Isaac Newton on the action at a distance in gravity: With or without God?

Sfetcu, Nicolae Isaac Newton on the action at a distance in gravity: With or without God?, 2019 [Preprint]

[thumbnail of Isaac_Newton_on_the_action_at_a_distance_in_gravity-With_or_without_God-Nicolae_Sfetcu-GTW.pdf]
Preview
Text
Isaac_Newton_on_the_action_at_a_distance_in_gravity-With_or_without_God-Nicolae_Sfetcu-GTW.pdf - Published version

Download (344kB) | Preview
Alternative locations: https://doi.org/10.58679/TW14959

English abstract

The interpretation of Isaac Newton's texts has sparked controversy to this day. One of the most heated debates relates to the action between two bodies distant from each other (the gravitational attraction), and to what extent Newton involved God in this case. Practically, most of the papers discuss four types of gravitational attractions in the case of remote bodies: direct distance action as intrinsic property of bodies in epicurean sense; direct remote action divinely mediated by God; remote action mediated by a material ether; or remote action mediated by an immaterial ether. The purpose of this paper is to argue that Newton categorically rejected the types of direct action as the intrinsic property of bodies, and remote action mediated by a material ether. Concerning the other two types of action, direct through divine intervention and mediated through an immaterial environment, Newton has repeatedly stated that he does not know the exact cause of gravity, but in both cases, he has directly involved God, directly in the first case and as the primary cause (the environment/ether being the secondary cause) in immaterial mediated action. But since recognition of direct distance action could have given some credit to those who thought gravity could be essential to matter, and hence to atheism, Newton never openly acknowledged the possibility of such an idea.

Item type: Preprint
Keywords: Isaac Newton, action at a distance, God, gravity, gravity law, gravitation
Subjects: D. Libraries as physical collections. > DI. Science libraries.
Depositing user: Nicolae Sfetcu
Date deposited: 28 Jul 2023 08:02
Last modified: 28 Jul 2023 08:02
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/44589

References

Bentley, Richard. 1693. “A Confutation of Atheism from the Origin and Frame of the World. Part II a Sermon Preached at St. Martin’s in the Fields, November the 7th, 1692 : Being the Seventh of the Lecture Founded by the Honourable Robert Boyle ... / by Richard Bentley ...” 1693. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A69557.0001.001?view=toc.

———. 1963. “A Confutation of Atheism from the Origin and Frame of the World. Part II a Sermon Preached at St. Martin’s in the Fields, November the 7th, 1692 : Being the Seventh of the Lecture Founded by the Honourable Robert Boyle ... / by Richard Bentley ...” 1963. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A69557.0001.001.

Cohen, I. Bernard, ed. 1978. Isaac Newton’s Papers & Letters on Natural Philosophy and Related Documents. Reprint 2014 ed. edition. Harvard University Press.

Ducheyne, Steffen. 2011a. “Newton on Action at a Distance and the Cause of Gravity.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1): 154–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.11.003.

———. 2011b. “Newton on Action at a Distance and the Cause of Gravity.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1): 154–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.11.003.

Henry, John. 1994. “‘Pray Do Not Ascribe That Notion to Me’: God and Newton’s Gravity.” In The Books of Nature and Scripture: Recent Essays on Natural Philosophy, Theology and Biblical Criticism in the Netherlands of Spinoza’s Time and the British Isles of Newton’s Time, edited by James E. Force and Richard H. Popkin, 123–47. International Archives of the History of Ideas / Archives Internationales D’Histoire Des Idées. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3249-9_8.

———. 2011a. “Gravity and De Gravitatione: The Development of Newton’s Ideas on Action at a Distance.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1): 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.11.025.

———. 2011b. “Gravity and De Gravitatione: The Development of Newton’s Ideas on Action at a Distance.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1): 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.11.025.

Janiak, Andrew. 2008a. “Newton as Philosopher.” Cambridge Core. July 2008. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511481512.

———. 2008b. “Newton as Philosopher by Andrew Janiak.” Cambridge Core. July 2008. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511481512.

Kochiras, Hylarie. 2009a. “Gravity and Newton’s Substance Counting Problem.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (3): 267–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2009.07.003.

———. 2009b. “Gravity and Newton’s Substance Counting Problem.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (3): 267–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2009.07.003.

———. 2011. “Gravity’s Cause and Substance Counting: Contextualizing the Problems.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1): 167–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.11.005.

McMullin, Ernan. 2002. “The Origins of the Field Concept in Physics.” Physics in Perspective 4 (1): 13–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00016-002-8357-5.

Newton, Isaac. 1687. Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica. Translated by Andrew Motte.

———. 1952. Opticks, Or, A Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections & Colours of Light. Courier Corporation.

———. 1979. Opticks, Or, A Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections & Colours of Light. Courier Corporation.

———. 1999a. The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. University of California Press.

———. 1999b. The Principia : Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Translated by I. Bernard Cohen, Anne Whitman, and Julia Budenz. Berkeley: University of California Press.

———. 2004. Isaac Newton: Philosophical Writings. Cambridge University Press.

———. 2008. “Draft Versions of ‘The Queries’ (Normalized Version).” 2008. http://www.newtonproject.ox.ac.uk/view/texts/normalized/NATP00055.

Royal Society. 1775. “Philosophical Transactions (1683-1775).” 1775. https://www.jstor.org/journal/philtran1683177.

Schliesser, Eric. 2008. “Without God: Gravity as a Relational Property of Matter in Newton.” Other. 2008. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/4248/.

———. 2011a. “Newton’s Substance Monism, Distant Action, and the Nature of Newton’s Empiricism: Discussion of H. Kochiras ‘Gravity and Newton’s Substance Counting Problem.’” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1): 160–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.11.004.

———. 2011b. “Newton’s Substance Monism, Distant Action, and the Nature of Newton’s Empiricism: Discussion of H. Kochiras ‘Gravity and Newton’s Substance Counting Problem.’” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1): 160–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.11.004.

Stein, Howard. 1970. “On the Notion of Field in Newton, Maxwell, and Beyond.” http://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/184654.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item