Language, Communication and Social Representations [literature reviews]

Ionta, Matteo Language, Communication and Social Representations [literature reviews]., 2004 (Unpublished) [Report]

[thumbnail of BP100.pdf]
Preview
PDF
BP100.pdf

Download (106kB) | Preview

English abstract

One of the new roles of the teacher, whether in the humanities or in the scientific, is to provide students with useful tools that allow them to do good literature reviews before starting their work. My topic here is the literature review, in the field of Language, Communication and Social Representations. I am investigating more than one field because nowadays many subjects are linked and the outcomes are kinds of cyborg –subjects or hybrid subjects. My cyborg here is the internet, which simulates a real setting for language discourse. The amazing thing is that this cyborg or electronic setting which reproduces reality becomes as real as the latter. For the field of communication, the subject I have chosen is the relationship between the addressers and the speech acts of the addresses. The first thing to do is to build up proper parameters for my topic research. Then I can start to construct my map which will show my view of literature. Finally I will justify my approach to the topic. I have decided to review these three subjects as I am doing research in these fields. My method will be to select and then to read electronic or paper books in my chosen field, then I will quote them and provide a small abstract which will be more useful to readers. I will handle the information and turn it into concept maps. Finally I will evaluate the strong and the weak points of the concepts I derive from my review.

Item type: Report
Keywords: Literature review, Information Studies Communication
Subjects: C. Users, literacy and reading.
Depositing user: Matteo Ionta
Date deposited: 12 Aug 2006
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 11:58
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/4827

References

Alstete, Jeffrey W., “Alternative uses of electronic learning systems for enhancing team performance” in Team Performance Management : An International Journal, volume 7, n°3/4, 2001, pp.48-52.

Antonelli, Giuseppe Sintassi e stile dela narrativa italiana dagli anni Sessanta a oggi, in Storia generale dela letteratura italiana, diretta da N. Borsellino e W. Pedullà, vol. XII, Milano, Motta, 1999, pp. 682-711

Attili, Grazia, Introduzione alla psicologia sociale. Seam Grafica, Roma Formello, 2000.

Austin J.L., How to Do Things with words, The William James Lectures at Harward University, 1955, a cura di Urmson J.O., London, Oxford University Press (Trad. It. 1974 a cura di A. Pieretti, Torino, Marietti; II ed. riveduta, 1975, a cura di Urmson J.O. e Sbisà M

Baricco, Alessandro, F. Taricco, G. Vasta, D. Voltolini, Punteggiatura,Milano, Scuola Holden-Bur, 2001. Vol. I. I segni; vol. II. Francesca Serafini, Storia, regole, eccezioni.

Bhatt Ganesh D, “Knowledge management in organizations: examining the interaction between technologies, techniques, and people” in Journal of Knowledge Management, volume 5, n°1, 2001, pp.68-75.

Clancy M. Patricia, Thompson Sandra A., Suzuki Ryoko, Tao Hongyin, “The conversational use of reactive tokens in English, Japanese, and Mandarin.” In Journal of Pragmatics n°26, pp.355-387, 1996.

Collins, Catherine; Buhalis, Dimitrios; Mike Peters, “Enhancing SMTE’s business performance through the Internet and e-learning platforms” in Education & Training, volume 45, n°8/9, 2003, pp.483-494.

Corno Dario, 1995, “Teorie della scrittura. Tra psicologia e semiotica”, in Bereiter C.-Scardmalia M., Psicologia della composizione scritta, trad it., Firenze, La Nuova Italia, pp. IX-XXXIX

Cresti E, Maraschio N, Toschi L, Storia e teoria del’interpunzione, Roma, Bulzoni, 1992.

de Beaugrande R. A., 1984, Text production. Toword a Science of Composition, Norwood, NJ, Ablex Publishing Corporation.

de Beaugrande R., (1984a), “Text Linguistics in Discourse Studies”, in T. A. Van Dijk (a cura di), 1984, vol.1, pp. 41-70

de Rosa A.S. “Per un approccio multi-metodo allo studio delle Rappresentazioni Sociali,” in Rassegna di Psicologia n°3, pp.101-152.

Dixon, R.M.W, “The semantic basis of syntactic properties” in berkeley Linguistic Society proceedings n°10, 1984, pp.583-595.

Du Bois, John W, “Transcription design principles for spoken discourse research.” in Pragmatics 1, pp.71-106, 1991.

Du Bois, John W, Schuetze-Coburn Stephan, Paolino Danae and Cumming Susanna. “Outline of discourse transcription” in Santa Barbara papers in linguistics, vol.4, 1993, University of California; and in talking data: Transcription and coding methods for languahe research, Edwards jane A. And Lampert Martin D. Edition, pp.45-89, Hillsdale, N.J.:Erlbaum.

Ercolani A.P., La ricerca in psicologia. Modelli di indagine e di analisi dei dati, Roma, Carocci, 1999.

Ferrari, Angela Le ragioni del testo. Aspetti morfosintattici e interpuntivi del’italiano contemporaneo, Firenze, Accademia della Crusca, 2003

Giovanardi, Claudio, Interpunzione e testualità. Fenomeni innovativi del’italiano in confronto con altre lingue europee, in L’italiano oltre frontiera, V convegno internazionale (Leuven, 22-25 aprile 1998), Leuven University Press, Franco Cesati, 2000, pp. 89-107

Grandi, Roberto, I mass-media fra testo e contesto, Lupetti, Milano 1994.

Halliday M. A. K., Hasan, R., 1976, Cohesion in English, London, Longman

Halliday M. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Baltimore, University Park Press, 1978.

Halliday M. Writing Science-litearcy and discursive power. London, Falmer Press, 1993. Halliday M. Introduction to functional grammar. London, Arnold, 1994

Hayes J., Flower L.S., 1980, “Identifying the Organization of writing Processes”, in Gregg L.W., Steinberg, E.R. Cognitive Processes in Writing, Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hayes J., 1996, “A new Framework for understanding Cognition and Affect inWriting”, in Levy C.M., Ransdell S. (a cura di), The Science of Writing, Theories, Methods, Individual Diferences and Application, Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum

Hewitt, John P, Sé e Società: Un’introduzione alla psicologia sociale. Roma, Carocci, 1st Italian edition 1999-2000.

Hopper J.Paul, Thompson A. Sandra, “Language Universals, Discourse Pragmatics, and Semantics ” in Language Science, Vol.15, n°4, pp.357-376, 1993.

Levy Shlomit, Elizur Dov, Facet Theory: Towards Cumulative Social Science, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Center for Educational Development, 2003.

Mannetti, Lucia, Strategie di Ricerca in Psicologia Sociale, Roma, Carocci, 1998.

Maraschio, Nicoletta, Grafia e ortografia: evoluzione e codificazione, in Storia dela lingua italiana, in Luca Serianni and P. Trifone, vol. I (I luoghi dela codificazione), Torino, Einaudi, 1993, pp. 139-227

Merlyn P; Valikngas L., “From information technology to knowledge technology: taking the user into consideration” in Journal of Knowledge Management, volume 2, n°2, pp.28-35. se also Metaxiotis Kostas

Metaxiotis Kostas; Psarras John; Papastefanatos Stefanos, “Knowledge and information management in e-learning environments: the user agent architecture” in Information Management & Computer Security, 10/4, 2002, pp.165-170

Mortara Garavelli, Bice La punteggiatura tra scritto e parlato, in «Italiano & Oltre», I 1986, pp. 154-58.

Mortara Garavelli, Bice, L’interpunzione nella costruzione del testo, in La costruzione del testo in italiano. Sistemi costruttivi e testi costruiti, a c. di M. Muniz e F. Amella, Firenze, Cesati, 1996, pp. 93-111.

Mortara Garavelli, Bice, Prontuario di punteggiatura, Roma-Bari, Laterza, 2003

Quinn J .B; Anderson P. “Managing professional intellect: making the most of the best” in Harvard Business Review, volume 74, n°2, pp.71-80.

Pepitone A. “Historical sketches and critical commentary about social psychology in the golden age” in Rodrigues & Levine ed, Reflections of 100 years of experimental social psychology. New York, basic Books, 1999.

Rumelhart D.E., Ortony A., 1977, “The Rapresentation of Knowledge in Memory”, in Anderson R.C., Spiro R.J., Montague W.E. in Schooling and the Acquisition ok Knowledge, Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum.

Rosenthal R. Meta-analytic procedures for social research, Thousand oaks, Ca, Sage, 2001.

Ryan, Steve, “Learning, teaching and course design with resource-based learning” in The Virtual University: The Internet and resource-based learning, Kogan page, 2000.

Sabatini, Francesco, Pause e congiunzioni nel testo. Quel ma a inizio di frase..., in Norma e lingua in Italia: alcune riflessioni tra passato e presente, Milano, Istituto lombardo di scienze e lettere, 1997, pp. 113-46.

Schank R.C., Abelson R.P., 1977, Scripts, Plans, goals and Understanding, Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schegloff, Emanuel, “Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences” in Analyzing discourse: Text and talk, Deborah tannen ed., 1981.

Searle J. R., “Indirect Speech Acts”, in Cole P., Morgan J.L. in Sintax and Semantics-Speech Acts, NJ and London, Academic Press, 1975.

Serianni, Luca, Grammatica italiana. Italiano comune e lingua letteraria,Torino, UTET libreria, 1989. New edition: Italiano. Grammatica, sintassi, dubbi, Milano, Garzanti, 1997.

Serianni, Luca, Sul punto e virgola nel’italiano contemporaneo, in «Studi linguistici italiani», XXVII 2001, pp. 248-55.

Serianni, Luca, Italiani scritti, Bologna, Il Mulino, 2003. Shirley, A, “E-learning developments and experiences” in Education and Training, volume 43, n°4-5, pp.240-8. see Metaxiotis Kostas.

Simone Raffaele, 1988, Maistock, Il linguaggio spiegato da una bambina, Firenze, La Nuova Italia.

Simone, Raffaele, Riflessioni sula virgola, in La costruzione del testo scritto nei bambini, in M. Orsolini and C. Pontecorvo, Firenze, La Nuova Italia, 1991, pp. 219-31.

Svoboda A., 1968, “The Hierarchy of Communicative Units and Fields as illustrated by English Attributive Constructions”, in Brno Studies in English, n.7, pp. 49-101

Tao Hongyin, Sandra A.Thompson, “English backchannels in Mandarin conversations: A case study of superstratum pragmatic ‘interference’ ”, in Journal of Pragmatics, n°16, pp.209-223, 1991, North Holland.

Van Leeuwen T. “Genre and Field in Critical Discourse Analysis: A synopsis.” In Discourse and Society 4,2, 193-225, 1993

Van Leeuwen T, Thibault P. “Grammar, society, and the speech act: Renewing the connections” in Journal of Pragmatics, volume 25, issue 4, April 1996, pp.561-585.

Van Leeuwen T. “It Was Just Like Magic-A multimodal Analysis of Children’s Writing” in Linguistics and Education, volume 10, issue 3, February 1998, pp.273-305.

Van Leeuwen T. Speech, Music, Sound. Macmillan, 1999.

Van Leeuwen T., Jewitt C. Handbook of Visual Analysis. Sage, 2000.

Van Leeuwen T. Multimodal Discourse-The Modes and media of Contemporary Communication. Arnold, 2001.

Van Leeuwen T., Kress G. “Reading and writing with images: a review of four texts. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design.” In Computers and Composition, volume 18, issue 1, 1st Quarter 2001, pp.85-87.

Wang, Feng-Kwei, “Designing a case-based e-learning system: what, how and why” in Journal of Workplace Learning, volume 14, n°1, 2002, pp.30-43. see Quinn J.B

Wild, Rosemary; Griggs, Kenneth; Downing, Tanja. “A framework for e-learning as a tool for knowledge management” in Industrial Management & data Systems n°102/7, 2002, pp.371-380.

Yngve, Victor. “On getting a word in edgewise” in Papers from the Sixth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, pp.567-577. 1970.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item