The distinction between falsification and refutation in the demarcation problem of Karl Popper

Agassi, Joseph. 1991. “Popper’s Demarcation of Science Refuted.” Methodology and Science 24.

Ariew, Roger. 2014. “Pierre Duhem.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by

Edward N. Zalta, Fall 2014. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.

https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/duhem/.

Bartley, W. W. 1976. “III: Biology – Evolutionary Epistemology.” Philosophia 6.

Bunge, Mario. 1982. “Demarcating Science from Pseudoscience.” Fundamenta Scientiae 3.

Champion, Rafe. 1985. “Agreeing to Disagree: Bartley’s Critique of Reason.” 1985.

http://www.the-rathouse.com/bartagree.html.

Cioffi, Frank. 1985. “Psychoanalysis, Pseudo-Science and Testability.” In Popper and the

Human Sciences, edited by Gregory Currie and Alan Musgrave, 13–44. Kluwer

Academic Publishers.

Derksen, A. A. 1985. “The Alleged Unity of Popper’s Philosophy of Science: Falsifiability as

Fake Cement.” Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the

Analytic Tradition 48 (3): 313–36. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4319794.

———. 1993. “The Seven Sins of Pseudo-Science.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science /

Zeitschrift Für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 24 (1): 17–42.

Einstein, Albert (Author). 1918. “Motive des Forschens.” 1918.

Feleppa, Robert. 1990. “Kuhn, Popper, and the Normative Problem of Demarcation.” Philosophy

of Science and the Occult 2.

Feyerabend, Paul K. 2010. Against Method. 4th edition. London ; New York: Verso.

Gleberzon, William. 1984. “Academic Freedom and Holocaust Denial Literature: Dealing with

Infamy.” Interchange on Education.

Grayling, A. C. 2001. Wittgenstein: A Very Short Introduction. OUP Oxford.

Grove, J W. 1985. “Rationality at Risk: Science Against Pseudoscience.” ResearchGate. 1985.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11730117_Rationality_at_Risk_Science_Again

st_Pseudoscience.

Grünbaum, Adolf. 1989. “Degeneration of Popper’s Theory of Demarcation.” 1989.

http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199989928.001.0001/a

cprof-9780199989928-chapter-3.

Hacking, Ian. 1983. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of

Natural Science. Cambridge University Press.

Hansson, Sven Ove. 1996. “Defining Pseudo-Science.” Philosophia Naturalis 33 (1): 169–176.

———. 2006. “Falsificationism Falsified.” Foundations of Science 11 (3): 275–86.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-004-5922-1.

———. 2017. “Science and Pseudo-Science.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy,

edited by Edward N. Zalta, Summer 2017. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford

University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/pseudo-science/.

Heath, Joseph. 2015. “Methodological Individualism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of

Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, Spring 2015. Metaphysics Research Lab,

Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/methodologicalindividualism/.

Hempel, Carl G. 1958. “Empirical Statements and Falsifiability.” Philosophy 33 (127): 342–48.

http://www.jstor.org/stable/3748661.

Hume, David. 1738. A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford University Press.

Nicolae Sfetcu: The distinction between falsification and refutation - Karl Popper

35

Hurd, Paul DeHart. 1998. “Scientific Literacy: New Minds for a Changing World.” Science

Education 82 (3): 407–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-

237X(199806)82:3<407::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-G.

Jeffrey, Richard C. 1975. “Probability and Falsification: Critique of the Popper Program.”

Synthese 30 (1–2): 95–117.

Keita, Lansana. 1989. “Are Universal Statements Falsifiable?” Journal for General Philosophy

of Science 20 (2): 351–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01801484.

Kuhn, Thomas. 1970. “Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research?” Criticism and the

Growth of Knowledge.

Kuhn, Thomas S. 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 3rd edition. Chicago, IL:

University of Chicago Press.

Kvasz, Ladislav. 2004. “How Can A Falsified Theory Remain Corroborated?” In Induction and

Deduction in the Sciences, 263–71. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook. Springer,

Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2196-1_19.

Lakatos, I. 1974. “Popper on Demarcation and Induction.” In The Philosophy of Karl Popper,

edited by Karl R. Popper and Paul Arthur Schilpp, 1st ed. Vol. The Library of living

philosophers. La Salle, Ill: Open Court.

Lakatos, Imre. 1970. “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programs.”

1970. http://www.stephenjaygould.org/ctrl/lakatos_prediction.html.

———. 1973. “Science and Pseudoscience.” Scribd. 1973.

https://www.scribd.com/document/324484267/Science-and-Pseudoscience-1973-Imre-

Lakatos.

———. 1978. “The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.” Cambridge Core. 1978.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621123.

Laudan, Larry. 1983. “The Demise of the Demarcation Problem.” In Physics, Philosophy and

Psychoanalysis, 111–27. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Springer,

Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7055-7_6.

LeVine, Michael V. 2016. “Science Has Experience Fighting Fake News — and Facebook

Should Take Note.” 2016. https://mic.com/articles/161376/science-has-experiencefighting-

fake-news-and-facebook-should-take-note.

Lugg, Andrew. 1992. “Pseudoscience as Nonsense.” Methodology and Science 25.

Lutz, Sebastian. 2011. “On an Allegedly Essential Feature of Criteria for the Demarcation of

Science.” Published Article or Volume. The Reasoner. 2011.

http://www.kent.ac.uk/secl/philosophy/jw/TheReasoner/vol5/TheReasoner-5(8).pdf.

Magendie, Francois. 1843. “An Elementary Treatise on Human Physiology.” Bokus.com. 1843.

https://www.bokus.com/bok/9781334413049/an-elementary-treatise-on-humanphysiology/.

Mahner, Martin. 2007. “Demarcating Science from Non-Science.” ResearchGate. 2007.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286895878_Demarcating_Science_from_Non-

Science.

———. 2013. “Science and Pseudoscience. How to Demarcate after the (Alleged) Demise of the

Demarcation Problem.” In Pigliucci and Boudry.

Mayo, Deborah G. 1996. “Ducks, Rabbits, and Normal Science: Recasting the Kuhn’s-Eye View

of Popper’s Demarcation of Science.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

47 (2): 271–90. http://www.jstor.org/stable/687948.

Nicolae Sfetcu: The distinction between falsification and refutation - Karl Popper

36

Merton, Robert. 1973. “Science and Technology in a Democratic Order.” Journal of Legal and

Political Sociology 1.

Miller, David. 1985. Popper Selections. Princeton.

———. 2009a. “Out of Error: Further Essays on Critical Rationalism.” In Rethinking Popper,

edited by Zuzana Parusniková and R. S. Cohen, 417–423. Springer.

———. 2009b. “Some Hard Questions for Critical Rationalism.”

https://philpapers.org/rec/MILSHQ.

Mises, Ludwig von. 2014. “Human Action.” Text. Mises Institute. 2014.

https://mises.org/library/human-action-0.

Mitra, Suddhachit. 2016. “What Constitutes Science: Falsifiability as a Criterion of

Demarcation.” ResearchGate. 2016.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304462826_What_Constitutes_Science_Falsifia

bility_as_a_Criterion_of_Demarcation.

Morris, Robert L. 1987. “Parapsychology and the Demarcation Problem.” Inquiry 30 (3): 241–

51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201748708602122.

Musgrave, Alan, and Charles Pigden. 2016. “Imre Lakatos.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of

Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, Winter 2016. Metaphysics Research Lab,

Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/lakatos/.

Newall, Paul. 2005. “Falsificationism.” 2005.

https://web.archive.org/web/20070708134433/galilean-library.org/falsificationism.html.

O’Hear, Anthony. 1996. “Karl Popper: Philosophy and Problems.” Cambridge Core. 1996.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511563751.

Papineau, D. 2006. “Three Scenes and a Moral.” The Philosophers’ Magazine 38.

Pigliucci, Massimo. 2013. “The Demarcation Problem: A (Belated) Response to Laudan.” In

Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, edited by

Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry, 9. University of Chicago Press.

Popper, Karl. 1934. Logica Cercetării.

———. 1974. “Replies to My Critics.” 1974. http://www.theopensociety.net/category/popperkarl/

replies-to-my-critics/.

Popper, Karl, and Konrad Lorentz. 1985. Die Zukunft ist offen. Das Altenberger Gespräch. Mit

den Texten des Wiener Popper-Symposiums. 2. Auflage, 9.-18. Tausend. München: Piper.

Popper, Karl R. 1959. “The Propensity Interpretation of Probability.” The British Journal for the

Philosophy of Science 10 (37): 25–42. https://www.jstor.org/stable/685773.

———. 1979. Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford University Press.

Popper, Karl Raimund. 1983. Realism and the Aim of Science. Hutchinson.

———. 2002a. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. Psychology

Press.

———. 2002b. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Psychology Press.

Putnam, Hilary, Philip Gasper, and J. D. Trout. 1974. The ‘Corroboration’ of Theories - In The

Philosophy of Science. Vol. The ‘corroboration’ of Theories. MIT Press.

Quine, W. V. O. 1953. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” In Wikipedia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Two_Dogmas_of_Empiricism&oldid=840214

769.

Reisch, George A. 1998. “Pluralism, Logical Empiricism, and the Problem of Pseudoscience.”

Philosophy of Science 65 (2): 333–48. https://doi.org/10.1086/392642.

Nicolae Sfetcu: The distinction between falsification and refutation - Karl Popper

37

Rothbart, Daniel. 1990. “Demarcating Genuine Science from Pseudoscience.” Philosophy of

Science and the Occult 2.

Salmon, Wesley C., and Christopher Hitchcock. 2017. The Foundations of Scientific Inference:

50th Anniversary Edition. University of Pittsburgh Press.

https://muse.jhu.edu/book/52596.

Sfetcu, Nicolae. 2015. Pseudoştiinţă? Dincolo de noi... Lulu.com.

Shasha, Dennis Elliot, and Cathy A. Lazere. 1998. “Out of Their Minds: The Lives and

Discoveries of 15 Great Computer Scientists.” 1998.

https://books.google.ro/books/about/Out_of_their_Minds.html?id=-0tDZX3z-

8UC&redir_esc=y.

Shea, Brendan. 2017. “Karl Popper.” 2017. http://www.iep.utm.edu/pop-sci/.

Siitonen, Arto. 1984. “Demarcation of Science From the Point of View of Problems and

Problem-Stating.” Philosophia Naturalis 21: 339–353.

Sokal, Alan, and Jean Bricmont. 1999. Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals’ Abuse

of Science. 1st edition. New York: Picador.

Stove, D. C. 1978. “Popper on Scientific Statements.” Philosophy 53 (203): 81–88.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819100016326.

Taliga, Miloš. 2004. “Against Watkins: From a Popperian Point of View.” Organon F:

Medzinárodný Asopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 11 (2): 143–157.

Thagard, Paul R. 1978. “Why Astrology Is a Pseudoscience.” PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial

Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978: 223–234.

Thornton, Stephen. 2017. “Karl Popper.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by

Edward N. Zalta, Summer 2017. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.

https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/popper/.

Toulmin, Stephen. 1967. “Conceptual Revolutions in Science.” Synthese 17 (1): 75–91.

http://www.jstor.org/stable/20114536.

Watkins, J. W. N. 1968. “Hume, Carnap and Popper.” The Problem of Inductive Logic.

Watkins, John W. N. 1997. “Popperian Ideas on Progress & Rationality in Science.” The Critical

Rationalist 2.

Williams, Nigel. 2005. “Heavyweight Attack on Climate-Change Denial.” Current Biology 15

(4): R109–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.02.002.