The persistent implementation gap: a critical policy analysis of institutional barriers in the EU orphan works regime

De Robbio, Antonella The persistent implementation gap: a critical policy analysis of institutional barriers in the EU orphan works regime. Digital Library Perspectives, 2026, vol. 42, n. 1, pp. 1-29. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of DLP-06-2025-0085.R2_AAM_depositOA.pdf]
Preview
 Text
DLP-06-2025-0085.R2_AAM_depositOA.pdf - Accepted version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
Download (651kB) | Preview

English abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide a critical policy analysis of the systemic deficits in operationalizing the Directive (2012/28/EU), using Italy as a paradigm case of implementation deficits. Design/methodology/approach Moving beyond a simple review, this analysis is grounded in a doctrinal and regulatory review approach, critically examining the bureaucratic complexity, lack of operational tools, and regulatory uncertainties that have limited the unlocking of this cultural heritage. Findings Thirteen years after the Directive’s adoption, the balance sheet appears highly disappointing, and the application of the legislation has proven largely ineffective, primarily due to persistent administrative deficits at the national level. Research limitations/implications This study highlights the need for comprehensive reform of the Directive’s national transposition and suggests implications for policy analysis concerning the implementation gap between EU legislation and Member State practice. Practical implications The analysis concludes by reflecting on the need to simplify procedures, expand the scope for beneficiary institutions, and integrate orphan works with open licenses and Rights Statement tools, enabling effective digital access while respecting intellectual property rights. Originality/value of paper This study's primary contribution is its critical policy analysis, which integrates legal-doctrinal review with institutional evidence (EUIPO data and administrative reports). It provides an in-depth focus on the systemic administrative barriers in the Italian context, offering a comparative case study for analyzing wider EU implementation challenges.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Libraries, Copyright, Cultural heritage, EU directives, Orphan works, Out-of-commerce works
Subjects: E. Publishing and legal issues. > ED. Intellectual property: author's rights, ownership, copyright, copyleft, open access.
Depositing user: Antonella De Robbio
Date deposited: 16 Feb 2026 17:48
Last modified: 16 Feb 2026 17:54
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/47655

References

AIB (Associazione Italiana Biblioteche) (2014). (UE) 2012/28/UE sulle opere orfane. [Online]. Available at: https://www.aib.it/notizie/dir-2012-28-ue/ (Accessed: 18 October 2025).

AIB (Associazione Italiana Biblioteche) (2025). Gruppo di studio Open Access e Dominio Pubblico. [Online]. Available at: https://www.aib.it/struttura/gruppo-studio-open-access-pubblico-dominio/ (Accessed: 18 October 2025).

Arquero-Avilés, R., Marco-Cuenca, G. and Salvador-Oliván, J.A. (2018). Good practices in the declaration of orphans works in Europe. Analysis of European projects with orphan works declared. Ibersid, 12(1), pp. 13-25. Available at http://eprints.rclis.org/33157/ (Accessed: 18 October 2025).

Bertoni, A., Guerrieri, F., Borghi, M., Guibault, L. and Montagnani, M.L. (2017). Report 2: Requirements for Diligent Search in 20 European Countries. EnDOW Project. [Online]. Available at: diligentsearch.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/REPORT-2.pdf (Accessed: 18 October 2025).

Borghi, M. and Karapapa, S. (2021). Copyright and Mass Digitization: A Cross-Jurisdictional Perspective. Oxford University Press. Available at: global.oup.com/academic/product/copyright-and-mass-digitization-9780199664559 (Accessed: 18 October 2025).

Borgman, C. L. (2007). Scholarship in the digital age: information, infrastructure, and the internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, p. 108

Cobo-Serrano, S., Arquero-Avilés, R., Marco-Cuenca, G. and Siso-Calvo, B. (2019). Orphan Works at Theater Library and Information Centres: Assessing Librarians' Perceptions and Management in Spain. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 45(1), pp. 58-65. Available at: http://eprints.rclis.org/45555/ (Accessed: 18 October 2025).

de la Durantaye, K. (2011). Finding a Home for Orphans: Google Book Search and Orphan Works Law in the United States and Europe. Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal, 21(2), pp. 229-281. Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/iplj/vol21/iss2/6 (Accessed: 18 October 2025).

De Robbio, A. (2009). Rights Management in Mass Digitizations: An Analysis in the Light of the Google Book Search Case. Bibliotime, 12(2). Available at: www.aib.it/aib/sezioni/emr/bibtime/num-xii-2/derobbio.htm (Accessed: 18 October 2025).

De Robbio, A. (2010). Google Books Odyssey. The Google Book Search Project and the New Proposal for a Settlement Agreement. Biblioteche oggi, 10, pp. 44-59. Available at: http://eprints.rclis.org/13046/1/20100304401.pdf (Accessed: 18 October 2025).

De Robbio, A. (2011). Google Books: for libraries, will it be the end or a new beginning? Paper presented at The Italy of libraries: betting on the future on the 150th anniversary of national unity, Milan (Italy), 3-4 March 2011. [Online]. Available at: http://eprints.rclis.org/15563/5/stelline2011testo.pdf (Accessed: 18 October 2025).

De Robbio, A. (2012). Open Access and Rights: An Analysis of the Google Books Case. Bibliotime, 16(3). Available at: www.aib.it/aib/sezioni/emr/bibtime/num-xvi-3/derobbio.htm (Accessed: 18 October 2025).

Dirittodautore.it (2025). Opere orfane: Artt. da 69-bis a 69-septies. [Online]. Available at: https://www.dirittodautore.it/la-guida-al-diritto-dautore/eccezioni-e-limitazioni/opere-orfane-artt-da-69-bis-a-69-septies/ (Accessed: 18 October 2025).

EUIPO (European Union Intellectual Property Office) (2025a). European Observatory on Infringements of Intellectual Property Rights. [Online]. Available at: https://www.euipo.europa.eu/it/observatory (Accessed: 18 October 2025).

EUIPO (European Union Intellectual Property Office) (2025b). IP in Culture: Awareness and Initiatives. [Online]. Available at: https://www.euipo.europa.eu/it/observatory/awareness/ip-in-culture (Accessed: 18 October 2025).

EUIPO (European Union Intellectual Property Office) (2025c). List of Competent National Authorities (CNAs). [PDF]. Available at: https://euipo.europa.eu/tunnel-web/secure/webdav/guest/document_library/observatory/documents/Orphan_works/CNA_contacts_en.pdf (Accessed: 18 October 2025).

EUIPO (European Union Intellectual Property Office) (2025d). Orphan Works DB. [Online]. Available at: https://www.euipo.europa.eu/it/observatory/awareness/ip-in-culture/orphan-works-db (Accessed: 18 October 2025).

EUIPO (European Union Intellectual Property Office) (2025e). Guidelines and Sources for Diligent Searches: Italy. [PDF]. Available at: https://euipo.europa.eu/tunnel-web/secure/webdav/guest/document_library/observatory/documents/Orphan_works/Guidelines%20and%20Sources%20for%20Diligent%20Searches/IT%20-%20Guidelines.pdf (Accessed: 18 October 2025).

EUIPO (European Union Intellectual Property Office) (2018). Guidelines and Sources for Diligent Searches: Italy. [PDF]. Available at: https://euipo.europa.eu/tunnel-web/secure/webdav/guest/document_library/observatory/documents/Orphan_works/Guidelines%20and%20Sources%20for%20Diligent%20Searches/IT%20-%20Guidelines.pdf (Accessed: 18 October 2025).

European Commission (2012). Orphan works - Frequently asked questions. MEMO/12/751. [Online]. Brussels: European Commission. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/api/files/document/print/en/memo_12_743/MEMO_12_743_EN.pdf (Accessed: 18 October 2025).

European Commission (2022). Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the functioning of Directive 2012/28/EU on certain permitted uses of orphan works. [Online]. Brussels: European Commission. Available at: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/3c880c5c-7065-11ed-9887-01aa75ed71a1 (Accessed: 18 October 2025).

European Parliament and Council of the European Union (2012). Directive 2012/28/EU on certain permitted uses of orphan works. [PDF]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2012:299:FULL:EN:PDF (Accessed: 18 October 2025).

European Parliament and Council of the European Union (2019). Directive (EU) 2019/790 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market. [PDF]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/790/oj/eng (Accessed: 18 October 2025)

Favale, M., Homberg, F., Kretschmer, M., Mendis, D. and Secchi, D. (2022). Copyright, and the Regulation of Orphan Works: A Comparative Review of Seven Jurisdictions and a Rights Clearance Simulation. Intellectual Property Office Research Paper, (2013/31). Available at: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4094024 (Accessed: 18 October 2025).

Gross, E. (2023). The Significance of Orphan Photography: Rethinking vernacular Photography in the Context of Art History. Eon - Asociație for Promovare Culturii, Artei, Educației Științifice, 4(1), pp. 127-137. Available at: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4801544 (Accessed: 18 October 2025).

Hansen, D.R. (2011). Orphan Works: Definitional Issues. Berkeley Digital Library Copyright Project White Paper, 1. [Online]. Available at: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3272334 (Accessed: 18 October 2025).

HathiTrust (2025). HathiTrust Digital Library. [Online]. Available at: https://www.hathitrust.org/ (Accessed: 18 October 2025)

High Level Expert Group, Copyright Subgroup (2009). i2010: DL Final Report on Digital Preservation, Orphan Works, and Out-of-Print Works. DigItalia, 4(2), pp. 126-154. Available at: digitalia.cultura.gov.it/article/view/468 (Accessed: 18 October 2025).

Illustrators Partnership (2011). Court Rejects Google Book Settlement. [Online]. Available at: https://illustratorspartnership.org/2011/03/23/court-rejects-google-book-settlement/ (Accessed: 18 October 2025).

Lifshitz-Goldberg, Y. (2010). Orphan Works: WIPO Seminar – May 2010. Lecture Summary. [Online]. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Available at: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/sme/en/wipo_smes_ge_10/wipo_smes_ge_10_ref_theme11_02.pdf (Accessed: 18 October 2025).

Ministry of Culture (2025a). Opere orfane. [Online]. Available at: https://biblioteche.cultura.gov.it/it/diritto-dautore/Opere-orfane/ (Accessed: 18 October 2025).

Ministry of Culture (2025b). Registro Pubblico Generale delle Opere Protette. [Online]. Available at: https://biblioteche.cultura.gov.it/it/diritto-dautore/registro-pubblico-generale-delle-opere-protette/ (Accessed: 18 October 2025).

Mishra, A.K. and Saxena, A. (2019). Use of Orphan Works In Derivative Works: Towards A Model Framework. Maharishi Journal of Law and Society, 2(1 & 2), pp. 12-23. Available at: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3858203 (Accessed: 18 October 2025).

Montagnani, M.L. and Zoboli, L. (2017). The Making of an 'Orphan': Cultural Heritage Digitization in the EU. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 25(3), pp. 196-209. Available at: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2757245 (Accessed: 18 October 2025).

O'Sullivan, K. (2017). Reforming Irish Copyright Law: The Question of Orphan Works. Dublin University Law Journal, 40(1), pp. 165-190. Available at: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3272334 (Accessed: 18 October 2025).

Orlandi, S.D., De Angelis, D., Fasano, P.C., Manasse, C., Marras, A.M., and Modolo, M. (eds.) (2021). Copyright FAQ, Copyright and Open Licenses for Culture on the Web: 100 Questions and Answers for Museums, Archives and Libraries. Digital Cultural Heritage Working Group ICOM ITALIA. Http:// http://eprints.rclis.org/41842/

RightsStatements.org (2016). Rights Statements 1.0. [Online]. Available at: https://rightsstatements.org/page/1.0/?language=en (Accessed: 18 October 2025).

Samuelson, P. (2011). The Google Book Settlement. [Online]. Available at: https://wlr.law.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/1263/2011/07/11-Samuelson-Final.pdf (Accessed: 18 October 2025).

Sarid, E. and Ben-Zvi, O. (2023). A Theoretical Analysis of Orphan Works. Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 40(3), pp. 561-595. Available at: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4484049 (Accessed: 18 October 2025).

Schroff, S., Favale, M. and Bertoni, A. (2017). The Impossible Quest – Problems with Diligent Search for Orphan Works. IIC-International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 48(3), pp. 286-304. doi: 10.1007/s40319-017-0568-z.

U.S. Copyright Office (2005). Notice of Inquiry; Orphan Works. 70 Fed. Reg. 3739. [Online]. Available at: https://www.copyright.gov/fedreg/2005/70fr3739.html (Accessed: 18 October 2025).

U.S. Copyright Office (2015). Orphan Works and Mass Digitization: A Report of the Register of Copyrights. [Online]. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Copyright Office. Available at: https://www.copyright.gov/orphan/reports/orphan-works2015.pdf (Accessed: 18 October 2025).


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS