Evaluation of books as research outputs in history of medicine

E Allen, C Cooper, G Fawcett, G Lewison and C Matterson C (2000), Evaluation of the Wellcome Trust History of Medicine Programme (The Wellcome Trust, London).

P Bourke and L Butler (1998), Institutions and the map of science: matching university departments and fields of research, Research Policy, 26, pages 711-718.

PM Bumhill and M E Tubby-Hille (1994), On measuring the relation between social science research activity and research publication, Research Evaluation, 4, pages 130-152.

M Davis, C S Wilson and W W Hood (1999), Ophthalmology and optics: an informetric study of Australia's contribution to fields in the vision science domain, 1991-95, Scientometrics, 46, pages 399-416.

G Dawson, B Lucocq, R Cottrell and G Lewison (1998), Mapping the Landscape: National Biomedical Research Outputs 1988-95 (The Wellcome Trust: London:), Policy Report 9.

Higher Education Funding Councils (1996), Research Assessment Exercise: The Outcome (HEFCE, Bristol), ref RAE96 1/96.

D Jacobs and P Ingwersen (2000), A bibliometric study of the publication patterns in the Sciences of South African scholars 1981-96, Scientometrics, 7, pages 75-93.

M L Jordy, E L McGrath and J B Rutledge (1999), Book reviews as a tool for assessing publisher reputation, College and Research Libraries, 60(2), pages 132-42.

B S Kademani. V L Kalyane and S Jange (1999), Scientometric portrait of Nobel laureate Dorothy Crowfoot Hodgkin, Scientometrics, 45(2), pages 233-250.

J S Katz and J Plevin (1998), Environmental scier,ce in the UK: a bibliometric study, Research Evaluation. 7(1), pages 39-52.

M Krauskopf and M I Vera (1997), Assessment of scientific profiles and capabilities of PhD programs in Chile: a scientometric approach, Scientometrics, 40, pages 569-577.

G Lewison (1996), The definition of biomedical research subfields with title keywords and application to the analysis of research outputs, Research Evaluation, 6, pages 25-36.

G Lewison (1998), New bibliometric techniques for the evaluation of medical schools, Scientometrics, 41, pages 5-16.

G Lewison (1999), The definition and calibration of biomedical subfields, Scientometrics, 46, pages 529-537.

G Lewison, J Anderson and J Jack (1995), Assessing track records, Nature, 377, page 671.

R E Lopez-Martinez and A Rocha-Lackiz (1998), University R&D performance evaluation: the case of the National University of Mexico, Research Evaluation, 7(3), pages 167-177.

M Luwel (2000), A bibliometric profile of Flemish research in natural, life and technical sciences', Scientometrics. 47, pages 281-302.

H F Moed, M Luwel, J A Houben, E Spruyt and H van den Berghe (1998), The effects of changes in the funding structure of the Flemish universities on their research capacity, productivity and impact during the 1980s and early 1990s, Scientometrics, 43, pages 231-255.

O Must(1999), Estonian historical science in the 1990s, Research Evaluation, 8(2), pages 77-81.

F Narin F and E S Whitlow (1990), Measurement of scientific coperation and coauthorship in CEC-related areas of science (Commission of the European Communities), report EUR12900 EN/1. See page 82 and Figures 6.5, 6.6.

I K R Rao and P Suma (1999), A quantitative study of Indian engineering literature, Scientometrics, 46, pages 605-619.

P R Thomas and D S Watkins (1998), Institutional research rankings via bibliometric analysis and direct peer review: a comparative case study with policy implications', Scientometrics, 41, pages 335-355.

D Ugolini, S Parodi and L Santi (1997), Analysis of publication quality in a cancer research institute, Scientometrics, 38, pages 265-274.

P Vinkler (1998), General performance indexes calculated for research institutes of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences based on scientometric indicators, Scientometrics, 41, pages 185-200.