Kanıta Dayalı Tıp ve Tıp Kütüphaneciliği

Sincan, Murat Kanıta Dayalı Tıp ve Tıp Kütüphaneciliği. Bilgi Dünyası, 2003, vol. 4, n. 1, pp. 64-72. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[img]
Preview
PDF
64-72.pdf

Download (50kB) | Preview

English abstract

Medical profession is in a transition as it has never been since its foundation thousands of years ago. We are experiencing a world where paternalistic medicine is being given up by most practitioners as hundreds of articles are published daily on scientific journals and patients can acquire the most contemporary scientific information through internet instantaneously. Hence this concept renders a shift from Experience Based Medicine towards Evidence Based Medicine (EBM). EBM requires a team effort in which clinicians, medical informatics specialists and medical librarians need to work together thus providing patients -the most reliable and contemporary scientific evidence- with best informed choices for their diagnosis and treatment process. EBM is a team effort in which clinicians, medical informatics specialists and medical librarians should work together to provide the patients -using the best evidence from contemporary and reliable scientific evidence– with best informed choices in their diagnosis and treatment process. This study is intended to discuss Evidence Based Medicine and its relation with to the profession of medical librarianship.

Turkish abstract

Binlerce yıllık tıp mesleği günümüzde hiç olmadığı kadar büyük bir değişim içindedir. Paternalistik tıp geleneğinin terkedilmeye başlandığı, her gün yüzlerce bilimsel makalenin dergilerde yerini aldığı ve hastaların internet aracılığı ile bir kaç dakika içinde en son klinik araştırmalar hakkında bilgi sahibi olabildiği bir dünyada yaşamaktayız. Bu ortam bizi Kanıya Dayalı Tıptan, Kanıta Dayalı Tıbba (KDT) doğru zorunlu bir yönelişe itmektedir. Hastaların tanı ve tedavi süreçlerinde en güncel ve doğru bilimsel kanıtların ışığında hareket etmesi olarak kısaca özetlenebilen KDT pratiği, kütüphanecilik ve kütüphanecilerin vazgeçilmez bir biçimde içinde yer aldığı bir takım çalışmasıdır. Bu yazıda KDT incelenecek ve tıp kütüphaneciliği ile ilişkisi tartışılacaktır.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Kanıta dayalı tıp, bilişim, tıp kütüphaneciliği, tıbbi bilişim, evidence based medicine, informatics, medical librarianship, medical informatics
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BH. Information needs and information requirements analysis.
A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information. > AC. Relationship of LIS with other fields .
D. Libraries as physical collections. > DK. Health libraries, Medical libraries.
A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information. > AA. Library and information science as a field.
Depositing user: Kamil Comlekci
Date deposited: 26 Mar 2006
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:02
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/7354

References

"SEEK" links will first look for possible matches inside E-LIS and query Google Scholar if no results are found.

Chambliss, M.L. ve Conley, J. (1996). Answering clinical questions. Journal of Family Practice, 43(2): 140–144.

Cochrane Library (2003). National Electronic Library for Health. [Çevrim içi], Elektronik adres: http://www.nelh.nhs.uk/cochrane.asp[10 Ağustos 2003].

Connelly, D.P., Rich, E.C., Curley, S.P. ve Kelly, J.T. (1990). Knowledge resource preferences of family physicians. Journal of Family Practice, 30(3): 353–359.

Covell, D.G., Uman, G.C. ve Manning, P.R. (1985). Information needs in office practice: are they being met? Annals of Internal Medicine, 103(4): 596–599.

Ely, J.W., Burch, R.J. ve Vinson, D.C. (1992). The information needs of family physicians: Case-specific clinical questions. Journal of Family Practice, (35): 265–269.

Gorman, P.N. Ash, J. ve Wykoff, L. (1994). Can primary care physicians’ questions be answered using the medical journal literature? Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 82(2): 140–146.

Haug, J.D. (1997). Physician preferences for information sources: a meta-analytical study. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 85 (3): 223–232.

Jamrozik, K. (2001). Why evidence based medicine? Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology, 15(4): 505-518.

Lyman, P. ve Varian, H.R. How Much Information, 2000 [Çevrim içi], Elektronik adres: http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/how-much-info [4 Eylül 2003].

National Guideline Clearing House. (1998). [Çevrim içi], Elektronik adres: http://www.guideline.gov [17 Ağustos 2003].

National Library of Medicine. PubMed. [Çevrim içi], Elektronik adres: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ [25 Ağustos 2003].

Sackett, D.L., Rosenberg, W.M., Gray, J.A., Haynes, R.B. ve Richardson, W.S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. British Medical Journal, 312 (7023): 71-72.

Science Direct. [Çevrim içi], Elektronik adres: http://www.sciencedirect.com [5 Ağustos 2003].

Verhoeven, A.A., Boerma, E.J., ve Meyboom-de Jong, B. (1995). Use of information sources by family physicians: A literature survey. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 83(1): 85–90.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item