., Kalinna, N., & Mittermaier, B. (2018). Data-driven transition: Joint reporting of subscription expenditure and publication costs. Publications, 6(2), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications6020019

Barbers, I., & Pollack, P. (2021). Open Access in Deutschland: Entwicklung in den Jahren 2005 - 2019. Forschungszentrum Jülich, Zentralbibliothek. http://hdl.handle.net/2128/27849

Butkovich, N. J. (1996). Use studies: A selective review. Library Resources & Technical Services, 40, 359–368

Chan, L., Cuplinskas, D., Eisen, M., Friend, F., Genova, Y., Guédon, J.-C., Hagemann, M., Harnad, S., Johnson, R., Kupryte, R., LaManfredi, Rév, I., Segbert, M., deSidnei, Suber, P., & Velterop, J. (2002). Budapest open access initiative. https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read

Clark, R. (2020). Browsable title list. https://www.crossref.org/documentation/reports/browsable-title-list/

Dhakal, K. (2019). Unpaywall. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 107(2), 286–288. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.650

Doenges, H. (2017). Non-disclosure clauses: The making, breaking, and remaking of relationships [PhD thesis, University of Washington; School of Law]. https://depts.washington.edu/uwlawlib/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Doenges2017.pdf

Gray, A. (2015). Considering non-open access publication charges in the “total cost of publication.” Publications, 3(4), 248–262. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications3040248

Hendricks, G., Tkaczyk, D., Lin, J., & Feeney, P. (2020). Crossref: The sustainable source of community-owned scholarly metadata. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 414–427. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00022

Hey, T., Tansley, S., & Tolle, K. (2009). The fourth paradigm: Data-intensive scientific discovery. Microsoft Research. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/fourth-paradigm-data-intensive-scientific-discovery/

Johnson, Rob & Chiarell, Andrea (2017). Defining and Prototyping an Open Access Dashboard. Final Report, Prepared on Behalf of JISC. https://scholarlycommunications.jiscinvolve.org/wp/files/2017/09/Defining-and-Prototyping-an-OA-Dashboard-Final-Report-Abridged.pdf

Kloth, H. (2021). openCost - Universität Regensburg. https://www.uni-regensburg.de/bibliothek/projekte/opencost/index.html

Mittermaier, B. (2021). Transformationsverträge – Stairway to Heaven oder Highway to Hell? 027.7 Zeitschrift Für Bibliothekskultur / Journal for Library Culture, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.21428/1bfadeb6.d80f0652

Olijhoek, T., Bjørnshauge, L., & Mitchell, D. (2015). Criteria for open access and publishing. ScienceOpen Research. https://doi.org/10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-EDU.AMHUHV.v1

OpenAPC. (2021). Collect and disseminate information on fee-based Open Access publishing. https://github.com/OpenAPC/openapc-de

Pieper, D., & Broschinski, C. (2018). OpenAPC: A contribution to a transparent and reproducible monitoring of fee-based open access publishing across institutions and nations. Insights, 31. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.439

ROR Leadership Team. (2021). ROR and GRID: The way forward. https://ror.org/blog/2021-07-12-ror-grid-the-way-forward/

Schimmer, R., Geschuhn, K. K., & Vogler, A. (2015). Disrupting the subscription journals’ business model for the necessary large-scale transformation to open access. https://doi.org/10.17617/1.3

Schonfeld, R. C. (2018). A new citation database launches today: dimensions. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2018/01/15/new-citation-database-dimensions/

Singh, V. K., Singh, P., Karmakar, M., Leta, J., & Mayr, P. (2021). The journal coverage of web of science, scopus and dimensions: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 126(6), 5113–5142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5

Smith, D. (2009). According to Microsoft, the fourth paradigm of science is data (Revolution Analytics, Ed.). https://blog.revolutionanalytics.com/2009/12/fourth-paradigm.html

Wagner, A. (2018). APC-Verwaltung im institutionellen Repositorium: GMS Medizin - Bibliothek - Information; 18(3):Doc21. https://doi.org/10.3205/MBI000422

Wahlig, R. (2018). Der Nationale Statistikserver. Vom Projekt zum nationalen Dienst. https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/docId/3583


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Altmetric
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS