Information technology and interests in scholarly communication: a discourse analysis

Jacobs, Neil Information technology and interests in scholarly communication: a discourse analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2001, vol. 52, n. 13, pp. 1122-1133. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of JASISpaper.pdf]
Preview
 PDF
JASISpaper.pdf
Download (268kB) | Preview

English abstract

Although technological determinism is an inadequate description of change, it remains common, if implicit, in much information science literature. Recent developments in science and technology studies offer a social constructivist alternative, in which technology is seen, not as autonomous, but as the result of interests. However, the stability of these interests can be argued to privilege social factors in the same way as technological determinism privileges technological factors. A second alternative is to shift to a relativist stance and analyse discourse as interaction, rather than as a neutral carrier of information, or communication. The focus of the discourse analyses of interview interactions presented in this paper is on two aspects of discursive structure, the indexical category of ‘research’, and interest management, which refers to the ways that participants manage their own and others’ stakes in particular accounts. The paper concludes by noting how formal scholarly communication acts as a ‘category entitlement’ in interviews, and how technological determinism works as a dilemma for this entitlement that participants (including researchers) negotiate at the very local level of their interactions and accounts.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: relativism, interests, discourse analysis, information technology
Subjects: L. Information technology and library technology > LZ. None of these, but in this section.
B. Information use and sociology of information > BG. Information dissemination and diffusion.
Depositing user: Neil Jacobs
Date deposited: 31 Oct 2005
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:01
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/6803

References

Antaki, C. and Horowitz, A. (2000) Using identity ascription to disqualify a rival version of events as ‘interested’. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33(2), 155-177.

Antaki, C. and Wetherell, M. (1999) Show concessions. Discourse Studies. 1(1), 7-27.

Ashmore, M. (1989) The reflexive thesis: wrighting sociology of scientific knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Barthes, R. (1972) Mythologies. London: Jonathan Cape Ltd.

Bijker, W. (1995) Of bicycles, bakelites and bulbs: toward a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Billig, M. (1996) Arguing and thinking: a rhetorical approach to social psychology, 2nd edition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Borgman, C.L. (2000) Digital libraries and the continuum of scholarly communication. Journal of Documentation, 56(4), 412-430.

Brearley, M. (1985) The art of captaincy. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

Budd, J.M. and Raber, D. (1996) Discourse analysis: method and application in the study of information. Information Processing and Management, 32(2), 217-226.

Callon, M. and Law, J. (1989) On the construction of sociotechnical networks: content and context revisited. Knowledge and Society, 8, 57-83.

Collins, H.M. (1981) Stages in the empirical programme of relativism. Social Studies of Science, 11, 3-10.

Collins, H.M. (1998) The meaning of data: open and closed evidential cultures in the search for gravitational waves. American Journal of Sociology, 104(7), 293-338.

Costa, S. and Meadows, J. (2000) The impact of computer usage on scholarly communication among social scientists. Journal of Information Science, 26(4), 255-262.

Crabtree, A. et al (2000) Ethnomethodologically informed ethnography and information system design. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(7), 666-682.

Davenport, E. (1993) The author in the digital environment. In A.M. Cunningham and W. Wicks (Eds.), Changing roles on information distribution. Philadelphia, PA: National Federation of Abstracting and Information Services.

Day, D. et al (1993) Agents for electronic document supply: who are the likely players? Aslib Proceedings, 45(7/8), 189-199.

Day, R. (2000) The ‘conduit metaphor’ and the nature and politics of information studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(9), 805-811.

Doolin, B. (1998) Information technology as disciplinary technology: being critical in interpretive research on information systems. Journal of Information Technology, 13, 301-311.

Edwards, D. (1997) Discourse and cognition. London: Sage.

Edwards, D., Ashmore, M. and Potter, J. (1996) Death and furniture: the rhetoric, politics and theology of bottom line arguments against relativism. History of the Human Sciences, 8(2), 25-49.

Ekman, R. & Quandt, R.E. (Eds.). (1999) Technology and scholarly communication. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Foucault, M. (1972) The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. New York: Pantheon Books.

Frohmann, B. (1994) Discourse analysis as a research method in library and information science. Library and Information Science Research, 16, 199-138.

Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Gilbert, G.N. and Mulkay, M. (1984) Opening Pandora’s box: a sociological analysis of scientists’ discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Grint, K. and Woolgar, S. (1997) The machine at work: technology, work and organization. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Heidegger, M. (1977) The question concerning technology. In D.F. Krell (Ed.), Basic writings. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Heritage, J.C. (1984) Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Hughes, T.P. (1983) Networks of power: electrification of western society, 1880-1930. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

Jacobs, N. et al (2000) Planning document access: options and opportunities. London: Bowker-Saur.

Kelland, J.L and Young, A.P. Citation patterns and library use. In: Kent, A. ed. Encyclopaedia of Library and Information Science. Volume 61, 1998. New York: Marcel Dekker.

Kerslake, E. and O’Brien, A. (1999) Storm Center: a discursive approach to constructions of library workers. Library Management, 20(8), 439-446.

Latour, B. (1991) Technology is society made durable. pp. 103-131 In: A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination. (Law, J., eds.) Routledge, London.

Leudar, I. and Antaki, C. (1996) Discourse participation, reported speech and research practices in social psychology. Theory and Psychology, 6(1), 5-29.

McKinlay, A. and Potter, J. (1987) Model discourse: interpretative repertoires in scientists’ conference talk. Social Studies of Science, 17, 443-463.

McKnight, C. et al (2000) Librarians in the delivery of journals: roles revisited. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 32(3), 117-134.

McOmber, J.B. (1999) Technological autonomy and three definitions of technology. Journal of Communication, 49(3), 137-153.

MacRoberts, M.H. and MacRoberts, B.R. Problems of citation analysis. Scientometrics, 36(3), 1996, 435-444.

Parker, I. (1992) Discourse dynamics: critical analysis for social and individual psychology. London: Routledge.

Pinch, T.P. and Bijker, W.E. (1987) The social construction of facts and artefacts: or How the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. In W.E. Bijker, T.P. Hughes and T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Pollner, M. (forthcoming) Inside the bubble? Community, meaning and deep play at the intersection of Wall Street and cyberspace. In S. Woolgar (Ed), Virtual society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Potter, J. (1996) Representing reality. London: Sage.

Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. (1987) Discourse and social psychology. London: Sage.

Psathas, G. (1995) Conversation analysis: the study of talk-in-interaction. London: Sage.

Psathas, G and Anderson, T. (1990) The ‘practices’ of transcription in conversation analysis. Semiotica, 78(1/2), 75-99.

Sacks, H. (1992) Lectures on conversation. G. Jefferson (Ed.) Oxford: Blackwell.

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. and Jefferson, G. (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696-735.

Schegloff, E.A. (1992) Repair after next turn: the last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97(5), 1295-1345.

Shannon, C. and Weaver, W. (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. Illinois: University of Illinois Press.

Tuominen, K. (1997) User-centred discourse: an analysis of the subject positions of the user and the librarian. Library Quarterly, 67(4), 350-371.

Warner, J. (2000) What should we understand by information technology (and some hints at other issues)? Aslib Proceedings, 52(9), 350-370.

Wetherell, M. (1998) Positioning and interpretative repertoires: conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse and Society, 9(3), 387-412.

Williams, R. and Edge, D. (1992) The social shaping of technology: research concepts and findings in Great Britain. In M. Dierkes and U. Hoffmann (Eds.), New technology at the outset: social forces in the shaping of technological innovations. Frankfurt / Main: Campus Verlag.

Williams, R. and Edge, D. (1996) The social shaping of technology. In W.H. Dutton (Ed.), Information and communication technologies: visions and realities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Woolgar, S. (1981) Interests and explanation in the social study of science. Social Studies of Science, 11, 365-394.

Woolgar, S. (Ed). (1988) Knowledge and Reflexivity: new frontiers in the sociology of knowledge. London: Sage.

Woolgar, S. (1991) Beyond the citation debate: towards a sociology of measurement technologies and their use in science policy. Science and Public Policy, 18(5), 319-326.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS