Karl Popper și problema demarcației între știință și ne-știință

Sfetcu, Nicolae Karl Popper și problema demarcației între știință și ne-știință., 2019 [Preprint]

[thumbnail of Nicolae_Sfetcu-Karl_Popper_problema_demarcatiei-CC.pdf]
Preview
 Text
Nicolae_Sfetcu-Karl_Popper_problema_demarcatiei-CC.pdf
Download (252kB) | Preview

English abstract

Karl Popper, as a critical rationalist, was an opponent of all forms of skepticism, conventionalism and relativism in science. Many of his arguments on the issue of demarcation are directed against members of the "Viennese Circle". Popper agreed with them on general aspects of scientific methodology and their distrust of traditional philosophical methodology, but his solutions were significantly different. He contributed significantly to debates on general scientific methodology, the demarcation of science from pseudoscience, the nature of probability, and social science methodology.

Romanian abstract

Karl Popper, ca raționalist critic, a fost un oponent al tuturor formelor de scepticism, convenționalism și relativism în știință. Multe dintre argumentele sale privind problema demarcației sunt îndreptate împotriva membrilor "Cercului Vienez". Popper este de acord cu aceștia cu privire la aspectele generale ale metodologiei științifice și neîncrederea lor în metodologia filosofică tradițională, dar soluțiile sale au fost semnificativ diferite. A contribuit semnificativ la dezbaterile privind metodologia științifică generală, demarcarea științei de pseudoștiință, natura probabilității și metodologia științelor sociale.

Item type: Preprint
Keywords: Karl Popper, problema demarcației, știință, ne-știință
Subjects: I. Information treatment for information services > ID. Knowledge representation.
Depositing user: Nicolae Sfetcu
Date deposited: 20 Jun 2023 08:48
Last modified: 20 Jun 2023 08:48
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/44404

References

Bunge, Mario. 1982. “Demarcating Science from Pseudoscience.” Fundamenta Scientiae 3. Derksen, A. A. 1993. “The Seven Sins of Pseudo-Science.” Journal for General Philosophy of

Science / Zeitschrift Für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 24 (1): 17–42.

Grayling, A. C. 2001. Wittgenstein: A Very Short Introduction. OUP Oxford.

Hansson, Sven Ove. 2017. “Science and Pseudo-Science.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, Summer 2017. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.

https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/pseudo-science

Hume, David. 1738. A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford University Press. Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. “Structura Revolutiilor Stiintifice.” 1962.

http://www.humanitas.ro/humanitas/structura-revolutiilor-stiintifice-0

———. 1970. “Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research?” Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge.

Lakatos, I. 1974. “Popper on Demarcation and Induction.” In The Philosophy of Karl Popper, edited by Karl R. Popper and Paul Arthur Schilpp, 1st ed. Vol. The Library of living philosophers. La Salle, Ill: Open Court.

Laudan, Larry. 1983. “The Demise of the Demarcation Problem.” In Physics, Philosophy and Psychoanalysis, 111–27. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7055-7_6

Lugg, Andrew. 1992. “Pseudoscience as Nonsense.” Methodology and Science 25. Mahner, Martin. 2007. “Demarcating Science from Non-Science.” ResearchGate. 2007.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286895878_Demarcating_Science_from_Non- Science

Mayo, Deborah G. 1996. “Ducks, Rabbits, and Normal Science: Recasting the Kuhn’s-Eye View of Popper’s Demarcation of Science.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (2): 271–90.

http://www.jstor.org/stable/687948

Morris, Robert L. 1987. “Parapsychology and the Demarcation Problem.” Inquiry 30 (3): 241–

51.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00201748708602122

Popper, Karl. 1934. Logica Cercetării.

———. 1963. Conjecturi Și Infirmări.

———. 1985. “Filosofie Socială Şi Filosofia Ştiinţei.” 1985. http://www.edituratrei.ro/carte/karl-r-popper-filosofie-sociala-si-filosofia-stiintei/1085

Sfetcu, Nicolae, “Distincția dintre falsificare și respingere în problema demarcației la Karl Popper”, SetThings (3 iunie 2018), MultiMedia (ed.)

10.13140/RG.2.2.10444.72329

ISBN 978-606-033-139-1

https://www.telework.ro/ro/e-books/distinctia-dintre-falsificare-si-respingere-in-problema-demarcatiei-la-karl-popper/

Siitonen, Arto. 1984. “Demarcation of Science From the Point of View of Problems and Problem-Stating.” Philosophia Naturalis 21: 339–353.

Thornton, Stephen. 2017. “Karl Popper.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, Summer 2017. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/popper


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS