Información sobre salud. La función del periodista [Health information. The role of the journalist]

Ferrer-Pérez, Sergio and Peñafiel-Saiz, Carmen Información sobre salud. La función del periodista [Health information. The role of the journalist]. Infonomy, 2024, vol. 2, n. 1. [Journal article (Unpaginated)]

[img]
Preview
 Text
Ferrer-Penafiel-Informacion-sobre-salud.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (317kB) | Preview

English abstract

Journalism always requires ethics and responsibility from those who practice it, and sci-ence journalism is no exception. However, health journalism is a particularly delicate field within the profession: alarmist, sensationalist, or less rigorous communication from other areas of science can lead the reader to misunderstand the Higgs boson or, at most, believe that a meteorite could impact Earth. In the case of health, there is a danger of creating confusion, alarm, false hopes, and over-expectations on such delicate and personal matters as cancer and Alzheimer's, or matters of public health importance such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, one of the most important and challenging tasks of the science journalist in urgent contexts is, paradoxically, not to publish. In other words, deciding which information, preprints, studies, reports, press releases, and even debates deserve to reach the public opinion and which ones do not.

Spanish abstract

El periodismo siempre requiere de ética y responsabilidad por parte de quienes lo ejercen, y el periodismo de ciencia no es una excepción. Sin embargo, el periodismo de salud es un campo especialmente delicado dentro de la profesión: una comunicación alarmista, sensacionalista o poco rigurosa de otras áreas de la ciencia puede hacer que el lector no entienda el bosón de Higgs o, como mucho, crea que un meteorito puede impactar contra la Tierra. En el caso de la salud existe el peligro de crear confusión, alarma, falsas esperanzas y sobreexpectativas en temas tan delicados y personales como el cáncer y el alzhéimer, o de importancia para la salud pública como la pandemia de covid-19. Así, una de las tareas más importantes y difíciles del periodista científico en contextos de urgencia consiste, paradójicamente, en no publicar. En otras palabras, en decidir qué informaciones, preprints, estudios, informes, notas de prensa y hasta debates merecen llegar a la opinión pública y cuáles no.

Item type: Journal article (Unpaginated)
Keywords: Información; Salud; Periodismo; Desinformación; Periodismo científico; Ciencia; Salud pública; Opinión pública; Medios y redes sociales; Information; Health; Journalism; Fake news; Scientific journalism; Science; Public health; Public opinion; Media and social networks.
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BH. Information needs and information requirements analysis.
C. Users, literacy and reading. > CE. Literacy.
Depositing user: Tomàs Baiget
Date deposited: 22 Jan 2024 11:19
Last modified: 22 Jan 2024 11:19
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/45355

References

Cacciatore, M.A. et al. (2012). «Coverage of emerging technologies: A comparison between print and online media». New media & society, v. 14, n. 6, pp. 1039-1059.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1461444812439061

Catalán-Matamoros, D.; Peñafiel-Saiz, C. (2019). «Specialty matters. Analysis of health journalists’ coverage about vaccines». El profesional de la información, v. 28, n. 2.

https://doi.org//10.3145/epi.2019.mar.01

Elías-Pérez, C.; Catalán-Matamoros, D. (2020). «Coronavirus: Fear to “official” fake news boosts WhatsApp and alternative sources». Media communication, v. 8, pp. 462-466.

https://e-archivo.uc3m.es/handle/10016/30665

Hinnant, A.; Len-Ríos M. E.; Hyun-Jee, O. (2012).«Are health journalists’ practices tied to their perceptions of audience? An attribution and expectancy-value approach». Health communication, v. 27, n. 3, pp. 234-243.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.578331

Lewis, J.;Cushion, S.(2017).«Think tanks, television news and impartiality: The ideological balance of sources in BBC programming». Journalism studies, v. 20.

https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1389295

López-Doblas, M.; Luque-Martín, N.; Martín-Barato, A. (2020). Medios de comunicación y COVID-19. Pautas para una información responsable. Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública.

http://www.easp.es/web/coronavirusysaludpublica/medios-de-comunicacion-y-covid-19-pautas-para-una-informacion-responsable

Mejia, Christian et al.(2020).«The media and their informative role in the face of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Validation of fear perception and magnitude of the issue (MED-COVID-19 )». Electronic journal of general medicine, v. 17, n. 6.

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/7946

Nguyen, A.; Catalán-Matamoros, D. (2020). «Digital Mis/Disinformation and Public Engagement with Health and Science Controversies: Fresh Perspectives from Covid-19». Media communication, v. 8, pp. 323-328.

https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.3352

Stroobant, J.; De Dobbelaer R.; Raeymaeckers, K.(2018). «Tracing the Sources: A comparative content analysis of Belgian health news». Journalism practice, v. 12, n. 3, pp. 344-361.

https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2017.1294027

The New York Times(2020). Your coronavirus test is positive. Maybe it shouldn’t be. August 29.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html

Viswanath K. et al.(2008).«Occupational practices and the making of health news: A national survey of U.S. health and medical science journalists». Journal of health communication, v. 13, n. 8, pp. 759-777.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730802487430


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS