RoMEO Studies 4: An analysis of Journal publishers' Copyright Agreements

1 Bammel, J. (1999). "The publisher-author relationship: principles of good practice in scholarly journal publishing." Learned Publishing 12(2): 75-78.

2 Oliver, R. (1999). "Copyright assignment: some considerations." Learned Publishing 11(1): 4-7.

3 (1999). What authors want :the ALPSP research study on the motivations and concerns of contributors to learn. West Sussex, Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers.

4 Gadd, Elizabeth., Charles Oppenheim and Steve Probets. RoMEO Studies 1: The impact of copyright ownership on author self-archiving. Journal of Documentation 59(3), 243-277.

5 Swan, A. (2002). Authors and electronic publishing: the ALPSP research study on authors' and readers' views of electronic research communication. West Sussex, ALPSP.

6 Project RoMEO. (2003) URL: http://www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/dis/disresearch/romeo/index.html

7 Jaffe, S. (2002). "The next Research Assessment Exercise will probably include citation analysis." The Scientist 16(22): 54.

8 The market for scientific, technical and medical journals: A statement by the OFT. (2002). London, Office of

Fair Trading: 27 URL: http://www.oft.gov.uk/News/Press+releases/2002/PN+55-02+Can+the+scientific+journals+market+work+better%3f.htm.

9 Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers. URL: http://www.alpsp.org/

10 Society for Scholarly Publishing. URL: http://www.sspnet.org/

11 Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory Database. Accessed 14 January 2003.

12 Morris, S. (2000). "Guest Editorial. Authors and copyright." Learned Publishing 13(2): 75-76.

13 ALPSP (1999). Model Grant of Licence. URL: http://www.alpsp.org/grantli.pdf. 14 See the September-98-Forum list. Threads entitled: “Learned Society Publisher's Comment on PLoS/Sabo” and “Detecting Plagiarism”. 22-23 July, 2003. URL: http://amsci-forum.amsci.org/archives/september98-forum.html

15 Lawrence, S. (2001). "Online or invisible?" Nature 411(6837): 521 http://www.neci.nec.com/~lawrence/papers/online-nature01/.

16 Copyright Law of the United States of America and related laws contained in title 17 of the United States

Code. http://www.copyright.gov/title17/circ92.pdf. (2001) Washington, D.C., Library of Congress: US Copyright Office.

17 BioMed Central’s Publishing Model. (2003) URL:http://www.biomedcentral.com/download/advocacy/lib_advocacy.ppt

18 Harnad, S. (2001). For Whom the Gate Tolls? How and Why to Free the Refereed Research Literature Online Through Author/Institution Self-Archiving, Now. URL:http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/documents/disk0/00/00/16/39/index.html.

19 Kahin, B. (1994). The Copyright law: how it works and new issues in electronic settings. New scholarship: new serials. Proceedings of the North American Serials Interest Group. 8th Annual Conference, June 10-13, 1993. Brown University, Providence, RI. G. McMillan, and Marilyn Norstedt. New York, Haworth Press: 163-172.

20 Rosenblatt, B. (1998). Moral rights basics, Harvard Law School http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/property/library/moralprimer.html. 2002.

21 Relman, A. S. (1981). "The Ingelfinger Rule." New England Journal of Medicine 305(Oct 1, 1981): 824-826.

22 Angell, M., J.P. Kassirer (1991). "The Ingelfinger rule revisited." New England Journal of Medicine 325(Nov.7, 1991): 1371-1373.

23 See for example, the September-98-Forum list. Thread entitled: Garfield: "Acknowledged Self-Archiving is Not Prior Publication". 31 August – 13 September, 2002. URL: http://amsci-forum.amsci.org/archives/september98-forum.html

24 Hanks, Patrick (ed.) Collins dictionary of the English language. (2nd ed.) London : Collins, 1986.

25 Swan, A. (2002). Authors and electronic publishing: the ALPSP research study on authors' and readers' views of electronic research communication. West Sussex, ALPSP: 83pp. Pp. 24-25.

26 Pinfield, S. (2001). "How Do Physicists Use an E-Print Archive? Implications for Institutional E-Print Services." D-Lib Magazine 7(12): http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december01/pinfield/12pinfield.html.

27 Day, M. (2003). Prospects for institutional e-print repositories in the United Kingdom: ePrints UK supporting study, no. 1. Bath, UKOLN. URL: http://www.rdn.ac.uk/projects/eprints-uk/docs/studies/impact/.

28 (1999). What authors want :the ALPSP research study on the motivations and concerns of contributors to learn. London, Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers.

29 Maly, K., Mohammad Zubair and Xiaoming Liu (2001). "Kepler - An OAI Data/Service Provider for the Individual." D-Lib Magazine 7(4): http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april01/maly/04maly.html.

30 Le Hunte Ward, F. (2003). Metadata and copyright. Post to the metadata@creativecommons.org

discussion list. Monday 10 March, 2003

31 Bammel, J. (1999). "The publisher-author relationship: principles of good practice in scholarly journal publishing." Learned Publishing 12(2): 75-78.

32 Frankel, Mark S. et al. (2000). "Defining and Certifying Electronic Publication in Science: A Proposal to the

International Association of STM Publishers." Learned Publishing 13(4): 251-258.

33 Gadd, E., Charles Oppenheim and Steve Probets (2003). "RoMEO Studies 2: How academics want to protect their open-access research papers." Journal of Information Science [In Press]

34 Gadd, E., Charles Oppenheim and Steve Probets (2003). "RoMEO Studies 3: How academics expect to use open-access research papers." Submitted to Journal of Librarianship and Information Science

35 Gadd, Elizabeth., Charles Oppenheim and Steve Probets. RoMEO Studies 1: The impact of copyright ownership on author self-archiving. Journal of Documentation 59(3), 243-277

36 Zwolle Group. (2003). The Zwolle approach: balancing stakeholders' interests in scholarship-friendly

copyright practices. Report of working conference on Copyright and Universities: from principles to practices,

Zwolle, 6 and 7 December 2002. URL: http://www.surf.nl/copyright/zwolle/2002dec/index.php.