Research Trends on Open Science: A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization

Ayush Kumar, Patel and Kunwar, Singh . Research Trends on Open Science: A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization., 2022 In: Management of Modern Libraries in New Normal. CORVETTE PRESS 123, Ground Floor, Sector-3, Vasundhara, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh - 201012, pp. 197-204. [Book chapter]

This is the latest version of this item.

[thumbnail of ResearchTrends-OpenSc Ed.pdf]
Preview
Text
ResearchTrends-OpenSc Ed.pdf

Download (359kB) | Preview

English abstract

This study examines Open Science research output at a global level from 1989 to 2021. The data was obtained from the Web of Science database. During the study, 1301 records were retrieved. The data was then visualized using VOSviewer software version 1.1.16. The finding revealed that Ross, Joseph S., and Bradley, Jean-Claude were the most prolific authors, with 7 documents. The leading organization on open science research was the MCGILL University, with 25 documents. Furthermore, the United States had supplied 442 documents, followed by England with 169 and Germany with 113. The finding indicates that there was a steady increase in open science research during the study period.

Item type: Book chapter
Keywords: Bibliometric analysis; Visualization; Open Science; Open innovation;Research Trends; Web of Science; VOSviewer
Subjects: L. Information technology and library technology > LZ. None of these, but in this section.
Depositing user: Unnamed user with email ayush.bhu21@gmail.com
Date deposited: 16 Nov 2023 09:08
Last modified: 16 Nov 2023 09:08
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/45094

Available Versions of this Item

References

Aristovnik, A., Ravšelj, D., &Umek, L. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of COVID-19across science and social science research landscape. Sustainability, 12(21), 9132.https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219132

Laengle, S., Merigó, J. M., Modak, N. M., & Yang, J. B. (2018). Bibliometrics in operationsresearch and management science: a university analysis. Annals of OperationsResearch, 1-45.

Mirowski, P. (2018). The future (s) of open science. Social studies of science, 48(2), 171-203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312718772086

Murnaka, N. P., Suwarno, Rusdarti, Rustono, Sudana, I. M., &Raharjo, T. J.(2021). Educational Technology Research Trends: A Bibliometrics AnalysisAnd Visualization. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education(TURCOMAT), 12(6), 2695-2701. https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i6.5770

Patel, A. K., Singh, M., Singh, K., Patel, A. K., Varma, A. K., &Kuri, R. (2021). VisualizingPublication Trends in Webology Journal: A Bibliometric Review based on theScopus Database (2006–2020) Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal) , 5995,1-24. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/5995

Vicente-Saez, R., & Martinez-Fuentes, C. (2018). Open Science now: A systematicliterature review for an integrated definition. Journal of Business Research, 88 ,428–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.043

Wang, M. H., Ho, Y. S., & Fu, H. Z. (2019). Global performance and developmenton sustainable city based on natural science and social science research: Abibliometric analysis. Science of the Total Environment , 666, 1245-1254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.139

Web of Science. (n.d.). Search. Retrieved October 12, 2021, from https://www.webofscience.com/

Zurita, G., Merigo, J. M., Lobos-Ossandon, V., &Mulet-Forteza, C. (2020). Bibliometricsin computer science: An institution ranking. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems,38(5), 5441-5453. DOI: 10.3233/JIFS-179636


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item