Arguments supporting the permission or prohibition of students’ use of Generative Artificial Intelligence: A systematic review

19Blesa, A., Ripollés, M. y Boughattas, Y. (2024). La inteligencia artificial en la educación superior. REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 22(2), 9-14. https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2024.23133Bukar, U., Sayeed, M., Razak, S., Yogarayan, S. yAmodu, O. (2024). An integrative decision-making framework to guide policies on regulating ChatGPT usage. PeerJ Computer Science, 10, e1845. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1845Caccavale, F., Gargalo, C., Kager, J., Larsen, S., Gernaey, K.y Krühne, U. (2025). ChatGMP: A case of AI chatbots in chemical engineering education towards the automation of repetitive tasks. Computers and Education: AI, 8, 100354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100354Chan, S., Lo, N. yWong, A. (2024). Enhancing university level English proficiency with generative AI: Empirical insights into automated feedback and learning outcomes. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(4), ep541. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15607Chan, V. (2025). Integrating generative artificial intelligence in a writing intensive course for undergraduate nursing students. Journal of Professional Nursing, 57, 85-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2025.01.003Chauncey, S.y McKenna, H. (2023). A framework and exemplars for ethical and responsible use of AI Chatbot technology to support teaching and learning. Computers and Education: AI, 5, 100182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100182Chen, A., Xiang, M., Zhou, J., Jia, J., Shang, J., Li, X., Gašević, D.y Fan, Y. (2025). Unpacking help-seeking process through multimodal learning analytics: A comparative study of ChatGPT vs Human expert. Computers andEducation, 226, 105198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105198Cheng, Y., Fan, Y., Li, X., Chen, G., Gašević, D.y Swiecki, Z. (2025). Asking generative artificial intelligence the right questions improves writing performance. Computers andEducation: AI, 8, 100374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100374Chiu, T. (2024). Future research recommendations for transforming higher education with generative AI. Computers and Education: AI, 6, 100197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100197Chocobar, E., Ubillús, J. y Cevallos, G. (2025). ¿Sólo el ChatGPT? Diferentes herramientas de Inteligencia Artificial Generativa (GenAI) y sus usos: Una revisión de la literatura científica, 2021-2024.Revista Científica de la UCSA,12(1), 70-85. https://doi.org/10.18004/ucsa/2409-8752/2025.012.01.070Chocobar, E. y Barreda, R. (2025). Estructuras metodológicas PICO y PRISMA 2020 en la elaboración de artículos de revisión sistemática: Lo que todo investigador debe conocer y dominar.Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar,9(1), 8525-8543. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v9i1.16491Cinque, T. (2024). Exploring the paradox: Perceptions of AI in Higher Education –A Study of Hype and Scandal. Explorations in Media Ecology, 23, 199-215. https://doi.org/10.1386/eme_00205_7

20Cui, Y. (2025). What Influences College Students Using AI for Academic Writing? -A Quantitative Analysis Based on HISAM and TRI Theory. Computers and Education: AI, 8, 100391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100391Costa, I.,Do Nascimento, M.,Treviso, P.,Chini, L.,Roza, B.,Barbosa, S. yMendes, K. (2024).Using the Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer in academic writing in health: a scoping review.Revista Latino-americana de Enfermagem, 32,e4194. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7133.4194Dai, W., Tsai, Y., Lin, J., Aldino, A., Jin, H., Li, T., Gašević, D.y Chen, G. (2024). Assessing the proficiency of large language models in automatic feedback generation: An evaluation study. Computers and Education: AI, 7, 100299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100299Dakakni, D.y Safa, N. (2023). Artificial intelligence in the L2 classroom: Implications and challenges on ethics and equity in higher education: A 21st century Pandora's box. Computers and Education: AI, 5, 100179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100179Deng, R., Jiang, M., Yu, X., Lu, Y.y Liu, S. (2025). Does ChatGPT enhance student learning? A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies. Computers andEducation, 227, 105224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105224Digital Education Council(DEC, August 2, 2024). Digital Education Council Global AI Student Survey 2024. https://acortar.link/siv8XVFarhi, F., Jeljeli, R., Aburezeq, I., Dweikat, F., Al-shami, S.y Slamene, R. (2023). Analyzing the students' views, concerns, and perceived ethics about chat GPT usage. Computers and Education: AI, 5, 100180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100180Fleckenstein, J., Meyer, J., Jansen, T., Keller, S., Köller, O.y Möller, J. (2024). Do teachers spot AI? Evaluating the detectability of AI-generated texts among student essays. Computers and Education: AI, 6, 100209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100209Flores, J., García, A., Vizcarra, S.., De la Cruz, J., Gutiérrez, J., Quiroga, B. yTaype, A. (2023). Performance of ChatGPT on the Peruvian National Licensing Medical Examination: Cross-Sectional Study. JMIR Med Educ, 9, e48039. https://doi.org/10.2196/48039Gao, Z., Cheah, J., Lim, X. yLuo, X. (2024). Enhancing academic performance of business students using generative AI: An interactive-constructive-active-passive (ICAP) self-determination perspective. The International Journal of Management Education, 22, 100958. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.100958Garg, A., Soodhani, K. yRajendran, R. (2025). Enhancing data analysis and programming skills through structured prompt training: The impact of generative AI in engineering education. Computers and Education: AI, 8, 100380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100380Gasaymeh, A., Beirat, M. yAbu, A. (2024). University Students’ Insights of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Writing Tools. Education Sciences, 14(10), 1062. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101062

21Gruenhagen, J., Sinclair, P., Carroll, J., Baker, P., Wilson, A. yDemant, D. (2024). The rapid rise of generative AI and its implications for academic integrity: Students’ perceptions and use of chatbots for assistance with assessments. Computers and Education: AI, 7, 100273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100273Heung, Y. yChiu, T. (2025). How ChatGPT impacts student engagement from a systematic review and meta-analysis study. Computers and Education: AI, 8, 100361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100361Holderried, F., Stegemann, C., Herschbach, L., Moldt, J., Nevins, A., Griewatz, J., Holderried, M., Herrmann, A., Festl, T. yMahling, M. (2024a). A Generative Pretrained Transformer (GPT)–Powered Chatbot as a Simulated Patient to Practice History Taking: Prospective, Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Med Educ, 10, e53961. https://doi.org/10.2196/53961Holderried, F., Stegemann, C., Herrmann, A., Festl, T., Holderried, M., Eickhoff, C.yMahling, M. (2024b). A Language Model–Powered Simulated Patient with Automated Feedback for History Taking: Prospective Study. JMIR Med Educ,10, e59213. http://doi.org/10.2196/59213Hu, W., Tian, J.y Li, Y. (2025). Enhancing student engagement in online collaborative writing through a generative AI-based conversational agent. The Internet and Higher Education, 65, 100979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100979Jafarian, N. yKramer, A. (2025). AI-assisted audio-learning improves academic achievement through motivation and reading engagement. Computers and Education: AI, 8, 100357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100357Jin, F., Sun, L., Pan, Y.y Lin, C. (2025). High heels, compass, spider-man, or drug? Metaphor analysis of generative artificial intelligence in academic writing. Computers andEducation, 228, 105248.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105248Kavadella, A., Dias, M. Kaklamanos, E., Stamatopoulos, V. yGiannakopoulos, K. (2024). Evaluation of ChatGPT’s Real-Life Implementation in Undergraduate Dental Education: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Med Educ, 10, e51344. http://doi.org/10.2196/51344Kinder, A., Briese, F., Jacobs, M., Dern, N., Glodny, N., Jacobs, S.y Leßmann, S. (2025). Effects of adaptive feedback generated by a large language model: A case study in teacher education. Computers and Education: AI, 8, 100349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100349Kim, R. (2024). Comparative analysis of AI-generated and human-made instructional videos: Effects on learning English caused-motion constructions by Korean high school EFL learners. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 27(4), 179-199. https://doi.org/10.15702/mall.2024.27.4.179Kizilcec, R., Huber, E., Papanastasiou, E. C., Cram, A., Makridis, C. A., Smolansky, A., Zeivots, S. yRaduescu, C. (2024). Perceived impact of generative AI on assessments: Comparing educator and student perspectives in Australia, Cyprus, and the United States. Computers and Education: AI, 7, 100269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100269

22Knoth, N., Tolzin, A., Janson, A.y Leimeister, J. (2024). AI literacy and its implications for prompt engineering strategies. Computers and Education: AI, 6, 100225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100225Knopp, M., Warm, E., Weber, D., Kelleher, M., Kinnear, B., Schumacher, D., Santen, S., Mendonça, E. yTurner, L. (2023). AI-Enabled Medical Education: Threads of Change, Promising Futures, and Risky Realities Across Four Potential Future Worlds. JMIR Med Educ, 9, e50373. https://doi.org/10.2196/50373Kohnke, L. (2024). Exploring EAP students' perceptions of GenAI and traditional grammar-checking tools for language learning. Computers and Education: AI, 7, 100279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100279Lai, C., Cheung, K., Chan, C.y Law, K. (2024). Integrating the adapted UTAUT model with moral obligation, trust and perceived risk to predict ChatGPT adoption for assessment support: A survey with students. Computers and Education: AI, 6, 100246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100246Lee, D., Arnold, M., Srivastava, A., Plastow, K., Strelan, P., Ploeckl, F., Lekkas, D.y Palmer, E. (2024). The impact of generative AI on higher education learning and teaching: A study of educators’ perspectives. Computers and Education: AI, 6, 100221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100221Li, T., Zhan, Z., Ji, Y.y Li, T. (2025). Exploring human and AI collaboration in inclusive STEM teacher training: A synergistic approach based on self-determination theory.The Internet and Higher Education, 65, 101003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.101003Magalhaes, S. yCruz, R. (2024). Incorporating ChatGPT in Medical Informatics Education: Mixed Methods Study on Student Perceptions and Experiential Integration Proposals. JMIR MedEduc, 10, e51151. http://doi.org/10.2196/51151Meinlschmidt, G., Koc, S., Boerner, E., Tegethoff, M., Simacek, T., Schirmer, L.y Schneider, M. (2025). Enhancing professional communication training in higher education through artificial intelligence (AI)-integrated exercises: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Medical Education, 25, 804.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07307-3Meniado, J., Huyen, D., Panyadilokpong, N.yLertkomolwit, P. (2024). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Experiences and perceptions of EFL learners in Thailand and Vietnam. Computers and Education: AI, 7, 100313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100313Molinari, A.y Molinari, E. (2025). The added value of academic writing instruction in the age of large language models: A critical analysis. IADIS International Journal on WWW/Internet, 22(1), 44-58. https://doi.org/10.33965/ijwi_2024220104Moorhouse, B. (2024). Beginning and first-year language teachers’ readiness for the generative AI age. Computers and Education: AI, 6, 100201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100201

23Moreno, A., Ventura, N.y Ventura, M. (2025).Neuroeducación en la resolución de problemas verbales, funciones ejecutivas y comprensión lectora: revisión sistemáticaexploratoria. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 10, 1-22.https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2025-1376Moundridou, M., Matzakos, N.y Doukakis, S. (2024). Generative AI tools as educators’ assistants: Designing and implementing inquiry-based lesson plans. Computers and Education: AI, 7, 100277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100277Noda, M., Ueno, T., Koshu, R., Takaso, Y., Shimada, M. D., Saito, C., Sugimoto, H., Fushiki, H., Ito, M., Nomura, A. yYoshizaki, T. (2024). Performance of GPT-4V in Answering the Japanese Otolaryngology Board Certification Examination Questions: Evaluation Study. JMIR Med Educ, 10, e57054. https://doi.org/10.2196/57054Ojubanire, O., Olaleye, S., Marhraoui, M., Kamihanda, M., Oke, O. yOjubanire, O. (2025). Awareness, perception, and adoption of ChatGPT in African HEIs: A multi-dimensional analysis. The Internet and Higher Education, 65, 100999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.100999Pan, M., Lai, C.y Guo, K. (2025). Effects of GenAI-empowered interactive support on university EFL students' self-regulated strategy use and engagement in reading. The Internet and Higher Education, 65, 100991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100991Pérez, G. (2025).La Publicación Académica y las Actitudes de los Investigadores: Revisión Sistemática. European Public & Social Innovation Review,10, 01-19. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2025-900Pozdniakov, S., Brazil, J., Abdi, S., Bakharia, A., Sadiq, S., Gašević, D., Denny, P.y Khosravi, H. (2024). Large language models meet user interfaces: The case of provisioning feedback. Computers and Education: AI, 7, 100289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100289Rodrigues, L., Pereira, F., Cabral, L., Gašević, D., Ramalho, G.y Mello, R. (2024). Assessing the quality of automatic-generated short answers using GPT-4. Computers and Education: AI, 7, 100248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100248Ruiz, K., Miramontes, M. y Reyna, C. (2024). Percepciones y expectativas de estudiantes universitarios sobre la IAG.European Public & Social Innovation Review,9, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-357Rutherford, T., Rodrigues, A., Duque, S., Veng, S., Mykyta, R., Cao, Y., Chisholm, K.y Bergwall, E. (2025). “I just think it is the way of the future”: Teachers’ use of ChatGPT to develop motivationally-supportive math lessons. Computers and Education: AI, 8, 100367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100367Saihi, A., Ben-Daya, M., Hariga, M.y As’ad, R. (2024). A Structural equation modeling analysis of generative AI chatbots adoption among students and educators in higher education. Computers and Education: AI, 7, 100274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100274Sánchez, M. (2023). La inteligencia artificial generativa y la evaluación: ¿qué pasará con los exámenes?Investigación en educación médica,12(48), 5-8. https://doi.org/10.22201/fm.20075057e.2023.48.23550

24Segbenya, M., Bervell, B., Frimpong, E., Otoo, I., Andzie, T.y Achina, S. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: Modelling the antecedents of artificial intelligence usage and effects on 21st century employability skills among postgraduate students in Ghana. Computers and Education: AI, 5, 100188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100188Siemens, G., Marmolejo, F., Gabriel, F., Medeiros, K., Marrone, R., Joksimovic, S. yde Laat, M. (2022). Human and artificial cognition. Computers and Education: AI, 3, 100107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100107Smerdon, D. (2024). AI in essay-based assessment: Student adoption, usage, and performance. Computers and Education: AI, 7, 100288.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100288Sousa, A. yCardoso, P. (2025). Use of Generative AI by Higher Education Students.Electronics,14(7), 1258. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14071258Su, J., Ng, D. yChu, S. (2023). Artificial Intelligence (AI) Literacy in Early Childhood Education: The Challenges and Opportunities. Computers and Education: AI, 4, 100124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100124Tai, T. yChen, H. (2024). Improving elementary EFL speaking skills with generative AI chatbots: Exploring individual and paired interactions. Computers andEducation, 220, 105112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105112Takahashi, H., Shikino, K., Kondo, T., Komori, A., Yamada, Y., Saita, M.y Naito, T. (2024). Educational Utility of Clinical Vignettes Generated in Japanese by ChatGPT-4: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Med Educ, 10, e59133. https://doi.org/10.2196/59133Teng, M. (2024). “ChatGPT is the companion, not enemies”: EFL learners’ perceptions and experiences in using ChatGPT for feedback in writing. Computers and Education: AI, 7, 100270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100270Tshidi, M. yDewa, A. (2024). The promise and peril of Coding & Robotics education in South Africa: A scoping review of teacher preparation and generative artificial intelligence's potential for delivering equity.Journal of Education (University of KwaZulu-Natal), 96, 140-164.https://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2520-9868/i96a08Ubilla, A.,Bustamante, D.y Pinuer, L.(2025).Clarificando tax morale: Revisión sistemática de literatura apoyada con inteligencia artificial.European Public & Social Innovation Review,10,1-18. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2025-725Urban, M., Děchtěrenko, F., Lukavský, J., Hrabalová, V., Svacha, F., Brom, C.y Urban, K. (2024). ChatGPT improves creative problem-solving performance in university students: An experimental study. Computers andEducation, 215, 105031. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105031Valdés, G. (2025). La explicación en el aula de matemáticas: una revisión de la literatura. European Public & Social Innovation Review,10, 01-14.https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2025-921

25Valeri, F., Nilsson, P. yCederqvist, A. (2025). Exploring students’ experience of ChatGPT in STEM education. Computers and Education: AI, 8, 100360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100360Van Niekerk, J., Delport, P. ySutherland, I. (2025). Addressing the use of generative AI in academic writing. Computers and Education: AI, 8, 100342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100342Wang, C. yYin, H. (2025). How do Chinese undergraduates harness the potential of appraisal and emotions in generative AI-Powered learning? A multigroup analysis based on appraisal theory. Computers andEducation, 228, 105250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105250Wang, P., Jing, Y.y Shen, S. (2025). A systematic literature review on the application of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in teaching within higher education: Instructional contexts, process, and strategies. The Internet and Higher Education, 65, 100996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.100996Wiboolyasarin, W., Wiboolyasarin, K., Suwanwihok, K., Jinowat, N.y Muenjanchoey, R. (2024). Synergizing collaborative writing and AI feedback: An investigation into enhancing L2 writing proficiency in wiki-based environments. Computers and Education: AI, 6, 100228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100228Xiao, L., Pyng, H., Ayub, A., Zhu, Z., Gao, J.y Qing, Z. (2025). University Students’ Usage of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Sustainability: A Cross-Sectional Survey from China.Sustainability,17(8), 3541. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083541Yamamoto, A., Koda, M., Ogawa, H., Miyoshi, T., Maeda, Y., Otsuka, F. yIno, H. (2024). Enhancing Medical Interview Skills Through AI-Simulated Patient Interactions: Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Med Educ, 10, e58753. http://doi.org/10.2196/58753Yik, B. yDood, A. (2024). ChatGPT Convincingly Explains Organic Chemistry Reaction Mechanisms Slightly Inaccurately with High Levels of Explanation Sophistication. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(5). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00235Yilmaz, R.y Yilmaz, F. (2023). The effect of generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool use on students' computational thinking skills, programming self-efficacy and motivation. Computers and Education: AI, 4, 100147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100147Youssef, E., Medhat, M., Abdellatif, S.y Al Malek, M. (2024). Examining the effect of ChatGPT usage on students’ academic learning and achievement: A survey-based study in Ajman, UAE. Computers and Education: AI, 7, 100316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100316Zhai, C., Wibowo, S. yLi, L. (2024). Evaluating the AI dialogue System's intercultural, humorous, and empathetic dimensions in English language learning: A case study. Computers and Education: AI, 7, 100262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100262Zhang, L.y Xu, J. (2025). The paradox of self-efficacy and technological dependence: Unraveling generative AI's impact on university students' task completion. The Internet and Higher Education, 65, 100978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100978

26Zhang, Z., Zhang, J., Zhang, X. yMai, W. (2025). A comprehensive overview of Generative AI (GAI): Technologies, applications, and challenges. Neurocomputing, 632, 1, 129645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2025.129645Zheng, S. (2024). The effects of chatbot use on foreign language reading anxiety and reading performance among Chinese secondary school students. Computers and Education: AI, 7, 100271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100271Zheldibayeva, R. (2025). GenAI as a Learning Buddy for Non-English Majors: Effects on Listening and Writing Performance. Educational Process: International Journal, 14, e2025051. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.14.51Zhou, S., Si, Y., Li, J., Manta, O.YYue, G. (2024). A Study of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Mobile Learning Adoption Based on SEM Models. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 18(22), 68-76. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i22.52343Zhong, B.y Liu, X. (2025). Evaluating AI literacy of secondary students: Framework and scale development. Computers andEducation, 227, 105230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105230