Learning strategies through digital games in a university context

Cavalcante-Pimentel, Fernando-Silvio, Morais-Marques, Margarida and Barbosa-de-Sales-Junior, Valdick Learning strategies through digital games in a university context. Comunicar, 2022, vol. 30, n. 73, pp. 83-93. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of Research article (English)]
Preview
 Text (Research article (English))
10.3916_C73-2022-07-english.pdf - Published version
Download (18MB) | Preview
[thumbnail of Research article (Spanish)]
Preview
 Text (Research article (Spanish))
10.3916_C73-2022-07.pdf - Published version
Download (17MB) | Preview

English abstract

The relationship between digital games and the mobilization of cognitive and metacognitive learning strategies deserves attention and needs research that contributes to the understanding of how these strategies can favor the teaching and learning processes. This study describes how university students over 18 years of age mobilize cognitive and metacognitive learning strategies through digital games. The research methodology used was ex post facto with a quantitative approach. 941 students from 22 States and from the Federal District, enrolled in higher education courses at Brazilian colleges and universities, participated in this research. Data collection occurred through the application of an online questionnaire that integrates the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) and the Inventory of Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies with Digital Games (ICMSDG). The results indicated that university students make regular use of metacognitive knowledge, skills, and strategies. Moreover, cognitive and metacognitive learning strategies seem to be more mobilized by digital game players than by non-players, particularly among those who played over a longer period of time (9 years or more) and with higher intensity (playing every day). With the results found and analyzed, we observe that this study is relevant for both university professors and game designers who aim to promote metacognition skills.

Spanish abstract

La relación entre los juegos digitales y la movilización de estrategias de aprendizaje cognitivas y metacognitivas merece atención y requiere investigaciones que contribuyan a la comprensión de cómo estas estrategias pueden favorecer a los procesos de enseñanza y aprendizaje. Este estudio describe cómo los estudiantes universitarios mayores de 18 años movilizan estrategias de aprendizaje cognitivas y metacognitivas a través de los juegos digitales. La metodología de investigación utilizada fue ex-post-facto con un enfoque cuantitativo. Participaron en esta investigación 941 estudiantes de 22 estados y del Distrito Federal, matriculados en cursos de educación superior en las universidades brasileñas. La recolección de datos fue proporcionada a través de la aplicación de un cuestionario en línea que integra el Inventario de Conciencia Metacognitiva (IMA) y el Inventario de Estrategias Cognitivas y Metacognitivas con Juegos Digitales (ICMSDG). Los resultados indicaron que los estudiantes universitarios encuestados hacen un uso regular de conocimientos, habilidades y estrategias metacognitivas. Además, las estrategias cognitivas y metacognitivas de aprendizaje parecen ser más movilizadas por los jugadores de juegos digitales que por los no jugadores, particularmente entre aquellos que jugaron durante más tiempo (9 años o más) y con mayor intensidad (jugando todos los días). Con los resultados encontrados y analizados, observamos que este estudio es relevante tanto para los profesores universitarios como para los diseñadores de juegos que pretenden promover las habilidades metacognitivas.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Digital games; higher education; cognition; metacognition; assessment; questionnaire; Juegos digitales; educación superior; cognición; metacognición; evaluación; cuestionario
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BJ. Communication
G. Industry, profession and education.
G. Industry, profession and education. > GH. Education.
Depositing user: Alex Ruiz
Date deposited: 09 Jan 2023 12:21
Last modified: 09 Jan 2023 12:21
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/43872

References

Boruchovitch, E. (1999). Estratégias de aprendizagem e desempenho escolar: Considerações para a prática educaci-onal. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 12(2), 361-376. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79721999000200008

Braad, E., Degens, N., & Ijsselsteijn, W. (2019). Meco: A digital card game to enhance metacognitive awareness. In L. Elbaek, G. Majgaard, A. Valente, & S. Khalid (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Game Based Learning, ECGBL 2019 (pp. 92-100). Dechema e.V. https://doi.org/10.34190/GBL.19.066

Bruce, N., Pope, D., & Stanistreet, D. (2018). Quantitative methods for health research: A practical interactive guide to epidemiology and statistics. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118665374.index

Castellòn, L., & Jaramillo, O. (2013). Educación y videojuegos: Hacia un aprendizaje inmersivo. In C. Scolari (Ed.), Homo Videoludens 2.0: Del Pacman a la gamification (pp. 264-281). Col·lecció Transmedia XXI. https://bit.ly/3sWO5Hq

Castronovo, F., Van-Meter, P.N., & Messner, J.I. (2018). Leveraging metacognitive prompts in construction educational games for higher educational gains. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(1), 19-30 https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1492760

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2002). Research methods in education. Routledge. https://bit.ly/3wS10Mc

Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555

Drummond, A., & Sauer, J.D. (2015). Daily videogame use and metacognitive knowledge of effective learning strate-gies. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 4(4), 342-350. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000049

Flavell, J.H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. Ameri-can Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906

Fox, E., & Riconscente, M. (2008). Metacognition and self-regulation in James, Piaget, and Vygotsky. Educational Psy-chology Review, 20(4), 373-389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9079-2

Frenkel, S. (2014). Metacognitive components in learning to learn approaches. International Journal of Psychology, 14, 95-112. https://doi.org/10.7220/2345-024X.14.5

Hacker, D.J. (2017). The role of metacognition in learning via serious games. In R. Zheng, & M.K. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of research on serious games for educational applications (pp. 19-40). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0513-6.ch002

Hartman, H. (2001). Developing students’ metacognitive knowledge and strategies. In H.J. Hartman (eds), Metacogni-tion in Learning and Instruction (pp. 33-68). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2243-8_3

Hertzog, C., & Dunlosky, J. (2011). Metacognition in later adulthood: Spared monitoring can benefit older adults’ self-regulation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(3),167-173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411409026

Ke, F. (2008). Computer games application within alternative classroom goal structures: Cognitive, metacognitive, and affective evaluation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(5), 539-556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-008-9086-5

Kim, B., Park, H., & Baek, Y. (2009). Not just fun, but serious strategies: Using meta-cognitive strategies in game-based learning. Computers & Education, 52(4), 800-810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.004

Lima-Filho, R.N., & Bruni, A.L. (2015). Metacognitive awareness inventory: Tradução e validação a partir de uma aná-lise fatorial confirmatória. Psicologia: Ciência e Profissão, 35(4), 1275-1293. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-3703002292013

Maharg, P., & de-Freitas, S. (2011). Digital games and learning. Continuum. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3029

Matlin, W.M. (2004). Psicologia cognitiva. LTC Editora.

Mattar, J., & Ramos, D.K. (2021). Metodologia da pesquisa em educação: Abordagem qualitativas, quantitativas e mistas. Edições 70. https://bit.ly/3MQQGLb

Moncarz, H.T. (2012). The relationship between playing games and metacognitive awareness. [Doctoral Dissertation, George Mason University]. https://bit.ly/3PCS2Ln

Neuman, W.L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Pearson Education Limited. https://doi.org/10.2307/3211488

Pimentel, F.S.C. (2018). Conectivismo. In D. Mill (Ed.), Dicionário crítico de Educação e Tecnologias e de Educação a Distância (pp. 126-128). Papirus.

Pimentel, F.S.C., & Marques, M.M. (2021). Learning strategies with digital games in the university context: Multiple case study. In L.G. Chova, A.L. Martínez, & I.C. Torres (Eds.), EDULEARN21 Proceedings: 13th Annual Internation-al Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (pp. 8885–8894). IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2021.1790

Pimentel, F.S.C., Ramos, D., & Marques, M.M. (s.n.). Cognitive and metacognitive learning strategies in digital games: construction and validation of a research instrument. RELIEVE.

Pombo, L., & Marques, M.M. (2020). The potential educational value of mobile augmented reality games: The case of EduPARK app. Education Sciences, 10(10), 287. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10100287

Pornel, J.B., & Saldaña, G.A. (2013). Four common misuses of the Likert Scale. Philippine Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 18(2), 12-19. https://bit.ly/3ggPbqP

Pouralvar, K., Sekhavat, Y.A., & Roohi, S. (2019). The interplay between metacognitive strategies and learning styles in learning via serious games. International Serious Games Symposium, 129-134. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISGS49501.2019.9047033

Prensky, M. (2007). Digital game-based learning. Paragon House.

Roni, S.M., Merga, M.K., & Morris, J.E. (2020). Conducting quantitative research in education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9132-3

Sampieri, R.H., Collado, C.F., & Lucio, P.B. (2013). Metodologia de pesquisa. Penso.

Santos, C., Beja, J., & Carvalho, A.R. (2019). Learning SQL with games: Pedagogical innovation when Students are willing to mentor other students. In B.D. Silva, J.A. Lencastre, M. Bento, & A.J. Osório (Eds.), Experiences and per-ceptions of pedagogical practices with Game-Based Learning & Gamification. Research Centre on Education. https://bit.ly/3GmRUti

Schraw, G., & Dennison, R.S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460-475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033

Taub, M., Azevedo, R., Bradbury, A.E., & Mudrick, N.V. (2020). Self-regulation and reflection during game-based learn-ing. In J.L. Plass, R.E. Mayer, & B.D. Homer (Eds.), Handbook of Game-Based Learning (pp. 239-262). The MIT Press. https://bit.ly/3ulCjrB

Trindade, J.F., Fonseca, T., & Trindade, L.F. (2019). Teaching with strategic games: An interdisciplinary study with ‘Electric Field Hockey’. Millenium, 10, 69-73. https://doi.org/10.29352/mill0210.07.00253

Van-Eck, R. (2015). Digital game-based learning: Still restless, after all these years. Educause Review, 50(6), 13. https://bit.ly/3sf8Mxr

Waltz-Schelini, P., Tiziotto-Deffendi, L., Akemi-ujie, M., Boruchovitch, E., & Rabello-Lovosi-de-Freitas, M.F. (2016). Avaliação do monitoramento metacognitivo: Análise da produção científica. Avaliação Psicológica, 15, 57-65. https://bit.ly/3IVjzDn

Zumbach, J., Rammerstorfer, L., & Deibl, I. (2020). Cognitive and metacognitive support in learning with a serious game about demographic change. Computers in Human Behavior, 103, 120-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.026


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS