Análisis bibliométrico del impacto científico de los artículos de autoría única en revistas brasileñas de información

de Caneda Queiroz, Daniela Gralha and Vilan Filho, Jayme L. Análisis bibliométrico del impacto científico de los artículos de autoría única en revistas brasileñas de información. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología, 2024, vol. 48, n. 1. [Journal article (Unpaginated)]

[thumbnail of v48n1e355217-3.pdf]
Preview
Text
v48n1e355217-3.pdf - Published version

Download (334kB) | Preview

English abstract

This research aims to describe the scientific impact of single-authored articles pub-lished in Brazilian journals in information-related fields (Archival, Library Science, Information Science and Museology) between 2009 and 2017. This is a bibliomet-ric study of a descriptive character, with an applied quantitative methodological approach. The ABCDM database, the Harzing’s Publish or Perish software and the Lattes Platform were used for data collection, which were then fed into and ana-lyzed as Excel table and SPSS (t-test). From 1680 single-authored articles, 313 were randomly selected for study. Main results regarding the authorship were: 55.12% of authors had more single-authored articles than multiple-authored articles; 67.36% of the most cited articles were single-authored. Main results regarding the articles were: 35.10% of single-authored articles were the most frequently cited among an au-thor’s entire body of work; in 49.67% of the cases, the average number of citations of single-authored articles exceeded the authors’ total average number of citations; in 50.00% of cases, the average number of citations of single-authored articles exceeded the average number of citations of multiple-authored articles. The average number of citations of single-authored articles exceeded the average number of citations of multiple-authored articles and of articles in general.

Spanish abstract

Esta investigación tuvo como objetivo describir el impacto científico de los artículos de un solo autor publicados en re-vistas brasileñas en las áreas de información: archivo, biblio-teca, ciencias de la información y museología, entre 2009 y 2017. Se trata de un estudio bibliométrico descriptivo, con un enfoque metodológico cuantitativo aplicado. Se utiliza-ron la base de datos ABCDM, el software Harzing's Publi-sh or Perish y la plataforma Lattes para recopilar datos, que se alimentaron y se analizaron en una tabla de Excel y con una prueba t (SPSS). De 1680 artículos de un solo autor, 313 fueron seleccionados al azar para su estudio. Los principales resultados en cuanto a la autoría mostraron que el 55,12 % de los autores tenía más artículos de un solo autor que de varios autores y el 67,36 % de los artículos más citados son de autoría única. Entre los principales resultados en relación con los artículos se tiene que el 35,10 % de los artículos de autoría única fueron los más citados entre todo el trabajo de un autor; en el 49,67% de los casos, el número medio de citas de artículos de un solo autor superó el número medio total de citas de los autores; en el 50 % de los casos, el número medio de citas de artículos de un solo autor superó el número medio de citas de artículos de varios autores. El número medio de citas de los artículos de un solo autor superó el número me-dio de citas de los artículos de varios autores y los artículos en general

Item type: Journal article (Unpaginated)
Keywords: Single authorship; scientific impact; scientific journal; bibliometrics; infor-mation fields; Brazil
Subjects: A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information. > AA. Library and information science as a field.
B. Information use and sociology of information > BA. Use and impact of information.
B. Information use and sociology of information > BB. Bibliometric methods
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HL. Databases and database Networking.
L. Information technology and library technology > LJ. Software.
Depositing user: Juan Camilo Vallejo Echavarria
Date deposited: 21 Apr 2025 01:45
Last modified: 21 Apr 2025 01:45
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/46518

References

Andrés, Ana (2009). Measuring academic research: how to undertake a bibliometric study. Chandos Publishing.

Araújo, Carlos Alberto Ávila (2006). Bibliometria: evolução histórica e questões atuais. Em Questão, 12(1), 11 32. https://seer.ufrgs.br/EmQuestao/article/view/16/5

Beaver, Donald deB.; Rosen, Richard (1978). Studies in scientific collaboration: Part I. The professional origins of scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 1(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016840

Bourdieu, Pierre (1983). O campo científico. In Renato Ortiz (Org.), Pierre Bourdieu: Sociologia (pp. 122–155). Ática.

Bourdieu, Pierre (1996). É possível um ato desinteressado? In Pierre Bourdieu, Razões práticas: sobre a teoria da ação (pp. 137–156). Papirus.

Chang, Chen-chi (2008). The of value knowledge created by individual scientists and research groups. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 39(3), 274–293. https://doi.org/10.1353/scp.0.0006

Chuang, Kun-yang; Ho, Yuh-shan (2014). Bibliometric profile of top-cited single-author articles in the Science Citation Index Expanded. Journal of Informetrics, 8(4), 951–962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.008

Cronin, Blaise (1984). The citation process: the role and significance of citations in scientific communication. Taylor Graham.

Eliyan, Faysal F. (2014). Why is it becoming increasingly rare to see single-authored journal papers? Question in Research Gate. https://web.archive.org/web/20190801123402/https:/www.researchgate.net/post/Why_is_it_becoming_increasingly_rare_to_see_single-authored_journal_papers

Fedderke, Johannes Wolfgang (2013). The objectivity of National Research Foundation peer review in South Africa assessed against bibliometric indexes. Scientometrics, 97(2), 177–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-0981-0

Finlay, Craig; Ni, Chaoqun; Sugimoto, Cassidy (2012). New methods for an old debate: utilizing reader response to investigate the relationship between collaboration and quality in academic journal articles. Library & Information Science Research, 34(2), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2011.11.003

Fu, Hui-zhen; Ho, Yuh-shan (2018). Collaborative characteristics and networks of national, institutional and individual contributors using highly cited articles in Environmental Engineering in Science Citation Index Expanded. Current Science, 115(3), 410–421. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v115/i3/410-421

Gabriel Junior, René Faustino (2017). Panorama dos 45 anos das revistas de Ciência da Informação no Brasil: um estudo na Brapci. In 18 Encontro Nacional de Pesquisa em Ciência da Informação. (pp. 1-19). Marília, Brasil. http://enancib.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/XVIII_ENANCIB/ENANCIB/paper/viewFile/626/581

Gomes, Cristina Marques (2013). Comunicação científica: alicerces, transformações e tendências. Labcom Books.

Hart, Richard L. (2007). Collaboration and article quality in the literature of academic Librarianship. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(2), 190–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2006.12.002

Hartley, James; Cabanac, Guillaume (2016). Are two authors better than one? Can writing in pairs affect the readability of academic blogs? Scientometrics, 109(3), 2119–2122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2116-x

Harzing, Anne-Wil. (2007). Publish or perish. http://www.harzing.com

Hochman, Gilberto (1994). A Ciência entre a comunidade e o mercado: leituras de Kuhn, Bourdieu, Latour e Knorr-Cetina. In Vera Portocarrero (Org.), Filosofia, História e Sociologia das Ciências: Abordagens Contemporâneas (pp. 199–231). FIOCRUZ.

Katz, J. Sylvan; Martin, Ben R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1

King, Christopher (2013). Single-author papers: a waning share of output, but still providing the tools for progress. Science Watch. Saint Helier. http://sciencewatch.com/articles/single-author-papers-waning-share-output-still-providing-tools-progress

Kousha, Kayvan; Thelwall, Mike (2008). Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index: A comparison between four science disciplines. Scientometrics, 74(2), 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-0217-x

Maltrás-Barba, Bruno (2003). Los indicadores bibliométricos: fundamentos y aplicación al análisis de la ciencia. Trea.

Maslow, Abraham Harold (2001). Maslow no gerenciamento. Qualitymark.

Meadows, Arthur Jack (1999). A comunicação científica. Briquet de Lemos.

Merton, Robert K. (1957). Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. American Sociological Review: Official Journal of the American Sociological Society, 22(6), 635¬–659. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089193

Mueller, Suzana Pinheiro Machado (2003). A Ciência, o sistema de comunicação científica e a literatura científica. In Bernadete Santos Campello; Beatriz Valadares Cendón; Jeanette Marguerite Kremer (Orgs.), Fontes de informação para pesquisadores e profissionais (pp. 21–34). UFMG.

Packer, Abel; Meneghini, Rogério (2006). Visibilidade da produção científica. In Dinah Aguiar Poblacion; Geraldina Porto Witter; José Fernando Modesto da Silva (Orgs.), Comunicação e Produção Científica: Contexto, Indicadores, Avaliação (pp. 237–259). Angellara.

Pinto, Carlos Sousa; Costa, Joaquim Luís (2018). Padrões de comunicação em diferentes comunidades científicas. In Sely Maria de Souza Costa; Fernando César Lima Leite; Rosemeire Barbosa Tavares (Orgs.), Comunicação da informação, gestão da informação e gestão do conhecimento (pp. 145–159). IBICT.

Reif, Frederick (1961). The competitive world of the pure scientist: the quest for prestige can cause conflict between the goals of science and the goals of the scientist. Science, 134(3494), 1957–1962. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.134.3494.1957

Vilan Filho, Jayme Leiro (2016). A colaboração científica nas áreas de informação no Brasil (1972-2013). Revista Ibero-Americana de Ciência da Informação, 9(1), 258-269. https://doi.org/10.26512/rici.v9.n1.2016.2238

Wagner, Caroline S.; Whetsell, Travis A.; Mukherjee, Satyam (2019). International research collaboration: Novelty, conventionality, and atypicality in knowledge recombination. Research Policy, 48(5), 1260–1270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.002

Weinstock, Melvil (1971). Citation indexes. In Allan Kent (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of library and information science (pp. 16–40). Marcel Dekker.

Ziman, John (1988). An introduction to Science studies: the philosophical and social aspects of science and technology. Cambridge University Press.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item