Triple P Model: Publications, Patents, and Production

Noruzi, Alireza, Gholampour, Behzad and Gholampour, Sajad Triple P Model: Publications, Patents, and Production. Informology, 2022, vol. 1, n. 1, pp. 67-74. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of Triple P Model Publications Patents Production.pdf]
Preview
Text
Triple P Model Publications Patents Production.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (652kB) | Preview

English abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to develop an indicator for measuring the relationships between publications, patents, and production (so-called 3Ps). The purpose of this study was to investigate these relationships further to propose a new model. Materials and Methods: To examine the relationships between publications, patents, and production, several models in the field of science, technology, and innovation (STI) have been reviewed. Results: The Triple P model assumes a tripartite influence connection among publications, patents, and production. The Triple P refers to publications, patents, and production of a particular country or institution in a specific field, subfield, or specialty in a given period. This model can be used as an indicator to measure the attention level of countries or institutions to a particular product. Conclusion: The Triple P model refers to a set of interactions between publications, patents, and production, to foster scientific, economic, social, and technological development. This study presents the way to measure the interrelationships between the Triple P’s of publications, patents, and production of a particular country or a specific field.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Publications, Patents, Production, Science and technology indicators
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BB. Bibliometric methods
Depositing user: Dr. Alireza Noruzi
Date deposited: 26 Sep 2022 23:05
Last modified: 27 Sep 2022 08:05
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/43587

References

Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2009). 'Mode 3'and'Quadruple Helix': toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International journal of technology management, 46(3-4), 201-234.‏

Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2010). Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other?: A proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development (IJSESD), 1(1), 41-69.‏ http://www.igi-global.com/bookstore/article.aspx?titleid=41959

Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2014). Developed democracies versus emerging autocracies: arts, democracy, and innovation in Quadruple Helix innovation systems. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 3(1), 1-23.‏

Carayannis, E.G., & Campbell, D.F.J. (2009). 'Mode 3' and 'Quadruple Helix': toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3/4), 201–234. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374

Chinennaya, T. Y., & Chebanenko, V. V. (2020). Publication activity as an indicator of scientific status. RUDN Journal of Studies in Literature and Journalism, 25(2), 386-391.‏

Dang, J., & Motohashi, K. (2015). Patent statistics: A good indicator for innovation in China? Patent subsidy program impacts on patent quality. China Economic Review, 35, 137-155.‏

European Patent Office. (2022). The patenting process. European Patent Office (EPO). https://www.epo.org/learning/materials/inventors-handbook/protection/patents_fr.html

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix--University-industry-government relations: A laboratory for knowledge based economic development. EASST Review, 14(1), 14-19.‏

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research policy, 29(2), 109-123.

Javanpour, A., & Norouzi, D. (2014). Business ethics from the perspective of Islamic economics. Marketing and Branding Research, 1 (1), 4-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.33844/mbr.2014.60181

Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations (February 2012)". SSRN Working Paper Series. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1996760. ISSN 1556-5068.

Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1996). Emergence of a Triple Helix of university—industry—government relations. Science and public policy, 23(5), 279-286.

Nagaoka, S., Motohashi, K., & Goto, A. (2010). Patent statistics as an innovation indicator. In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (Vol. 2, pp. 1083-1127). North-Holland.‏

Pavitt, K. (1985). Patent statistics as indicators of innovative activities: possibilities and problems. Scientometrics, 7(1-2), 77-99.‏

Plasser, F. (2004). Politische Kommunikation in Österreich : ein praxisnahes Handbuch. Wien: WUV. pp. 22–23. ISBN 3851148584. OCLC 57566424.

Schubert, A., & Telcs, A. (1986). Publication potential—an indicator of scientific strength for cross-national comparisons. Scientometrics, 9(5-6), 231-238.‏

Simonton, D. K. (2012). Taking the US Patent Office criteria seriously: A quantitative three-criterion creativity definition and its implications. Creativity research journal, 24(2-3), 97-106.

United States Patent and Trademark Office. (2021). Types of patent applications and proceedings. https://www.uspto.gov/patents/basics/types-patent-applications

United States Patent and Trademark Office. (2022). General information concerning patents. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Available at: https://www.uspto.gov/patents/basics/general-information-patents

World Intellectual Property Organization. (2022). Patents - What is a patent? World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Available at: https://www.wipo.int/patents/en/


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item