RoMEO Studies 1 : the impact of copyright ownership on academic author self-archiving

Gadd, Elizabeth and Oppenheim, Charles and Probets, Steve RoMEO Studies 1 : the impact of copyright ownership on academic author self-archiving. Journal of Documentation, 2003, vol. 59, n. 3, pp. 243-277. [Journal article (Paginated)]

RoMEO Studies 1.pdf

Download (564kB) | Preview

English abstract

This is the first of a series of studies emanating from the UK JISC-funded RoMEO Project (Rights Metadata for Open-archiving) which investigated the IPR issues relating to academic author self-archiving of research papers. It considers the claims for copyright ownership in research papers by universities, academics, and publishers by drawing on the literature, a survey of 542 academic authors and an analysis of 80 journal publisher copyright transfer agreements. The paper concludes that self-archiving is not best supported by copyright transfer to publishers. It recommends that universities assert their interest in copyright ownership in the long term, that academics retain rights in the short term, and that publishers consider new ways of protecting the value they add through journal publishing.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: universities; publishers; academics; copyright ownership; self-archiving; open-access.
Subjects: E. Publishing and legal issues. > ED. Intellectual property: author's rights, ownership, copyright, copyleft, open access.
Depositing user: Elizabeth Gadd
Date deposited: 18 Jan 2005
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:00


AAU/ARL (1994). Report of the AAU Task Force on Intellectual Property Rights in an Electronic Environment. Washington DC, Association of American Universities. URL:

ALPSP (Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers) (1999). What authors want :the ALPSP research study on the motivations and concerns of contributors to learned journals. London, Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers.

ALPSP (Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers) (2000) Model Grant of Licence. URL:

ALPSP (Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers) (2002) Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishing. URL:

Angell, M., and Kassirer, J.P. (1991) “The Ingelfinger rule revisited.” New England Journal of Medicine, 325(19), 1371-1373. URL:

Anon. (2003). The Zwolle approach: balancing stakeholders' interests in scholarship-friendly copyright practices. Report of working conference on Copyright and Universities: from principles to practices, Zwolle, 6 and 7 December 2002. URL:

ARL (Association of Research Libraries) (2000). Principles for emerging systems of scholarly publishing. Association of Research Libraries:

ArXiv (2003). URL: Association for University Research and Industry Links (2002). Managing intellectual property: a guide to strategic decision-making in universities. London, Association for University Research and Industry Links; Universities UK; Patent Office. URL:

Bammel, Jens. (1999). “The publisher-author relationship: principles of good practice in scholarly journal publishing.” Learned Publishing 12(2). 75-78.

Baty, P. (2002). Cambridge row over rights plan. Times Higher Education Supplement (1549), 6.

Bennett, S. (1998). Position Paper on Yale University Copyright Policy Prepared for the Cooperative Research Committee. Connecticut, Yale University: URL:

Crews, Kenneth. (1993) Copyright, fair use, and the challenge for universities: promoting the progress of Higher Education, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

Crow, R. (2002). The case for institutional repositories: a SPARC position paper. Washington DC, The Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition. URL:

Davies, Pam (2002) Personal correspondents to Elizabeth Gadd, 10 September 2002.

“Defining and certifying electronic publication in science. A proposal to the International Association of STM Publishers.” (2000) Learned Publishing 13(4), 251-258.

Department for Education and Skills (2003). The future of Higher Education Cm.5735. London, The Stationery Office.

Department for Trade and Industry (2000). Excellence and opportunity - science and innovation policy for the 21st century. Cm 4814. London, The Stationery Office. URL:

Department for Trade and Industry (2001). Opportunity for all in a world of change: White Paper on enterprise, skills and innovation, DTI and DfEE. London, The Stationery Office.

Emerald Literati Club. (2003) URL:

Evans, R. J. (2002). “Why I ...believe Cambridge's IPR Proposals Threaten Academic Freedom”. Times Higher Educational Supplement (1562),16.

Gadd, E. A. (2002). Clearing the way: copyright clearance in UK libraries. LISU Occasional Paper No. 31. Loughborough, LISU: 109pp.

Great Britain. (1977). Patents Act 1977, Ch. 39 Elizabeth II. London: HSMO

Great Britain. (1988). Copyright, designs and patents Act 1988, Ch. 11 Elizabeth II. London : HMSO

Guédon, J.-C. (2001). In Oldenburg’s Long Shadow: Librarians, Research Scientists, Publishers, and the Control of Scientific Publishing. Creating the Digital Future: Association of Research Libraries: Proceedings of the 138th Annual Meeting, Toronto, Ontario, URL:

Harnad, S. (2001). For Whom the Gate Tolls? How and Why to Free the Refereed Research Literature Online Through Author/Institution Self-Archiving, Now. URL:

Harper, G. (2001). Managing the Risk of Copyright Infringement Liability, Texas, University of Texas System. URL:

HEFCE (Higher Education Funding Council for England). (2003). E-University. URL:

Hunt, C. (2002). Archive User Survey. Electronics and Computer Science Department. Southampton, Southampton University. URL:

ICMJE (International Committee of Medical Journal Editors). (2001) Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. URL:

Jaffe, S. (2002). "The next Research Assessment Exercise will probably include citation analysis." The Scientist 16(22): 54.

JISC (Joint Information Systems Committee). (2003) Focus on Access to Institutional Resources programme. URL: JISC Scholarly Communications Group (2002).

Final Report from the JISC Scholarly Communications Group (SCG) to the Research Support Libraries Group (RSLG). London, Joint Information Systems Committee. URL:

Kulkarni, S. R. (1995). "All Professors Create Equally: Why Faculty Should Have Complete Control Over the Intellectual Property Rights in Their Creations." Hastings Law JournaI 47(November 1995): 22-256.

Law, D. G., R.L. Weedon, and M.R.Sheen (2000). "Universities and article copyright." Learned Publishing 13(3): 141-150.

Lawrence, S. (2001). "Online or invisible?" Nature 411(6837): 521 URL:

Long, Maurice. (1998). “Authors and their rights.” Learned Publishing 11(1), 3-4.

Morris, Sally. (2000) Guest Editorial. “Authors and Copyright”. Learned Publishing. 13(2), 75-76.

Morris, Sally. (2003) Open Access: what does it mean for STI distribution? [Unpublished conference presentation] Open Access to Scientific and Technical Information: State of the Art and Future Trends, Paris, 23-24 January 2003. URL [Web cast]:

Mossink, W. (1999). Copyright Policy for universities: A proposal from the SURF Foundation for a joint copyright policy for the Dutch universities. The Netherlands, SURF Foundation /IWI and Open Universiteit Nederland. URL:

NSF (National Science Foundation) Division of Science Resources Statistics. Science and Engineering Indicators–2002. Arlington, VA. URL:

Office of Fair Trading (2002). The market for scientific, technical and medical journals: A statement by the OFT. London, Office of Fair Trading: 27 URL:

Oliver, Rhonda. “Copyright assignment – some practical considerations.” Learned Publishing 11(1), 4-5

Oppenheim, C. (1996). Copyright in HEIs: a discussion paper. Strathclyde, Department of Information Science. URL:

Oppenheim, C. (2001). "Is copyright strangling higher education?" UKOLUG Newsletter 12(5): 26-29.

Page, G., Robert Campbell and Jack Meadows. (1997). Journal Publishing. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Picciotto, Sol (2002) Personal correspondence to Elizabeth Gadd, 4 September 2002.

RoMEO Project (2003). URL:

Rose, Mark. (1993) Authors and owners: the invention of copyright. Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press.

Schalkwyk, F., van (1998). "Beyond copyright: reconsidering the author/publisher/reader relationship." Logos 9(4): 207-218. Society for Scholarly Publishing. (2002) URL:

Suber, P. (2003). "Removing the barriers to research: an introduction to open access for Librarians." College and Research Libraries News 64, 92-94, 113. URL:

Swan, A. (2002). Authors and electronic publishing: the ALPSP research study on authors' and readers' views of electronic research communication. West Sussex, ALPSP: 83pp. Ulrichs Periodicals Directory Database (2003). Available online via Bowker.

Universities UK/Standing Conference of Principals (2002). Report of the HEFCE, Universities UK and Standing Conference of Principals (SCOP) Working Group on intellectual property rights (IPRs) in e-learning programmes. London, Higher Education Funding Councils, Universities UK, Standing Conference of Principals. [IN PRESS - WILL SUPPLY FINAL REFERENCE AT PROOF STAGE]

US Copyright Office (2001). Copyright Law of the United States of America and related laws contained in title 17 of the United States Code. Washington, D.C.,

Library of Congress: US Copyright Office. URL:

Weedon, R. (2000). Policy approaches to copyright in HEIs: a study for the JISC Committee for Awareness, Liaison and Training (JCALT). Glasgow, The Centre for Educational Systems.

Willinsky, J. (2002). "Copyright Contradictions in Scholarly Publishing." First Monday 7(11). URL:

Zwolle Principles. (2002). URL:


Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item