Vendor partnerships with engineering libraries partnering with Knovel : case studies in information outreach

Bhatt, Jay, Paulsen, W. Charles, Dunn, Lisa G. and Van Epps, Amy S. Vendor partnerships with engineering libraries partnering with Knovel : case studies in information outreach., 2005 . In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (2005 : Portland), Portland, Oregon (US), 12-15 June 2005. (Unpublished) [Conference paper]

[thumbnail of Partnering_with_Knovel.pdf]
Preview
PDF
Partnering_with_Knovel.pdf

Download (198kB) | Preview

English abstract

The engineering library plays a critical role in initiating and maintaining the conduit between vendors of engineering information and the users of that information—faculty, students, and researchers. Likewise, vendors play a key role in supporting library and faculty efforts to promote engineering information resources, beyond just supplying content and interface. Engineering libraries and vendors can effectively work together to get the most from electronic engineering resources for both large and small institutions. The case studies here show how Knovel Corporation, a sci-tech e-book vendor, has worked with engineering librarians at large and small institutions and with faculty members to promote awareness and usage of Knovel’s interactive library of electronic books for engineering education. Librarians and Knovel partner at a large institution like Drexel University to give on-site workshops for faculty and students. At these workshops important features of Knovel’s content and software are discussed and demonstrated in a live format. Questions are encouraged to ensure participants understand the technology, and short assignments reinforce learning. Knovel works with librarians to promote these sessions and continues the dialogue with attendees afterward. On-site demonstrations are one of the most effective ways to educate users about new technologies and new content. The Information Services Librarian for Engineering at Drexel University will discuss Knovel's use of on-site workshops to promote electronic engineering information awareness. Librarians at smaller institutions often do not have the time and resources to devote to a full-scale on-site workshop. They need an "out-of-the-box" solution that is quick to deploy with an interface that is self-evident to users. Complete integration of e-book titles into the institution’s information toolbox is the key here. Knovel provides resources to promote ready access to meet the needs of smaller institutions, including MARC records for the library's catalog. The Head of Reference at the Colorado School of Mines library will discuss how Knovel provides support for access and outreach at this institution. Finally, librarians and Knovel work directly with faculty to integrate Knovel's content into their courses. An example is Purdue University’s "treasure hunt" assignment given in the Mechanical Engineering Technology program which includes questions which leverage Knovel titles to answer. By supporting outreach and access strategies appropriate for institution size and need, librarians and Knovel illustrate how to create an effective partnership with engineering libraries to increase awareness, usage and, ultimately, cost-effectiveness of electronic resources.

Item type: Conference paper
Keywords: Academic Libraries, Engineering Librarianship, Faculty and Library Collaboration, Information Literacy, Library Instruction, Science and Technology Libraries, students, electronic resources, Knovel, access strategies.
Subjects: D. Libraries as physical collections. > DD. Academic libraries.
F. Management. > FA. Co-operation.
C. Users, literacy and reading. > CD. User training, promotion, activities, education.
Depositing user: In Spain E-LIS Chapter
Date deposited: 04 Aug 2005
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:01
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/6601

References

Webster, Peter. 2003. Implications of expanded library electronic reference collections. Online v. 27(5) p. 24-27.

Lehto, Mark R.; Zhu, Wenli.; Carpenter, Bryan. 1995. The relative effectiveness of hypertext and text. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction v. 7(4) p. 293-313.

Marcum, Deanna. 2003. Requirements for the future digital library. Journal of Academic Librarianship v. 29(5) p. 276-279.

Gray, Edward; Langley, Anne. 2002. Public services and electronic resources: Perspectives from the science and engineering libraries at Duke University. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship no. 35, 8 p. http://www.istl.org/02-summer/article2.html.

Komerath, Narayanan; Smith, Marilyn. 2002. Learner adaptation to digital libraries by engineering students. Vive L’ingénieur! Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, June 16-19 2002, Montréal, Quebec, Canada, 10 p. http://www.asee.org/acPapers/2002-497_Final.pdf.

Kantor, Paul B.; Summerfield, Mary; Mandel, Carol. 2000. The Columbia University evaluation study of online book use: 1995-1999. The Economics and Usage of Digital Library Collections, PEAK (Pricing Electronic Access to Knowledge) Conference, March 23-24 2000, Ann Arbor MI, 22 p. http://www.si.umich.edu/PEAK-2000/kantorpaper.pdf.

Lonsdale, Ray; Armstrong, Chris. 2001. Electronic books: Challenges for academic libraries. Library Hi Tech v. 19(4) p. 332-339.

Trolley, Jacqueline H.; Sheppard, Ryan. 2002. Collaborative marketing: Library and vendor partnerships. SLA 2002: Putting Knowledge to Work. Papers presented at the Special Libraries Association Conference, June 9-12 2002, Los Angeles CA, 8 p. http://www.sla.org/documents/conf/Collaborative_marketing.doc.

Glynn, Tom; Wu, Connie. 2003. New roles and opportunities for academic library liaisons: A survey and recommendations. Reference Services Review v. 31(2) p. 122-128.

Bell, Steven J. 2004. The Infodiet: How libraries can offer an appetizing alternative to Google. Chronicle of Higher Education v. 50(24) p. B15.

Kenny, Brian. 2004. Googlizers vs. resistors. Library Journal v. 129(20) p. 44-46.

Wong, Tim; Kim, Grace. 2004. One in three Americans use a search engine, according to Nielsen/Netratings. NetRatings, Inc., 4 p. http://www.nielsen-netratings.com/pr/pr_040223_us.pdf.

Subramanian, Jane M. 1998. Patron attitudes toward computerized and print resources: Discussion and considerations for reference service. Reference Librarian no. 60 p. 127-138.

Landoni, Monica; Wilson, R.; Gibb, F. 2000. From the virtual book to the WEB book: The importance of design. Electronics Library v. 18(6) p. 407-419.

Peters, Thomas A. 2002. What’s the use? The value of e-resource usage statistics. New Library World v. 103(1172/1173) p. 39-47.

COUNTER. 2005. Draft Release 1 of the COUNTER Code of Practice for Books and Reference Works. COUNTER (Counting Online Usage of Networked Electronic Resources). http://www.projectcounter.org/cop_books_ref.html

Shepherd, Peter. 2003. Keeping count. Library Journal v. 128(2) p. 46-48.

Townley, Charles T.; Murray, Leigh. 1999. Use-based criteria for selecting and retaining electronic information: A case study. Information Technology and Libraries v. 18(1) p. 32-39.

Albanese, Andrew Richard. 2004. The reference evolution. Library Journal v. 129(19) p. 10-12.

Van Epps, Amy S. (in press). The evolution of electronic resources. Library Hi Tech.

Moyo, Leslie M. 2004. Electronic libraries and the emergence of new service paradigms. Electronic Library v. 22(3) p. 220-230.

Rader, Hannelore B. 2000. The impact of digital collections on library use: The manager’s perspective. The Economics and Usage of Digital Library Collections, PEAK (Pricing Electronic Access to Knowledge) Conference, March 23-24 2000, Ann Arbor MI, 7 p. http://www.si.umich.edu/PEAK-2000/rader.pdf.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item