Collaborative Tagging as a Knowledge Organisation and Resource Discovery Tool

Macgregor, George and McCulloch, Emma Collaborative Tagging as a Knowledge Organisation and Resource Discovery Tool., 2006 [Preprint]


Download (225kB) | Preview

English abstract

Purpose – The purpose of the paper is to provide an overview of the collaborative tagging phenomenon and explore some of the reasons for its emergence. The paper reviews the related literature and discusses some of the problems associated with, and the potential of, collaborative tagging approaches for knowledge organisation and general resource discovery. Design/methodology/approach – A definition of controlled vocabularies is proposed and used to assess the efficacy of collaborative tagging. An exposition of the collaborative tagging model is provided and a review of the major contributions to the tagging literature is presented. Findings – There are numerous difficulties with collaborative tagging systems (e.g. low precision, lack of collocation, etc.) that originate from the absence of properties that characterise controlled vocabularies. However, such systems can not be dismissed. Librarians and information professionals have lessons to learn from the interactive and social aspects exemplified by collaborative tagging systems, as well as their success in engaging users with information management. The future co-existence of controlled vocabularies and collaborative tagging is predicted, with each appropriate for use within distinct information contexts: formal and informal. Research limitations/implications – Librarians and information professional researchers should be taking a lead role in research aimed at assessing the efficacy of collaborative tagging in relation to information storage, organisation, and retrieval, and to influence the future development of collaborative tagging systems. Practical implications – The paper indicates clear areas where digital libraries and repositories could innovate in order to better engage users with information. Originality/value – At time of writing there were no literature reviews summarising the main contributions to the collaborative tagging research or debate.

Item type: Preprint
Keywords: Classification, Collaborative Tagging, Controlled languages, Information management, Information retrieval, Knowledge organisation
Subjects: I. Information treatment for information services > IC. Index languages, processes and schemes.
I. Information treatment for information services > ID. Knowledge representation.
I. Information treatment for information services > IA. Cataloging, bibliographic control.
Depositing user: George Macgregor
Date deposited: 27 Feb 2006
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:02


Abbott, R. (2004), "Subjectivity as a concern for information science: a Popperian perspective", Journal of Information Science, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp.95-106.

Anderson, J, D. & Perez-Carball, J. (2001), "The nature of indexing: how humans and machines analyze messages and texts for retrieval. Part I: Research, and the nature of human indexing", Information Processing & Management, Vol. 37 No. 2, pp.231-254.

Broughton, V. (2004) Essential Classification, Facet Publishing, London.

Chamis, A, Y. (1991), Vocabulary Control and Search Strategies in Online Searching, Greenwood Press, Connecticut.

Cruz, B. (2004), "Corporate taxonomies can open up the big picture", Handbook of Business Strategy, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp.247-251.

Dawson, A. (2004), "Creating metadata that works for digital libraries and Google", Library Review, Vol. 53 No. 7, pp.347-350.

Davis, I. (2005), "Why Tagging is Expensive", Silkworm Blog, available at: (accessed 20 February 2006)

Delphi Group. (2004), Information Intelligence: Content Classification and the Enterprise Taxonomy Practice, Delphi Group, Boston, USA, available at: (accessed 20 February 2006)

Duval, E., Hodgins, W., Sutton, S. & Weibel, S, L. (2002), "Metadata Principles and Practicalities", D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 8 No. 4, available at: (accessed 20 February 2006)

Foucault, M. (1977), The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, Tavistock Publications, London.

Garshol, L, M. (2004), "Metadata? Thesauri? Taxonomies? Topic Maps! Making sense of it all", Journal of Information Science, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp.378-391.

Golder, S, A. & Huberman, B, A. (2005), The Structure of Collaborative Tagging Systems, Information Dynamics Lab: HP Labs, Palo Alto, USA, available at: (accessed 20 February 2006)

Greenberg, J. (2004) "Metadata extraction and harvesting: a comparison of two automatic metadata generation applications", Journal of Internet Cataloging, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp.59-82.

Greenberg, J., Spurgin, K. & Crystal, A. (2006), "Functionalities for automatic metadata generation applications: a survey of metadata experts’ opinions", International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp.3-20.

Guy, M. & Tonkin, E. (2006), "Folksonomies: Tidying up Tags?" D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 12 No. 1, available at: (accessed 20 February 2006)

Kremer, S., Kolbe, L, M. & Brenner, W. (2005), "Towards a procedure model in terminology management", Journal of Documentation, Vol. 61 No. 2, pp.281-295.

Lancaster, F, W. (1979), Information Retrieval Systems: Characteristics, Testing and Evaluation (2nd Ed.), John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.

Lancaster, F, W. (2003), Indexing and Abstracting in Theory and Practice (3rd Ed.), Thomson-Shore Inc., Michigan USA.

Mai, J.-E. (2004) "Classification in Context: Relativity, Reality, and Representation", Knowledge Organization, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp.39-48.

Maltby, A. (1975), Sayers’ Manual of Classification for Librarians (5th Ed.), Andre Deutsch, London.

Mathes, A. (2004), "Folksonomies – Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata", Adam, USA, available at: (accessed 20 February 2006)

McCulloch, E. (2004), "Multiple terminologies: an obstacle to information retrieval", Library Review, Vol. 53 No. 6, pp.297-300.

Merholz, P. (2005), "Clay Shirky’s Viewpoints are Overrated", links, thoughts, and essays from Peter Merholz, available at: (accessed 20 February 2006)

Nicholson, D., Neill, S., Currier, S., Will, L. Gilchrist, A., Russell, R. & Day, M. (2001), HILT: High Level Thesaurus Project – Final Report to RSLP & JISC, Centre for Digital Library Research, Glasgow, UK, available at: (accessed 20 February 2006)

Quintarelli, E. (2005), "Folksonomies: power to the people", Proceedings of the 1st International Society for Knowledge Organization (Italy) (ISKOI), UniMIB Meeting, June 24, Milan, Italy, ISKOI, Italy, available at: (accessed 20 February 2006)

Ranganathan, S, R. (1967), Prolegomena to Library Classification (3rd Ed.), Asia Publishing House, London.

Shirky, C. (2005a), "Ontology is Overrated: Categories, Links and Tags",, New York, USA, available: (accessed 20 February 2006)

Shirky, C. (2005b), "Folksonomies are a forced move: a response to Liz", Many2Many: A group Weblog of social software, available at: (accessed 20 February 2006)

Shirky, C. (2005c), "Semi-Structured Meta-data has a Posse: A response to Gene Smith", You’re It! A Blog on Tagging, available: (accessed 20 February 2006)

Sinha, R. (2005), "A cognitive analysis of tagging", Rashmi Sinha’s weblog, available: (accessed 20 February 2006)

Sterling, B. (2005), "Order Out of Chaos", Wired Magazine, Vol. 13 No. 4, available at: (accessed 20 February 2006)

Vander Wal, T. (2005), "Explaining and Showing Broad and Narrow Folksonomies",, available at: (accessed 20 February 2006)

Vickery, B, C. (1971), Techniques of Information Retrieval, Butterworths, London.

Zeng, M. L., & Chan, L. M. (2004), "Trends and issues in establishing interoperability among knowledge organization systems", Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 55 No. 5, pp.377-395.


Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item