Exploring the Relationships between the Characteristics of Papers published by the Iranian Top One Percent Researchers and Their Citation and Social Impacts

Tahmouresi, Neda and Noruzi, Alireza and Saboury, Ali Akbar Exploring the Relationships between the Characteristics of Papers published by the Iranian Top One Percent Researchers and Their Citation and Social Impacts. Rahyaft, 2021, vol. 31, n. 3, pp. 94-73. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[img]
Preview
Text
researchers-social impacts.pdf

Download (678kB) | Preview

English abstract

The purpose of this study in the first phase was to determine the relationships between the characteristics of the articles published by the Iranian top one percent researchers in 2020 (journal Impact Factor, and author impacts; paper, abstract, and title lengths; author affiliations, number of references, author-supplied keywords, and number of countries; access type, and funding) with the citation counts, readership counts, and altmetric attention score (AAS), which were respectively extracted from Web of Science (WoS), Mendeley and Altmetic.com. The research aim in the second phase was to demonstrate their presence in the international patents, Iranian research outputs indexed in WoS, the curriculum of their fields, profiling services, and their academic inbreeding status and collaborations patterns. The method of this applied study was descriptive in terms of purpose and scientometric in terms of approach, which was conducted based on citation analysis, altmetric and bibliometric techniques. The statistical population of the research was 12 Iranian top one percent researchers from the top one percent researchers listed on Clarivate Analytics in 2020. The findings demonstrated that the characteristics of the articles, including the number of affiliations, authors' h-index, journal impact factor, authors and references counts, and title and abstract length, have been correlated positively with their citations, AAS, and readership. In addition, articles published by authors with a higher h-index had a greater AAS and readership, and articles with longer titles had a lower AAS. However, no statistically significant correlation was found between the citation counts and the AAS with the author keywords’ counts, and paper lengths, and also between the AAS with the countries count. The access type variable did not affect the number of citations, but non-open-access articles received higher AAS and readership than open-access articles. In addition, funded articles obtained fewer citations, AAS, and readership than non-funded articles. There was no relationship between the academic inbreeding of Iranian top one percent researchers with their citations and AAS. However, there was a weak correlation between the average number of citations and AAS of the Iranian top one percent researchers. Eventually, these researchers did not have a high national impact based on the indicators of presence in the references of Iranian papers indexed in WoS and references/resources of the curriculum of their field. Just 1.5 percent of the publications of these researchers' were cited in patents, and many of them were contributed by Omid Akhavan and Nosratullah Dabir Vaziri.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Top one percent researchers; Bibliographic characteristics; Citation impact; Social impact; Mendeley readership; Academic inbreeding, Iran
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BB. Bibliometric methods
Depositing user: Dr. Alireza Noruzi
Date deposited: 25 Jan 2023 11:32
Last modified: 25 Jan 2023 11:32
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/44064

References

Alinezhad Chamazkoti, F. Investigating citation-related indicators: A case study of the relationship between citations and No. of resources, No. of keywords, o-authorship, and inter-institutional collaboration among Iranian agricultural science journals [In Persian], Scientometrics Research Journal, 2020; 7 (13): 77- 90. DOI: 10.22070/rsci.2020.4760. 1321.

Alla, K., Hall, WD., Whiteford, HA., Head, BW., Meurk, CS. How do we define the policy impact of public health research? A systematic review. Health Research Policy and Systems. 2017 Dec; 15 (1): 1-2.

Bonyadi Naeini, A., Moghiseh, Z. Altmetric study of scientific outputs of Iranian researchers in coronavirus [In Persian], Scientometrics Research Journal. 2022; 8 (15): 239-254. doi: 10.22070/rsci.2020.13360.1447

Bornmann L, Williams R. How to calculate the practical significance of citation impact differences? An empirical example from evaluative institutional bibliometrics using adjusted predictions and marginal effects. Journal of informetrics. 2013 Apr 1; 7 (2): 562-574.

Bornmann., L. Measuring the societal impact of research: Research is less and less assessed on scientific impact alone we should aim to quantify the increasingly important contributions of science to society. EMBO reports. 2012 Aug; 13 (8): 673-6.

Dardas LA, Woodward A, Scott J, Xu H, Sawair FA. Measuring the social impact of nursing research: An insight into altmetrics. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2019 Jul; 75 (7): 1394-405.

Davarpanah, M., Adamian, R. The impact of country development on the visibility of co-authorship [In Persian], Library and Information Science Research. 2012; 2 (2): DOI: 10.22067/riis.v2i2.11015

Didegah F, Bowman TD, Holmberg K. On the differences between citations and altmetrics: An investigation of factors driving altmetrics versus citations for Finnish articles. Journal of the Association for information Science and Technology. 2018 Jun; 69 (6): 832-43.

Didegah F, Thelwall M. Determinants of research citation impact in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2013 May; 64 (5): 1055-64.

Ebrahimy, S., Dehghan, M., Jowkar, A. Evaluation the predictive indicators of scientific impact to increase the citations of articles in scientific journals [In Persian], Journal of Information Processing and Management. 2017; 32 (3): 661-694.

Elgendi M. Characteristics of a highly cited article: A machine learning perspective. IEEE Access. 2019 Jul 2; 7: 87977-86.

Erfanmanesh, A., Moghise, Z., Asnafi, A. The impact of receiving scientific awards on research performance of laureates: The case of Price medal in informatics [In Persian], Scientometrics Research Journal, 2017; 20 (2): 42-75.

Feizabadi, M., Vaziri, E., Haseli, D. Analysis of the factors influencing citations in systematic reviews of medical research in Iran. [In Persian], Journal of Health Administration. 2017; 20 (68): 86-98.

Ghaseminik, Z., Gazni, A. The influence of funding on the scientific impact of research: The case of Iranian international papers and citations [In Persian], Scientometrics Research Journal, 2019; 5 (9): 85-98. DOI: 10.22070/rsci.2018.697

Haslam N, Ban L, Kaufmann L, Loughnan S, Peters K, Whelan J, Wilson S. What makes an article influential? Predicting impact in social and personality psychology. Scientometrics. 2008 Jul 1; 76 (1):169-85.

Holmberg K, Hedman J, Bowman TD, Didegah F, Laakso M. Do articles in open access journals have more frequent altmetric activity than articles in subscription-based journals? An investigation of the research output of Finnish universities. Scientometrics. 2020 Jan; 122 (1): 645-59.

Horta H. Deepening our understanding of academic inbreeding effects on research information exchange and scientific output: new insights for academic based research. Higher Education. 2013 Apr; 65 (4): 487-510.

Hou J, Ma D. How the high-impact papers formed? A study using data from social media and citation. Scientometrics. 2020 Dec; 125 (3): 2597-615.

Jabbour CJ, Jabbour AB, de Oliveira JH. The perception of Brazilian researchers concerning the factors that influence the citation of their articles: A study in the field of sustainability. Serials Review. 2013 Jun 1; 39 (2):93-6.

Jiang J, He D, Ni C. The correlations between article citation and references' impact measures: What can we learn? Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2013; 50 (1):1-4.

Kolahi J, Khazaei S, Bidram E, Kelishadi R. Altmetric analysis of contemporary Iranian medical journals. International Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2019; 10.

Kreiman G, Maunsell JH. Nine criteria for a measure of scientific output. Frontiers in computational neuroscience. 2011 Nov 10; 5: 48.

Lemke S, Zagovora O, Weller K, Orth A, Beucke D, Stropel J, Peters I. * metrics. Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin; 2020.

Lora Viana A, Nel-lo Andreu MG. Alternative metrics for assessing the social impact of tourism research. Sustainability. 2020 May 25; 12 (10): 4299.

Mansouri, Ali., Forouzandeh Shahraki, M., Erfanmanesh, M. Status and factors associated with citedness of scholarly outputs by patents for the type 1 medical science universities in Iran during the years 2000-2015 [In Persian], Health Information Management. 2018; 15 (3 (61)): 126-131.

Martinez M, Sá C. Highly cited in the south: International collaboration and research recognition among Brazil’s highly cited researchers. Journal of Studies in International Education. 2020 Feb; 24 (1): 39-58.

Mohammadzadeh, F. Examining the amount of citations to highly cited Iranian articles by patents [dissertation]. [Iran]: University of Tehran; 2017.

MORADI S. Applying Quadruple Helix model in Research Evaluation. Scientometrics Research Journal. 2021; 6 (2 (12)): 147-166.

Mousazadeh, N. Study of the Relationships between recruitment type of faculty members of College of Science and Technology at the University of Tehran with their research productivity [dissertation]. [Iran]: University of Tehran; 2017. 152.

Nazarian, S., Atapour, H., Noroozi Chakoli, A. High citation of Iranian coauthored articles in comparison with single authored ones: does it link with self-citation [In Persian], Information Processing and Management. 2012; 27 (4): 945-960.

Noruzi A. Patent citations to Webology journal on the USPTO database. Webology. 2018 Jun 25; 15 (1): 1-7.

Ouchi A, Saberi MK, Ansari N, Hashempour L, Isfandyari-Moghaddam A. Do altmetrics correlate with citations? A study based on the 1,000 most-cited articles. Information Discovery and Delivery. 2019 Oct 17; 47 (4): 192-202.

Parabhoi L. Analysis of the Altmetric top 100 Altmetric Attention Score coronavirus publications. Library Philosophy and Practice. 2020 Aug 31; 2020: 1-0.

Park H, Park HW. Research evaluation of Asian countries using altmetrics: Comparing South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Singapore, and China. Scientometrics. 2018 Nov; 117 (2): 771-88.

Pulido, C. M., Redondo-Sama, G., Sordé-Marti, T., & Flecha, R. Social impact in social media: A new method to evaluate the social impact of research. Plos One, 2018; (13) 8, 1–20.

Sadegh Vishkaee, M., Esmaili Givi, M., Nakhoda, M. A study on the impact of international scientific mobility of the University of Tehran faculty members on their research performance and scientific collaborations [In Persian], Scientometrics Research Journal. 2018; 4 (7): 37-58. DOI: 10.22070/rsci.2018.638.

Sedighi M. Evaluating the impact of research using the altmetrics approach (case study: the field of scientometrics). Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication. 2020 Jan 31.

Sharif Moghaddam, H., Zaiee, S., Salami, M., Alijani, R. A Review of authorship patterns and citation rates of Iranian researcher's articles in the field of surgery according to the data from the ISI database [In Persian], Iranian Association of Surgery, 2012; 27 (4): 945-960.

Sotudeh, H., & Omidi, M. Investigating the role of domestic and foreign research credits in improving research effectiveness: the case study of Iran's scientific productions in the expanded profile of sciences in the period from 2008 to 2011[In Persian], Journal of Studies in Library and Information Science. 2017; 8 (18): 45-66. DOI:10.22055/slis. 2016.11639.

Thelwall M, Kousha K. Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 1: Citations and links to academic articles from the Web. Profesional de la Información. 2015 Sep 24; 24 (5): 587-606.

Uzun, B., Danesh, T., Ryazi pour, M. Statistical relationship of some basic bibliometric indicators in scientometrics research [In Persian], Librarianship and Information Organization Studies. 2007; 18 (3): 249-254.

Van Wesel M, Wyatt S, ten Haaf J. What a difference a colon makes: How superficial factors influence subsequent citation. Scientometrics. 2014 Mar; 98 (3): 1601-15.

Zagovora O, Weller K, Janosov M, Wagner C, Peters I. What increases (social) media attention: Research impact, author prominence or title attractiveness? InSTI 2018 Conference Proceedings 2018 Sep 11 (1182-1190). Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS).

Zahedi Z, Haustein S. On the relationships between bibliographic characteristics of scientific documents and citation and Mendeley readership counts: A large-scale analysis of Web of Science publications. Journal of Informetrics. 2018 Feb 1; 12 (1): 191-202.

Zahedi, S., Noruzi, A., Fahimifar, S. Citations to Iranian English-language journals approved by the Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education in patents registered in the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) database [In Persian], Health Information Management. 2019; 16 (2): 73-81. DOI: 10.22122/him.v 16i2.3848


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item