A Meta-Analysis of Studies on Quality Assessment of Public Libraries Using the LibQUAL Model

Karimi, Reza and Asadzadeh-Baghi, Mohammad A Meta-Analysis of Studies on Quality Assessment of Public Libraries Using the LibQUAL Model. Research on Information Science and Public Libraries, 2024, vol. 30, n. 1, pp. 65-48. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of A Meta-Analysis of Studies on QualityAssessment of Public Libraries Using theLibQUAL Modelpdf] Text
A Meta-Analysis of Studies on QualityAssessment of Public Libraries Using theLibQUAL Modelpdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.
Download (782kB)

English abstract

Purpose: Given the importance of assessing the quality of public libraries and their different services, this study aimed to comprehensively review the existing research in this field and present the findings in the form of a meta-analysis. The primary goal of this meta-analysis was to combine and compare the results of studies conducted on public libraries using the LibQUAL model through statistical meta-analysis methods to achieve applicable and cohesive results. Methodology: This research employed a library-based data collection approach and a meta-analysis technique for data analysis. The statistical population of this study included studies conducted on public libraries using the LibQUAL model from 2009 to 2020. A total of 25 articles and theses available in scientific databases were selected, and after evaluation based on inclusion criteria, 17 studies with a defined population, sample size, sampling method, and usage of the LibQUAL model were analyzed. Data collection tools included relevant studies and a metaanalysis coding form. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software (CMA 2) was used for calculating coefficients. Findings: According to the funnel plot and Begg and Mazumdar’s rank correlation method, there was no publication bias in the reviewed studies. Additionally, the Q index for six research variables and overall I2 statistic indicators indicated that the studies are heterogeneous. The adjusted standardized difference between the maximum and received mean effect sizes, considering the random model, showed large effect sizes and negative differences of -1.13 in the service effect at maximum, medium effect size and positive difference of +0.66 in the service effect at minimum, large effect size and negative difference of -2.2 in information access at maximum, large effect size and negative difference of -0.14 in information access at minimum, large effect size and negative difference of -2 in the library as a place at maximum, and large effect size and negative difference of -0.02 in the library as a place at minimum. Overall, the total maximum effect size was large with a negative difference of -1.77, and the total minimum effect size was large with a positive difference of +0.16. Originality/Value: The results indicate that public libraries, except in the minimum service variable, perform poorly in all variables and fail to meet the minimum expectations of public library users. They do not offer satisfactory and ideal services in almost all dimensions. Additionally, given the substantial sample size and low error rate in studies on these three variables according to Cohen’s d index, the findings of research on public libraries using the LibQUAL tool can be considered highly reliable. It is suggested that public library institutions focus more on information and communication technologies and related equipment to facilitate access, create websites, provide printed journals and electronic resources and meet user needs to achieve the highest level of user satisfaction.

Persian abstract

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: meta-analysis,LibQUAL,Public Libraries
Subjects: D. Libraries as physical collections. > DC. Public libraries.
Depositing user: rispl journal Journal
Date deposited: 30 Jan 2026 17:42
Last modified: 30 Jan 2026 17:42
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/47481

References

22. Anzures‐Cabrera, J. & Higgins, J. P. (2010). Graphical displays for meta‐analysis: an overview with suggestions for practice. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(1), 66-80. [DOI:10.1002/jrsm.6]

23. Arachchige, J. J. G. (2022). Importance-satisfaction analysis of LibQUAL service quality attributes in the Sri Lankan context. New Library World, 110(1/2), 37-51.

24. Ashcroft, L., Farrow, J. & Watts, C. (2007). Public libraries and adult learners. Library Management, 28, 125-138. [DOI:10.1108/01435120710727974]

25. Bernstein, H. M., Pollock, B. H., Calhoun, D. A. & Christensen, R. D. (2001). Administration of recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to neonates with septicemia: a meta-analysis. Journal of Pediatrics, 138(6), 917-920. [DOI:10.1067/mpd.2001.114014]

26. Callinan, J. E. (2005). Information-seeking behaviour of undergraduate biology students: A comparative analysis of first year and final year students in University College Dublin. Library Review, 54, 86-99. [DOI:10.1108/00242530510583039]

27. Casey, M. E. & Savastinuk, L. C. (2006). Service for the next-generation library. Library Journal, 131, 40-42.

28. Chen, C.-F. & Chen, F.S. (2010). Experience quality, perceived value, satisfaction and behavioral intentions for heritage tourists. Tourism Management, 31, 29-35. [DOI:10.1016/j.tourman.2009.02.008]

29. Cook, C. & Heath, F. M. (2001). Users' perceptions of library service quality: A LibQUALt qualitative Study. Library Trends, 49(4), 546-584.

30. Cook, C., Heath, F., Thompson, B., Davis, M., Kyrillidou, M. & Roebuck, G. (2016), ARL Notebook, Association of Research Libraries, Washington, DC.

31. Egger, M., Smith, G. D. and Altman, D. G. (2001). Systematic Reviews in Health Care Meta-analysis in Context. BMJ Publishing Group. [DOI:10.1002/9780470693926]

32. Harris, S., Folkes, C., Tyrell, K. & Brown, D. (2020). Nurturing customer service culture in an experience economy: employees' assessment of the UWI, Mona library service model. Library Management, 41(4/5), 193-220. [DOI:10.1108/LM-05-2020-0080]

33. Heath, C. F., & Cook, C. (2001). Users' perceptions of library service quality: a LibQUALt qualitative study. Library Trends, 49(4), 548-583.

34. Heath, F. M., Thompson, B., Cook, C., & Thompson, R. L. (2002). ARL index and other validity correlates of LibQUALþ[TM] scores. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 2(1), 21-42. [DOI:10.1353/pla.2002.0017]

35. Hernon, P. & Nitecki, D. A. (2001). Service quality: A concept not fully explored. Library Trends, 49(4): 687-708.

36. Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2003). Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal, 27(3), 557-560. [DOI:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557]

37. Matlabi, D., & Khanaliloo, R. (2019). An assessment of the quality of services in public libraries based on the users' perspective: A case study of the public libraries in West Azerbaijan province. Research on Information Science and Public Libraries, 25(4), 579-596

38. McCaffrey, C. (2019). Transforming the university library one step at a time: A ten year LibQUAL+ review. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 25(1), 59-75. [DOI:10.1080/13614533.2018.1511438]

39. Neshat, N. & Dehghani, M. (2011). Correspondence of user expectations with staff presumptions regarding the quality of services offered at [Iranian] National Library. Journal of Academic Librarianship and Information Research, 45(2), 97-118.

40. Oh, D. G. (2020). Beyond providing information: An analysis on the perceived service quality, satisfaction, and loyalty of public library customers. Libri, 70(4), 345-359. [DOI:10.1515/libri-2020-0006]

41. Ramezani, A., Ghazimirsaeed, S. J., Azadeh, F., Bandboni, M. E. & YektaKooshali, M. H. (2018). A meta-analysis of service quality of Iranian university libraries based on the LibQUAL model. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 19(3), 186-202. [DOI:10.1108/PMM-05-2017-0014]

42. Rowley, J. (2005). Making sense of the quality maze: Perspectives for public and academic libraries. Library Management, 26, 508-518. [DOI:10.1108/01435120510631792]

43. Tan, T. S., Chen, T. L. & Yang, P. H. (2017). User satisfaction and loyalty in a public library setting. Social Behavior and Personality: an International Journal, 45(5), 741- [DOI:10.2224/sbp.5999]

44. Thompson, B., Cook, C. & Heath, F. M. (2001). How many dimensions does it take to measure users' perceptions of libraries?: A LibQUAL+ study. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 1(2), 129-138. [DOI:10.1353/pla.2001.0030]

45. Thompson, B., Cook, C. & Kyrillidou, M. (2005). Concurrent validity of LibQUAL plus (TM) scores: What do LibQUAL plus (TM) scores measure? Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31(6), 517-522. [DOI:10.1016/j.acalib.2005.08.002]

46. Thompson, B., Kyrillidou, M. & Cook, C. (2008). Library users' service desires: To LibQUAL study. Library Quarterly, 78(1), 1-18. [DOI:10.1086/523907]

47. Vaidya, P., Malik, B. A. & Ali, P. N. (2022). Unveiling the research pattern and trends in library service quality studies: A meta-narrative review. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 54(4), 719-736. [DOI:10.1177/09610006211042928]

48. Weinstein, A. T. & McFarlane, D. A. (2017). How libraries can enhance customer service by implementing a customer value mindset. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 22(1), e1571. [DOI:10.1002/nvsm.1571]


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS