Understanding fake news during the Covid-19 health crisis from the perspective of information behaviour: The case of Spain

Montesi, Michela Understanding fake news during the Covid-19 health crisis from the perspective of information behaviour: The case of Spain. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 2021, vol. 53, n. 3, pp. 454-465. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of montesi-2020-understanding-fake-news-during-the-covid-19-health-crisis-from-the-perspective-of-information-behaviour.pdf]
Preview
 Text
montesi-2020-understanding-fake-news-during-the-covid-19-health-crisis-from-the-perspective-of-information-behaviour.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (138kB) | Preview

English abstract

The health crisis brought about by Covid-19 has generated a heightened need for information as a response to a situation of uncertainty and high emotional load, in which fake news and other informative content have grown dramatically. The aim of this work is to delve into the understanding of fake news from the perspective of information behaviour by analysing a sample of fake news items that were spread in Spain during the Covid-19 health crisis. A sample of 242 fake news items was collected from the Maldita.es website and analysed according to the criteria of cognitive and affective authority, interactivity, themes and potential danger. The results point to a practical absence of indicators of cognitive authority (53.7%), while the affective authority of these news items is built through mechanisms of discrediting people, ideas or movements (40.7%) and, secondarily, the use of offensive or coarse language (17.7%) and comparison or reference to additional information sources (26.6%). Interactivity features allow commenting in 24.3% of the cases. The dominant theme is society (43.1%), followed by politics (26.4%) and science (23.6%). Finally, fake news, for the most part, does not seem to pose any danger to the health or safety of people – the harm it causes is intangible and moral. The author concludes by highlighting the importance of a culture of civic values to combat fake news.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Fake news, Covid-19, Spain, information behaviour, cognitive authority, affective authority, interactivity, civic values.
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BC. Information in society.
Depositing user: Michela Montesi
Date deposited: 08 Aug 2024 13:31
Last modified: 08 Aug 2024 13:34
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/45500

References

Baillergeau E and Duyvendak JW (2016) Experiential knowledge as a resource for coping with uncertainty: Evidence and examples from the Netherlands. Health, Risk and Society 18(7–8): 407–426.

Bakir V and McStay A (2018) Fake news and the economy of emotions: Problems, causes, solutions. Digital Journalism 6(2): 154–175.

Barbarin AM, Klasnja P and Veinot TC (2016) Good or bad, ups and downs, and getting better: Use of personal health data for temporal reflection in chronic illness. International Journal of Medical Informatics 94: 237–245.

Bernal-Triviño A and Clares-Gavilán J (2019) Uso del móvil y las redes sociales como canales de verificación de fake news: El caso de Maldita.es. El Profesional de la Información 28(3): e280312.

Blanco-Herrero D and Arcila-Calderón C (2019) Deontología y noticias falsas: Estudio de las percepciones de periodistas españoles. El Profesional de la Información 28(3): e280308.

Borondo S (2020). Los bulos sobre el coronavirus más extendidos (y cómo detectarlos) en WhatsApp y redes sociales. El Correo, 27 March. https://www.elcorreo.com/tecnologia/internet/bulos-coronavirus-extendidos20200326134242-nt.html

Bremer S and Meisch S (2017) Co-production in climate change research: Reviewing different perspectives. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 8(6):e482.

Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (2020) Barómetro especial de abril 2020. Study no. 3279. http://datos.cis.es/pdf/Es3279mar_A.pdf

Cinelli M, Quattrociocchi W, Galeazzi A, et al. (2020) The covid19 social media infodemic. arXiv.org. Epub ahead of print 10 March 2020. DOI: arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.05004.

Ferrara E (2020). What types of Covid-19 conspiracies are populated by Twitter bots? First Monday, 25(6). https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/download/10633/9548

Hirvonen N, Tirroniemi A and Kortelainen T (2019) The cognitive authority of user-generated health information in an online forum for girls and young women. Journal of Documentation 75(1): 78–98.

Intelligence Centre against Terrorism and Organized Crime (2020) Fake news y desinformaciones sobre el virus covid-19 en fuentes abiertas. http://www.famp.es/export/sites/famp/.galleries/documentos-boeboja/20200300-INFORME-CITCO-FAKE-NEWS-CORONAVIRUS-2-231-956-2.pdf.pdf.pdf.pdf

International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (2020) How to spot fake news. https://www.ifla.org/publications/node/11174

Kuhlthau CC (1991) Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user’s perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 42(5): 361–371.

Soler Sarrió A (2020) Avalancha de bulos y fake news durante la crisis del Covid-19. Available at: https://www.albertosoler.es/avalancha-de-bulos-y-fake-news-durante-la-crisis-delcovid-19/

Spanish National Police (2020) Guía contra las fake news. https://www.policia.es/prensa/20200327_1.html

Spink A and Cole C (2004) A human information behavior approach to a philosophy of information. Library Trends 53(3): 617–628.

Sullivan MC (2019) Why librarians can’t fight fake news. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 51(4): 1146–1156.

Sun Y, Zhang Y, Gwizdka J, et al. (2019) Consumer evaluation of the quality of online health information: Systematic literature review of relevant criteria and indicators. Journal of Medical Internet Research 21(5): e12522.

Tandoc EC (2019) The facts of fake news: A research review. Sociology Compass 13(9): e12724.

Tandoc EC, Lim ZW and Ling R (2018) Defining ‘fake news’: A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism 6(2): 137–153.

Vincent F (2020) Cómo combatir las fake news en la era del Covid-19. YouTube, 25 March. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6QgTUPL2Xqs

Vraga EK, Bode L and Tully M (2020a) Creating news literacy messages to enhance expert corrections of misinformation on Twitter. Communication Research. Epub ahead of print 20 January 2020. DOI: 10.1177/0093650219898094

Vraga EK, Tully M and Bode L (2020b) Empowering users to respond to misinformation about Covid-19. Media and Communication 8(2): 475–479.

World Health Organization (2018) Managing epidemics: Key facts about major deadly diseases. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/managing-epidemicsinteractive.pdf

Xie B, He D, Mercer T, et al. (2020) Global health crises are also information crises: A call to action. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. Epub ahead of print 13 March 2020. DOI: 10.1002/asi.24357

Yang F and Shen F (2018) Effects of web interactivity: A metaanalysis. Communication Research 45(5): 635–658.

Zhang X and Ghorbani AA (2020) An overview of online fake news: Characterization, detection, and discussion. Information Processing and Management 57(2): 102025.

Zhang Y, Sun Y and Xie B (2015) Quality of health information for consumers on the web: A systematic review of indicators, criteria, tools, and evaluation results. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66(10): 2071–2084.

Kuhlthau CC (2005) Kuhlthau’s information search process. In: Fisher KE, Erdelez S and McKechnie LEF (eds) Theories of Information Behavior. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 230–234.

Lazer DM, Baum MA, Benkler Y, et al. (2018) The science of fake news. Science 359(6380): 1094–1096.

López-Borrull A, Vives-Gràcia J and Badell JI (2018) Fake news: ¿amenaza u oportunidad para los profesionales de la información y la documentación? El Profesional de la Información 27(6): 1346–1356.

Lynch K and Hunter S (2020) Conflicting authority. Using the Trump administration’s responses to the EPA climate assessment report to teach information literacy. Reference Services Review 48(1): 201–216.

Maldita.es (2018) Metodología de Maldito Bulo. https://maldita.es/metodologia-de-maldito-bulo

Marcos J (2020) El CIS pregunta si hay que mantener la ‘libertad total’ de información sobre el coronavirus. El País, 15 April. https://elpais.com/espana/2020-04-15/el-cis-pregunta-si-hay-que-mantener-la-libertad-total-deinformacion-sobre-el-coronavirus.html

Marquina J (2020) ¿Qué es la infodemia de la que habla la OMS?

https://www.julianmarquina.es/que-es-infodemia/

Montero-Liberona C and Halpern D (2019) Factores que influyen en compartir noticias falsas de salud online. El Profesional de la Información 28(3): e280317.

Montesi M (2019) Comportamiento informacional en la búsqueda de información sobre salud. In: Montesi M, Marco Cuenca G and Ramírez Martín S (eds.) Información, salud y ciudadanía. Gijón: Trea, 115–134.

Montesi M and Álvarez Bornstein B (2017) Defining a theoretical framework for information seeking and parenting: Concepts and themes from a study with mothers supportive of attachment parenting. Journal of Documentation 73(2): 186–209.

Naess LO (2013) The role of local knowledge in adaptation to climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 4(2): 99–106.

Nahl D (2005a) Affective and cognitive information behavior: Interaction effects in Internet use. In: 68th annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Charlotte, USA, 28 October–2 November.

http://eprints.rclis.org/6856/

Nahl D (2005b WAS A) Affective load theory (ALT). In: Fisher KE, Erdelez E and McKechnie LEF (eds) Theories of Information Behavior. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 39–43.

Nahl D (2007) Social-biological information technology: An integrated conceptual framework. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58(13): 2021–2046.

Neal DM and McKenzie PJ (2011) Putting the pieces together: Endometriosis blogs, cognitive authority, and collaborative information behavior. Journal of the Medical Library Association 99(2): 127–134.

Newtral (2019) Ocho claves para detectar noticias falsas. https://www.newtral.es/ocho-claves-paradetectar-noticias-falsas/20190513

Oh J and Sundar SS (2015) How does interactivity persuade? An experimental test of interactivity on cognitive absorption, elaboration, and attitudes. Journal of Communication 65(2): 213–236.

Oh J and Sundar SS (2020) What happens when you click and drag: Unpacking the relationship between on-screen interaction and user engagement with an anti-smoking website. Health Communication 35(3): 269–280.

Pennycook G and Rand DG (2019) Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition 188: 39–50.

Pérez Curiel C and García-Gordillo M (2018) Política de influencia y tendencia fake en Twitter: Efectos postelectorales (21D) en el marco del Procés en Cataluña. El Profesional de la Información 27(5): 1030–1040.

Pettigrew KE, Fidel R and Bruce H (2001) Conceptual frameworks in information behavior. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 35: 43–78.

Popay J (2018) What will it take to get the evidential value of lay knowledge recognised? International Journal of Public Health 63: 1013–1014.

Renkema J and Schubert C (2018) Introduction to Discourse Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.

Rieh SY (2002) Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53(2): 145–161.

Rodríguez-Ferrándiz R (2019) Posverdad y fake news en comunicación política: Breve genealogía. El Profesional de la Información 28(3): e280314.

Rubenstein EL (2015) ‘They are always there for me’: The convergence of social support and information in an online breast cancer community. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66(7): 1418–1430.

Rubin V (2019) Disinformation and misinformation triangle: A conceptual model for ‘fake news’ epidemic, causal factors and interventions. Journal of Documentation 75(5): 1013–1034.

Sáez-Martín HR and Caba-Pérez MC (2018) Using social media to enhance citizen engagement with local government: Twitter or Facebook? New Media and Society 20(1): 29–49.

Samerski S (2019) Health literacy as a social practice: Social and empirical dimensions of knowledge on health and healthcare. Social Science and Medicine 226.

Saunders L and Budd J (2020) Examining authority and reclaiming expertise. Journal of Academic Librarianship 46(1): 102077.

Sbaffi L and Rowley J (2017) Trust and credibility in web-based health information: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Medical Internet Research 19(6): e218.

Singh L, Bansal S, Bode L, et al. (2020) A first look at COVID19 information and misinformation sharing on Twitter. arXiv.org. Epub ahead of print 31 March 2020. DOI: arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.13907.

Sohn D and Choi SM (2014) Measuring expected interactivity: Scale development and validation. New Media and Society 16(5): 856–870.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS