Alethic rights and alethic pluralism in libraries

Ridi, Riccardo Alethic rights and alethic pluralism in libraries. Libri: international journal of libraries and information studies, 2023, vol. 73, n. 1, pp. 1-10. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[img]
Preview
 Text (Preprint)
ridi-alethic-rights.pdf - Draft version
Download (336kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
 Text (Editorial version)
ridi-alethic-rights(editorial-version).pdf - Published version
Download (337kB) | Preview

English abstract

The concept of truth, although unavoidable, is very problematic from a philosophical point of view and, in the field of librarianship, it is even more disputed for various reasons: inapplicability to libraries' collections and reference services, scarcity of resources necessary in the event of a possible application, conflict with the value of intellectual neutrality. The “alethic rights” proposed by D'Agostini in 2017, pertinent to truth claims in social contexts, can be interpreted in two ways: the “strong” way is not applicable to libraries because it would lead to the same problems caused by the research of the truthfulness of each document preserved by libraries and of any information provided by their reference services; the "weak" way would instead be applicable to libraries, but it is more appropriate not to apply this either, both because there would be the risk that it could be interpreted in the strong way, and because its application would still be redundant compared to what already happens in libraries and to what, if necessary, could be obtained in emergency situations by applying instead the principle of social responsibility. In the library field it would be more sensible and useful to apply, instead of alethic rights, the epistemological theory of “alethic pluralism” by Wright (1992) and Lynch (2009), which defines the concept of truth in a way compatible with technical practices and with deontological rules currently more widespread in libraries.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: truth, alethic rights, alethic pluralism, intellectual neutrality, Franca D’Agostini
Subjects: A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information. > AB. Information theory and library theory.
Depositing user: Riccardo Ridi
Date deposited: 02 Dec 2023 06:12
Last modified: 20 Jan 2024 10:19
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/45112

References

ALA. 2019. Library bill of rights, adopted June 19, 1939, by the American Library Association Council; amended October 14, 1944; June 18, 1948; February 2, 1961; June 27, 1967; January 23, 1980; January 29, 2019. ALA. http://www.ala.org/advocacy/intfreedom/librarybill (accessed March 17, 2022).

Antoniacomi, G. 2018. “I percorsi ingannevoli nella gestione delle collezioni di una biblioteca pubblica tra censura e legittimazione della post verità: verso il paradigma dei diritti aletici.” AIB studi 58 (1): 65-82. https://aibstudi.aib.it/article/view/11753 (accessed March 17, 2022).

Armour-Garb, B., and J. Woodbridge. 2021. “Deflationism about Truth.”, first published August 28, 1997, substantive revision December 14, 2021, In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, principal editor E. N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/truth-deflationary/ (accessed March 17, 2022).

Blackburn, S. 2018. On truth. New York: Oxford University Press.

Bufacchi, V. 2021. “Truth, Lies and Tweets: A Consensus Theory of Post-truth.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 47 (3): 347-61.

Capps, J. 2018. “The Coherence Theory of Truth.”, first published September 3, 1996, substantive revision June 26, 2018. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, principal editor E. N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/truth-coherence/ (accessed March 17, 2022).

Capps, J. 2019. “Pragmatic Theory of Truth.”, first published March 21, 2019. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, principal editor E. N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/truth-pragmatic/ (accessed March 17, 2022).

Caputo, S. 2015. Verità. Roma and Bari: Laterza.

D’Agostini, F. 2002. Disavventure della verità. Torino: Einaudi.

D’Agostini, F. 2011. Introduzione alla verità. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.

D’Agostini, F. 2012. Menzogna. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.

D’Agostini, F. 2017. “Diritti aletici.” Biblioteca della Libertà 52 (218): 5-42. https://www.centroeinaudi.it/images/abook_file/BDL218.pdf (accessed March 17, 2022).

D’Agostini, F. 2021. “Alethic Rights: Preliminaries of an Inquiry into the Power of Truth.” Social Epistemology 35 (5): 515-32.

D’Agostini, F., and M. Ferrera. 2019. La verità al potere: sei diritti aletici. Torino: Einaudi.

Dabney, D. 1991. “[Review of] The Freedom to Lie: A Debate about Democracy by John Swan and Noel Peattie, Jefferson: McFarland, 1989.” Journal of Education for Library and Information Science 31 (4): 377-9.

David, M. 2015. “The Correspondence Theory of Truth.”, first published May 10, 2002, substantive revision May 28, 2015. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, principal editor E. N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/truth-correspondence/ (accessed March 17, 2022).

Dowden, B. 2022. “Truth.” In Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, general editors J. Fieser and B. Dowden. https://iep.utm.edu/truth/ (accessed March 17, 2022).

Edwards, D. 2022. “Pluralistic Theories of Truth.” In Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, general editors J. Fieser and B. Dowden. https://iep.utm.edu/plur-tru/ (accessed March 17, 2022).

Fenner, E. 2004. Selecting Materials for Library Collections, edited by A. Fenner. Binghamton: Haworth Information.

Froehlich, T. J. 2021. “Some Thoughts Evoked by Peter Lor, Bradley Wiles, and Johannes Britz, “Re-thinking Information Ethics: Truth, Conspiracy Theories, and Librarians in the COVID-19 Era,” in LIBRI, March 2021.” International Journal of Libraries and Information Studies (LIBRI) 71 (3): 219-25.

Gabbatt, A. 2022. “Truth Social: The Failing Anti-Twitter Platform even Trump Barely Use.” The Guardian, 16 March 2022. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2022/mar/16/truth-social-donald-trump-failing-anti-twitter-platform (accessed March 17, 2022).

Gębołyś, Z., and J. Tomaszczyk Jacek. 2012. Library Codes of Ethics Worldwide: Anthology. Berlin: Simon Verlag für Bibliothekswissen.

Gregory, V. L. 2019. Collection Development and Management for 21st Century Library Collections: An Introduction, 2nd ed., edited by V. L. Gregory. Chicago: American Library Association and Neal-Schuman.

Harger, E. 2016. Which Side Are You on? Seven Social Responsibility Debates in American Librarianship, 1990-2015. Jefferson (North Car.): McFarland.

IFLA. 2022. “National Codes of Ethics for Librarians by Country.” International Federation of Library Associations, Committee on Freedom of Access to Information and Freedom of Expression. https://www.ifla.org/national-codes-of-ethics-for-librarians-by-countries/ (accessed March 17, 2022).

Labaree, R. V., and R. Scimeca. 2008. “The Philosophical Problem of Truth in Librarianship.” Library quarterly 78 (1): 43-70.

Lor, P. 2020. “Riccardo Ridi on Intellectual Neutrality: A Perspective from Italy.”, 2020-01-03, corrected 2020-01-05. https://peterlor.com/2020/01/03/riccardo-ridi-on-intellectual-neutrality-a-perspective-from-italy-2/ (accessed March 17, 2022).

Lor, P., B. Wiles, and J. Britz. 2021. “Re-thinking Information Ethics: Truth, Conspiracy Theories, and Librarians in the COVID-19 Era.” International Journal of Libraries and Information Studies (LIBRI) 71 (1): 1-14.

Lynch, M. P. 2009. Truth as One and Many. Oxford: Clarendon.

Mill, J. S. 1859. On Liberty. London, Parker. Also available at https://archive.org/details/onlibertyxero00milluoft (accessed March 17, 2022).

Moore, A. 2012. “Arcane Erotica and National ‘Patrimony’: Britain’s Private Case and the Collection de l’Enfer of the Bibliothèque Nationale de France”. Cultural Studies Review 18 (1): 196-216.

Pedersen, N. J. L. L., and C. Wright. 2018. “Pluralistic Theories of Truth.”, first published March 5, 2012, substantive revision October 19, 2018. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, principal editor E. N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/truth-pluralist/ (accessed March 17, 2022).

Ridi, R. 2011. Etica bibliotecaria: deontologia professionale e dilemmi morali. Milano: Editrice Bibliografica.

Ridi, R. 2014. “La responsabilità sociale delle biblioteche: una connessione a doppio taglio.” Biblioteche Oggi 32 (3): 26-41.

http://www.bibliotecheoggi.it/pdf.php?filepdf=20140302601.pdf (accessed March 17, 2022).

Ridi, R. 2018. “Livelli di verità: post-verità, fake news e neutralità intellettuale in biblioteca.” AIB Studi 58 (3): 455-77. https://aibstudi.aib.it/article/view/11833 (accessed March 17, 2022).

Ridi, R. 2022. “Biblioteche e diritti aletici: una, nessuna o centomila verità?” AIB Studi 62 (2): 317-338.

https://aibstudi.aib.it/article/view/13400 (accessed November 7, 2022).

RLA. 2011. The Code of Ethics for Russian Librarian, adopted by the Russian Library Association Conference of May 26, 2011. IFLA. http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/faife/publications/misc/code-of-ethics-ru.pdf (accessed March 17, 2022).

Scott, D., and L. Saunders. 2021. “Neutrality in Public Libraries: How Are We Defining One of Our Core Values?.” Journal of librarianship and information science 53 (1): 153-66.

Simon, S. 2022. Russian law bans journalists from calling Ukraine conflict a ‘war’ or an ‘invasion’, National public radio, March 2, 2022. https://www.npr.org/2022/03/05/1084729579/ (accessed July 4, 2022).

Sloman, S., and P. Fernbach. 2018. The Knowledge Illusion: Why We Never Think Alone. New York: Riverhead Books.

Soltani-Nejad, N., M. Jahanshahi, M. K. Saberi, N. Ansari, and N. Zarei-Maram. 2022. “The Relationship between Social Responsibility and Public Libraries Accountability: The Mediating Role of Professional Ethics and Conscientiousness.” Journal of librarianship and information science 54 (2): 306-24.

Swan, J. C. 1986. “Untruth or Consequences: As Librarians Our Case Is not Truth but Freedom.” Library Journal 111 (July): 44-52.

Volpe, G. 2012. La verità. Roma: Carocci.

Wenzler, J. 2019. “Neutrality and Its Discontents: An Essay on the Ethics of Librarianship”. Portal: Libraries and the Academy 19 (1): 55-78.

Whittaker, K. 1982. Systematic Evaluation: Methods and Sources for Assessing Books. London: Bingley.

Wilson, P. 1983. Second-Hand Knowledge: An Inquiry into Cognitive Authority. Westport (Conn.) and London: Greenwood.

Wright, C. 1992. Truth and Objectivity. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS