Draper, Mick Peer review : the HEP view., 2001 . In Workshop on the Open Archives Initiative (OAI) and Peer Review journals in Europe (OAI1), CERN (Geneva, Switzerland), 22-24th March 2001. [Presentation]
Preview |
PDF
Atlas.pdf Download (125kB) | Preview |
Microsoft PowerPoint
Draper.ppt Download (865kB) |
|
Preview |
Image (JPEG)
048.jpg Download (226kB) | Preview |
English abstract
HEP experiments are now done by large collaborations (e.g. ATLAS and CMS with almost 2000 physicists from 60 countries). Inside such collaborations there is an internal review before any paper gets sent for publication (done by a small group of between 5-10). Paper, in its almost final form, is then sent to the whole collaboration for review. For CERN experiments, a referee – external to the collaboration – validates the paper from a scientific and editorial point of view. This review process involves so many people that there is little ‘added value’ given by publishers’ peer review.
Item type: | Presentation |
---|---|
Keywords: | OAI, Open Archives Initiative, Cern, workshop, peer review journals, electronic libraries, digital libraries, OAI repositories. |
Subjects: | L. Information technology and library technology H. Information sources, supports, channels. |
Depositing user: | Imma Subirats Coll |
Date deposited: | 28 Feb 2004 |
Last modified: | 02 Oct 2014 11:57 |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10760/4526 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Actions (login required)
View Item |