Анонімно чи відкрито? Як рецензувати наукові статті?

Назаровець, Сергій Анонімно чи відкрито? Як рецензувати наукові статті? Академічна доброчесність: інформаційний бюлетень, 2022, n. 28. [Journal article (Unpaginated)]

[thumbnail of Integrity-bulletin-28.pdf]
Preview
 Text
Integrity-bulletin-28.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (526kB) | Preview

English abstract

In response to the peer review crisis, there are increasingly calls in the academic community to move away from traditional types of peer review in favour of open peer review. This issue of the Academic Integrity Newsletter briefly reviews the main types of peer review, their advantages and disadvantages. It should be remembered that regardless of which type the journal chose, the quality and rigour of the review process depends primarily on the involvement of the academic community in this process, which must demand responsible and ethical behaviour from all participants in scholarly communication.

Item type: Journal article (Unpaginated)
Keywords: Peer Review; Open Peer Review; Open Science; Academic Integrity
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BF. Information policy
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HN. e-journals.
I. Information treatment for information services > IM. Open data
Depositing user: Serhii Nazarovets
Date deposited: 01 Dec 2022 11:05
Last modified: 01 Dec 2022 11:05
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/43712

References

1. COPE Discussion document: Who “owns” peer reviews (2017). URL: https://doi.org/10.24318/rouP8ld4

2. Ross-Hellauer, T. (2017). What is open peer review? A systematic review. F1000Research, 6, 588. DOI:10.12688/f1000research.11369.2

3. Teixeira da Silva, J.A., Nazarovets, S. (2022). The Role of Publons in the Context of Open Peer Review. Publishing Research Quarterly. DOI:10.1007/s12109-022-09914-0.

4. URL: https://cutt.ly/EM2PjQx

5. URL: https://asapbio.org/publishyourreviews

6. URL: https://www.qeios.com/teaser

7. URL: https://prereview.org/

8. URL: https://www.scienceopen.com/

9. Baum, B. (2019). Reviewing papers as you would like your papers to be reviewed. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 30(25), 3013—3014. DOI:10.1091/mbc.E19-05-0273.

10. Thelwall, M. (2022). Journal and disciplinary variations in academic open peer review anonymity, outcomes, and length. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. DOI:10.1177/09610006221079345.

11. Aleksic, J., Alexa, A., Attwood, T. K., Chue Hong, N., Dahlö, M., Davey, R., et al. (2015). An Open Science Peer Review Oath. F1000Research, 3, 271. DOI:10.12688/f1000research.5686.2.

12. Smart, P. (2018). Handbook for Journal Editors. INASP. URL: https://www.inasp.info/editorshandbook


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS