Small science journals : stay alert for potentially dangerous information

De Castro, Paola and Napolitani Cheyne, Federica Small science journals : stay alert for potentially dangerous information. European Science Editing, 2006, vol. 32, n. 1. [Journal article (Unpaginated)]

[img]
Preview
PDF
A_note_on_security_concerns_14_dic.pdf

Download (27kB) | Preview

English abstract

Bioterrorism has become a key subject in global communication, forcing the scientific community to urgently deal with problems of security and publishing of potentially dangerous information. This short note suggests that while editors of big science journals, supported by a rigorous peer-review system, seem to be generally aware of security implications and how to handle them, greater attention to security issues should be paid in the editing of small science journals and of institutional reports as well, where sensitive information is more likely to be published. Some practical suggestions are also recommended to help evaluate when the potential harm of publication outweighs its benefits and therefore a submitted paper should be modified or even not published.

Item type: Journal article (Unpaginated)
Keywords: Dangerous information, peer review, security, editorial responsibilities, science journals, institutional reports
Subjects: E. Publishing and legal issues. > EB. Printing, electronic publishing, broadcasting.
E. Publishing and legal issues. > EE. Intellectual freedom.
E. Publishing and legal issues. > EF. Censorship.
Depositing user: Paola De Castro
Date deposited: 26 Apr 2006
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:03
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/7475

References

Journal Editors and Authors Group. Statement on Scientific Publication and Security. (Editorial). 2003. Science 21 February;299(5610):1149.

Falkow S, Kennedy D. Science Publishing and Security Concern. (Letter). 2003. Science 2 May;300(5620):737-9.

Keel BA. Protecting America’s secrets while maintaining academic freedom. 2004. Acad Med 79(4)333-42.

Censoring science. 2003. Can Med Assoc J 168(12):1517.

Marshall E. Biodefense experts warn against censoring basic science. 2004. Science 306(5704):2022.

Openness in biomedical research collides with heightened security concerns. 2003. JAMA 289(6):686, 689-90.

Falkaw S. “Statement on scientific publication and security” fails to provide necessary guidelines. 2003 PNAS 100(100):5575.

Marusic A, Marusic M. Small scientific journals from small countries: Breaking from a vicious circle of inadequacy. 1999. Cr Med J 40(4):508-14.

Wager E, Godlee F, Jefferson T. How to survive peer review. 2002. London: BMJ Books.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item