Bibliometric Analysis of the Top Ten Percent Iranian Medical Researchers Based on the I10-index and the H-index in Web of Science

Ansari, Masoumeh, Noruzi, Alireza, Fallah, Mohammad, Saedmoucheshi, Sholeh and Valinejadi, Ali Bibliometric Analysis of the Top Ten Percent Iranian Medical Researchers Based on the I10-index and the H-index in Web of Science. Informology, 2022, vol. 1, n. 2, pp. 27-40. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of i10-index-h-index.pdf]
Preview
Text
i10-index-h-index.pdf

Download (706kB) | Preview

English abstract

The i10-index is one of the newest scientometric indicators used to evaluate researchers in any field of science. The present study analyzes the top ten percent of Iranian medical researchers using the i10-index in the Web of Science database. The present study is descriptive-analytical research conducted using a scientometric approach. The research population includes the top ten percent of Iranian medical researchers whose publications were indexed in the Web of Science database between 2011 and 2020. Descriptive and inferential statistics and i10-index were used to analyze the data using the HistCite and the BibExcel software. Then, the results were sorted in the Excel software. Finally, the h-index and the number of citations of all researchers were compared with their i10-index. The findings show that in medical sciences, Iran ranked 23rd in the world, sixth in Asia, and first in the Middle East in Web of Science in the period 2011-2020, and the growth of scientific publications shows an upward trend. Moreover, there is a direct and positive relationship between the h-index and the i10-index of the top ten percent of medical researchers. This is confirmed with a correlation of 0.645. Also, a correlation of 0.269 shows a direct and positive relationship between the number of citations and the i10-index of the top ten percent of medical researchers. The results show that there is a positive and direct relationship between the h-index and the number of citations of the top ten percent of Iranian medical researchers with their i10-index.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Bibliometric analysis, Medical sciences, Iranian researchers, Top researchers, Web of Science
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BB. Bibliometric methods
Depositing user: Dr. Alireza Noruzi
Date deposited: 18 May 2023 06:05
Last modified: 18 May 2023 06:05
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/44363

References

Aithal, P. (2017). Comparative study of various research indices used to measure quality of research publications. International Journal of Applied and Advanced Scientific Research, 2(1), 81-89. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.569763

Currin, J. M., & Ingram IV, P. B. (2021). Current trends of peer review publications among early career counseling psychologists in academia. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 34(1), 150-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2020.1746635

Dhamdhere, S. N. (2018). Cumulative citations index, h-index and i10-index (research metrics) of an educational institute: A case study. International Journal of Library and Information Science, 10(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJLIS2017.0797

Imran, M., Haglind, F., Asim, M., & Alvi, J. Z. (2018). Recent research trends in organic Rankine cycle technology: A bibliometric approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 552-562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.028

Jiao, A., Wadhwa, V., Bundy, J. J., Hage, A. N., Srinivasa, R. N., Gemmete, J. J., . . . Chick, J. F. B. (2021). Scholarly activities and indices among academic endovascular specialists: a comparative analysis between interventional radiologists and vascular surgeons. Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology, 50(2), 132-136. https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2019.10.010

Kaur, H. (2018). Ranking of top authors of medical research of India: Quality vs quantity. The Journal of Medical Research, 4(4), 179-181. https://www.medicinearticle.com/JMR_20184_04.pdf

Moed, H. F. (2006). Citation analysis in research evaluation (Vol. 9). Springer Science & Business Media.

Mondal, D., & Maity, A. (2019). Foreign authorship pattern in selected Library and Information Science Journals of India. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 39(1), 17-22. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.39.1.13691

Mujumdar, A. S. (2006). Editorial. Drying Technology. https://arunmujumdar.com/drying-technology-journal/

Noruzi, A. (2016). Impact factor, h-index, i10-index and i20-index of Webology. Webology, 13(1), 1-4. http://www.webology.org/2016/v13n1/editorial21.pdf

Pitsolanti, M., Papadopoulou, F., & Tselios, N. (2017). Evaluation of 50 Greek science and engineering university departments using Google Scholar. https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.04478 , https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1703.04478

Radha, L. (2020). Research output of Thiagarajar College of Engineering, Madurai during 2014-2018: A scientometric analysis using Excel sheet. Humanities, 8(2), 97-101. https://doi.org/10.34293/sijash.v8i2.3337

Tamizhchelvan, M., & Anbalagan, M. (2020). Indian Research Information Network System (IRINS): An Analysis of Faculty Profifiles of The Gandhigram Rural Institute-Deeded to be University. Library Philosophy and Practice, 4206. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4206

Waqas, M., Siddiqui, U. T., & Shamim, M. S. (2019). Follow-up bibliometric analysis of neurosurgical publications from Pakistan and institutional comparison with other countries using h-index and i-10 index. Asian Journal of Neurosurgery, 14(1), 126. https://doi.org/10.4103/ajns.AJNS_286_17


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item