Factors Influencing User Acceptance of Digital Libraries: Banaras Hindu University and Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidyapeeth University

Dwiwedi, Utkarsh, Verma, Sandeep and Mishra, Rajani Factors Influencing User Acceptance of Digital Libraries: Banaras Hindu University and Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidyapeeth University. Perspectives in Social Work, 2023, vol. XXXVII, n. 01, pp. 69-84. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of 1. a) .Factors Influencing User Acceptance of Digital Libraries Banaras Hindu University and Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidyapeeth University.pdf]
Preview
 Text
1. a) .Factors Influencing User Acceptance of Digital Libraries Banaras Hindu University and Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidyapeeth University.pdf
Download (414kB) | Preview

English abstract

The study is conducted with the evaluation factor for user acceptance of digital libraries in India: A study of the University of Varanasi (BHU and MGKVP). Banaras Hindu University is explaining the role of digital libraries in universities by looking at the benefits of digital libraries, their applications, and their services. It is discussing the drawbacks of digital libraries and the challenges encountered in implementing digital libraries as resources in education. Since digital libraries are unique and creative information structures that are constantly evolving and changing, assessment is critical to ensuring not just their proper progression but also their adoption by the students. To increase education and public interest, information and communication technology (ICT) has been commonly used in digital library systems. Researchers can reliably access relevant knowledge by browsing the internet. Educational and cultural dimensions are included in the use of digital libraries, such as knowledge opportunities. A digital archive deals with data that is digital and has been digitised from analogue form.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Digital library, Evaluation, Education, Application & services, Challenges.
Subjects: D. Libraries as physical collections.
Depositing user: Mr. Sandeep Kumar Verma
Date deposited: 18 Mar 2024 12:12
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 12:12
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/45650

References

1. Fuhr, N., et al. (2007). Evaluation of digital libraries. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 8(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-007-0011-z (accessed on 06 January 2024).

2. Hamiyah, N., & Jauhar, M. (2015). Pengantar Manajemen Pendidikan di Sekolah. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.

3. Thong, J. Y., Hong, W., & Tam, K. Y. (2004). What leads to user acceptance of digital libraries? Communications of the ACM, 47(11), 78–83. https://doi.org/10.1145/1029496.1029498 (accessed on 06 January 2024).

4. Borgman C.L. (1999). What are digital libraries? Competing visions. Information Processing and Management, 35(3), 227-243.

5. Wiederhold, G. (1995). Digital libraries, value, and productivity, Communications of the ACM, 38(4), 85–96.

6. Rodliyah, U. (2012). Perpustakaan digital, dan prospeknya menuju resource sharing. Visi Pustaka, 14(1), 39-47.

7. McCray, A.T. and Gallagher, M.E. (2001). Principles for digital library development, Communications of the ACM, 44(5), 48-54.

8. Khan, A. M. (2016). A study on collection development and its organizational pattern of university libraries in Uttar Pradesh (India). Collection Building, 35(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1108/cb-03-2014-0019 (accessed on 06 January 2024).

9. Hong W. et al. (2002), Determinants of user acceptance of digital libraries: an empirical examination of individual difference and system characteristic. Journal of Management Information System, 18(3), 97-124.

10. Thong J. Y. L., Hong W., and Tam K. Y. (2002) Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries: what are the roles of interface characteristic, organizational context, and individual differences? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57 (3) 215-242.

11. Lee G. T. et al. (2005). Impact of interface characteristics on digital library usage. Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology, 2(1), 1-9.

12. Kani‐Zabihi, E., Ghinea, G., & Chen, S. Y. (2006). Digital libraries: what do users want? Online Information Review, 30(4), 395-412. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520610686292 (accessed on 06 January 2024).

13. Bearman, D (2007). Digital libraries. Annual review of Information science and technology, 41, 223-272.

14. Abdullah, Abrizah and Zainab, A. N. (2007). Collaborative Digital Library of Historical Resources: Evaluation of First Users. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 12(2), 99-122.

15. Ramakrishna, N. V. (2009). Digital library Services at the JSW steel LTM by Using D-space Software. Information studies, 15(3),131-140.

16. Khoo, M., Buchanan, G., & Cunningham, S. J. (2009). JCDL 2009 Workshop report: Lightweight User-Friendly Evaluation Knowledge for Digital Libraries. D-lib Magazine, 15(7/8). https://doi.org/10.1045/july2009-khoo (accessed on 06 January 2024).

17. Park N., et al. (2009). User acceptance of a digital library system in developing countries: an application of the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Information Management, 29(3), 196-209.

18. Xiao, L. (2010). Three‐dimensional extension of a digital library service system. Program, 44(4), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.1108/00330331011083202 (accessed on 06 January 2024).

19. Luong, Minh-Thang (2010). Logical structure Recovery in Scholarly Articles with rich Documents Feature. International Journal of Digital Library System, 1(4), 1-23.

20. Johnson H. (2003). The SCONUL task force on information skills Information and IT literacy: Enabling learning in the 21st century. 45-52.

21. Shahriza Abdul Karim, N. and Hasan, A. (2007). Reading habits and attitude in the digital age: Analysis of gender differences and academic programs in Malaysia. The Electronic Library, 25(3), 285-298. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640470710754805 (accessed on 06 January 2024).

22. Ilahi R. et al. (2019). Digital library as learning resources. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1402(7).

23. Soroya, S. H., & Ameen, K. (2018). What do they want? Millennials and role of libraries in Pakistan. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(2), 248–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.01.003 (accessed on 06 January 2024).

24. Shah, A. A., Ravana, S. D., Hamid, S., and Ismail, M. A. (2015). Web credibility assessment: affecting factors and assessment techniques. Information Research, 20(1). http://InformationR.net/ir/20-1/paper655.html (accessed on 06 January 2024).

25. Gil, Y., & Artz, D. (2007). Towards content trust of web resources. Journal of Web Semantics, 5(4), 227-239.

26. Cox, J., & Dale, B. (2002). Key quality factors in Web site design and use: an examination. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 19(7), 862– 888. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710210434784 (accessed on 06 January 2024).

27. Wu, S., Franken, M., & Witten, I. H. (2010). Supporting collocation learning with a digital library. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(1), 87–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220903532971 (accessed on 06 January 2024).

28. Kucirkova, N., & Cremin, T. (2017). Personalised reading for pleasure with digital libraries: towards a pedagogy of practice and design. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(5), 571–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764x.2017.1375458 (accessed on 06 January 2024).

29. Downer, S., Hein, M., Hinson, D., Barnes, J., & Arnaud, S. (2004). Birth of Digital Library: From Student to Institutional Resource. Technical Services Quarterly, 21(3), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1300/j124v21n03_04 (accessed on 06 January 2024).

30. Dubis, M. (2002). The Digital Library of Classic Protestant Texts. Journal of Religious & Theological Information, 5(3–4), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1300/j112v05n03_02 (accessed on 06 January 2024).

31. Machuca P. and Feria L. B. (2004). The digital library of Iberoamerica and the Caribbean: humanizing technological resources. The International Information & Library Review, 36(3), 177-183.

32. Hedberg J. G. and Chang C. H. (2007). Digital libraries creating identity through solving geographical environmental problems. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 16(1), 58-72.

33. Karuk Tribe, Hillman, L., Hillman, L., Harling, A. R. S., Talley, B., & McLaughlin, A. (2017). Building Sípnuuk: A Digital Library, Archives, and Museum for Indigenous Peoples. Collection Management, 42(3-4), 294-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2017.1331870 (accessed on 06 January 2024).

34. Aytac S. (2016). Karamanlidika Digital Library Proposal: Reconstructing the Past of a Specific Diaspora. New Review of Information Networking, 21(1), 11-23.

35. Barroso I, Hartmann N., and Ribeiro C. (2015). Crosswalk Metadata for a Museum in a Thematic Collection Digital Library. Journal of Library Metadata, 15(1), 36-49.

36. Asencio M. (2017). Collaborating for Success: The Digital Library of the Caribbean. Journal of Library Administration, 57(7), 818-825.

37. Bhattacharya P. (2004). Advances in digital library initiatives: a developing country perspective. The International Information & Library Review, 36(3), 165-175.

38. Buczynski J. A. (2005). Satisficing Digital Library Users. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 10(1), 99- 102.

39. Fitterling, L., Powers, E., & Vardell, E. (2018). OSTMED.DR®, an Osteopathic Medicine Digital Library. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 37(1), 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2018.1404390 (accessed on 06 January 2024).

40. Johnson, B., & Oliver, M. (1999). Designing a Digital Library of Environmental Information on Playa Lakes and the Ogallala Aquifer. Science & Technology Libraries, 18(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1300/j122v18n01_04 (accessed on 06 January 2024).


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS