|   homepage   |   about E-LIS   |   browse   |   search   |   help   |   classification schema   |   submission guidelines   ||
| Login/Your pages | Create Account|

Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

Zhao, Dangzhi (2005) Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis. [Conference Paper]

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
684Kb Language: English

Abstract(s)

The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed.


Item Type:Conference Paper
Keywords:citation analysis ; non-primary authors
Subjects:E. Publishing and legal issues. > EZ. None of these, but in this section.
B. Information use and sociology of information. > BB. Bibliometric methods.
Full Metadata:Show all fields
ID Code:5349
Deposited By:Medeiros, Norm
Deposited On:10 Feb 2006
Last Modified:19 Nov 2008 10:04
Statistics:View statistics for this eprint

Ahlgren, P., Jarneving, B., & Rousseau, R. (2003). Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 54, 550-560

Hair, J.F. Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis(5th edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Kreuzman, H. (2001). A co-citation analysis of representative authors in philosophy: examining the relationship between epistemologists and philosophers of science. Scientometrics, 51, 525-539.

Lawrence, S., Giles, C. L. & Bollacker, K. (1999). Digital libraries and autonomous citation indexing. IEEE Computer, 32(6): 67-71.

Marshakova, I. V. (1973). A system of document connections based on references. Scientific and Technical Information Serial of VINITI, 6, 3-8.

McCain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: a technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 433-443.

Persson, O. (2001). All author citations versus first author citations. Scientometrics, 50(2): 339-344

Small, H. (1973). Cocitation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24, 265-269.

Small, H. (1999). Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 799-813.

White, H. D. & McCain, K.W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 327-355.

White, H. D. (2003). Pathfinder networks and author cocitation analysis: a remapping of paradigmatic information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 54, 423-434.

White, H. D. &Griffith, B.C. (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32, 163-171.

Zhao, D. (2003). A comparative citation analysis study of Web-based and print journal-based scholarly communication in the XML research field. Dissertation, Florida State University. Retrieved Jan. 20, 2005, from http://etd.lib.fsu.edu/

theses/available/etd-09232003-012028/unrestricted/DangzhiZhao_dissertation_summer03.pdf

Zhao, D. (in press). Challenges of scholarly publications on the web to the evaluation of science –a comparison of author visibility on the web and in print journals. Information Processing & Management.

Zhao, D. &Logan, E. (2002). Citation analysis of scientific publications on the Web: A case study in XML research area. Scientometrics, 54, 449-472.

Zhao, D. &Strotmann, A. (2004). Towards a Problem Solving Environment for Scholarly Communication Research. In Proceedings of the Canadian Association for Information Science 2004 Annual Conference, June 3-5, 2004, Winnipeg, Canada.

Archive Staff Only: edit this record

|     E-LIS is hosted by AEPIC at CILEA     |     Powered by GNU Eprints software|