Alfabetización en privacidad:enfoques y contenidos en las universidades y sus bibliotecas alrededor del mundo

Andréia Letícia Johann, Andréia Letícia Johann and Enrique Muriel-Torrado, Enrique Muriel-Torrado Alfabetización en privacidad:enfoques y contenidos en las universidades y sus bibliotecas alrededor del mundo. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología, 2024, vol. 47, n. 3, pp. 1-14. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of v47n3e357426.pdf]
Preview
Text
v47n3e357426.pdf

Download (489kB) | Preview

English abstract

Amidst the scenario of digital surveillance and the treatment of personal data as a commodity, it is essential to raise issues related to the individuals' privacy, being a librarian's attribution to develop Privacy Literacy in academic environments. The general objective of the research is to present a panorama of content on Privacy Literacy developed from a sample of universities around the world, using the bibliographic and documental methods. From the bibliographic research it was found the discussion and orientation of library institutions regarding Privacy Literacy. In the documentary research with a sample of the 10 best positioned universities from each continent, 66 contents related to Privacy Literacy were identified, presenting the continent of Africa as the most representative in the content offerings. In the categorization of the contents it was identified that "Critical Thinking" is more present in the approaches, while only 5 of the total contents had the three categories, “Critical Thinking”, “Technosolutionist” and “Legislative”, in their approaches. It is suggested for future work the development of practices in Privacy Literacy applied in university libraries addressing the three topics, and the search for partnerships with areas that address the topic in the institutions themselves

Spanish abstract

En un contexto marcado por la vigilancia digital y el tratamiento de los datos personales como un bien, es fundamental abordar los temas relacionados con la privacidad de los individuos. En este sentido, los bibliotecarios tienen la responsabilidad de desarrollar la alfabetización en privacidad en los entornos académicos. El objetivo general de la investigación fue presentar un panorama del contenido sobre alfabetización en privacidad desarrollado a partir de una muestra de universidades de todo el mundo, utilizando los métodos bibliográfico y documental. La investigación bibliográfica reveló la discusión y la orientación de las instituciones bibliotecarias con respecto a la alfabetización en privacidad. En la investigación documental, con una muestra de las 10 mejores universidades de cada continente, se identificaron 66 contenidos relacionados con la alfabetización en privacidad, presentando al continente africano como el más representativo en la oferta de contenidos. En la categorización de los contenidos, se identificó que el pensamiento crítico está más presente en los enfoques, mientras que solo cinco de los contenidos totales incluían las tres categorías: pensamiento crítico, tecnosolucionista y legislativo en sus enfoques. Se sugiere para futuros trabajos el desarrollo de prácticas en alfabetización en privacidad aplicadas en bibliotecas universitarias, abordando los tres temas mencionados, y la búsqueda de alianzas con áreas que abordan el tema en las propias instituciones.

Portuguese abstract

Em meio ao cenário de vigilância digital e tratamento de dados pessoais como mer-cadoria, torna-se fundamental levantar questões relacionadas à privacidade dos in-divíduos, sendo uma atribuição do bibliotecário a de desenvolver a Competência em Privacidade em ambientes acadêmicos. O objetivo geral da pesquisa é apresentar um panorama de conteúdos em Competência em Privacidade a partir de uma amostra de universidades no mundo, utilizando-se os métodos bibliográfico e documental. A partir da pesquisa bibliográfica constatou-se a discussão e orientação das instituições bibliotecárias quanto à Competência em Privacidade. Na pesquisa documental com amostra de 68 universidades, identificou-se 66 conteúdos relacionados à Competên-cia em Privacidade, apresentando o continente da África como o mais representativo nas ofertas de conteúdos. Na categorização dos conteúdos identificou-se que o “Pen-samento Crítico” está mais presente nas abordagens, ao passo que apenas 5 do total de conteúdos possuíam as três categorias, “Pensamento Crítico”, “Tecnosolucionista” e “Legislatório”, nas suas abordagens. Sugere-se para trabalhos futuros o desenvolvi-mento de práticas em Competência em Privacidade aplicada em bibliotecas universi-tárias abordando os três tópicos, e a busca de parcerias com áreas que abordam o tema nas próprias instituições.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: competência em privacidade, privacidade, pessoa bibliotecária, bi-blioteca universitária, vigilância;privacy literacy, privacy, librarian, university li-brary, surveillance; alfabetización en privacidad, privacidad, bibliotecario, biblioteca universitaria, vigilancia
Subjects: C. Users, literacy and reading. > CE. Literacy.
D. Libraries as physical collections. > DD. Academic libraries.
G. Industry, profession and education. > GH. Education.
Depositing user: Juan Camilo Vallejo Echavarria
Date deposited: 21 Jan 2025 13:24
Last modified: 21 Jan 2025 13:24
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/46230

References

Association of College & Research Libraries (2016). Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework

American Library Association (2018). Choose Privacy Everyday. https://www.ala.org/news/2018/06/more-week-choose-privacy-now-everyday-choice

American Library Association (2019a). Interpretations of the Library Bill of Rights. http://www.ala.org/advocacy/intfreedom/librarybill/interpretations

American Library Association (2019b). Library Bill of Rights. https://www.ala.org/advocacy/intfreedom/librarybill

American Library Association (2021a). IFC Privacy Subcommittee. https://www.ala.org/aboutala/ifc-privacy-subcommittee

American Library Association (2021b). Professional Ethics. http://www.ala.org/tools/ethics

Ard, BJ (2016). Librarians as Privacy Advocates. A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, 13(1), 161-173. https://repository.law.wisc.edu/s/uwlaw/item/31750

Avuglah, Bright Kwaku; Owusu-Ansah, Christopher M.; Tachie-Donkor, Gloria; Yeboah, Eugene Baah (2020). Privacy issues in libraries with online services: Attitudes and concerns of academic librarians and university students in ghana. College and Research Libraries, 81(6), 997-1020. https://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/view/24619/32426

Cadwalladr, Carole; Graham-Harrison, Emma (2018). Revealed: 50 million Facebook profiles harvested for Cambridge Analytica in major data breach. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/17/cambridge-analytica-facebook-influence-us-election

Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals (2018). Ethical Framework. https://www.cilip.org.uk/page/ethics

Canadian Library Association (1976). Canadian Library Association Code of Ethics. http://cla.ca/wp-content/uploads/Code-of-Ethics-June-1976.pdf

Clarke, Roger (2006). What's 'Privacy'? http://www.rogerclarke.com/DV/Privacy.html

Clarke, Roger (2010). What is Überveillance? and what should be done about it? IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 29(2), 17-25. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5475107

Clarke, Roger (2016). A framework for analysing technology 's negative and positive impacts on freedom and privacy. Datenschutz und Datensicherheit, 40(2), 79-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11623-016-0550-9

Coombs, Karen (2004). Walking a tightrope: academic libraries and privacy. Managing Technology, 30(2), 493-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2004.08.003

Couldry, Nick (2016). Foreword. Em Sebastian Kubitschko; Anne Kaun. Innovative Methods in Media and Communication Research. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40700-5

Givens, Cherie (2015). Information privacy fundamentals for librarians and information professionals. Rowman and Littlefield.

Greenwald, Glenn; Macaskill, Ewen (2013). NSA Prism program taps in to user data of Apple, Google and others. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jun/06/us-tech-giants-nsa-data

Hagendorff, Thilo (2018). Privacy Literacy and its problems. Journals of Information Ethics, 27(2), 127-145. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2161594623?sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journal

Chisholm, Alexandria; Hartman-Caverly, Sarah (2022). Privacy Literacy: from doomscrolling to digital wellness. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 22(1), 53-79. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2022.0009

Hartman-Caverly, Sarah, Chisholm, Alexandria (2020). Privacy literacy instruction practices in academic libraries: past, present, and possibilities. IFLA Journal, 46(4), 305-327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035220956804

Hintz, Arne; Dencik, Lina; Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin (2017). Digital citizenship and surveillance society. International Journal of Communication, 11, 731-739. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5521/1929

Library Associations and Institutions (2012). IFLA Code of Ethics for librarians and other information workers. https://www.ifla.org/g/faife/professional-codes-of-ethics-for-librarians/

Library Associations and Institutions (2015). IFLA Statement on Privacy in the Library Environment. https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/hq/news/documents/ifla-statement-on-privacy-in-the-library-environment.pdf

Kumar, Priya (2023). What is Privacy Literacy for. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.5210/spir.v2022i0.13037

Mayer-Schönberger, Viktor; Cukier, Kenneth (2013). Big data: a revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Masur, Philipp (2020). How online privacy literacy supports self-data protection and self-determination in the age of information. Media and Communication, 8(2), 258-269. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.2855

Neves, Joana; Turel, Ofir; Oliveira, Tiago (2024). Explaining social media use reduction as an adaptive coping mechanism: The roles of privacy literacy, social media addiction and exhaustion. Information Systems Management, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2024.2332187

Nissenbaum, Helen (2004). Privacy as contextual integrity. Washington Law Review, 79(1), 119-158. https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr/vol79/iss1/10/

Rotman, Dana (2009). Are you looking at me? Social media and privacy literacy. Em ICONFERENCE, Chapel Hill, Carolina do Norte. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/15339

Society of College, National and University Libraries (2016). 7 Pillars of Information Literacy through a Digital Literacy ‘lens’.

Solove, Daniel J. (2008). Understanding Privacy. Harvard University Press.

Trepte, Sabine; Teutsch, Doris; Masur, Philipp; Eicher, Carolin; Fischer, Mona; Hennhöfer, Alisa; Lind, Fabienne (2015). Do people know about privacy and data protection strategies? towards the “Online Privacy Literacy Scale” (OPLIS). Em Serge Gutwirth; Ronald Leenes; Paul de Hert (Eds.), Reforming European Data Protection Law. Springer Netherlands (pp. 333-365). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9385-8_14

Tummon, Nikki; Mckinnon, Dawn (2018). Attitudes and practices of Canadian academic librarians regarding library and online privacy: a national study. Library and Information Science Research, 40(2), 86-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2018.05.002

Warren, Samuel D.; Brandeis, Louis D. (1980). The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4(5), 193-220. https://doi.org/10.2307/1321160

Westin, Alan (2008). Privacy & Freedom. Ig Publishing.

Wissinger, Christina (2017). Privacy Literacy: from theory to practice. Communications in Information Literacy, 11(2), 378-389. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2017.11.2.9

Zimmer, Michael (2014). Librarians’ Attitudes Referential Information and Internet Privacy. Library Quarterly, 84(2), 123-151. https://doi.org/10.1086/675329

Zuboff, Shoshana (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: the fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Public Affairs Books.

Zviran, Moshe (2008). User’s perspective on privacy on web-based applications. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48(4), 97-105. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08874417.2008.11646039#:~:text=The%20objective%20of%20this%20study%20is%20to%20get%20a%20better


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item