Exploring the Relationship between Bibliometric and Altmetrics Indices: A Study of Iranian JCR Journals

Mostafavi, Ismael, Namvar, Zahra and Dastar, Yeganeh Exploring the Relationship between Bibliometric and Altmetrics Indices: A Study of Iranian JCR Journals. Journal of Knowledge-Research Studies, 2024, vol. 3, n. 1. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of 5.pdf]
Preview
 Text
5.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB) | Preview

English abstract

Purpose: This study investigates the correlation between bibliometric and altmetrics indices of Iranian JCR (Journal Citation Reports) journals, with a focus on their presence on social media platforms. Methodology: The research utilized a scientometric approach to examine all Iranian JCR journals indexed in the Web of Science database in 2022. Initial data retrieval identified 156 Iranian journal titles, with 94 of them being shared at least once on social media, yielding variable scores. Data collection was carried out using the Altmetric.com database, and data analysis was conducted using Pearson's correlation test in the SPSS (v.23) software. Findings: The results indicate that Twitter is the primary platform for sharing scientific research among Iranian JCR journals on social media, with Pinterest and LinkedIn being underutilized. Interestingly, there was no significant relationship found between highly cited Iranian JCR journals and their presence on social media platforms, suggesting that some highly cited journals are not being shared on these platforms. Conclusion: Although Iranian journals exhibit promise in certain indicators, there is a need for increased utilization in scientific circles. Notably, a positive correlation was observed between journal citations and mentions on virtual social networks, emphasizing the importance of further exploration of this relationship. Value: This study emphasizes the potential for comparing bibliometric and altmetrics indicators to monitor scientific outputs in both traditional and virtual environments.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Altmetrics, Social Media, Iranian JCR Journals, Bibliometrics, Web of Science
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information
Depositing user: Rasoul Zavaraqi
Date deposited: 09 Aug 2024 22:23
Last modified: 09 Aug 2024 22:23
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/45917

References

Abramo, G., Cicero, T., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2012). A sensitivity analysis of researchers’ productivity rankings to the time of citation observation. Journal of Informetrics, 6(2), 192-201.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.12.003

Altmetric, L. L. P. (2019). When did Altmetric start tracking attention to each attention source?. https://help. altmetric. com/support/solutions/articles/6000136884-whendid-altmetric-start-tracking-atten-tion-to-each-attention-source.‏

Altmetric.com.(2020). How is the Altmetric Attention Score calculated.

Bornmann, L. (2014). Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics. Journal of informetrics, 8(4), 895-903.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005

Bornmann, L., Haunschild, R., & Adams, J. (2019). Do altmetrics assess societal impact in a comparable way to case studies? An empirical test of the convergent validity of altmetrics based on data from the UK research excellence framework (REF). Journal of informetrics, 13(1), 325-340.‏ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1807.03977

Buschman, M., & Michalek, A. (2013). Are alternative metrics still alternative?. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 39(4), 35-39.‏ https://doi.org/10.1002/bult.2013.1720390411

Chen, M., & Wang, L. (2022). An Altmetrics and citation analysis of selected predatory journals in library and information science field. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 48(6), 102618.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102618

Cooper, I. D. (2015). Bibliometrics basics. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 103(4), 217.‏ https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.103.4.013

Coyne, M., & Regan, J. (2022). Measuring the social impact of contemporary dysphagia research: an altmetric analysis. Speech, Language and Hearing, 25(1), 46-58.‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/2050571X.2021.1926626

Díaz-Faes, A. A., Bowman, T. D., & Costas, R. (2019). Towards a second generation of ‘social media metrics’: Characterizing Twitter communities of attention around science. PloS one, 14(5), e0216408. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216408

Engwall, L., Blockmans, W., & Weaire, D. (2014). Bibliometrics: Use and Abuse in the Review of Research Performance. Wenner - Gren International Series. Vol.87.

Erfanmanesh, M.A. (2018). The Relationship between Altmetric Activity and Quality Indicators of the Library and Information Science Journals in Scopus. Library studies and information organization, 29(2), 7-26. doi: 10.30484/nastinfo.2018.2220. [In Persian].

Evans, P., & Krauthammer, M. (2011). Exploring the use of social media to measure journal article impact. AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2011, 374–381.

Fekete, E., & Haffner, M. (2019). Twitter and academic geography through the lens of# AAG2018. The Professional Geographer, 71(4), 751-761.‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2019.1622428

Fenner, M. (2013). What can article-level metrics do for you?. PLoS biology, 11(10), e1001687.‏ https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001687

Gordon, G., Lin, J., Cave, R., & Dandrea, R. (2015). The question of data integrity in article-level metrics. PLoS Biology, 13(8), e1002161.‏ https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002161

Hammarfelt, B. (2014). Using altmetrics for assessing research impact in the humanities. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1419-1430.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1261-3.

Haustein, S., Peters, I., Bar-Ilan, J., Priem, J., Shema, H., & Terliesner, J. (2014). Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community. Scientometrics, 101, 1145-1163.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1221-3

Howard, J. (2012). Scholars Seek Better Ways to Track Impact Online. Chronicle of Higher Education.‏ https://cacmb4.acm.org/news/145756-scholars-seek-better-ways-to-track-impact-online/fulltext

HTOO, T. H. H. (2015). NA, Jin-Cheon. Comparison of Altmetrics across Multiple Disciplines: Psychology, History, and Linguistics.(2015). In International Conference of Asian Special Libraries 4th ICoASL (pp. 22-24).‏

Jaring, P., & Bäck, A. (2017). How Researchers Use Social Media to Promote their Research and Network with Industry. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(8), 32-39.‏ https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1098.

Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business horizons, 54(3), 241-251.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.005

Koprubasi, S., Bulut, E., & Celebi, A. R. C. (2022). The relationship between citation-based metrics and Twitter in the area of age related macular degeneration research: Altmetric and bibliometric study. Journal of Clinical Medicine of Kazakhstan, 19(5), 12-22.‏ https://doi.org/10.23950/jcmk/12502

Lin, J., & Fenner, M. (2013). Altmetrics in Evolution: Defining and Redefining the Ontology of Article-Level Metrics. Information Standards Quarterly 25: 20–26. Online verfügbar unter http://www. niso. org/apps/group_public/download. php/11273/lP_Lin_Fenner_PLOS_altmetrics_isqv25no2. pdf, zuletzt geprüft am, 4, 2016.‏

Melicherová, M., Ondrišová, M., & Šušol, J. (2021). Bibliometrics versus altmetrics: Researchers’ attitudes in Slovakia. Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.11

Moed, H.F. (2008). Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. (A. Mirzaei, H. Mokhtari, Trans). Chapar. [In Persian].

Nip, I., & Feng, H. (2022). Examining correlation of altmetric score and citation number in dermatology journal articles. Journal of Dermatological Treatment, 33(1), 297-299.‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2020.1750555

Noroozi Chakoli, A. (2011). Introduction to Scientometric. Organization for Researching and Composing University Textbooks in the Islamic Sciences and the Humanities (SAMT). [In Persian].

Priem, J., & Hemminger, B. H. (2010). Scientometrics 2.0: New metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web. First Monday, 15(7). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v15i7.2874

Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., & Neylon, C. (2010). Alt-metrics: A Manifesto. Available: http://altmetrics. org/manifesto.

Rathemacher, A.J. (2014). Rathemacher, Andrée J. "Article-Level Metrics and Altmetrics: New Ways to Measure the Impact of Your Research." URI AAUP News XXXVIII, no. 4 (April 2014): 2,4. Available: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BLbmAB0uzHGTDJKbnlUOWhzaUk

Robinson-García, N., Torres-Salinas, D., Zahedi, Z., & Costas, R. (2014). New data, new possibilities: Exploring the insides of Altmetric. com. Profesional de la información/Information Professional, 23(4), 359-366.‏ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1408.0135

Robinson-Garcia, N., van Leeuwen, T. N., & Rafols, I. (2018). Using altmetrics for contextualised mapping of societal impact: From hits to networks. Science and public policy, 45(6), 815-826.‏ https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy024

Sedighi, M. (2019). The Role of Social Media in Assessing the Impact of Research (Case Study: The Field of Scientometrics). Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 34(2), 765-792. doi: 10.35050/JIPM010.2019.056 [In persian]

Serati Shirazi, M. (2019). An Altmetric Study on Scientific Iranian Articles Indexed in Social Science index. Sciences and Techniques of Information Management, 5(4), 162-190. doi: 10.22091/stim.2020.4982.1356 [In persian]

Shenavar, N., Atapour, H., & Shenavar, A. (2022). A Bibliometric and altmetrics analysis of highly cited articles in the field of Infectious Diseases. Payavard Salamat, 15(5), 419-431.‏[In persian]

Sinha, P. K., Sahoo, S. B., Gajbe, S. B., Chakrabory, K., & Mahato, S. S. (2020). Altmetrics Research Progress: A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization. Journal of Scientometric Research, 9(3), 300-309.‏ https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.9.3.37

Sud, P., & Thelwall, M. (2014). Evaluating altmetrics. Scientometrics, 2(98), 1131-1143.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1117-2

Talebian, A., Okhovati, M., Arshadi, H., Hayati, R., Tabrizi, R., & Karimimoghadam, Z. (2023). Investigating and comparing citation indicators and altmetrics of articles in the field of addiction to opioids by using the PlumX tool. Journal of Health Administration, 26(2),33-50.‏ Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/26.2.33 [In persian]

Torres-Salinas, D., Cabezas-Clavijo, Á., & Jiménez-Contreras, E. (2013). Altmetrics: New Indicators for Scientific Communication in Web 2.0. Comunicar, 21(41), 53-60.‏ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1306.6595

Waltman, L. (2016). A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. Journal of informetrics, 10(2), 365-391.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007

Williams, A. E. (2017). Altmetrics: an overview and evaluation. Online information review, 41(3), 311-317.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/OIR-10-2016-0294

Wouters, P., & Costas, R. (2012). Users, narcissism and control: tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21st century.‏ Utrecht: SURF foundation.

Zou, X., Yue, W. L., & Le Vu, H. (2018). Visualization and analysis of mapping knowledge domain of road safety studies. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 118(9),131-145.‏https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.06.010

Zungu, N. (2021). Correlating Altmetrics and h5-Index Using Google Scholar Metrics for Journals in Library and Information Science. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/6435/


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS