Más allá de ChatGPT: Curación de contenidos con modelos de inteligencia artificial

Codina, Lluís Más allá de ChatGPT: Curación de contenidos con modelos de inteligencia artificial., 2024 . In Taller Cátedra Futurs de la Comunicació.. [Presentation]

[thumbnail of curacion-de-contenidos-con-IA-2024.pdf]
Preview
Slideshow
curacion-de-contenidos-con-IA-2024.pdf - Presentation
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (2MB) | Preview

English abstract

Presentation of the main phases and procedures for using generative artificial intelligence in content curation. Detailed presentation of the functionalities of Perplexity and Phind. Practical procedures. Ethical aspects. Other AI systems. Includes suggestions for activities.

Spanish abstract

Presentación de las fases y los procedimientos principales del uso de inteligencias artificiales generativas en la curación de contenidos. Presentación detallada de funcionalidades de Perplexity y Phind. Procedimientos prácticos. Aspectos éticos. Otros sistemas de IA. Incluye sugerencia de actividades.

Item type: Presentation
Keywords: Generative artificial intelligence, Content curation, Perplexity, Phind, GPT, Komo AI, Poe AI, inteligencia artificial generativa, curación de contenidos.
Subjects: I. Information treatment for information services
Depositing user: Dr Lluís Codina
Date deposited: 17 Dec 2024 09:43
Last modified: 17 Dec 2024 09:43
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/46199

References

Aguilera-Cora, E., Lopezosa, C., & Codina, L. (2024). Scopus AI Beta Functional analysis and cases. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Departament de Comunicació. (Serie Editorial DigiDoc. DigiDoc Reports). https://repositori.upf.edu/handle/10230/58658

Bianchini, S., Müller, M., & Pelletier, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence in science: An emerging general method of invention. Research Policy, 51(10), 104604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104604

Bhatia, P.(2023). ChatGPT for academic writing: A game changer or a disruptive tool? Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology, 39(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_84_23

Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8

Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J. S., Eirug, A., Galanos, V., Ilavarasan, P. V., Janssen, M., Jones, P., Kar, A. K., Kizgin, H., Kronemann, B., Lal, B., Lucini, B., . . . Williams, M. D. (2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 101994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002

Elsevier.(2023, August 1). Elsevier takes Scopus to the next level with generative AI. https://www.elsevier.com/about/press-releases/elsevier-takes-scopus-to-the-next-level-with-generative-ai

Elsevier. (2024, January, 16). Launch of Scopus AI to Help Researchers Navigate the World of Research. https://www.elsevier.com/about/press-releases/launch-of-scopus-ai-to-help-researchers-navigate-the-world-of-research

Gundersen, O. E., Gil, Y., & Aha, D. W.(2018). On Reproducible AI: Towards Reproducible Research, open Science, and digital scholarship in AI publications. AI Magazine, 39(3), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v39i3.2816

High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. (2019, April 8). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai

Kaebnick, G. E., Magnus, D., Kao, A., Hosseini, M., Resnik, D. B., Dubljević, V., Rentmeester, C. A., Gordijn, B., & Cherry, M. J.(2023). Editors’ statement on the responsible use of generative AI technologies in scholarly journal publishing. Medicine HealthCare and Philosophy, 26(4), 499–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-023-10176-6

Lopezosa, C., & Codina, L. (2023). Probando Bard: así funciona la Inteligencia Artificial Generativa de Google. Anuario ThinkEPI, 17. https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2023.e17a25

Lopezosa, C., Codina, L., & Ferran-Ferrer, N. (2023, February1). Chat GPT como apoyo a las systematic scoping reviews: integrando la inteligencia artificial con el framework SALSA. http://hdl.handle.net/2445/193691

Lopezosa, C., Codina, L., & Boté-Vericad, JJ. (2023). Testeando ATLAS.ti con OpenAI: hacia un nuevo paradigma para el análisis cualitativo de entrevistas con inteligencia artificial. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Departament de Comunicació. (Serie Editorial DigiDoc. DigiDoc Reports). https://repositori.upf.edu/handle/10230/56449

Lund, B., Wang, T., Mannuru, N. R., Nie, B., Shimray, S. R., & Wang, Z. (2023). ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarl ypublishing. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 74(5), 570–581. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24750

Tlili, A., Huang, R., Mustafa, M. Y., Zhao, J., Bozkurt,A., XU,L.,…Wang, H.(2023). Speaking of transparency: Are all Artificial Intelligence (AI) literature reviews in education transparent?. The Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching (JALT), 6 (2). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.2.15

UNESCO.(2023, September8). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/guidance-generative-ai-education-and-research

Whitfield, S., & Hofmann, M. A.(2023). Elicit: AI literature review research assistant. Public Services Quarterly, 19(3), 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2023.2224125

World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology. (2019). Preliminary study on the ethics of artificial intelligence. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000367823


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item