Research Trend Analysis of Information Science in France based on Total, Cited and Uncited Publications: A Scientometric and Altmetric Analysis

Gholampour, Behzad and Gholampour, Sajad and Noruzi, Alireza Research Trend Analysis of Information Science in France based on Total, Cited and Uncited Publications: A Scientometric and Altmetric Analysis. Informology, 2022, vol. 1, n. 1, pp. 7-26. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[img]
Preview
 Text
Information Science in France.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.
Download (1MB) | Preview

English abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to measure the number of contributions and highlight quantitatively the contributions made by French researchers in the field of Information Science indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection (WoS CC) during 1990-2021 from altmetric and bibliometric perspectives. Materials and Methods: The bibliometric data were collected from WoS and three indexes of SCI-Expanded, SSCI, and A&HCI in the period 1990-2021. Scientometric data analysis was done using the HistCite, VOSviewer, CiteSpace softwares, and altmetric data analysis was performed using the Altmetrics.com and social sites such as ResearchGate, Academia, and Mendeley. Results: The analysis showed that 1959 documents were published by French researchers in the field of Information Science. The highest number of publications was 114 documents contributed in 2020. The number of cited publications of French researchers in this field was more than the number of uncited publications, and this trend in cited publications was an upward trend. Michel Zitt and the Center National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) were the most prolific researcher and institute in the field of Information Science in France. The two journals, Social Science Information (Information sur les sciences sociales) and Scientometrics, published the most publications in this field. Moreover, the findings showed that topics such as information retrieval, and information systems were hotspots for research, as well as issues such as social media and big data, emerging topics in the field of Information Science in France. Conclusion: The publishing trend in the field of Information Science in France is an upward trend, and the United States and the UK were the main French collaborators in this field. The results of this study can serve as a roadmap for French researchers and research institutes to understand the current and future research trends in the field of Information Science in France.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Altmetric, Scientometric, Cited publications, Emerging topics, France, Hotspot, Information science, Uncited publications
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BB. Bibliometric methods
Depositing user: Dr. Alireza Noruzi
Date deposited: 26 Sep 2022 21:55
Last modified: 26 Sep 2022 21:55
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/43583

References

Buckland, M. (1995). The centenary of “Madame Documentation”: Suzanne Briet, 1894–1989. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(3), 235-237.

Garfield, E. (1994). The impact factor. Current Contents, 25, 3-7, 20 June.

Garfield, E. (1996). How can impact factors be improved? British Medical Journal, 313(7054), 411. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7054.411

Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. Journal of the American Medical Association, 295(1), 90-93. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.1.90

Gholampour, B., Gholampour, S., Noruzi, A., Arsenault, C., Haertlé, T., & Saboury, A. A. (2022). Retracted articles in oncology in the last three decades: frequency, reasons, and themes. Scientometrics, 127(4), 1841-1865. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04305-w

Gholampour, S., Gholampour, B., & Noruzi, A. (2022). Highly cited papers in sport sciences: Identification and conceptual analysis. International Journal of Information Science and Management, 20(2), 305-324. ‏ https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20088302.2022.20.2.19.4

Gopalakrishnan, S., Bathrinarayanan, A. L., & Tamizhchelvan, M. (2015). Uncited publications in MEMS literature: A bibliometric study. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 35(2). https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.35.2.8324

Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569-16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102

Hu, Z., Lin, A., & Willett, P. (2019). Identification of research communities in cited and uncited publications using a co-authorship network. Scientometrics, 118(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2954-9

Ibekwe-SanJuan, F. (2012). Information Science in France. Emergence, Evolution and Perspectives. In Spink, A. and Heinström, J. (Ed.), Library and Information Science Trends and Research: Europe (Library and Information Science, Vol. 6), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 273-295. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1876-0562(2012)0000006015

Ivanović, D., & Ho, Y. S. (2016). Highly cited articles in the Information Science and Library Science category in Social Science Citation Index: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 48(1), 36-46.

Jabeen, M., Yun, L., Rafiq, M., Jabeen, M., & Tahir, M. A. (2015). Scientometric analysis of library and information science journals 2003–2012 using Web of Science. International Information & Library Review, 47(3-4), 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2015.1113602

Levitt, J. M., & Thelwall, M. (2009). The most highly cited Library and Information Science articles: Interdisciplinarity, first authors and citation patterns. Scientometrics, 78 (1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1927-1

Liang, L., Zhong, Z., & Rousseau, R. (2015). Uncited papers, uncited authors and uncited topics: A case study in library and information science. Journal of Informetrics, 9(1), 50-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.11.001

Lin, W. Y. C. (2012). Research status and characteristics of library and information science in Taiwan: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 92 (1), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0725-6

Linux Information Project (2005). Documentation definition by The Linux Information Project. Retrieved June 9, 2021. http://www.linfo.org/documentation.html

Noruzi, A., Gholampour, B., Gholampour, S., Jafari, S., Farshid, R., Stanek, A., & Saboury, A. A. (2022). Current and Future Perspectives on the COVID-19 Vaccine: A Scientometric Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(3), 750. ‏ https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11030750

Okeji, C. C. (2019), Research output of librarians in the field of library and information science in Nigeria: a bibliometric analysis from 2000-March, 2018, Collection and Curation, 38 (3), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.1108/CC-04-2018-0012

Shehatta, I., & Mahmood, K. (2016). Research collaboration in Saudi Arabia 1980–2014: Bibliometric patterns and national policy to foster research quantity and quality. Libri, 66(1), 13-29. https://doi.org/10.1515/libri-2015-0095

Siddique, N., Rehman, S. U., Khan, M. A., & Altaf, A. (2021). Library and information science research in Pakistan: A bibliometric analysis, 1957–2018. Journal of librarianship and information science, 53(1), 89-102. ‏

Siddique, N., Ur Rehman, S., Ahmad, S., Abbas, A. and Khan, M. A. (2021). Library and information science research in the Arab World: a bibliometric analysis 1951–2021. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-06-2021-0103

Yamashita, Y., & Yoshinaga, D. (2014). Influence of researchers’ international mobilities on publication: a comparison of highly cited and uncited papers. Scientometrics, 101 (2), 1475–1489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1384-6


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS