La utilización de los expertos en la evaluación de las publicaciones periódicas primarias

Cañedo Andalia, Rubén La utilización de los expertos en la evaluación de las publicaciones periódicas primarias. ACIMED, 1998, vol. 6, n. 3. [Journal article (Unpaginated)]

[thumbnail of aci06398.pdf]
Preview
 PDF
aci06398.pdf
Download (31kB) | Preview

English abstract

The assessment by experts constitutes a study modality of the scientific literature with a broad use by the selectors of primary serial publications at the information institutes. However, the way in which such assessments have been carried out traditionally generates results that, in many occassions, have a predominantly subjective character and therefore are of doubtful validity for its application in the context of information scientific activity. The assessment by experts is analyzed as a tool of vital importance for the selecting activity of scientific publications with special emphasis on the limitative elements in its way of traditional fulfiment. Finally, it is proposed a new methodology for its carrying out.

Spanish abstract

La evaluación de expertos constituye una modalidad de estudio de la literatura científica de amplia utilización por parte de los selectores de publicaciones periódicas primarias en las instituciones de información. Sin embargo, la forma en que dichas evaluaciones se han realizado tradicionalmente, generan resultados que, en muchas ocasiones, poseen un carácter eminentemente subjetivo y, por lo tanto, resultan de dudosa validez para su aplicación en el contexto de la actividad científico informativa. Se aborda la evaluación de expertos, como herramienta de importancia vital para la actividad de selección de publicaciones científicas, con especial énfasis en las limitantes de su forma de realización tradicional. Por último, se propone una nueva metodología para su ejecución.

Item type: Journal article (Unpaginated)
Keywords: Evaluacion de publicaciones; sistemas de expertos; seleccion; publicaciones; metodologia; publishing evaluation; experts systems; selection; publications; methodology
Subjects: H. Information sources, supports, channels.
B. Information use and sociology of information
Depositing user: Cuerpo Editorial ACIMED
Date deposited: 10 Aug 2004
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 11:59
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/5291

References

Stross JK, Harlan WR. The dissemination of new medical information. JAMA 1979;241:2622-4.

Haynes RB, Mckibon KA, Fitzgerald D, Guyatt GH, Walker CJ, Sackett DL. How to keep up with the medical literature: II. Deciding which journals to read regularly. Ann Intern Med 1986,105:309-12.

Grogan D. Science and technology. An introduction to the literature. La Habana: Universidad de La Habana, 1973:108-33.

Haynes RB, Mckibon KA, Fitzgerald D, Guyatt GH, Walker CJ, Sackett DL. How to keep up with the medical literature: I. Why try to keep up and how to get started. Ann Intern Med 1986;105:149-53.

Mcmaster University. Health Sciences Centre. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics. How to reed clinical journals: I. Why to read them and how to start reading them critically. Can Med Assoc J 1981;124:555-8.

Solla Price DJ de. Hacia una ciencia de la ciencia. Barcelona: Ariel, 1973:33-69.

Benach de Rovira J, Tapia Granados JA. Mitos o realidades: a propósito de la publicación de trabajos científicos. Mundo Científico 1995;15(154):124-30.

Williamson JW, German PS, Weiss R, Skinner EA, Bowes F. Health science information management and continuing education of physicians. Ann Intern Med 1989;110:151-60.

Garfield E. Prestige versus impact: established images of journals, like institutions, are resistant to change. Current Contents 1987;15(38):3-4.

Swanson RW. Performing evaluation studies in information sciences. JASIS 1979;26(3):58-65.

Oxman AD, Guyatt GH. Guideliness for reading litearature reviews. Can Med Asoc J 1988;138:697-703.

Williamson JW, Goldschmidt PG, Colton T. The quality of medical literature: an analysis of validation assessments. En: Bailar III JC, Mosteller F. Medical uses of statistics. Waltham: NEJM Books,1986:383.

Mcmaster University. Health Sciences Centre. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics. How to read clinical journals: II. To learn about a diagnostic test. Can Med Assoc J 1981;124:703-10.

Bonitz M. Journals ranking by selective impacts. New methods on SDI results and journals impact factors. Scientometrics 1985;13:471-85.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS