Digitization of Cultural Objects in the Context of Cultural Heritage (Libraries, Archives and Museums)

Rabiei, Mahboubeh and Rezaei Sharifabadi, saeid Digitization of Cultural Objects in the Context of Cultural Heritage (Libraries, Archives and Museums). Journal of Knowledge-Research Studies, 2022, vol. 1, n. 2, pp. 20-40. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of JKRS_Volume 1_Issue 2_Pages 20-40.pdf]
Preview
Text
JKRS_Volume 1_Issue 2_Pages 20-40.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (888kB) | Preview

English abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to analyze the benefits and limitations of digitization of cultural heritage objects in the context of cultural heritage (Libraries, archives, and museums) and to increase the focus and attention to the digitization of cultural heritage objects that are at risk. Methodology: This study has been done by a systematic review of resources in the Scopus database. The retrieved resources are then analyzed and visualized by Excel and VOSviewer software. Findings: Digitization of cultural heritage objects affects the way of access, protection, and management of cultural heritage and has led to the democratization of content, increased global access, and preservation of cultural heritage objects. Digitization will stimulate the integration of libraries, archives, and museums in the context of cultural heritage due to the numerous overlaps in terms of public functions. Digitization of cultural heritage objects also has challenges such as financial issues, lack of expertise skills, legal restrictions on intellectual property, technology obsolescence, the digital divide in societies, the risk of distortion and alteration of information and metadata in the web environment, and finally, the user perceives the sensation of a digitized object relative to its physical version. Conclusion: Digitization of cultural heritage objects by advanced technologies, in addition to paving the way for the integration of libraries, archives, and museums, has created a new renaissance for cultural heritage objects in the context of cultural heritage. The role of digitization of cultural heritage objects in libraries, archives, and museums is significant, especially during the Covid 19 Pandemic, for remote access and greater audience access to cultural centers. However, it is important to note that our approach to digitalization should be modular, extensible, and flexible to be effective in sustainable protection. Let us also keep in mind that the digitization of cultural heritage objects, with all its benefits, will never replace physical experiences, but will complement and accompany natural cultural objects in the context of cultural heritage. Value: This study, for the first time, analyzes the benefits and limitations of digitization of cultural heritage objects in the context of cultural heritage and can be useful for decision-makers and policymakers in the field of cultural heritage.

Persian abstract

هدف: هدف مطالعه حاضر بررسی مزایا و محدودیت‌های دیجیتالی شدن میراث فرهنگی در بافت میراث فرهنگی (کتابخانه‌ها، آرشیوها و موزه‌ها ) و افزایش تمرکز و توجه به دیجیتالی شدن اشیاء میراث فرهنگی در معرض خطر و آسیب است. روش: این مطالعه به شیوه مرور نظام‌مند منابع موجود در پایگاه اسکوپوس انجام گرفته است منابع بازیابی شده با استفاده از نرم‌افزار اکسل و وی اس ویور تحلیل و بصری سازی شده است. یافته‌ها: دیجیتالی شدن اشیاء میراث فرهنگی، شیوه دسترسی، حفاظت و مدیریت میراث فرهنگی را تحت تاثیر قرار می‌دهد و موجب دموکراتیزه شدن محتوا، افزایش دسترسی جهانی و حفاظت از اشیاء میراث فرهنگی شده است. دیجیتالی شدن، محرک همگرایی بیشتر کتابخانه‌ها، آرشیوها و موزه‌ها در بافت میراث فرهنگی به دلیل هم‌پوشانی‌های متعددی به لحاظ وظایف عمومی بین آن‌ها خواهد شد. همچنین دیجیتالی شدن اشیاء میراث فرهنگی با چالش‌هایی نظیر مواجه‌شدن با مسائل و محدودیت‌های مالی، کمبود مهارت نیروی متخصص، محدودیت‌های حقوقی مربوط به مالکیت معنوی، منسوخ شدن فناوری‌ها، شکاف دیجیتالی موجود در جوامع، خطر تحریف و تغییر اطلاعات و فراداده‌ها در محیط وب و نهایتاً حس دریافت شده توسط کاربر از یک شیء دیجیتالی شده نسبت به نسخه فیزیکی آن، مواجه است. نتیجه‌: دیجیتالی شدن اشیاء میراث فرهنگی به‌وسیله فناوری‌های پیشرفته، علاوه بر اینکه مسیر همگرایی کتابخانه‌ها ، آرشیوها و موزه‌ها را هموار می‌سازد، رنسانسی جدید برای اشیاء میراث فرهنگی در بافت میراث فرهنگی به وجود آورده است. نقش دیجیتالی شدن اشیاء میراث فرهنگی در کتابخانه‌ها، آرشیوها و موزه‌ها به‌ویژه در دوران همه‌گیری کووید-19 برای دسترسی از راه دور و جذب مخاطبان بیشتر به مراکز فرهنگی قابل‌ملاحظه است. با این‌وجود توجه به این نکته ضروری است که رویکرد ما به دیجیتال‌سازی می‌بایست رویکردی مدولار، قابل توسعه و انعطاف‌پذیر باشد تا در حفاظت پایدار موثر واقع شود. همچنین این مسئله را مدنظر قرار دهیم که دیجیتالی شدن اشیاء میراث فرهنگی با تمام مزایایی که دربر دارد، هرگز جایگزین تجربیات فیزیکی نخواهد بود، بلکه مکمل و همراه اشیاء فرهنگی واقعی در بافت میراث فرهنگی است. اصالت و ارزش: مطالعه حاضر برای نخستین بار، به تحلیل مزایا و محدودیت‌های دیجیتالی شدن اشیاء میراث فرهنگی در بافت میراث فرهنگی پرداخته است و می‌تواند، راهگشای تصمیم‌گیرندگان و سیاست‌گذاران حوزه میراث فرهنگی واقع شود.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Digital Cultural Heritage; Cultural Heritage Context; Digital Cultural Objects
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BF. Information policy
Depositing user: Rasoul Zavaraqi
Date deposited: 22 Sep 2022 19:51
Last modified: 22 Sep 2022 19:51
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/43539

References

Arpin, R. (2000) Notre patrimoine, un présent du passé. Documentation et Bibliothèques,47, 3–45.

Baca, M., E. Coburn & S. Hubbard (2008) ‘Metadata and Museum Information’, In P. Marty and K. Burton Jones (Eds), Museum Informatics. People, Information, And Technology in Museums, New York: Routledge:107–128.

Baldini, G., Barboni, M., Bono, F., Delipetrev, B., Duch Brown, N., Fernandez Macias, E., & Nepelski, D. (2019). Digital Transformation in Transport, Construction, Energy, Government and Public Administration.

Barbara, J. (2020). Classification of gameplay interaction in digital cultural heritage. In Proceedings of the Digital Games Research Association Conference,1-13.

Champion, E. (2021). Preserving Authenticity in Virtual Heritage. In: Champion, E. M. (ed.) Virtual Heritage: A Guide: 129–137. London: Ubiquity Press. Doi: https://doi.org /10.5334/bck.l. License: CC-BY-NC.

Choi, Y., Yang, Y. J., & Sohn, H. G. (2021). Resilient Cultural Heritage Through Digital Cultural Heritage Cube: Two Cases in South Korea. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 48, 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2021.01.007

Dabler R., Preub, U. (2020) Digital Preservation of Cultural Heritage for Small Institutions. In: Kremers H. (Eds) Digital Cultural Heritag, pp.109-117.

Dempsey, L. (1999). Scientific, industrial, and cultural heritage: a shared approach. Ariadne: Web Magazine for Information Professionals, No. 22, January, 15.

Duff, W.M., Carter, J., Cherry, J.M, MacNeil, H.& Howarth, L.C (2013), From coexistence to convergence: studying partnerships and collaboration among libraries, archives and museums, Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 18 (3), n3.

Friedlander, A (2017).Summary of Findings In Building a National Strategy for Digital Preservation: Issues In Digital Media Archiving, Archived 2017-07-10 At The WaybackMachine Council On Library And Information Resources And Library Of Congress.

Henningsen, E. & Larsen, H. (2017), “The digitalization imperative: the sacralization of technology in cultural policies on archives, libraries and museums”, paper presented at the 8th Nordic Conference on Cultural Policy Research, Helsinki, August 23-25.

Kamariotou, V., Kamariotou, M., & Kitsios, F. (2021). Strategic planning for virtual exhibitions and visitors’ experience: A multidisciplinary approach for museums in the digital age. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 21, e00183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2021.e00183.

Krukowski, A., & Vogiatzaki, E. (2021). Protection of Cultural Heritage against the Effects of Climate Change Using Autonomous Aerial Systems Combined with Automated Decision Support. International Journal of Social and Business Sciences, 15(1), 49-54.

Li, W. (2018, September). Application of virtual reality technology in the inheritance of cultural heritage. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1087, No. 6, p. 062057). IOP Publishing, doi :10.1088/1742-6596/1087/6/062057.

Mahesh, G., & Mittal, R. (2009). Digital content creation and copyright issues. The Electronic Library, 27, (4): 676-683.

Marty, P. F. (2008). An introduction to digital convergence: libraries, archives, and museums in the information age. Archival Science, 8(4), 247-250.

Moustaira, E. (2011). Cultural Objects and Identity. Cultural Objects and Identity, Volume in Honor of Philippos Doris, Ant. N. Sakkoulas Editions, Athens, 2015, 871-877.

Navarrete, T. (2009). ‘An Outsider’s Perspective’, In Beumer, M. Capturing Museum Knowledge. A twenty-year Evolution in Digitally Recording The Tropen museum Collection, Bulletins of The Royal Tropical Institute Vol. 386. Amsterdam: KIT Publishers: 69–78.

Ocón, D. (2021). Digitalising endangered cultural heritage in Southeast Asian cities: preserving or replacing? International Journal of Heritage Studies, 27(10), 975-990. DOI: 10.1080/13527258.2021.1883711.

Parry, R. (2013). The end of the beginning: Normativity in the postdigital museum. Museum Worlds, 1(1), 24-39.

Portalés, C., Rodrigues, J. M., Rodrigues Gonçalves, A., Alba, E., & Sebastián, J. (2018). Digital cultural heritage. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 2(3), 58, https://doi.org/10.3390/mti2030058.

Rasmussen, CH (2019). Is digitalization the only driver of convergence? Theorizing relations between libraries, archives, and museums'. Journal of Documentation, vol. 75, no. 6, pp. 1258-1273. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-02-2019-0025.

Rayward, W. B. (1998). Electronic information and the functional integration of libraries, museums and archives. History and Electronic Artefacts, 207-224.

Rizzo, I., & Mignosa, A. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook on the economics of cultural heritage. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Ryan, J., & Silvanto, S. (2011). A brand for all the nations: The development of the World Heritage Brand in emerging markets. Marketing Intelligence & Planning,

Sotirova, K., Peneva, J., Ivanov, S., Doneva, R., & Dobreva, M. (2012). Digitization of cultural heritage–standards, institutions, initiatives. Access to digital cultural heritage: Innovative applications of automated metadata generation, 23-68.

Sullivan, A. M. (2015). Cultural heritage & new media: a future for the past. J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L., 15, 604.

Tanackovic, S. F., & Badurina, B. (2009). Collaboration of Croatian cultural heritage institutions: experiences from museums. Museum Management and Curatorship, 24(4), 299-321.

Thwaites, H. (2013). Digital heritage: what happens when we digitize everything? In Visual heritage in the digital age (pp. 327-348). Springer, London.

Tsichla, M. E. (2020, November). Covid-19 and Greek Museums. Digitality as a Mean of Promoting Cultural Heritage During the Coronavirus Period. New Ways of Expression. In Euro-Mediterranean Conference (pp. 675-682). Springer, Cham). Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/978-3-030-73043-7_59.

Unesco (2012). The Memory of the world in the digital age: Digitization and preservation, Vancouver.

Vecco, M. (2010). A definition of cultural heritage: From the tangible to the intangible. Journal of cultural heritage, 11(3), 321-324, doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2010.01.006.

Wijesundara, C., & Sugimoto, S. (2018). Metadata model for organizing digital archives of tangible and intangible cultural heritage, and linking cultural heritage information in digital space. LIBRES: Library and Information Science Research Electronic Journal, 28(2), 58-80.

Zhou, M., Geng, G., & Wu, Z. (2012). Digital preservation technology for cultural heritage. Beijing: Higher Education Press.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item