Scientometric Analysis of Indian Physics Literature During 2004-2018

Hosamani, S C and Krishnamurthy, C Scientometric Analysis of Indian Physics Literature During 2004-2018. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 2020, pp. 1-21. [Journal article (Paginated)]

This is the latest version of this item.

[thumbnail of Scientometric Analysis of Indian Physics Literature During 2004-2018 (2).pdf]
Preview
 Text
Scientometric Analysis of Indian Physics Literature During 2004-2018 (2).pdf - Published version
Download (940kB) | Preview

English abstract

The paper deals with the Indian physics literature published in resources as reflected in Web of Science (WOS) during the period 2004-2018. The study analyses India’s performance based on its publication output in physics, few Scientometric indices, such as the number of publications, number of citations, activity index, relative growth rate, doubling time, patterns of communication in national and international journals, are considered for portraying the different dimensions, Most prolific scientists and Institutions, and national & international collaboration from India were also considered. It was examined that during 2004-2018 there was a substantial increase in yearly output of Indian physics literature, compared to the global output ratio. The study reveals that the literature in the field of physics is gradually increasing and there is an upward trend, however there is some fluctuation in trends of publications with mean growth rate of 0.220 and average doubling time is 3.714. Among the subfields Materials Science has the largest number of publications amounting to 31.30% of the overall publications. Journal of Applied Physics has published highest number of papers i.e. 3097 with 12.5 average citations per paper. Among the Research Institutes, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Delhi, has published highest number of publications i.e. 19931 among the physics research institutes in India. However the publication trends indicates that there is greater scope for higher research in physics in India.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Scientometrics, Physics, Web of Science, Relative Growth Rate, Doubling Time, Impact Factor, Activity Index
Subjects: D. Libraries as physical collections.
D. Libraries as physical collections. > DZ. None of these, but in this section.
Depositing user: C Krishnamurthy
Date deposited: 14 Apr 2024 17:17
Last modified: 14 Apr 2024 17:17
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/45711

Available Versions of this Item

References

1. Bala, A., & Gupta, B. M. (2010). Research Activities in Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology during 1998-2007 in India: A Scientometric Analysis. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 30(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.30.1.278

2. Garfield, E., & Merton, R. K. (1979). Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities (Vol. 8). New York: Wiley.

3. Gupta, B. M., & Bala, A. (2011). Mapping of asthma research in India: A scientometric analysis of publications output during 1999-2008. Lung India: Official Organ of Indian Chest Society, 28(4), 239-246. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-2113.85683

4. Gupta, B., Sharma, L., & Karisiddappa, C. (1995). Modelling the growth of papers in a scientific specialty. Scientometrics, 33(2), 187-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02020568

5. Kademani, B. S., Vijai, K., Anil, S., & Anil, K. (2006). Scientometric dimensions of nuclear science and technology research in India: A study based on INIS (1970-2002) database. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 11(1), 23-48. http://adum.um.edu.my/index.php/MJLIS/article/view/7821

6. Krishnamurthy, C., Kotur, M. B. & Jodalli, S. (2011). Meteorology: A Bibliometric Study. Indian Journal of Library & Information Technology 1(3), 14-20. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4757904

7. Krishnamurthy, C. & Hosamani, S. C. (2019). Agriculture Research in India: A Scientometric Dimensions. In 9th KSCLA National Conference on Library in the Life of the User (pp. 532-539). Tumkur University. https://tinyurl.com/4r2kp9xe

8. Mahapatra, M. (1985). On the validity of the theory of exponential growth of scientific literature. 1985. In Proceedings of the 15th IASLIC Conference (pp. 61-70). https://scholar.google.com/scholarhl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=On+the+validity+of+the+theory+of+exponential+growth+of+scientific+literature&btnG=

9. Mooghali, A., Alijani, R., Karami, N., & Khasseh, A. A. (2011). Scientometric analysis of the scientometric literature. International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM), 9(1), 19-31. https://ijism.ricest.ac.ir/article_698154_608ec3cb0f12c93b2457c60a15b8f6a9.pdf

10. Ravichandrarao, I. K. (2010). Growth of literature and measures of scientific productivity: scientometric models.

11. Sinatra, R., Deville, P., Szell, M., Wang, D., & Barabási, A. L. (2015). A century of physics. Nature Physics, 11(10), 791-796. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3494

12. Takeda, G. (2009). Development of Fundamentals in Physics. Development of Physics- Volume I, 5, 27.

13. www.isiknowledge.com (2018)


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS