The Open Science ecosystem

Couto Corrêa da Silva, Fabiano and da Silveira, Lúcia The Open Science ecosystem. TransInforma��o, 2019, vol. 31. [Journal article (Unpaginated)]

[thumbnail of Silva-Silveira-2019.pdf]
Preview
 Text
Silva-Silveira-2019.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (817kB) | Preview

English abstract

The present study shows the dimensions of open science and the impact of this context on researchers’ lives. The birth of scientifi cjournals in the seventeenth century helped to promote the Scientifi c Revolution, allowing researchers to communicate through time and space, using the technologies of the time to generate reliable knowledge more quickly and effi ciently. Taking advantage of continuous advances in information technology, researchers are moving towards a new, more open scientifi c ecosystem to accompany the research life cycle. It is in this context that Open Science arises to ensure the free availability and usability of academic publications, data resulting from research and academic methodologies, including codes or algorithms that were used to generate such data.

Portuguese abstract

O presente estudo descritivo tem como objetivo apresentar as dimensões da Ciência Aberta e o impacto desse contexto na vida dos pesquisadores. O surgimento de revistas científicas no século XVII ajudou a promover a Revolução Científica, permitindo que os pesquisadores se comunicassem através do tempo e do espaço usando as tecnologias da época para gerar conhecimento confiável de maneira mais rápida e eficiente. Aproveitando os contínuos avanços nas tecnologias da informação, os pesquisadores estão caminhando para um novo ecossistema científico, o qual é mais aberto para acompanhar o ciclo de vida investigativo. É nesse contexto que a Ciência Aberta surge para garantir a disponibilidade e a usabilidade sem barreiras de acesso às publicações acadêmicas e aos dados resultantes de pesquisas e metodologias acadêmicas, incluindo códigos ou algoritmos que foram usados para gerar esses dados.

Item type: Journal article (Unpaginated)
Keywords: Open Access; Open Science; Ecosystem Acesso Aberto; Ciência Aberta; Ecossistema
Subjects: H. Information sources, supports, channels.
L. Information technology and library technology
Depositing user: Lúcia da Silveira
Date deposited: 12 Sep 2022 12:25
Last modified: 12 Sep 2022 12:25
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/43551

References

Andoni, A.; Rodríguez, J.; Lafuente, A. Todo sabio, ciencia ciudadana y conocimiento ampliado Madri: Ediciones Cátedra, 2013.

Anglada, L.; Abadal, E. ¿Qué es la ciencia abierta? Anuario Thinkepi, v.12, p.292-298, 2018. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2018.43. Disponible en: https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/ThinkEPI/article/view/thinkepi.2018.43. Acceso en: 6 mayo 2019.

» https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2018.43

» https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/ThinkEPI/article/view/thinkepi.2018.43.

Bartling, S.; Friesike, S. (Org.). Opening science New York: Springer, 2014. p.17-47. E-book. Available from: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8. Cited: May 6, 2019.

» https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8.

Berners-Lee, T. Linked data World Wide Web Consortium, 2006. Available from: http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html. Cited: May 6, 2019

» http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html.

Björk, B.C. Scholarly journal publishing in transition- from restricted to open access. Electronic Markets, v.27, n.2, p.101-109, 2017. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12525-017-0249-2. Cited: Aug. 18, 2019.

» http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12525-017-0249-2.

Brasil. Presidência da República. Decreto nº8.777, de 11 de maio de 2016. Institui a Política de Dados Abertos do Poder Executivo Federal. Diário Oficial da União, 2016 Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2016/decreto/D8777.htm. Acesso em: 12 maio 2016.

» http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2016/decreto/D8777.htm.

Brasil. Ministério da Transparência e Controladoria-Geral da União. 4º Plano de Ação Nacional em Governo Aberto Brasília: Open Government Partnership, 2018. Disponível em: http://governoaberto.cgu.gov.br/no-brasil/copy_of_planos-de-acao/4o-plano-de-acao-brasileiro/4o-plano-de-acao-nacional_portugues.pdf. Acesso em: 6 maio 2019.

» http://governoaberto.cgu.gov.br/no-brasil/copy_of_planos-de-acao/4o-plano-de-acao-brasileiro/4o-plano-de-acao-nacional_portugues.pdf.

Budapest Open Access Initiative. Budapest Open Access Initiative Budapeste: BOAI, 2002. Available from: http://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/openaccess/read. Cited: May 6, 2019.

» http://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/openaccess/read.

Canada. Government of Canada. 2018-2020 National Action Plan on Open Government 2018. Available from: https://open.canada.ca/en/content/canadas-2018-2020-national-action-plan-open-government. Cited: May 6, 2019.

» https://open.canada.ca/en/content/canadas-2018-2020-national-action-plan-open-government.

Declaration on Research Assessment. Good practices San Francisco: DORA, 2018. Available from: https://sfdora.org/good-practices/funders/. Cited: May 6, 2019.

» https://sfdora.org/good-practices/funders/.

Elsevier. Acesso aberto Holanda: Elsevier, 2019 Disponível em: https://www.elsevier.com/pt-br/about/open-science/open-access. Acesso em: 6 maio 2019.

» https://www.elsevier.com/pt-br/about/open-science/open-access.

France. Ministère de L’Enseignement supérieur de la Recherche et de L’Innovation. National plan for open science Paris: Open Science, 2018. Disponible en: https://libereurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/SO_A4_2018_05-EN_print.pdf. Acèss: mayo 6, 2019.

» https://libereurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/SO_A4_2018_05-EN_print.pdf.

Foster Open Science. Open science taxonomy [s.l.]: Foster, 2018. Available from: https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/foster-taxonomy/open-access. Cited: May 6, 2019.

» https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/foster-taxonomy/open-access.

Lafuente, A.; Alonso, A. Ciencia expandida, naturaleza común y saber profano Quilmes: Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, 2011.

Larivière, V.; Haustein, S.; Mongeon, P. The oligopoly of academic publishers in the Digital Era. PLo ONE, v.10, n.6, e0127502, 2015. Available from: http://dx.org/ 0.1371/journal.pone.0127502. Cited: Aug. 26, 2019.

» http://dx.org/ 0.1371/journal.pone.0127502.

Nüst, D. et al Reproducible research and GIScience: An evaluation using AGILE conference papers. PeerJ, v.6, e5072, 2018. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5072. Available from: https://peerj.com/articles/5072/. Cited: May 6, 2019.

» https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5072.

» https://peerj.com/articles/5072/.

Open Government Partnership. Open Government Partnership Global Report: democracy beyond the ballot box. Canada: OPG, 2019. Available from: https://www.opengovpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Global-Report_Volume-1.pdf. Cited: May 6, 2019.

» https://www.opengovpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Global-Report_Volume-1.pdf.

Pontika, N. et al Fostering Open Science to Research using a Taxonomy and an eLearning Portal. In: International Conference on Knowledge Technologies and Data Driven Business (iKnow), 15., 2015, Graz, Austria. Procedings […] New York: ACM, 2015. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1145/28 09563.2809571. Available from: http://oro.open.ac.uk/44719/2/kmi_foster_iknow.pdf. Cited: May 6, 2019.

» https://doi.org/10.1145/2809563.2809571.

» http://oro.open.ac.uk/44719/2/kmi_foster_iknow.pdf.

Relx Group. Annual reports and financial statements: 2018. London: Relx, 2018. Available from: https://www.relx.com/investors/annual-reports/2018. Cited: May 6, 2019.

» https://www.relx.com/investors/annual-reports/2018.

Rigatelli, L.T. Evariste Galois 1811–1832 Switzerland: Birkhäuser, 2012.

Ross-Hellauer, T. What is open peer review? A systematic review. F1000Research, v.6, 588, 2017. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12688%2Ff1000research.11369.1. Available from: https://f10 00research.com/articles/6-588. Cited: May 6, 2019.

» https://doi.org/10.12688%2Ff1000research.11369.1

» https://f10 00research.com/articles/6-588.

Ross-Hellauer, T.; Deppe, A.; Schmidt, B. Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers. PLoS One v.12, n.12, e0189311, 2017. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189311. Available from: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0189311. Cited: May 7, 2019.

» https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189311.

» https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0189311.

Sample, I. Nobel winner declares boycott of top science journals. The Guardian, Dec. 9, 2013. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/dec/09/nobel-winner-boycott-science-journals. Cited: May 7, 2019.

» https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/dec/09/nobel-winner-boycott-science-journals.

Schmidt, E.; Cohen, J. A nova era digital: como será o futuro das pessoas, das nações e dos negócios. Rio de Janeiro: Intrínseca, 2013.

Silva, D.M. et al Comunicação científica sob o espectro da Ciência Aberta: um modelo conceitual contemporâneo. Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação & Inovação em Saúde, v.11, 2017. Suplemento. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.29397/reciis.v11i0.1414. Disponível em: https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/. Acesso em: 7 maio 2019.

» https://doi.org/10.29397/reciis.v11i0.1414.

» https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/.

Silva, F.C.C. Movimento open data em bibliotecas: desafios e oportunidades. In: Seminário do Grupo de Pesquisa MHTX: perspectivas em representação e organização do conhecimento: atualidades e tendências na relação universidade-empresa, 3., Belo Horizonte, Brasil. Anais [...] Belo Horizonte: ECI/UFMG, 2018.

Silveira, L.; Benedet, L.; Santillán-Aldana, J. Interpretando a internacionalização dos periódicos científicos brasileiros. Motrivivência, v.30, n.54, p.90-110, 2018. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2175-8042.2018v30n54p90 Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-8042.2018v30n54p90. Acesso em: 7 maio 2019.

» https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8042.2018v30n54p90

» https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-8042.2018v30n54p90.

Spinak, E. Sobre as vinte e duas definições de revisão por pares aberta… e mais. SciELO em Perspectiva, 2018 Disponível em: https://blog.scielo.org/blog/2018/02/28/sobre-as-vinte-e-duas-definicoes-de-revisao-por-pares-aberta-e-mais/. Acesso em: 15 fev. 2019.

» https://blog.scielo.org/blog/2018/02/28/sobre-as-vinte-e-duas-definicoes-de-revisao-por-pares-aberta-e-mais/.

Wilsdon, J. et al Next-generation metrics: Responsible metrics and evaluation for open science. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2777/337729 Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/pdf/report.pdf. Cited: May 7, 2019.

» https://doi.org/10.2777/337729

» https://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/pdf/report.pdf.

World Ranking Open Data Open Knowledge Foundation. Place overview Canada: GODI, 2019. Available from: https://index.okfn.org/place/. Cited: May 7, 2019.

» https://index.okfn.org/place/.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS