RoMEO Studies 2: How academics wish to protect their open-access research paper

1 The Copyright Licensing Agency. (2003) URL: http://www.cla.co.uk/

2 Okerson, A. (1997). "Copyright or contract?" Library Journal 122(14): 136-139.

3 Kaye, L. (1999). "Owning and licensing content - key legal issues in the electronic environment." Journal of Information Science 25(1): 7-14.

4 Richards, R. (2001). "Licensing Agreements: Contracts, the Eclipse of Copyright, and the Promise of Cooperation." The Acquisitions Librarian 89(26).

5 Anon. (2002). The Scholarly Communications Crisis [Paper given at a seminar entitled 'The Scholarly Communication Crisis - change the future!' held at Worcester College, Oxford, 8 March 2002], URL:http://www.bodley.ox.ac.uk/ulsd/curl/advocacy.doc.

6 McGinnis, S. D. (2000). "Selling our collecting souls: How licence agreements are controlling collection management." Journal of Library Administration 31(2): 63-76.

7 ArXiv.org eprint archive. (2003) URL: http://arxiv.org/

8 Crow, R. (2002). The case for institutional repositories: a SPARC position paper. Washington DC, The Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition: http://www.arl.org/sparc/IR/ir.html.

9 Harnad, S. (2001). For Whom the Gate Tolls? How and Why to Free the Refereed Research Literature Online Through Author/Institution Self-Archiving, Now. http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/documents/disk0/00/00/16/39/index.html.

10 Cope, B., and Robin Freeman, Ed. (2000). Digital rights management and content development. Altona, Vic., Common Ground.

11 Johnson, P. (2003). "All Wrapped Up? A Review of the Enforceability of "Shrink-wrap" and "Click-wrap" Licences in the United Kingdom and the United States." European Intellectual Property Review 25(2): 98-102.

12 Anon. What is copyleft?, Free Software Foundation Inc., http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/copyleft.html.

2002.

13 Creative Commons. (2003) URL: http://creativecommons.org/

14 (2003). RoMEO Project. URL: http://www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/ls/disresearch/romeo/index.html.

15 See: Gadd, Elizabeth, Charles Oppenheim and Steve Probets. (2003) RoMEO Studies 3: How academics expect to use open-access research papers. [To be submitted to the Journal of Library and Information Science]

16 Great Britain. (1988). Copyright, designs and patents Act 1988, Elizabeth II. London : HMSO

17 Open Digital Rights Language. http://odrl.net/ 2002

18 Lessig, L. (2002). "Free Culture. [Keynote paper presented at the Open Source Convention. 22-26 July, 2002. San Diego, CA]." http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/policy/2002/08/15/lessig.html.

19 Council Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the Harmonisation of Certain Aspects of Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society URL: http://www.patent.gov.uk/about/consultations/eccopyright/annexb.htm

20 Clark, C. (1990). Photo-copying :photocopying from books and journals : a guide for all users of copyright literary works. London, British Copyright Council. p.10

21 (2000). Fair dealing and library privilege: copyright for research and private study in the UK. London, Copyright Licensing Agency. http://www.cla.co.uk/copyrightvillage/fairdealing.PDF.

22 UUK vs CLA. 2001, CT71/00, 72/00, 73/00, 74/00 and 75/00. URL: http://www.patent.gov.uk/copy/tribunal/uukvcla.pdf

23 (1998) Guidelines for Fair Dealing in an Electronic Environment. London, Joint Information Systems Committee; Publishers Association: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/services/elib/papers/pa/fair/intro.html.

24 Council Directive 92/100/EEC of 19 November 1992 on rental right and lending right and on certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellectual property. URL: http://europa.eu.int/ISPO/ecommerce/legal/documents/392L0100/392L0100_EN.doc and Council Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the Harmonisation of Certain Aspects of Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society URL: http://www.patent.gov.uk/about/consultations/eccopyright/annexb.htm

25 United States Code. 17 USC 109. URL: http://liimirror.warwick.ac.uk/uscode/index.html

26 The Copyright and Related Rights Regulations 1996 SI 1996/2967. Reg. 10(2).

27 Great Britain, 1988. Copyright, designs and patents Act 1988, Ch. 80. Elizabeth II. London : HMSO

28 (2003). Summary table of electronic journal licences, Leicester University. URL: http://www.le.ac.uk/li/sources/ejournal/licences.html.

29 (2003). Permitted uses of online resources, Yale University Library. URL:

http://www.library.yale.edu/journals/licensing.html.

30 (2001). Copyright Law of the United States of America and related laws contained in title 17 of the

United States Code. http://www.copyright.gov/title17/circ92.pdf. Washington, D.C., Library of Congress: US Copyright Office. S107

31 Gadd, Elizabeth., Charles Oppenheim, and Steve Probets. (2003) “RoMEO Studies 1: The impact of copyright ownership on academic author self-archiving.” Journal of Documentation 59(3), 243-277.

32 See RoMEO Studies 5: Rights metadata for open archiving.

33 Gadd, Elizabeth., Charles Oppenheim, and Steve Probets. (2003) “RoMEO Studies 1: The impact ofcopyright ownership on academic author self-archiving.” Journal of Documentation 59(3), 243-277.

34 Swan, A. (2002). Authors and electronic publishing: the ALPSP research study on authors' and readers' views of electronic research communication. West Sussex, ALPSP: 83pp.

35 See: Woodward, H., McKnight, C; Pritchett, C; Rowland, F (1997). Cafe Jus: commercial and free electronic journals user study. London, British Library. Research and Innovation Report: 1-52. See also:

Tenopir, C., and Donald W. King (2002). Reading behaviour and electronic journals. Learned Publishing

15(4): 259-265.