Title of the article: The role of new technologies in improving data governance and increasing security in the countryś land and property registration organization.

MohseniSani, Mostafa and AkbariBirjandi, Athe Title of the article: The role of new technologies in improving data governance and increasing security in the countryś land and property registration organization. Human Information Interaction, 2025, vol. 12, n. 3, 0-0. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of cc1908en.pdf]
Preview
 Text
cc1908en.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.
Download (6MB) | Preview

English abstract

Background and Objective: The present study was conducted with the aim of investigating the role of new technologies in improving data governance and enhancing information security in the country's Land and Property Registration Organization. The increasing importance of data in institutional decision-making and the need to harmonize with international standards double the need to address this issue. Research Method: This study was qualitative and conducted with a grounded theory approach. The statistical population included managers and experts of the Land and Property Registration Organization, and data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 12 people. The coding process was carried out in three stages: open, axial, and selective, and participant review and comparison with international research were used to validate the data. Findings: Data analysis showed that the main challenges include weak technological infrastructure, fragmentation of systems, legal gaps, security concerns, and cultural resistance of employees. In contrast, opportunities such as increasing transparency, reducing document forgery, promoting public trust, and improving service efficiency were identified. The findings were consistent with international studies, including the OECD’s emphasis on the link between technology and organizational culture, and the experiences of Sweden and Georgia in using blockchain in the registration system. Conclusion: The Iranian Document Registration Organization has taken steps such as digitization and piloting blockchain, but it still faces legal, security, and institutional shortcomings. Achieving data-driven governance and increasing security requires a combination of institutional reforms, technological investment, and promoting a data-driven culture.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Data governance, information security, Land and Property Registration Organization, Blockchain, Digitalization, E-government
Subjects: D. Libraries as physical collections. > DC. Public libraries.
Depositing user: HII Journal Human Information Interaction
Date deposited: 25 Feb 2026 17:44
Last modified: 25 Feb 2026 17:44
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/47436

References

Adlington, G., Lamb, T., Tonchovska, R. & Mclaren, R. 2021. Real Estate Registration

and Cadastre. London. RICS.

Aditya, T., Maria-Unger, E., vd Berg, C., Bennett, R., Saers, P., Syahid, H.L., Erwan,

D. et al. 2020. Participatory land administration in Indonesia: Quality and

usability assessment. Land, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/land9030079.

African Union. 2020. African Union Convention on Cyber Security and Personal Data

Protection. Cited 17 QAugust 2022. https://au.int/en/treaties/african-unionconvention-cyber-security-and-personal-data-protection.

Amankwah-Amoah, J., Khan, Z., Wood, G. & Knight, G. 2021. COVID-19 and digitalization: The great acceleration. Journal of Business Research, 136. https://doi.

org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.011.

Ameyaw, P.D. & de Vries, W.T. 2020. Transparency of land administration and the

role of blockchain technology, a four-dimensional framework analysis from the

Ghanaian land perspective. Land, 9(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/land9120491.

de Andrade Correa, F. & Jansen, L. 2022a. Climate change and tenure rights: interlinked challenges in the context of Myanmar. Policy Brief. Rome. FAO. https://doi.

org/10.4060/cb8148en.

de Andrade Correa, F. & Jansen, L. 2022b. Climate change and tenure rights: interlinked challenges in the context of Viet Nam. Policy Brief. Rome. FAO. https://doi.

org/10.4060/cb8146en.

de Andrade Correa, F. & Jansen, L.J.M. 2022c. Climate change and tenure rights: Interlinked challenges in Lao People’s Democratic Republic – Policy brief. Rome. FAO.

https://doi.org/10.4060/cb8145en.

de Andrade Correa, F. & Jansen, L.J.M. 2022d. Climate change and tenure rights: Interlinked challenges in Cambodia – Policy brief. Rome. FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/

cb8144en.

Asiama, K. & Arko-Adjei, A. 2022. An experiment on the role of participatory GIS in

the adjudication process of customary lands. Survey Review. https://doi.org/10.

1080/00396265.2022.2040869.

Asiama, K., Bennett, R. & Zevenbergen, J. 2017. Participatory Land Administration on Customary Lands: A Practical VGI Experiment in Nanton, Ghana. ISPRS

International Journal of Geo-Information, 6(7): 186. https://doi.org/10.3390/

ijgi6070186.

Asiama, K.O., Bennett, R.M., Zevenbergen, J.A. & da Silva Mano, A. 2019. Responsible consolidation of customary lands: A framework for land reallocation. Land

Use Policy, 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.006.

Bakhia, N. 2021. The Georgian Case: IGIF for Strengthening NSDI. In: Geospatial Information for Digital Transformation. Online Conference. Kartverket. Norway,

27–29 October 2021.

Bennett, R., Miller, T., Pickering, M. & Kara, A.K. 2021. Hybrid approaches for smart

contracts in land administration: Lessons from three blockchain proofs‐of‐

concept. Land, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/land10020220

Bennett, R., Oosterom, P. van, Lemmen, C. & Koeva, M. 2020. Remote Sensing for

Land Administration. Remote Sensing, 12(15): 2497. https://doi.org/10.3390/

rs12152497.

Bennett, R., Pickering, M. & Sargent, J. 2019. Transformations, transitions, or tall

tales? A global review of the uptake and impact of NoSQL, blockchain, and big

data analytics on the land administration sector. Land Use Policy, 83. https://doi.

org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.016.

Bennett, R., Rajabifard, A., Kalantari, M., Wallace, J. & Williamson, I. 2010. Cadastral Futures: Building a New Vision for the Nature and Role of Cadastres. In: FIG

Congress 2010: Facing the Challenge – Building Capacity. 2010.

Bennett, R., Rajabifard, A., Williamson, I. & Wallace, J. 2012. On the need for

national land administration infrastructures. Land Use Policy, 29(1): 208–219.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.06.008.

Bennett, R., Unger, E.-M., Lemmen, C.H.J. & de Zeeuw, C.J. 2020. COVID-19, the

Land Administration Sector and Spatial Information. GIM International.

Bennett, R., Unger, E.M., Lemmen, C. & Dijkstra, P. 2021. Land administration maintenance: a review of the persistent problem and emerging fit-for-purpose solutions. Land, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/land10050509.

Böhme, K., Zillmer, S., Hans, S., Hrelja, D., Valenza, A. & Mori, A. 2022. Research

for REGI Committee – The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on EU cohesion and

EU cohesion policy – Part I: Overview and first analysis. Brussels. European Parliament, Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies.

BMWi. 2019. Making space for innovation. The handbook for regulatory sandboxes.

https://www.bmwk.de/Redaktion/EN/Publikationen/Digitale-Welt/handbookregulatory-sandboxes.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2.

Cetl, V., Ioannidis, C., Dalyot, S., Doytsher, Y., Felus, Y., Haklay, M., Mueller, H. et

al. 2019. New Trends in Geospatial Information: The Land Surveyors Role in the

Era of Crowdsourcing and VGI. FIG Publication, 73.

Coote, A. 2022. Socio-Economic Impact Assessment for Moldova. In: Socio-economic

benefits of geospatial information. UNECE Webinar. UNECE. 19 May 2022.

Crompvoets, J., Vancauwenberghe, G., Ho, S., Masser, I. & de Vries, W.T. 2018.

Governance of national spatial data infrastructures in Europe. International

Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, 13.

Cucinotta, D. & Vanelli, M. 2020. WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic. Acta

Biomedica, 91(1). https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i1.9397.

Diagana, O. 2021. Three Paths to Accelerating Digital Access in West and Central

Africa. Opinion. World Bank. Cited 17 August 2022. https://www.worldbank.org/

en/news/opinion/2021/08/23/three-paths-to-accelerating-digital-access-inwest-and-central-africa.

Dale, M. 2022. Liquid Enterprizes – Introduction to Business Information Systems.

Melbourne, Swinburne University of Technology.

Danish Ministry of Energy Utilities and Climate. 2015. Key registers and keys

between registers – the key to effectiveness in the basic data programme in

Denmark. In: WPLA Seminar. Baku, Azerbaijan, 2015. https://www.oicrf.org/

documents/40950/43224/Key+Registers+and+Keys+between+Registers+th

e+key+to+effectiveness+in+the+Basic+Data+Programme+in+Denmark.pdf/

d57251d0-0664-7f94-69a0-f04d7ddd11ad?t=1510190786715.

Deininger, K. & Feder, G. 2009. Land registration, governance, and development:

Evidence and implications for policy. World Bank Research Observer, 24(2). https://

doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkp007.

Draskovic, B., Vucetic, D. & Tonchovska, R. 2021. Geospatial Information in Response

to Covid-19 Pandemic Serbian Experience. In: FIG e-Working Week: Smart

Surveyors for Land and Water Management – Challenges in a New Reality. FIG,

June 2021.

Dorosh, Y., Ibatullin, S., Tarnopolskyy, A., Dorosh, A. & Bohdan, A. 2021. Application of digital transformations of data and processes for modelling the structure of

land use in the conditions of open land market in Ukraine. In: Digital Transformation, Data and AI in the Western Balkans.

EAP. 2022. Salvaging the Historical Heritage of Land Registration Documents of the

Archives of Land Registration Division and Lands Commission of Ghana. https://

eap.bl.uk/sites/default/files/2022-05/EAP1119%20Survey%20Report.pdf.

Enemark, S., McLaren, R. & Lemmen, C. 2016. Fit-For-Purpose Land Administration

– Guiding Principles for Country Implementation. FIG Publication, 60. https://

www.fig.net/resources/publications/figpub/pub60/Figpub60.pdf.

Enemark, S., McLaren, R. & Lemmen, C. 2021. Fit-For-Purpose Land Administration

– Providing Secure Land Rights at Scale. Land, 10(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/

land10090972.

Ertink, D. 2022. NSDI in The Netherlands. Presentation for the BiH High-Level NSDI

Commitee. Kadaster International.

European Parliament. Directive (EU) on open data and the re-use of public sector

information, 2019/1024, 2019.

European Union. 2020. Digitally-enabled Development for a Sustainable Future in

Eastern Europe. M. Kilibarda, A. Kotsev & V. Cetl, eds. EU Joint Research Center.

European Union. 2022. Digital Transformation, Data and AI in the Western Balkans.

In: B. Delipetrev, O. Chukaliev & B. Idrizi, eds. EU Joint Research Center Conference and Workshop Report.

FAO. 2002. Land Tenure and Rural Development. In: Land Tenure Studies. Vol. 3.

FAO. 2013. Governing land for women and men – A technical guide to support the

achievement of responsible gender-equitable governance of land tenure.

FAO. 2022. Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land,

Fisheries and Forests in the Context of National Food Security. First Revision.

Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/i2801e.

FAO. 2022a. Achieving Indicator 5.a.2 in the Western Balkans and Beyond, Partnership

for Gender Equality and Land Ownership and Control. https://www.fao.org/3/

cb9475en/cb9475en.pdf.

FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP & WHO. 2021. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in

the World 2021. Transforming food systems for food security, improved nutrition

and affordable healthy diets for all. Rome. https://www.fao.org/3/cb4474en/

cb4474en.pdf.

FAO & IUNL. 2022. Responsible governance of tenure and preventive justice – A guide for

notaries and other practitioners in the preventive administration of justice.

In: Governance of Tenure Technical Guide, 13. FAO, 28 February 2022. https://doi.

org/10.4060/cb8251en.

Fuckar, M. & Simic Rukavina, A. 2021. Land Registry Procedures in Time of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Republic of Croatia. In: Accelerated Digitalisation:

The impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Land Administration sector. UNECE

Webinar. UNECE, 22 March 2021. https://unece.org/info/events/event/354013.

Geving, C. 2021. The impact of COVID-19 on the property market: Norwegian Association of Real Estate Agents’ experience. In: COVID-19 and Property Markets: How is

the pandemic affecting property markets in the UNECE region? UNECE Webinar.

UNECE, 15 April 2021. https://unece.org/info/Housing-and-Land-Management/

events/354070.

Gitobu, C. 2021. The shift to mobile technology for amplified government and

humanitarian cash and voucher assistance amid the COVID-19 pandemic

in Kenya. In: GMSA Blog. Cited 17 August 2022. https://www.gsma.com/

mobilefordevelopment/blog/mobile-technology-government-humanitariancva-covid19-kenya/.

Govender, W. 2020. IOT/AI Disruption in Land Administration. In: Geospatial World

Forum 2020: Transforming Economies in 5G era. Amsterdam, 7 April 2020.

Guenette, J.D., Kenworthy, P.G. & Wheeler, C.M. 2022. Implications of the War in

Ukraine for the Global Economy. Washington, DC, World Bank. Cited 15 August

2022. https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/5d903e848db1d1b83e0ec8f7

44e55570-0350012021/related/Implications-of-the-War-in-Ukraine-for-theGlobal-Economy.pdf.

Gray, R. 2021. How vulnerable groups were left behind in pandemic response.

In: Horizon, the EU Research & Innovation Magazine. Cited 16 August 2022.

https://ec.europa.eu/research-and-innovation/en/horizon-magazine/howvulnerable-groups-were-left-behind-pandemic-response.

Grudzień, M. 2021. Experiences from Poland on Open Data Policy. In: Geospatial Information for Digital Transformation. Online Conference. Kartverket. Norway,

27–29 October 2021.

Hadley, C. 2018. Fundamental Global Geospatial Data Themes. In: World Geospatial Information Congress 2018. https://ggim.un.org/unwgic/presentations/

SS2_20Nov_Clare-Hadley.pdf.

Handal, Y. 2019. SINAP – National Property Administration System. In: Presentation

at the Property Institute Honduras. https://www.cepal.org/sites/default/files/

presentations/honduras-reduccion-brecha-digital-geoespacial.pdf.

Harlow, M. 2021. Working Towards a Truly Digital Conveyancing Process. In: Accelerated

Digitalisation: The impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Land Administration

sector. UNECE Webinar. UNECE, 22 March 2021. https://unece.org/info/events/

event/354013.

Hagemann, R., Huddleston, J. & Thierer, A.D. 2018. Soft Law for Hard Problems: The

Governance of Emerging Technologies in an Uncertain Future. Colorado Technology Law Journal, 17(1).

Home, R. 2021. History and prospects for African land governance: institutions,

technology and ‘land rights for all’. Land, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/

land10030292.

Huntley, H. 2019. How to Deal With Digital Disruption. In: Gartner IT Symposium/XpoTM

. Barcelona, Gartner. Inc, 2019. https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/

how-to-deal-with-digital-disruption.

IGAC. 2019. Cadaster in Colombia. Presentation. https://www.oicrf.org/

documents/40950/0/0808_2_Colombia.pdf/4e2a3508-3c02-bd8b-c8d4-

995990e461c0?t=1650959796406.

Jansen, L. 2022. Climate change and tenure rights: interlinked challenges in the context

of China – Policy Brief. Rome. FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb8147en.

Kadaster. 2022. Corporate Presentation. The Netherlands.

Kalogianni, E., van Oosterom, P., Dimopoulou, E. & Lemmen, C. 2020. 3D land administration: A review and a future vision in the context of the spatial development lifecycle. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(2). https://doi.

org/10.3390/ijgi9020107.

Kedar, J. 2022. Communicating the Benefits of Geospatial Information: Experiences from

Georgia. In: Socio-economic benefits of geospatial information. UNECE Webinar.

UNECE, 19 May 2022.

Kedar, J. 2021. Norwegian Support to the IGIF implementation. In: Geospatial Information for Digital Transformation. Online Conference. Kartverket. Norway, 27–29

October 2021.

Kelm, K. 2021. World Bank Methodology for IGIF Implementation. In: Geospatial Information for Digital Transformation. Online Conference. Oslo, Kartverket. Norway,

27–29 October 2021.

Kelm, K. 2022. Socio-economic impact assessment within the integrated geospatial

information framework: the World Bank Methodology. In: UNECE Webinar: Socioeconomic benefits of geospatial information. 19 May 2022. https://unece.org/

sites/default/files/2022-05/KKelm_20220519.pdf.

Land, N. 2021. Transforming National Mapping & Cadastre with Deep Learning. In: Geospatial Information for Digital Transformation. Online Conference. Kartverket.

Norway, 27–29 October 2021.

Lillethun, A. 2021. NSDI in Norway. In: Geospatial Information for Digital Transformation. Online Conference. Kartverket. Norway, 27–29 October 2021.

Litreeva, M. 2021. Use of geoinformation systems and cadastral data during and after

the pandemic. In: NSDI, geospatial data and technology: The role of geospatial

and cadastre agencies in the COVID-19 pandemic response. UNECE Webinar.

­UNECE, 11 May 2021. https://unece.org/housing/events/nsdi-geospatial-dataand-technology.

Litvintcev, K. 2021. Geospatial data and cadastre in the Russian Federation in support

of economy recovery measures . In: NSDI, geospatial data and technology: The

role of geospatial and cadastre agencies in the COVID-19 pandemic response.

UNECE Webinar. UNECE, 11 May 2021. https://unece.org/housing/events/nsdigeospatial-data-and-technology.

Makarenko, D. 2021. IGIF Implementation in Ukraine: Challenges, Results and Perspectives. In: Geospatial Information for Digital Transformation. Online Conference.

Kartverket. Norway, 27–29 October 2021.

Martynova, E. 2021. Digitalization of Rosreestr’s Public Services: Modern technologies in

the Service of Socitey. In: Accelerated Digitalisation: The impact of the COVID-19

Pandemic on the Land Administration sector. UNECE Webinar. UNECE, 22 March

2021. https://unece.org/info/events/event/354013.

Masser, I. 2019. Changing Notions of a Spatial Data Infrastructure. In: Geographic Information Systems to Spatial Data Infrastructure. https://doi.

org/10.1201/9780429505904-14.

Masser, I., Williams, M.B. & Williams, R. 2005. Learning from Other Countries:

The Cross-National Dimension in Urban Policy Making. Routledge.

Ntara, C. 2015. An analysis of M-Pesa use in international transactions. European

Journal of Business and Management, 7(17): 73–79.

Mitchell, D., Enemark, S. & van der Molen, P. 2015. Climate resilient urban development: Why responsible land governance is important. Land Use Policy, 48.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.05.026.

Moreno, I. 2022. Modernization of Bogota Cadaster. In: World Bank Land Lightening

Conference. World Bank, May 2022.

Müller, H. & Seifert, M. 2019. Blockchain, a feasible technology for land administration. In: FIG Working Week: Geospatial information for a smarter life and environmental resilience. Hanoi. 22–26 April 2019.

Munoz, J. 2022. Land Tenure Reforms in Latin America: The experience over past 20 years

and future perspectives. In: World Bank Land Lightening Conference. World Bank,

May 2022.

Munshi, A., Kumar, Dr.V. & Malik, P. 2019. Digitization of Land Records--What We

Can Learn from Bhoomi? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/

ssrn.3464213.

Musinguzi, M., Enemark, S. & Mwesigye, S.P. 2021. Fit for purpose land administration: Country implementation strategy for addressing uganda’s land tenure

security problems. Land, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060629.

Niftiyev, Y. 2015. Interoperability between key registers in e-government: Azerbaijani experience. In: WPLA seminar. Baku, Azerbaijan, 2015. https://www.oicrf.

org/documents/40950/43224/Interoperability+among+key+registers+in

+e+Government+Azerbaijani+expericence.pdf/2bde9e26-a8cc-ecc9-2f2c14bb95dd38d0?t=1510190723573.

de la O Campos, A.P., Edouard, F. & Ruiz Salvago, M. 2021. Effects of land tenure

rights formalization on household investments – The case of PRODEP in Nicaragua. In: FAO Agricultural Development Economics Working Paper 21-11. Rome,

FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb7981en.

OECD. 2013. OECD guidelines on the protection of privacy and transborder flows of personal data. Cited 17 August 2022. https://www.oecd.org/sti/ieconomy/oecdguidelinesontheprotectionofprivacyandtransborderflowsofpersonaldata.htm.

OECD. 2019. Is there a role of blockchain in responsible supply chains? Responsible

Business Conduct. http://mneguidelines.oecd.org/Is-there-a-role-for-blockchain-in-responsible-supply-chains.pdf.

OECD. 2020. Going Digital in Brazil. In: OECD Reviews of Digital Transformation. Paris,

OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/e9bf7f8a-en.

OECD, Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, CAF Development Bank of Latin America & European Commission. 2020. Latin American

Economic Outlook 2020. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/e6e864fb-en.

Olaya Alvarez, A., Guarin, A. & Cassalprim, D. 2020. Implementation of the LADM_

COL model for the reception and institutional data validation in Colombia. Project

“Model of allocation and recognition of rights through massive land survey for

multipurpose cadaster and formalization – Pilot Ovejas, Sucre”. In: Annual World

Bank Conference on Land and Poverty: Institutions for Equity and Resilience.

Washington DC. 2020. https://www.swisstierrascolombia.com/wp-content/

uploads/2020/06/2020_03_WB_LADM_Ovejas.pdf.

Oput, R. 2022. Modernization of land administration services in Uganda. Coordinates,

27(10). https://mycoordinates.org/modernization-of-land-administrationservices-in-uganda/.

Ortega, D. & Alvarez, R. 2019. Registry Cadastre Services Decentralization in the Property Management System in Honduras. https://www.oicrf.org/-/registry-cadastreservices-decentralization-in-the-property-management-system-in-honduras.

Ovdii, M. & Zekušić, S. 2021. Developing Moldovan NSDI through EU Twinning Project

and other donors support . In: Geospatial Information for Digital Transformation.

Online Conference. Kartverket. Norway, 27–29 October 2021.

Overland, I. 2021. KartAI Project. In: Online Conference: Geospatial Information for Digital Transformation, Kartverket. Norway, 27–29 October 2021.

Phong, D.H. 2019. Vietnam National Land Information System in e-Government Architecture. In: In: FIG Working Week: Geospatial information for a smarter life and

environmental resilience. Hanoi. 22–26 April 2019.

Retief, F., Bond, A., Pope, J., Morrison-Saunders, A. & King, N. 2016. Global

megatrends and their implications for environmental assessment practice. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.

eiar.2016.07.002.

Riekkinen, K. 2021. PPPs in Land Administration. Presentation for the joint task force

between UNECE WPLA and FIG Commission 7. https://unece.org/sites/default/

files/2021-06/Item 5c Riekkinen PPPs LA new.pdf.

Robinson, L., Schulz, J., Khilnani, A., Ono, H., Cotten, S.R., McClain, N., Levine, L.

et al. 2020. Digital inequalities in time of pandemic: COVID-19 exposure risk

profiles and new forms of vulnerability. First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/

fm.v25i7.10845.

Schippers, M.C. & Rus, D.C. 2021. Optimizing Decision-Making Processes in Times

of COVID-19: Using Reflexivity to Counteract Information-Processing Failures.

Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.650525.

Sancoko, A.Y.D., Ramadhani, S.A., Brilianto, D.E., Swantika, S.P., 2022. COVID-19

Pandemic and Land Administration Modernization in Indonesia. In: FIG Congress 2022, Poland, 11–15 September 2022.

Scott, G. 2021. Bridging the Digital Divide. In: Geospatial Information for Digital Transformation. Online Conference. Kartverket. Norway, 27–29 October 2021.

Skog, D.A., Wimelius, H. & Sandberg, J. 2018. Digital Disruption. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 60(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0550-4.

Songwe, V. 2020. The Role of Digitalization in the Decade of Action for Africa. UNCTAD

News. Cited 17 August 2022. https://unctad.org/news/role-digitalizationdecade-action-africa.

Spichiger, R., Broegaard, R.B., Pedersen, R.H. & Ravnborg, H.M. 2013. Land administration, gender equality and development cooperation: lessons learned and

challenges ahead. Report, Danish Institute for International Studies (30).

Stöcker, C., Bennett, R., Koeva, M., Nex, F. & Zevenbergen, J. 2022. Scaling up UAVs

for land administration: Towards the plateau of productivity. Land Use Policy,

114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105930.

Suomisto, J. 2021. Smart City Platform Enabling Digital Twin: Helsinki 3D+ project. In:

Geospatial Information for Digital Transformation. Online Conference. Kartverket. Norway, 27–29 October 2021.

Svitlica, D. 2021. The impact of Covid-19 on the real estate market in Republika Srpska.

In: COVID-19 and Property Markets: How is the pandemic affecting property markets in the UNECE region? UNECE Webinar. UNECE, 15 April 2021. https://unece.

org/info/Housing-and-Land-Management/events/354070.

Takeuchi, S. & Marara, J. 2022. Land Law Reform and Complex State-Building Process

in Rwanda. In: African Land Reform Under Economic Liberalisation. https://doi.

org/10.1007/978-981-16-4725-3_7.

Teece, D.J. 2018. Dynamic capabilities as (workable) management systems theory.

Journal of Management and Organization, 24(3). https://doi.org/10.1017/

jmo.2017.75.

Todorovski, D., Zevenbergen, J. & van der Molen, P. 2016. Conflict and post-conflict

land administration – the case of Kosovo. Survey Review, 48(350).

https://doi.org/10.1179/1752270615Y.0000000044.

Tomasic, L. 2022. Accelerated Digitization and the future role of Land administration

–Review. Presentation on 4 July 2022, IUNL.

Tonchovska, R., Kelm, K. & Coote, A. 2022. Geospatial Information and the role of

Cadastre agencies in responding to the government policy drivers. FAO and World

Bank support. In: B. Delipetrev, O. Chukaliev & I. Bashkim, eds. Enlargement and

Integration: Digital Transformation, Data and AI in the Western Balkans. Publications Office of the European Union, 2022.

Turner, S. 2002. Tools for success: A manager’s guide. McGraw-Hill.

UN. 2015. Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development

UN. 2016. A/RES/70/125: Outcome document of the high-level meeting of the General Assembly on the overall review of the implementation of the outcomes of the World

Summit on the Information Society. https://unctad.org/system/files/officialdocument/ares70d125_en.pdf.

UN. 2021. The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2021. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/

report/2021/.

UN. 2022. The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2022. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/

report/2022/.

UN-DESA. 2018. United Nations. World Urbanization Prospects: Key facts.

UN-DESA. 2020. Shaping the Trends of Our Time. https://doi.org/10.18356/d81797b7-

en.

UNECE. 2021a. Public-Private Partnership in Land Administration. https://unece.org/

sites/default/files/2021-10/PPPs_LA_E.pdf.

UNECE. 2021b. Scenario Study on Future Land Administration in the UNECE Region.

https://unece.org/info/Housing-and-Land-Management/pub/363124.

UNECE. 2022a. Sustainable Urban Development. Cited 17 August 2022. https://unece.

org/housing/urbandevelopment.

UNECE. 2022b. COVID-19 Recovery Action Plan for Informal Settlements in the ECE

Region. https://unece.org/info/publications/pub/367518.

UNECE. 2022c. Geospatial information – advanced education and competence needs.

https://unece.org/info/events/event/364956.

UN-GGIM. 2019. Integrated Geospatial Information Framework. https://ggim.un.org/

meetings/GGIM-committee/8th-Session/documents/Part 1-IGIF-OverarchingStrategic-Framework-24July2018.pdf.

UN-GGIM. 2020a. Framework for Effective Land Administration. https://ggim.un.org/

meetings/GGIM-committee/10th-Session/documents/E-C.20-2020-29-Add_2-

Framework-for-Effective-Land-Administration.pdf.

UN-GGIM. 2020b. Future trends in geospatial information management: the five to ten

year vision (Third Edition). https://ggim.un.org/future-trends/.

Unger, E.M., Bennett, R., Lemmen, C., de Zeeuw, K., Zevenbergen, J., Teo, C.H.

& Crompvoets, J. 2020. Global policy transfer for land administration and

disaster risk management. Land Use Policy, 99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.

landusepol.2020.104834.

Vial, G. 2019. Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda.

Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.

jsis.2019.01.003.

van der Vegt, H. 2021. Key Registers in the Netherlands. In: Geospatial Information for

Digital Transformation. Online Conference. Kartverket. Norway, 27–29 October

2021.

de Vries, W.T., Bennett, R.M. & Zevenbergen, J.A. 2015. Toward Responsible Land

Administration. In: Advances in Responsible Land Administration. CRC Press. pp.

3–14.

Vucetic, D. 2021. Geospatial Information in response to COVID-19 pandemic – Serbian

Experience. In: NSDI, geospatial data and technology: The role of geospatial and

cadastre agencies in the COVID-19 pandemic response. UNECE Webinar. UNECE,

11 May 2021. https://unece.org/housing/events/nsdi-geospatial-data-andtechnology.

Wallace, J., Williamson, I.P., Rajabifard, A. & Bennett, R. 2006. Spatial information

opportunities for government. Journal of Spatial Science, 51(1). https://doi.org/

10.1080/14498596.2006.9635066.

Welle Donker, F.M., Crompvoets, J. & van Loenen, B. 2017. Adapting national mapping & cadastral agencies business models to open data supply: The survey

results. Official Publication – EuroSDR, 2017(67).

Williamson, I., Enemark, S., Wallace, J. & Rajabifard, A. 2010. Land Administration

for Sustainable Development. Sustainable Development(April): 11–16.

Williamson, I. & Ting, L. 2001. Land administration and cadastral trends – A framework for re-engineering. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 25(4–5).

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0198-9715(00)00053-3.

Wills, S. 2022. Kyrgyzstan: A model for sustainable base mapping . In: Socio-economic

benefits of geospatial information. UNECE Webinar. UNECE, 19 May 2022. https://

unece.org/housing-and-land-management/events/socio-economic-benefitsgeospatial-information.

World Bank. 2016. Protecting and strengthening land tenure of vulnerable groups.

In: Land & Conflict.

World Bank. 2018. Program to accelerate Agrarian Reform. Cited 17 August 2022.

https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/393931532143851037/pdf/

Indonesia-One-Map-PAD-06262018.pdf.

World Bank. 2020a. Public-Private Partnerships in Land Administration – Analytical and Operational Frameworks. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/

urbandevelopment/publication/ppps-in-land-administration.

World Bank. 2020b. Securing Land Rights for the Poor: Nicaragua’s Land Administration, Regularization, and Titling Experience. Results in Brief. Cited 17 August

2022. https://www.worldbank.org/en/results/2020/10/16/securing-landrights-for-the-poor-nicaragua-land-administration-regularization-and-titlingexperience.

World Bank. 2021. World Bank Provides $100 Million to Accelerate Rwanda’s Digital

Transformation. Press Release. Cited 17 August 2022. https://www.worldbank.

org/en/news/press-release/2021/12/01/world-bank-provides-100-million-toaccelerate-rwanda-s-digital-transformation.

World Bank. 2022. Global Program for Resilient Housing. In: Build Better Before,

Save Lives After. Cited 16 August 2022. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/

disasterriskmanagement/brief/global-program-for-resilient-housing.

Zamani, E., He, Y. & Phillips, M. 2020. On the Security Risks of the Blockchain. Journal

of Computer Information Systems, 60(6).

https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2018.1538709.

Zeeuw, K. 2022. Opening Session. In: Fourth Meeting of the Expert Group on Land

Administration and Management and International Seminar on United Nations

Global Geospatial Information Management with the theme ‘effective land

administration’. Singapore. 16–20 May 2022.

Zelić, J. 2021. Sales Price Register and impact of COVID-19 on the property market in the

Federation of BiH. In: UNECE Webinar: COVID-19 and Property Markets: How is the

pandemic affecting property markets in the UNECE region? UNECE, 15 April 2021.

https://unece.org/info/Housing-and-Land-Management/events/354070.

Zevenbergen, J., de Vries, W. & Bennett, R. 2015. Advances in Responsible Land

Administration. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b18988.

Zúñiga, N. 2018. Land Corruption Topic Guide. Transparency International. https://

knowledgehub.transparency.org/assets/uploads/kproducts/Land-CorruptionTopic-Guide-2018-with-picture.pdf.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS