Performance Evaluation of Public Library Managers in Qom by 360-degree Feedback Method

Mohammadi-Ostani, Morteza, Akbari, Ali and Azargoon, Maryam Performance Evaluation of Public Library Managers in Qom by 360-degree Feedback Method. Research on Information Science and Public Libraries, 2023, vol. 29, n. 2, pp. 198-184. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of Performance Evaluation of Public LibraryManagers in Qom by 360-degree Feedback Method.pdf]
Preview
Text
Performance Evaluation of Public LibraryManagers in Qom by 360-degree Feedback Method.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (724kB) | Preview

English abstract

Purpose: 360-degree evaluation is one of the evaluation methods that provides a complete and accurate evaluation of the skills, abilities, competencies, and performance of the evaluator due to the use of several sources to evaluate people. The aim of the study is to evaluate the performance of public library managers in Qom city by 360-degree feedback method. Method: The current research is an applied study which used a survey-analytical method to evaluate the performance of libraries managers in eight indicators (management skills, decision-making, encouragement and innovation, communication and interaction, leadership, professional skills, behavioral skills and teamwork) by 360-degree feedback method. The statistical population included all library managers (12 people), librarians (42 people) and superior officials (2 people) in the public libraries in Qom city. The tool for collecting data was the Brown questionnaire (with some modifications) in the five-point Likert scale with 64 items. The face validity of questionnaire was approved by experts, and its reliability was calculated by Cronbach’s alpha coefficient (0.97). Non-parametric tests of SPSS (version 26) software were used for data analysis. Findings: Findings revealed that the status of all indicators of the performance of the managers of public libraries in Qom city is in a favorable situation, and there was no significant difference between the managers’ self-evaluation with librarians and superior officials- except for the “leadership” indicator. “Management skills”, “Interaction and communication” and “Team work” are ranked first to third. According to its average rating, the “decision-making” indicator has the least importance from the respondents’ point of view and there was a high and significant correlation between performance indicators of managers. Furthermore, no significant difference was observed between the opinions of the respondents based on the demographic variables of age, gender, education degree, discipline and work experience. Originality/value: Thus far, there has been no study on evaluating the performance of public library managers with this method. 360-degree feedback method can be a suitable model for deciding on the performance of public libraries managers in a group and selecting them. The need to pay attention and delegation of authority is emphasized in indicators such as “encouragement and innovation”, “leadership” and “decision-making” according to the findings of the research in evaluating the performance of managers. Moreover, compiling and communicating performance evaluation indicators to librarians and managers of public libraries in order to gain a better understanding of these indicators and improve the quality of their performance can be useful.

Persian abstract

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: 360-degree feedback method,library managers,performance evaluation,Qom public libraries
Subjects: D. Libraries as physical collections. > DC. Public libraries.
Depositing user: rispl journal Journal
Date deposited: 30 Jan 2026 17:37
Last modified: 30 Jan 2026 17:37
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/47461

References

13. Benson, D. S., & DeSanto, D. L. (2016). The 360 feedback model for library instructors: Observing, teaching, reflecting, adapting. C & RL News, 77(9), 448-451. [DOI:10.5860/crln.77.9.9554]

14. Biranvand, A., & Nikkar, M. (2012). Public libraries and cultural development. Tehran: Chpar Press.

15. Garza, M. C. (2000). 360 performance evaluations: An assessment of the attitudes of human resource directors in the state of Texas [Unpublished master's thesis]. Texas State University- San Marcos.

16. Inayah, N. A., Sulistyo, B., & Yogaswara, B. (2022). Designing employee performance appraisal using 360 degrees feedback and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) methods at DP3P2KB of lebak regency, Banten province. E-Proceedings of Engineering, 9(1), 31-35.

17. Kanaslan, E. K. and Iyem, C. (2016). Is 360 degree feedback appraisal an effective way of performance evaluation? International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6(5), 172-182. [DOI:10.6007/IJARBSS/v6-i5/2124]

18. Kofi, Y. C., & Opare-Adzobu, J. A. (2012, July). Performance appraisal for senior staff at the University of Cape Coast library [Paper presentation]. The 8th seminar of CULD on the academic and research librarian in the 21st century, China.

19. Kopsidas, O. (2021). The 360-degree feedback model as a tool of total quality management. Economics world, 9(1), 1-11. [DOI:10.17265/2328-7144/2021.01.001]

20. Lampty, R. B., & Agyen-Gyasi, K. (2012, July). Performance appraisal as an effective management tool in the state-owned university libraries in Ghana. Paper presented at the 8th seminar of GULD on the academic and research librarian in the 21st century, Ghana.

21. Lithakong, K E. (2014). Evaluating the effectiveness of a 360-degree performance appraisal and feedback in a selected steel organization. [Unpublished master's thesis]. North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.

22. Olusadum, N. J., & Leo, M. I. (2021). 360-degree feedback appraisal system and employee productivity of deposit Moneybanks in Imo state, Nigeria. Global Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(2), 60-72.

23. Sureda, E., Chacon-Moscoso, S., Sanduvete-Chaves, S., & Sese, A. (2021). A training intervention through a 360 multisource feedback model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 9137, 1-12. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph18179137] [PMID]


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item