Primeros pasos hacia la Ciencia Abierta

ALBAGLI, S., APPEL, A. L. y MACIEL, M. L. (2014) E–science, Ciência Aberta e o regime de informação em ciência e tecnologia. Tendências da Pesquisa Brasileira em Ciência da Informação, 7(1), 1–20. https://ridi.ibict.br/bitstream/123456789/854/1/124-540-1-PB.pdf

ALL EUROPEAN ACADEMIES. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Berlin. https://allea.org/code–of–conduct/

CHESBROUGH, H. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School.

DASGUPTA P. y DAVID, P. A. (1994). Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23, Issue 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)01002-1

EUROPEAN Comission. (2021). Facilitate Open Science Training For European Research (FOSTER). https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/612425

FECHER, B. (2022). As cinco escolas ou correntes de pensamento da Ciência Aberta: entrevista com Benedikt Fecher. Ciência da Informação Express, 3(1), 6. https://bit.ly/3wIoqo3

FORTALEZA, J. M. y BERTIN, P. R. B. (2019). A parceria para Governo Aberto e o compromisso pela Ciência Aberta. In: Shintaku, M.; Sales L. F. (Org.). Ciência aberta para editores científicos. Botucatu, SP: ABEC, 2019. pp. 21–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.21452/978-85-93910-02-9.cap3

FOSTER (2018). The Open Science Training Handbook. https://zenodo.org/records/2587951

LENS. (2024a). Ciencia abierta. https://link.lens.org/NqgIytlk7Ad

LENS. (2024b). Open Science. https://link.lens.org/RTmbNzAYLDd

LOPES, A. C., ANTUNES, M. L. y SANCHES, T. (2018). Contributos da literacia da informação para a Ciência Aberta. IBERSID: Revista de Sistemas de Información y Documentación, 12(1), 59–67. https://repositorio.ul.pt/handle/10451/35256

MASUZZO, P. y MARTENS, L. (2017). Do you speak open science? Resources and tips to learn the language. PeerJ Preprints, 3. https://peerj.com/preprints/2689/

MÉNDEZ, E. y SÁNCHEZ–NÚÑEZ, P. (2023). Navigating the Future and Overcoming Challenges to Unlock Open Science. In: González–Esteban, E., Feenstra, R.A., Camarinha–Matos, L.M. (eds). Ethics and Responsible Research and Innovation in Practice, 13875. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3–031–33177–0_13

MERTON, R. (1973). The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://archive.org/details/sociologyofscien0000mert/page/n5/mode/2up

NIELSEN, M. (2011). Doing science in the open. Physics World, 22(05). http://doi.org/10.1088/2058-7058/22/05/38

PETERS, M. A. (2010). Openness, Web 2.0 Technology, and Open Science. Policy Futures in Education, 8(5), 567–574. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2010.8.5.567

PITRELLI, N. y DELFANTI A. (2015). Ciência aberta: revolução ou continuidade? In: ALBAGLI, S.; MACIEL, M. L.; ABDO, A. H. (Ed.). Ciência Aberta, questões abertas. Brasília: IBICT ; Rio de Janeiro: UNIRIO, 2015. pp. 59–70. https://livroaberto.ibict.br/bitstream/1/1060/1/Ciencia%20aberta_questoes%20abertas_PORTUGUES_DIGITAL%20(5).pdf

PONTIKA, N., y KNOTH, P. (2015). Open Science Taxonomy. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Open-Science-Taxonomy-Pontika-Knoth/65f3b49f9d2f664202fd94e74d0d2655d6a4978f

RAMÍREZ, P. A. y SAMOILOVICH, D. (2018). Ciencia abierta. Reporte para tomadores de decisiones. Asociación Columbus–UNESCO. https://unes doc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000368788

ROGERS, P. (2024). Micro and Macro Open Science Perspective Taxonomy. Zenodo, 1. https://zenodo.org/records/10835001

ROSS–HELLAUER, T. (2017). What is open peer review? A systematic review. F1000Research, 6(588). https://f1000research.com/articles/6–588

SENA, O., FERNÁNDEZ, DE ARROYABE, J. C., SENA, V. y GUPTA, S. (2023). Stakeholder diversity and collaborative innovation: Integrating the resource-based view with stakeholder theory, Journal of Business Research, 164, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113955

SILVA, F. C. C. da y SILVEIRA, L. da. (2019). O ecossistema da Ciência Aberta. Transinformação, Campinas, 31, e190001. DOI: 10.1590/2318- 0889201931e190001. http://ref.scielo.org/kmkdcc

SILVEIRA, L., CALIXTO RIBEIRO, N., MELERO, R., MORA–CAMPOS, A., PIRAQUIVE–PIRAQUIVE, D. F., URIBE–TIRADO, A., MACHADO BORGES, P., POLANCO–CORTÉS,J., SANTILLÁN–ALDANA,J., CORRÊA DA SILVA, F., FERREIRA ARAÚJO, R. y ENCISO–BETANCOURT, A. M. (2023). Taxonomia da Ciência Aberta: revisada e ampliada. Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação, 28, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.5007/1518– 2924.2023.e91712

SILVEIRA, L., RIBEIRO, N., OLIVEIRA SANTOS, S. R., ALMEIDA SILVA, F. M., CORRÊA DA SILVA, F., CAREGNATO, S. E., SILVA DE OLIVEIRA, A. C., ANDRADE OLIVEIRA, D., RIBEIRO GARCIA, J. C. y FERREIRA ARAÚJO, R. (2021). Ciência aberta na perspectiva de especialistas brasileiros: proposta de taxono mia. Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação, 26, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.5007/1518–2924.2021.e79646

SZKUTA, K. y OSIMO, D. (2012). Openessin the research cycle. Science 2.0 study, 29. https://science20study.wordpress.com/2012/05/29/open ness–in–the–research–cycle/

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2021). Recomendación de la UNESCO sobre la Ciencia Abierta. Pa rís. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379949_spa

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2023). Open science outlook 1: status and trends around the world. París. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000387324

UNIVERSIDAD DE ANTIOQUIA. (2024). Curso de Ciencia Abierta. https://udearroba.udea.edu.co/externos/course/view.php?id=483

URIBE–TIRADO, A. y OCHOA, J. (2018). Perspectivas de la ciencia abierta. Un estado de la cuestión para una política nacional en Colombia. BiD: textos universitaris de biblioteconomia i documentació, (40). https://dx.doi.org/10.1344/BiD2018.40.5

UZWYSHYN, R. J. (2023). From Open Science and Datasets to AI and Discovery. Trends & issues in library technology, 26–38. https://rayuzwyshyn.net/MSU2023/TILT2023/OpenScienceAIUzwyshyn2023.pdf

VICENTE–SAEZ, R. y MARTINEZ–FUENTES, C. (2018). Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition. Journal of business research, 88, 428–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.043

WATSON, M. (2015). When will ‘open science’ become simply ‘science’? Genome Biology, 16. https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-015-0669-