Posibilidad, riesgo e incertidumbre: análisis de tendencias en las ciencias de la información

Arenas Grisales, Sandra Patricia, Giraldo Lopera, Marta Lucía, Ochoa Gutiérrez, Jaider and Tangarife Patiño, Ana María Posibilidad, riesgo e incertidumbre: análisis de tendencias en las ciencias de la información. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología, 2022, vol. 45, n. 3, pp. 1-25. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of v45n3a1.pdf]
Preview
 Text
v45n3a1.pdf
Download (418kB) | Preview

English abstract

This paper presents the results of research on trends in the information sciences in the framework of the project “Curricular innovation of the undergraduate programs in Archival and Library Sciences of the Universidad de Antioquia” of the Escuela Interamericana de Bibliotecología. Social trends were analyzed to think about how political, educational, economic, and environmental factors influence the contexts in which professionals and institutions operate; trends in scientific and academic production in the field of information sciences, to investigate where research is going. Trends in information and data technologies are described, characterized by rapid changes and developments which indicate the horizons of this area of work, but which are not the sole determinant of trends. Finally, we reflect on trends in institutions, how they respond to these transformations and social and technological demands. The method implemented in the research had a mainly qualitative approach, using four research techniques: 1) analysis of social networks of scientific production; 2) consultation of press releases from multilateral organizations and institutions in the area; 3) analysis of market sources; and 4) development of in-depth interviews with specialists in the field. It is concluded that technological development and the role of information and memory professionals and institutions demand constant and abrupt changes for the adoption of new technologies. However, care must be taken; a critical and conscious position must be taken, which does not ignore the foundations of the fields of knowledge, and the social and cultural practices that professionals face.

Spanish abstract

En este artículo se presentan los resultados de investigación sobre las tendencias de las ciencias de la información en el marco del proyecto de “Innovación curricular de los programas de pregrado en Archivística y Bibliotecología de la Universidad de Antioquia” de la Escuela Interamericana de Bibliotecología. Se analizan las tendencias sociales que permiten pensar en qué forma factores políticos, educativos, económicos y medioambientales influyen en los contextos en los cuales actúan los profesionales y las instituciones; se identifican las tendencias en la producción científica y académica del campo de las ciencias de la información, para indagar hacia dónde va la investigación; se describen las tendencias en las tecnologías de la información y los datos, caracterizadas por cambios y desarrollos vertiginosos que indican los horizontes de esta área de trabajo, pero que no se constituyen en el único factor determinante de las tendencias; y, por último, se reflexiona sobre las tendencias en las instituciones, cómo ellas responden a esas transformaciones y demandas sociales y tecnológicas. El método implementado en la investigación tuvo un enfoque principalmente cualitativo, se usaron tres técnicas de investigación: 1) el análisis de redes sociales de la producción científica, 2) la consulta de comunicados de organismos multilaterales e instituciones del área, el análisis de fuentes de mercado y 3) el desarrollo de entrevistas en profundidad con especialistas en el tema. Se concluye que el desarrollo tecnológico y el rol de los profesionales e instituciones de la información y la memoria demandan cambios constantes y abruptos para la adopción de nuevas tecnologías. Sin embargo, se debe tener cuidado con ello; hay que asumir una posición crítica y consciente, que no desconozca las bases de los campos de conocimiento ni las prácticas sociales y culturales a las que se enfrentan los profesionales.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Trends, information sciences, curricular innovation, informative-documentary institutions, information technologies
Subjects: A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information. > AB. Information theory and library theory.
B. Information use and sociology of information > BD. Information society.
G. Industry, profession and education. > GG. Curricula aspects.
G. Industry, profession and education. > GH. Education.
Depositing user: Juan Camilo Vallejo Echavarria
Date deposited: 30 Sep 2022 23:42
Last modified: 30 Sep 2022 23:42
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/43553

References

ACRL Research Planning; Review Committee (2014). Top trends in academic libraries: A review of the trends and issues affecting academic libraries in higher education. College & Research Libraries News, 75(6), 294‑302. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.75.6.9137

Álvarez Zapata, Didier. (2020). La institución informativo documental. Una categoría sociocultural articuladora de la bibliotecología, la archivología y la museología. Informatio, 25(1), 79-105. https://doi.org/10.35643/Info.25.1.4

American Library Association (2014). Trends report: Snapshots of a turbulent world. ALA.

http://www.ala.org/tools/future/trends

Ayris, Paul; Lopez de San Román, Alea; Maes, Katrien; Labastida, Ignasi. (2018). Open Science and its role in universities. A roadmap for cultural change. League of European Research Universities.

Aytac, Selenay; Kipp, Margaret; Neal, Diane; Rubin, Victoria; Pattuelli, Cristina; Hsieh-Yee, Ingrid (2011). Emerging trends in knowledge organization and information organization course curriculum. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 48(1), 1-4.

Bem, Roberta Moraes de; Coelho, Christianne (2013). Applications of knowledge management in the area of librarianship and information science: A systematic review. Brazilian Journal of Information Science, 7(1), 69-97. https://doi.org/10.36311/1981-1640.2013.v7n1.06.p67

Benavides, Angélica (2020, mayo 22). Movilidad social, una materia pendiente. Forbes. https://forbes.co/2020/05/22/economia-y-finanzas/movilidad-social-una-materia-pendiente/

Berrío-Zapata, Cristian; Assis Rodrigues, Fernando de; Cássia-Cassiano Lopes, Rita de; Grossi de Carvalho, Ángela María; Gonçalves Santana, Ricardo César (2016). Comportamiento informacional y políticas públicas de información: consideraciones teóricas alrededor del caso de DATASUS en Brasil. Investigacion Bibliotecológica, 30(69), 19-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibbai.2016.04.011

Blackburn, Fiona (2020). Cultural competence: Toward a more robust conceptualisation. Public Library Quarterly, 39(3), 229-245. https://doi.org/10/gjg9t9

BNF Technologies (2019). 5 Trends that are changing the records management industry [Corporativa]. https://www.bnfco.com/trends-that-are-changing-the-records-management-industry/

Bottis, Maria; Papadopoulos, Marinos; Zampakolas, Christos; Ganatsiou, Pavareski (2019). Text and Data Mining in directive 2019/790/EU enhancing web-harvesting and web-archiving in libraries and archives. Open Journal of Philosophy, 9(03), 369-395. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2019.93024

Bounfour, Ahmed (2016). From IT to digital transformation: A long term perspective. En Digital futures, digital transformation (pp. 11-29). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23279-9_2

C4IR (2020). ¿Qué es la cuarta revolución industrial? [Institucional]. https://c4ir.co/

Castellanos-Domínguez, Óscar; Fúquene-Montañez, Aida; Ramírez-Martínez, Diana (2011). Análisis de tendencias: de la información hacia la innovación. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, BioGestión.

Cheng, Yanping; Liu, Qingyu (2019). Process and application of data mining in the university library. 2019 IEEE 4th International Conference on Big Data Analytics (ICBDA) (123-127). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBDA.2019.8713202

Consejo Internacional de Archivos (2016). Archives, Harmony and Friendship. https://www.ica.org/en/archives-harmony-and-friendship-sustaining-spirit-seoul

Convery, Nicole (2011). Information management, records management, knowledge management: The place of archives in a digital age. En J. Hill (Ed.), The Future of Archives and Recordkeeping: A reader (pp. 195-216). Facet Publishing. https://doi.org/10.29085/9781856048675.011

Cordell, Ryan (2020). Machine Learning + Libraries. Library of Congress. https://labs.loc.gov/static/labs/work/reports/Cordell-LOC-ML-report.pdf?loclr=blogsig

David, Paul (2004). Understanding the emergence of “open science” institutions: Functionalist economics in historical context. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(4), 571-589. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth023

Diamond, Jared. (2007). Colapso. Por qué unas sociedades perduran y otras desaparecen (R. García Pérez, Trad.). Debolsillo.

Eckerdal, Johanna (2018). Equipped for resistance: An agonistic conceptualization of the public library as a verb. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(12), 1405-1413. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24069

Engseth, Ellen (2018). Cultural competency: A framework for equity, diversity, and inclusion in the archival profession in the United States. The American Archivist, 81(2), 460-482. https://doi.org/10.17723/0360-9081-81.2.460

Federación Internacional de Asociaciones e Instituciones Bibliotecarias (2013). ¿Surcando las olas o atrapados en la marea? Navegando el entorno en evolución de la información. Federación Internacional de Asociaciones de Bibliotecarios y Bibliotecas. https://trends.ifla.org/files/trends/assets/ifla-trend-report_spanish.pdf

Federación Internacional de Asociaciones e Instituciones Bibliotecarias (2019). IFLA trend report 2019 update [Report]. IFLA.

Fenlon, Katrina (2019). Modeling digital humanities collections as research objects. 2019 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL) (pp. 138-147). https://doi.org/10.1109/JCDL.2019.00029

Findlay, Cassie (2017). Participatory cultures, trust technologies and decentralisation: Innovation opportunities for recordkeeping. Archives and Manuscripts, 45(3), 176-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2017.1366864

Flinn, Andrew; Alexander, Ben. (2015). Humanizing an inevitability political craft: Introduction to the special issue on archiving activism and activist archiving. Archival Science, 15(4), 329-335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9260-6

Fresa, Antonella; Justrell, Börje; Prandoni, Claudio (2015). Digital curation and quality standards for memory institutions: PREFORMA research project. Archival Science, 15(2), 191-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9242-8

Garay, Luis Jorge; Espitia, Jorge Enrique. (2019). Dinámica de las desigualdades en Colombia. Ediciones Desde Abajo.

García, Patricia (2017). Accessing archives: Teaching with primary sources in K-12 classrooms. The American Archivist, 80(1), 189-212. https://doi.org/10.17723/0360-9081.80.1.189

Gartner (2020). Gartner Top 110 Trends in Dadta and Analytics for 2020. Gartner. https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/gartner-top-10-trends-in-data-and-analytics-for-2020/

Gilliland, Anne (2014). Conceptualizing 21st-Century Archives. Society of American Archivists.

Gilliland, Anne (2015). Permeable binaries, societal grand challenges, and the roles of the twenty-first century archival and recordkeeping profession. UCLA. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/90q5538g

Herrera-Masó, Juan; Calero-Ricardo, Jorge, González-Rangel, Miguel, Collazo-Ramos, Milagros; Travieso, Yelami (2022). El método de consulta a expertos en tres niveles de validación. Revista Habanera de Ciencias Médicas, 21(1). http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1729-519X2022000100014&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es

Hjørland, Birger (2016). Knowledge organization. En Birger Hjørland; C Gnoli (Eds.), Encyclopedia of knowledge organization. https://www.isko.org/cyclo/knowledge_organization

Hocking, John; Biagioni, Chiara. (2016). Out of the box, into the world: The contribution of archives and archivists to today’s world. Comma, (1-2), 15-24. https://doi.org/10.3828/comma.2016.2

Human Rights Watch (2020, enero 3). World Report 2020: Rights Trends in Colombia. https://www.hrw.org/es/world-report/2020/country-chapters/336672

Huyssen, Andreas (2002). En busca del futuro perdido. Fondo de Cultura Económica.

IBM (2020, 1 de mayo). Deep Learning. https://www.ibm.com/cloud/learn/deep-learning

Intergoverment Panel on Climatic Change (2018). Calentamiento global de 1,5 °C. Resumen para responsables de políticas. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2019/09/IPCC-Special-Report-1.5-SPM_es.pdf

International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (2019). IFLA trend report 2019 update [Report]. IFLA.

Jaeger, Paul; Cooke, Nicole; Feltis, Cecilia; Hamiel, Michelle; Jardine, Fiona; Shilton, Katie (2015). The virtuous circle revisited: Injecting diversity, inclusion, rights, justice, and equity into LIS from education to advocacy. The Library Quarterly, 85(2), 150-171. https://doi.org/10/f648br

Kim, Tae-Young; Gang, Ju-Yeon; Oh, Hyo-Jung. (2020). Spatial usage analysis based on user activity big data logs in library. Library Hi Tech, 38(3), 678-698. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-11-2018-0182

Lankes, David (2018). The atlas of new librarianship. The MIT Press. https://davidlankes.org/new librarianship/the-atlas-of-new-librarianship-online/

Lankes, R. David; Silverstein, Joanne; Nicholson, Scott; Marshall, Tood. (2007). Participatory networks: The library as conversation. Information Research, 26(4). http://informationr.net/ir/12-4/colis/colis05.html

Larsen, Håkon (2018). Archives, libraries and museums in the Nordic model of the public sphere. Journal of Documentation, 74(1), 187-194. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-12-2016-0148

Laurent, Nicola (2017). Archivists as amanuenses (scribes) of Indigenous knowledge. Comma, (2), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.3828/comma.2017.2.5

Lemieux, Victoria (2017). Blockchain and distributed ledgers as trusted recordkeeping systems. An archival theoretic evaluation framework. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317433591_Blockchain_and_Distributed_Ledgers_as_Trusted_Recordkeeping_Systems_An_Archival_Theoretic_Evaluation_Framework

Lemieux, Victoria; Batista, Danielle; Hofman, Darra; Joo, Alysha. (2019). Blockchain technology & recordkeeping. ARMA International Education Fundation.

Mahboob-Kanafi, Matin (2019). The impact of digital literacy on digital transformation at the workplace: Digital immigrants and digital natives (tesis de maestría). Åbo Akademi University. http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2019111638388

Market Research Future (2020). Production Information Management (PIM) Market Report – Information by Component (Hardware, Software), Deployment (Cloud, On-Premise), Organization Size (Small & Medium, Large Enterprise) Vertical (BFSI, Government, Retail) – Global Forecast till 2027. MRFR. https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/production-information management-market-5965

Martín, Sandra Gisela (2015, junio 19 y 20). Tendencias tecnológicas en bibliotecas, oportunidades, problemas y transformaciones [conferencia]. 9.º Encuentro de Bibliotecarios de la Provincia de Córdoba: “Sumando ideas… transformando bibliotecas”. La Falda, Córdoba. http://eprints.rclis.org/25357/

McKinnon, Cheryl (2013). 5 trends are reshaping records management. KMWorld. https://www.kmworld.com/Articles/Editorial/Features/5-trends-are-reshaping-records-management-92683.aspx

Meneses-Tello, Felipe (2013). Bibliotecas y sociedad: reflexiones desde una perspectiva sociológica. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología, 28(2), 117-133. https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/RIB/article/view/8588

Millar, Laura. (2017). On the crest of a wave: Transforming the archival future. Archives and Manuscripts, 45(2), 59-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2017.1328696

Nesmith, Tom (2015). Toward the archival stage in the history of knowledge. Archivaria, (80), 119-145.

https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13546

Novara, Elizabeth; Novara, Vincent (2017). Exhibits as scholarship: Strategies for acceptance, documentation, and evaluation in academic libraries. The American Archivist, 80(2), 355-372. https://doi.org/10.17723/0360-9081-80.2.355

Ohly, H. Peter (2015). Knowledge organization and ISKO: State, demands, ideals. Scire: Representación y Organización Del Conocimiento, 21(1), 13-19. https://ibersid.eu/ojs/index.php/scire/article/view/4211/3806

Pan, Weimei (2017). The implementation of electronic recordkeeping systems: An exploratory study of socio technical issues. Records Management Journal, 27(1), 84-98. https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-04-2016-0014

Pan, Weimei; Duranti, Luciana. (2020). Sitting in limbo or being the flaming Phoenix: The relevance of the archival discipline to the admissibility of digital evidence in China. Archives and Manuscripts, 48(3), 300‑327. https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2020.1822892

Parada, Alejandro (2015). Hacia un inventario provisional de las tendencias en bibliotecología y ciencia de la información. Información, Cultura y Sociedad, (33), 75‑88. https://doi.org/10.34096/ics.i33.1890

Rendón, Miguel Ángel (2013). Conceptualización y fundamentación del Sistema de Información Documental (SID). Códices, 9(1), 11-20. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/16292299.pdf

Santos, Henrique Machado dos; Flores, Daniel (2015). Repositórios digitais confiáveis para documentos arquivísticos: Ponderações sobre a preservação em longo prazo. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, 20(2), 198-218. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5344/2341

Santos, Henrique Machado dos; Mazuco, Fabiana Ciocheta; Flores, Daniel (2020). Preservação sistêmica de documentos arquivísticos digitais: uma perspectiva holística. PerCursos, 21(46), 244-271. https://doi.org/10.5965/1984724621462020244

Saunders, Laura (2015). Academic libraries’ strategic plans: Top trends and under-recognized areas. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(3), 285-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.03.011

Supply and Demand Chain Executive (2018, diciembre 3). Predictions for the future of document management in business. https://www.sdcexec.com/software-technology/article/21034986/predictions for-the-future-of-document-management-in-business

Sioshansi, Fereidoon (Ed.). (2019). Consumer, prosumer, prosumager. How service innovations will disrupt the utility business model. Academic Press.

Sula, Chris; Berger, Claudia. (2020). Digital humanities among LIS Programs: An analysis of courses [Conference]. ALISE 2020 Conference Proceedings. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/108825

Theimer Kate (2011). Interactivity, flexibility and transparency: Social media and Archives 2.0. En The future of archives and recordkeeping (pp. 127-148). Facet Publishing.

Universidad de Alicante (s. f.). ¿Qué es un Fab Lab? http://fablab.ua.es/que-es-fab-lab

Uribe, Alejandro; Ochoa, Jaider (2018). Perspectivas de la ciencia abierta. Un estado de la cuestión para una política nacional en Colombia. BiD: textos universitaris de biblioteconomia i documentació, (40). https://doi.org/10.1344/BiD2018.40.5

Wallace, David; Duff, Wendy; Saucier, Renée; Flinn, Andrew (2020). Archives, recordkeeping and social justice. Routledge.

Winberry, Joseph; Mehra, Bharat (2020). U.S. state libraries as strong institutions: Supporting justice for LGBTQ+ patrons? Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 57(1), e360. https://doi.org/10/gjg9t8

Xiao, Long (2020). Innovative application of knowledge management in organizational restructuring of academic libraries: A case study of Peking University Library. IFLA Journal, 46(1), 15-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035219892289

Yeo, Geoffey (2018). Records, information and data. Exploring the role of record-keeping in an information culture. Facet Publishing.

Zhang, Ying; Liu, Shu; Mathews, Emilee (2015). Convergence of digital humanities and digital libraries. Library Management, 36(4-5), 362-377. https://doi.org/10/ggrbbx


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS