First steps towards Open Science

ALBAGLI, S., APPEL, A. L. y MACIEL, M. L. (2014) E–science, Ciência Aberta e o regime de informação em ciência e tecnologia. Tendências da Pesquisa Brasileira em Ciência da Informação, 7(1), 1–20. https://ridi.ibict.br/bitstream/123456789/854/1/124-540-1-PB.pdf 1

ALL EUROPEAN ACADEMIES. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Berlin. https://allea.org/code–of–conduct/ 1

CHESBROUGH, H. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School. 1

DASGUPTA P. y DAVID, P. A. (1994). Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23, Issue 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)01002-1 1

EUROPEAN Comission. (2021). Facilitate Open Science Training For European Research (FOSTER). https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/612425 1

FECHER, B. (2022). As cinco escolas ou correntes de pensamento da Ciência Aberta: entrevista com Benedikt Fecher. Ciência da Informação Express, 3(1), 6. https://bit.ly/3wIoqo3 1

FORTALEZA, J. M. y BERTIN, P. R. B. (2019). A parceria para Governo Aberto e o compromisso pela Ciência Aberta. In: Shintaku, M.; Sales L. F. (Org.). Ciência aberta para editores científicos. Botucatu, SP: ABEC, 2019. pp. 21–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.21452/978-85-93910-02-9.cap3 1

FOSTER (2018). The Open Science Training Handbook. https://zenodo.org/records/2587951 1

LENS. (2024a). Ciencia abierta. https://link.lens.org/NqgIytlk7Ad 1

LENS. (2024b). Open Science. https://link.lens.org/RTmbNzAYLDd 1

LOPES, A. C., ANTUNES, M. L. y SANCHES, T. (2018). Contributos da literacia da informação para a Ciência Aberta. IBERSID: Revista de Sistemas de Información y Documentación, 12(1), 59–67. https://repositorio.ul.pt/handle/10451/35256 1

MASUZZO, P. y MARTENS, L. (2017). Do you speak open science? Resources and tips to learn the language. PeerJ Preprints, 3. https://peerj.com/preprints/2689/ 1

MÉNDEZ, E. y SÁNCHEZ–NÚÑEZ, P. (2023). Navigating the Future and Overcoming Challenges to Unlock Open Science. In: González–Esteban, E., Feenstra, R.A., Camarinha–Matos, L.M. (eds). Ethics and Responsible Research and Innovation in Practice, 13875. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3–031–33177–0_13 1

MERTON, R. (1973). The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://archive.org/details/sociologyofscien0000mert/page/n5/mode/2up 1

NIELSEN, M. (2011). Doing science in the open. Physics World, 22(05). http://doi.org/10.1088/2058-7058/22/05/38 1

PETERS, M. A. (2010). Openness, Web 2.0 Technology, and Open Science. Policy Futures in Education, 8(5), 567–574. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2010.8.5.567 1

PITRELLI, N. y DELFANTI A. (2015). Ciência aberta: revolução ou continuidade? In: ALBAGLI, S.; MACIEL, M. L.; ABDO, A. H. (Ed.). Ciência Aberta, questões abertas. Brasília: IBICT ; Rio de Janeiro: UNIRIO, 2015. pp. 59–70. https://livroaberto.ibict.br/bitstream/1/1060/1/Ciencia%20aberta_questoes%20abertas_PORTUGUES_DIGITAL%20(5).pdf 1

PONTIKA, N., y KNOTH, P. (2015). Open Science Taxonomy. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Open-Science-Taxonomy-Pontika-Knoth/65f3b49f9d2f664202fd94e74d0d2655d6a4978f 1

RAMÍREZ, P. A. y SAMOILOVICH, D. (2018). Ciencia abierta. Reporte para tomadores de decisiones. Asociación Columbus–UNESCO. https://unes doc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000368788 1

ROGERS, P. (2024). Micro and Macro Open Science Perspective Taxonomy. Zenodo, 1. https://zenodo.org/records/10835001 1

ROSS–HELLAUER, T. (2017). What is open peer review? A systematic review. F1000Research, 6(588). https://f1000research.com/articles/6–588 1

SENA, O., FERNÁNDEZ, DE ARROYABE, J. C., SENA, V. y GUPTA, S. (2023). Stakeholder diversity and collaborative innovation: Integrating the resource-based view with stakeholder theory, Journal of Business Research, 164, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113955 1

SILVA, F. C. C. da y SILVEIRA, L. da. (2019). O ecossistema da Ciência Aberta. Transinformação, Campinas, 31, e190001. DOI: 10.1590/2318- 0889201931e190001. http://ref.scielo.org/kmkdcc 1

SILVEIRA, L., CALIXTO RIBEIRO, N., MELERO, R., MORA–CAMPOS, A., PIRAQUIVE–PIRAQUIVE, D. F., URIBE–TIRADO, A., MACHADO BORGES, P., POLANCO–CORTÉS,J., SANTILLÁN–ALDANA,J., CORRÊA DA SILVA, F., FERREIRA ARAÚJO, R. y ENCISO–BETANCOURT, A. M. (2023). Taxonomia da Ciência Aberta: revisada e ampliada. Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação, 28, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.5007/1518– 2924.2023.e91712 1

SILVEIRA, L., RIBEIRO, N., OLIVEIRA SANTOS, S. R., ALMEIDA SILVA, F. M., CORRÊA DA SILVA, F., CAREGNATO, S. E., SILVA DE OLIVEIRA, A. C., ANDRADE OLIVEIRA, D., RIBEIRO GARCIA, J. C. y FERREIRA ARAÚJO, R. (2021). Ciência aberta na perspectiva de especialistas brasileiros: proposta de taxono mia. Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação, 26, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.5007/1518–2924.2021.e79646 1

SZKUTA, K. y OSIMO, D. (2012). Openessin the research cycle. Science 2.0 study, 29. https://science20study.wordpress.com/2012/05/29/open ness–in–the–research–cycle/ 1

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2021). Recomendación de la UNESCO sobre la Ciencia Abierta. Pa rís. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379949_spa 1

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2023). Open science outlook 1: status and trends around the world. París. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000387324 1

UNIVERSIDAD DE ANTIOQUIA. (2024). Curso de Ciencia Abierta. https://udearroba.udea.edu.co/externos/course/view.php?id=483 1

URIBE–TIRADO, A. y OCHOA, J. (2018). Perspectivas de la ciencia abierta. Un estado de la cuestión para una política nacional en Colombia. BiD: textos universitaris de biblioteconomia i documentació, (40). https://dx.doi.org/10.1344/BiD2018.40.5 1

UZWYSHYN, R. J. (2023). From Open Science and Datasets to AI and Discovery. Trends & issues in library technology, 26–38. https://rayuzwyshyn.net/MSU2023/TILT2023/OpenScienceAIUzwyshyn2023.pdf 1

VICENTE–SAEZ, R. y MARTINEZ–FUENTES, C. (2018). Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition. Journal of business research, 88, 428–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.043 1

WATSON, M. (2015). When will ‘open science’ become simply ‘science’? Genome Biology, 16. https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-015-0669- 1